Analyse your stocks in seconds
Expert insights you can understand
Improve the odds of your stock picks
Generate investing ideas fast
Track & improve your Portfolio
Time your trades better with charts
Explore all the featuresStockopedia contains every insight, tool and resource you need to sort the super stocks from the falling stars.
We’re closing in fast on the end of January (a month that has seen the FTSE and AIM All Share markets rally 3.4% and 2.4% respectively) and we’re perhaps ready to put the pain of 2022 behind us. But our annual subscriber survey results are in and - as always - our community has provided us with some interesting insights which we can all learn from.
So let’s return for a moment to 2022 - a year which started with a hint of uncertainty for Britain’s (and the world’s) continued economic recovery post-Covid, flew through a crisis in the bond market and ended (as last week’s retail figures have now confirmed) with the worst month for consumer spending since ONS records began. ‘Energy crisis’, ‘inflation’ and ‘interest rate’ have become market buzzwords and they’ve had a far stronger impact than the buzzwords that they have replaced: ‘lockdown’, ‘deficit’ and ‘bubble’. The FTSE All Share started the year at 4100 points and fell to a low of 3712 in October. AIM fared rather worse, down almost a third from its January peak to its October trough.
Not too badly, all things considered, as the chart below shows.
The 903 subscribers who responded to our survey reported a median performance of -9% in 2022. Almost a third of you ended the year with your portfolio in positive territory, with eight respondents managing to more than double their money. The most common performance ‘bracket’ was -10% to -20% with almost all respondents falling somewhere in the region of -30% to +30%. And only 6% of you had to endure a portfolio which underperformed AIM.
When we compare that to some of the returns of renowned fund managers, that’s not a bad performance at all. And considering you’d have had to have been overweight in the energy sector at the start of the year to have outperformed the FTSE (more on that below), there is a lot of comfort to be taken in these numbers.
5 of the worst performing funds in 2022 | ||
Fund | Category | 2022 Return |
Morgan Stanley US Growth Fund | US Large-Cap Growth | −55.98 |
Baillie Gifford Long-Term Global Growth | Global Large-Cap Growth | −40.42 |
Jupiter UK Mid Cap | UK Mid-Cap | −40.12 |
Jupiter UK Small Company Focus | UK Small-Cap | −39.18 |
Baillie Gifford Global Discovery | Global Small/Mid-Cap | −38.90 |
As with any survey, these insights are prone to some inherent selection bias - those who were badly burned in this year’s market may feel less inclined to talk about. And as a once-a-year, end-of-year occurrence there is likely to have been some survivorship bias as well.
It’s also worth noting the open-ended nature of the question, which will have impacted the responses. Some of you may have recorded your performance versus the benchmark, others might have taken the average performance of the stocks in your portfolio. Trading costs and dividends may have been accounted for differently, too. But still, we hope the relative success of your fellows provides a little reassurance for the ongoing value of stock picking.
As mentioned, exposure to the energy market was the only sure fire way of outperforming the FTSE 100 last year. For global investors, the performance imbalance of the different economic sectors was even more stark, demonstrated by the figures in the tables below.
FTSE 100 Sector Performance (%) | S&P 500 Sector Performance (%) | ||
Energy | 17 | Energy | 59 |
Utilities | 8 | Utilities | -1 |
Basic Materials | 5 | Consumer Staples | -3 |
Healthcare | 2 | Healthcare | -4 |
Industrials | 0 | Industrials | -7 |
Consumer Defensives | -5 | Materials | -14 |
Financials | -8 | Banks | -22 |
Consumer Cyclicals | -8 | Software & Services | -27 |
Technology | -12 | Real Estate | -28 |
Telecoms | -25 | Consumer Discretionary | -38 |
Communication Services | -40 |
It’s therefore perhaps unsurprising that Shell was the top performing stock for almost 10% of our subscribers last year. Not only did Shell owners benefit from the 20% share price appreciation over the course of the year, there were also bumper dividend payments and a massive share buyback scheme courtesy of the group’s record-beating profits. Rarely have we had so many subscribers pick the same stock as their top performing holding in a single year.
