Benjamin Graham Formula for Growth Stocks

Thursday, Oct 06 2011 by
5
Benjamin Graham Formula for Growth Stocks

Those of you grappling with perhaps the most difficult investing challenge of all, valuation, might be interested to know of a simple formula Benjamin Graham articulated in "The Intelligent Investor" for the valuation of growth stocks. In his words: “Our study of the various methods has led us to suggest a foreshortened and quite simple formula for the evaluation of growth stocks, which is intended to produce figures fairly close to those resulting from the more refined mathematical calculations.”

The initial formula as described by Graham was as follows: Intrinsic Value = EPS * (8.5 + 2g). In this case, g represents the expected annual growth “over the next seven to ten years”. 8.5x was therefore Graham’s effective base P/E for a no-growth company. 

This formula however took no account of prevailing interest rates. He revised his formula in 1974 as follows: Intrinsic Value = EPS * (8.5 + 2g) * 4.4 / Y where Y was the current yield on 20 year AAA corporate bonds. The current yield on US AAA corporate bonds is 4.35%, as you can see on Yahoo Finance 

Is the Graham Formula Useful?

You can compare the fair value given by a two-stage discounted cash flows model with the fair value of Graham's Formula. The conclusion is that the formula broadly equates to the two-stage DCF value (with that set of assumptions at least!).

Watch Out For

Benjamin Graham however did provide a caveat to the use of this equation. Of companies with a below-par debt position, Graham wrote: "My advice to analysts would be to limit your appraisals to enterprises of investment quality, excluding from that category such as do not meet specific criteria of financial strength". In the book “Small Stocks, Big Profits”, Dr. Gerald Perritt summarised four quantitative caveats:

  1. The firm must not be excessively levered, i.e. it should not have debt to total asset ratios greater than 60% of total assets.
  2. The firm must have positive earnings (i.e. no losses)
  3. The share price must be below net working capital per share.
  4. The inverse PE (i.e E/P) should be greater than twice the AAA bond yield.

Arguably, however, this is confusing Graham's screening criteria with the valuation formula. The first two seems quite reasonable in any case. Of those criteria, the last two are the most severe and may be open to debate as they restrict use of the formula in most cases. Using say the Graham Multiplier constraint of 22.5 for P/E * P/B might be more suited to today's environment.  

How can I apply this? 

On Stockopedia Premium, of course! 

From the Source:

Graham discusses the original formula on page 295 of the Intelligent Investor, available on Amazon. You can also however find Graham’s fascinating 1974 piece, “The Decade 1965-1974: Its significance for Financial Analysts” online.

Further Reading on the Graham Formula: 


Filed Under: Valuation,
There's value in the stock market
but do you know where to look?

Get the most concise synopsis of everything that's been proven to work in value investing. If you like your stocks cheap you've found a treasure trove distilled to under 70 pages.

  • How to find ultimate Bargain Stocks with Ben Graham
  • How to spot Turnarounds and avoid Value Traps
  • From Graham to Greenblatt via Piotroski & Lakonishok
  • How to value stocks and set a margin of safety

Soon to be retailing for an RRP of £14.99, for a limited time only,
you can get your copy free by joining our 35,000 strong mailing list.

*By signing up you'll be joining our mailing list
no junk, no spam - just great content like this example.


Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
5 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




1 Comment on this Article show/hide all

anahin 24th Feb '12 1 of 1
2

This is a very dangerous misconception. Graham never intended this formula to be used to evaluate stocks. Please see http://www.anahin.net/misquoted

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? to Comment Now

 
 
You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Stockopedia Features

Stockopedia Features covers in-depth stories on strategies, companies and themes that are relevant to online investors. Investing is hard work. We don't try to over-simplify complex concepts - we prefer to try to help you navigate the detail.  more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.


Get started
or Take a Tour to find out more.