BAYFIELD - Caribbean Speed?

Tuesday, Dec 11 2012 by
2

There's an RNS out today at www.investegate.co.uk/bayfield-energy-%28beh%29/rns/update-on-operations-reserves-and-proposed-merger/201212110700031736T

Two problems arise.

Firstly the RNS says that the placing document will be sent to shareholders "by February" - is that Feb 1 or Feb 28? - with an EGM to approve the transaction 14 days later - which takes us to somewhere between Feb 14 and Mar 14. It does not say how long the relisting will take after the EGM - another 2 weeks? another month? So that takes us to somewhere between March 1 and April 14.

This seems to me quite extraordinarily slow. The shares were suspended October 15. That means that the shares will have spent between 5 and 6 months suspended by the time they resume trading. That's long enough to fight a small war.

My holding was not enormous, thank goodness, but I am it still very irritated that my shares are being stuck on hold for so long. Surely it must be possible to get this simple transaction done much quicker?

The second problem is that the RNS includes a table which sets out Bayfield's reserves. Unfortunately whoever drafted it seems not to grasp the basic concept of 1P vs 2P vs 3P reserves and did not get it proof read by someone else who does, so the headings make no sense. They show columns headed 1) "proved" 2) "proved plus probable" and 3) "proved plus probable plus probable" (sic)

and the headings do not line up properly with the columns below them

Of course, this looks like a couple of simple typos and a formatting error. But I am not impressed. Bayfield pays its staff pretty well. So does the PR company. So does the NOMAD/broker. And none of these well paid people spent long enough checking this RNS to spot glaring schoolboy errors which are obvious at first glance?

Are they all asleep? Is that why the trasaction is taking such an unconscionable length of time?

It's simply not good enough. Not good enough at all.


Filed Under: Oil,

Disclaimer:  

The author may hold shares in this company. All opinions are his own. You should check any statements that appear factual and seek independent professional advice before making any investment decision.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
2 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



Trinity Exploration & Production PLC is an independent oil and gas company. The Company is engaged in upstream oil and gas exploration and production, with the focus on Trinidad and Tobago. The Company operates 10 licenses in Trinidad, including two licenses in the Gulf of Paria, offshore Trinidad’s West coast, and eight onshore licenses. These licenses cover a total acreage of 12,581 acres and operate approximately 300 producing wells. Its Galeota block is situated within the established oil play of the Columbus Basin in shallow waters off the south-east coast of Trinidad. The exploration license for its Pletmos Inshore block covers an area of approximately 11,000 square kilometers. The Company holds 100% interest Pletmos Inshore block. Its onshore field includes Fyzabad-2, Guapo-1, Tabaquite, WD-2, WD-13 and WD-16. Its Offshore West Coast includes Brighton Marine. more »

Share Price (AIM)
48.58p
Change
0.0  0.0%
P/E (fwd)
15.1
Yield (fwd)
n/a
Mkt Cap (£m)
46.7



  Is Trinity Exploration and Production fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


10 Posts on this Thread show/hide all

marben100 11th Dec '12 1 of 10
2

Hi T,

You might find the PDF version of the RNS on the company's own website more readable. ;0) [though it still contains the "proved + probable + probable" error]

I met with the head of the LSE's RNS service some months back and learnt that quite a bit of "munging" goes on between a company issuing an RNS and it working its way through the LSE's systems - including some manual processing/formatting. Quite often tables as presented on the LSE's service do not come out well-formatted, in my experience. I did suggest that a PDF based RNS service (as other exchanges offer) would be more satisfactory, allowing diagrams, photos etc to be included in RNSs, and eliminating the need for format transformations.

I understand that the LSE is reviewing its RNS service.

 

I am not particularly surprised by the delay to readmission. The only other case like this I have knowledge or was Caledon Resources, when it transformed from being a gold explorer to a coal miner, via a similar takeover deal. It took a similar amount of time to complete and for the shares to be readmitted. Unfortunately, legal and regulatory matters do seem to take forever to complete.

Cheers,

Mark

| Link | Share
marben100 9th Jan '13 2 of 10
1

Proposed re-admission, as "Trinity Exploration & Production plc" in mid-Feb. Seeking to raise $50-$90m in a placing: http://www.investegate.co.uk/bayfield-energy-(beh)/rns/proposed-readmission-to-trading/201301080700100154V/

| Link | Share
tournesol 10th Jan '13 3 of 10
3

Actually the announcement does NOT say that re-admission will be mid Feb.

Close reading of the RNS reveals that it says nothing at all about the timing of re-admission.

I called the co for clarification the morning the RNS was issued and a spokesman said he would not like to be quoted but..... the mid Feb date is when they expect to issue a circular to shareholders calling for an EGM. The pre-condition for that is the completion of regulatory acceptance processes. So if regulatory stuff completes pre mid Feb, then an EGM circular will go out in mid Feb. Then some weeks later there will be an EGM to seek shareholder approval for the merger AND also for the raising of additional capital by issuing new shares. If the EGM approves all that, then the placing will need to be completed BEFORE trading of the relisted entity can be resumed (if resume is the right word to use in this context).