Top 20 | Count | % | 2022 1y performance |
Shell (LON:SHEL) | 86 | 9.56% | 21.5 |
BAE Systems (LON:BA.) | 69 | 7.67% | 44.4 |
Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) | 67 | 7.44% | 18.7 |
Crestchic (LON:LOAD) | 65 | 7.22% | 128 |
ME International (LON:MEGP) | 58 | 6.44% | 89.8 |
Cerillion (LON:CER) | 45 | 5.00% | 32.8 |
Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE) | 37 | 4.11% | 62.1 |
Indivior (LON:INDV) | 37 | 4.11% | 67.3 |
Plus500 (LON:PLUS) | 30 | 3.33% | 22 |
BP (LON:BP.) | 24 | 2.67% | 29.5 |
Bloomsbury Publishing (LON:BMY) | 24 | 2.67% | 27.8 |
Wynnstay (LON:WYN) | 22 | 2.44% | -5.26 |
MS International (LON:MSI) | 21 | 2.33% | 196 |
Rio Tinto (LON:RIO) | 21 | 2.33% | 16.5 |
BHP (LON:BHP) | 21 | 2.33% | 36 |
H & T (LON:HAT) | 20 | 2.22% | 59.5 |
SQZ Biotechnologies Co (NYQ:SQZ) | 20 | 2.22% | 11.8 |
Beazley (LON:BEZ) | 16 | 1.78% | 37.4 |
K3 Capital (LON:K3C) | 15 | 1.67% | 1.31 |
Devro (LON:DVO) | 14 | 1.56% | 55.6 |
Slightly fewer (7.7%) of you counted defence giant BAE Systems - the top performing share in the FTSE 100 in 2022 - as your own top holding. That might be because a large proportion of the 44% annual share price growth happened in the week Russian troops marched into Ukraine. Between 22 February and 1 March, BAE shares climbed 26% to 746p and finished the year at 856p. I have a hunch that most of you holding BAE at the start of the year were hoping to continue benefiting from the reliable dividend (which has been hiked every year for more than a decade) rather than an escalation of Russian aggression in Eastern Europe, but apologies if that is doing anyone a disservice.
And it wasn’t just Shell and BAE among the large-cap winners for our subscribers in 2022. BP, BHP and Rio Tinto (which all posted share price growth of more than 20% last year) were popular holdings. Indeed, large-caps dominated the list of top performing investments, with only a handful of small-cap stocks managing to rise to the top. Again, our data needs to be interpreted with caution, but your responses do mirror a fact that we already knew: small-cap stock picking was tough in 2022.
Still, most of you are feeling optimistic about your portfolio in 2023 - decidedly more optimistic than you are about the outlook for the market as a whole.
Perhaps that is because many of you benefited from your stop losses or sell decisions in 2022 and you’re now sitting on a nice amount of cash. Indeed, cash almost made the top 20 list of best performing investments for our survey respondents last year. And as 2023 begins, cash certainly isn’t a bad place to be. With plenty of cash in your portfolio you’re less likely to make irrational decisions to any continued volatility and you’re well placed to benefit from new opportunities as they arise.
It is worth noting the difference between your feelings for the market in 2023 and your own portfolio’s performance in the context of an interesting psychological phenomenon: overconfidence bias. Hundreds of studies have shown that we are all susceptible to this (one of my favourites is the one where 80% of Swedish people believed that they had above average skills in driving) and it can be especially pervasive in investing, preventing us from seeking ideas which don’t match our own, or forcing us to hold onto poorly performing shares for too long.
So this begs the question: why are you more optimistic about your own portfolio’s outlook than that of the market? Is it because you have the investment skills to outperform the market (or perhaps know how to best use Stockopedia’s tools to help you do so)? Or is it because your contrarian mindset can see opportunities in 2023 and the outlook for the markets isn’t actually as bad as current commentary would have us all believe?
Untangling your feelings on this point is very tricky (I think there are opportunities to be exploited in 2023, but perhaps that is because I am suffering from overconfidence bias), but if we look at the facts there are indeed reasons to be optimistic. The FTSE All Share had its low point in October when inflation peaked and since then has climbed steadily. There are hints that supply-side trends might soon help stabilise inflation, in which case central banks could loosen their tight grip on money supply. The era of free money probably won’t come back this year, but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Markets are more likely to reward rational, disciplined investors than those looking for a quick win.
This leads us nicely onto the most self-indulgent parts of our questionnaire. Consistent with previous years, the overwhelming majority of survey respondents said that Stockopedia has given them more confidence in understanding the stock market. We hope that subscribers continue to use Stockopedia’s tools to help them make wise choices in the year ahead.
Speaking of the tools - the StockReports continue to rank very highly, with almost 70% of you finding them the most helpful tool in our armoury. We’re especially encouraged that the StockRanks proved just as helpful as they have done in previous years. As the Ranks approach their 10th birthday they are being tested by a bear market for the first time and we’re encouraged that they’re still helping so many of you with your investment decision making.
Editorial still comes in third place, but has dropped off slightly in terms of the proportion of you flagging it as helpful. As always we’re grateful for your feedback - let us know what you’d like to see more (or less) of in the comments. And we’ve got a newcomer in the league table following the launch of the improved Director Dealings tool towards the end of last year. We can learn a lot from directors’ interest in their companies and hope to keep providing useful insights with this data in 2023.
As 2023 begins I am sure I am not alone in pondering some difficult questions: should I sell the tech companies which have collapsed or will that just be crystallising a loss; is there any point in attempting to identify growth opportunities right now; share prices have fallen, but does that mean stocks are actually good value? The list could go on. And then there is the biggest concern that you have flagged to us as 2023 starts: how to invest during a recession? There is no one correct answer to any of these issues (investing part of everyone’s own personal financial planning), but keeping a steady head, sticking to your long-term objectives and not getting swept up in the story are the key themes which we hope we can help with.
Thank you to everyone who has responded to our survey this year and to all of our subscribers for your continued support.
As ever, safe investing.
About Megan Boxall
Disclaimer - This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.
Thank you. A really interesting article. I think that, like football, 2023 will be a game of two halves. Bear for 6months and Bull for the rest. I will continue to hold a balanced and pretty defensive portfolio and perhaps be a little more adventurous from July onwards. Of course, everything I do will be guided by Stockopedia!!
Hi Megan, a couple of quick thoughts on 'most useful features'.
The StockReport and StockRanks are the mainstay of the site - this was Ed's vision when he started and it's the first point of reference for any analysis. I don't think it's a criticism that refinements such as StockRank Styles are less useful. They depend entirely on the StockRanks. They do help you think more critically about a company's characteristics.
I'm a bit surprised that editorial was voted lower this year. First off, the quality and sheer volume of output from the SCVR is greater than ever. Then you have the weekend articles from Edmund and the regular features from you and Roland. I unhesitatingly voted for the top three (green bars) in your chart. Really, the editorial is in good shape. I hope you weren't disheartened.
Some of the other features are different in nature. The portfolio tools help with analysis and reflection on things like position size and portfolio balance. They aren't directly useful in helping find and research good investment ideas, that doesn't mean they aren't valuable and an important part of why I keep paying my subscription. Same with the 'director trades' and 'major shareholders' information that has been added in recent months, sometimes this doesn't matter and in a few cases its important to understand. Their ranking in the 'most valuable tools' vote doesn't necessarily tell the full story.
Hope that's of interest and thank you for the articles. My 2023 wish from Stockopedia is a modest one: please may we have more than 10 portfolios? That would be a real help.
Personally I set quite an ambitious target of 20% compounded gains per year on my SIPP using this platform so over the 4 years of using it by planning out my retirement on a spreadsheet to see what my target should be when I hit 67. I've had to navigate through a stock market crash and competing against a negative market in 2022 during that 4 year period. I've actually achieved an average 15% compounded gain YoY so I can't complain really it does mean my target at 67 will be less than my initial target at this average rate but you know it's still a good pension if this continues at this rate. Right now though I'm 75% cash in the SIPP fund at the moment. So when you compound that average of 15% it equates to roughly double my initial fund value in 4 years. The best part about my SIPP is I haven't made any contributions into it those go into my company pension instead using traditional fund managers that fund is actually worth less than I've paid in.