So my expectation is that the earliest we can expect to have an opportunity to trade is likely to be end March or first half of April.

I look forward to it. I'm being held here against my will and will be glad to exit.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
marben100 10th Jan '13 4 of 10

In reply to tournesol, post #3

True re re-admission, T - it will take some time for all the formalities to be completed, but the new Trinity looks like quite an interesting proposition to me, if the price is right...

| Link | Share
tournesol 10th Jan '13 5 of 10
1

Mark
What's your opinion of the management team? The new CEO is a relaxed and fluent speaker if the video clips on Trinity's website are anything to go by, but his experience of managing an E&P seems somewhat nugatory. And i've never taken to Mr Dingwall. They just do not present as a management team I want to entrust with my money frankly. I'll be out at the first opportunity......
T

| Link | Share | 1 reply
marben100 12th Jan '13 6 of 10
1

In reply to tournesol, post #5

Hi T,

Well, I have to admit to not having much knowledge of Dingwall, but Venture which he was CEO of, certainly proved a successful investment for me, so I personally don't have a problem there.

Pemberton's background is more financial than technical (but specialising in the energy sector). I don't see that necessarily as a problem - but means that the technical ability of the rest of the team will be leant on, so we need to look further. To a fair extent that is compensated for by Dingwall's technical experience. Ian MacDonald, COO and board member, is a petroleum engineer with 25 years experience with BP & Amoco - should bring the right skills. Jon Murphy & Anthony Brash bring further significant techical expertise, according to the summary CVs.

Another factor in favour of the management is that Trinity has successfully been built up from scratch, starting as a spin out from Venture in 2005, doing several deals along the way, culminating in the reverse T/O of Bayfield. Finally, Dattels & Mellon have backed Trinity's management, via Regent Pacific, and have done well from that.

 

Most importantly, the combined business has some decent cash-generative assets.

I am not currently invested. Details of assets, production history/plans, financial history, and importantly price, will determine whether I am prepared to invest or not.

I am considering seeing whether I can arrange a presentation for investors interested in the placing. Please contact me if anyone is interested.

Cheers,

Mark

| Link | Share | 1 reply
marben100 16th Jan '13 7 of 10
2

In reply to marben100, post #6

Finally, Dattels & Mellon have backed Trinity's management, via Regent Pacific, and have done well from that.

Hmmm... looks like I have to correct that statement. This just published by RP: http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2013/0116/LTN20130116512.pdf

 

...The principal reason for the expected loss for the year ended 31 December 2012 is the realised loss on Avion Gold Corporation and the anticipated impairment in relation to the Group’s investment in Project 1 (owned and operated through West China Coking & Gas Company Limited) and Trinity Exploration and Production Limited, all of which are non-cash items...

Would definitley have to look long and hard at the proposed offer before considering an investment!

| Link | Share
marben100 28th Jan '13 8 of 10
1

Regent Pacific subscribes for 20.5m Bayfield shares @ 12p (to be converted into 2.05m New Trinity shares following consolidation): http://www.regentpac.com/ICMServlet/download/13-1710-2830/EAnnt-SubscriptionofBayfieldShares(28Jan2013).pdf 

| Link | Share
tournesol 29th Jan '13 9 of 10
1

I note that the information provided to me on Jan 10 about the resumption of trading has turned out to be totally inaccurate.

Seems somehow fitting that even the routine admin surrounding the Bayfield fiasco has been poorly executed.

| Link | Share
tournesol 2nd Feb '13 10 of 10
4

Just for the sake of completeness, I will disclose that I sold earlier this week at an average of around 14.25p which represents a loss of over 75% of my purchase price (60p in the IPO).

Another poor outcome.

On reflection it is clear that I overweighted my confidence in management - their due diligence and their execution have both proved mediocre/inadequate and they have turned out to lack grit and resolve. Their bad for being so limp. My bad for being too complacent/relaxed. I should probably have picked up earlier on the signals that things were going awry.

More irritating than my failure to spot their failings is my error in overweighting my holding. I had 8% of my investable funds in BEH, so lost 6%. I should have limited my exposure to 2% max then the loss would have been much less painful.

Still, it's always good to learn.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this thread? to Comment Now

 
 
You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

 Are Trinity Exploration and Production's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »





Stock Picking Tutorial Centre


Related Content
BayField Energy  Was it all all Blarney
BayField Energy - Was it all all Blarney?
Trinity Exploration and Production 30th Oct '12

BayfieldTrinity  A conundrum for Investors
Bayfield-Trinity - A conundrum for Investors
Trinity Exploration and Production 4th Dec '12

Bayfield Energy  BEH
Bayfield Energy - BEH
Trinity Exploration and Production 27th Jan '12




Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.


Get started
or Take a Tour to find out more.