I just use the Value and Quality metrics in my scans mainly. My knowledge on balance sheets is pretty basic but I find Paul's / Graham's articles very useful in what to look for on them because most of this accounting stuff goes whoosh over my head. I find the Altman Z and Health metrics useful as that uses TTM giving you a heads up shares that are high value for a reason. There's also money / risk management but that's a personal preference. I'm no expert in this but I've dabbled in shares since the crash of '87. So Stockopedia has a thumbs up from me.
Hello - thanks for the feedback! We had 20 Australian subscribers respond to the survey, which isn't quite enough for us to do a full Aus-centric review. Great to hear that this is something you'd be interested in, though.
Those who responded were much more likely to say they were 'systematic' investors than the rest of the cohort. They also said that the StockRanks and Custom Screens were most helpful in improving their investing in 2022.
Australian respondents also fared slightly better performance-wise. The average performance was +5.4%, with the following distribution:
I hope this helps.
Thanks for this interesting article, Megan.
You wrote:
"As with any survey, these insights are prone to some inherent selection bias - those who were badly burned in this year’s market may feel less inclined to talk about it."
I suspect that this year the inherent selection bias has been much greater than in previous years!
I second the request about folios, 10 is just not enough. Ed has been saying for a while that that will be increased. Also having folios you can share, as on the old site, would be useful. There is not even one for NAPS or Roland's portfolio. Quite a few features that were on the old site are still missing.
Charts, I stated looking more at them recently but they could be improved, most chart users seem to using other sites.
Whilst the move to the cloud has improved the speed, before it was awful on the new site, there been a few site issues in the last few months, error messages, access to the site is slow, freezing, charts not loading etc. seems to be getting worse.
More Portfolios please from me too......(fifth time of asking I think). Surely if the software is all there it can't be so very costly to hold the data for 20 Folios each???
"Do you feel more or less confident in your understanding of the stock market since using Stockopedia"?
This question annoys me, because it is being used incorrectly to imply a causative effect between being a more confident investor and using Stockopedia. There may well be a causative effect, but that is not demonstrated by answering "yes" to this question.
It should be rephrased along the following lines: "Has using Stockopedia made you feel more or less confident in your understanding of the stock market "?
its baffling that having more data to aid in ones decision making would result in less or the same feeling of confidence since using Stockopedia, after all it does nothing else but add more data. I can only conclude that in these cases, more data may increases the level of confusion, or information overload, among newbie investors, such that it incapacitates their decision making process, but for experienced investors to say anything other than more confidence would be illogical. I suppose confidence is also subjective, and one can feel less confident about things for example when it's raining or had a bad nights sleep or a bad day in general so there's that.
... for experienced investors to say anything other than more confidence would be illogical.
It depends - being more confident isn't the same as making better decisions. In fact more confident investors tend to make worse decisions.
@timarr - if only we had more products to offer!
I think the feedback on the confidence question is valuable - I'll ask the team to change the question next year.
More to the point - the whole ethos of the site is to help people gain a better understanding of what works in the stock market. If we haven't helped subscribers feel more confident in their understanding, then I'd personally see that as a mission failure!
I never got an invite, but if I had I would be in the 110 percent profit bracket, so that 8 figure would be 9 who doubled their money. My strategy last year was to focus my trading solely on energy stocks as it was obvious to me that that was where the money was, due to sky high gas prices caused by the Ukraine war.
Any of the other 8 respondents out there willing to share a little or a lot on how they managed to beat the other 896 respondents? Certaintly not boasting but that is quite an achievement and I'm sure it didn't come from the lucky odd trade.
*Past performance is no indicator of future performance. Performance returns are based on hypothetical scenarios and do not represent an actual investment.
This site cannot substitute for professional investment advice or independent factual verification. To use Stockopedia, you must accept our Terms of Use, Privacy and Disclaimer & FSG. All services are provided by Stockopedia Ltd, United Kingdom (company number 06367267). For Australian users: Stockopedia Ltd, ABN 39 757 874 670 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ABN 77 633 984 773, AFSL 521404.
Megan, thanks for your article. I think Shell (LON:SHEL) went up more than 21%, I make it around 44%, maybe you could check your figures?
Some Ultities also did well, Centrica (LON:CNA) Telecom Plus (LON:TEP) and Yu (LON:YU.)
Markets and many stocks bounced off lows around October.