Beware the "Dash to Trash"

Wednesday, Feb 13 2013 by
Beware the quotDash to Trashquot

What many don't realise is that sometimes in a stock market rally the quality of the stocks you own just doesn't matter. Indeed, when the whole market rallies there are times when it pays best to own junk. These periods have become known as a 'dash to trash' and understanding the phenomenon could just save you from an awful lot of pain when the music stops.

Over the last 15 months since we've been monitoring the performance of 65 stock screens and strategies in real time the market's preference for trash stocks in strong rallies has been obvious. If you navigate to the performance history page you can explore this phenomenon better. We've annotated the chart below to illustrate how the December-January rallies in both 2012 and 2013 have been characterised by the strong rebound of stocks we normally categorise as potential short sales.


Short selling screens are filled full of story stocks, glamour stocks and trash stocks. These are stocks on nosebleed valuations or those that have little or no profits, low or no dividends, little asset backing and high share price volatility. Why do these stocks rally so hard? Because there is a lot of implied optionality in these kinds of stocks. Some of them may have blue sky potential - intrepid drillers or high tech R&D stories while others may be glamorous 'market darlings' that itch to have another leg up. When the macro environment feels a bit safer, or money is easier to come by people are more willing to go swimming with these sharks.

The danger comes when the market turns

But cyclical market downturns can be absolutely devastating to shortable stocks (glamour and trash). You can see in the chart above that between April and December 2012, when the stock market steadied itself, long strategies (quality, growth and value) outperformed short strategies (glamour/trash) by a huge margin of 30% - a margin that the shortable stocks won't ever be able to make up again though they may seem hell bent on trying.

This phenomenon of value & quality outperforming during bearish market periods has been well observed. The famous academics turned hedge fund managers Lakonishok, Vishny and Shleifer studied this phenomenon and confirmed that across typical bear markets value stocks decline less and outperform the market as a whole. For those that have read our book "How to Make Money in Value Stocks" this will come as no surprise.

The most important thing is to not get flattered in a market rally and be suckered into holding poor quality stocks. Investors can get complacent as they see their stocks rise - woozy even. But price is NOT value. Market rallies should be used as a chance to sell low quality stocks, not to fall in love!

The best time to buy trash is not now

Frankly the dash to trash this year is not very pronounced and the odds of continued outperformance are perhaps low. There really is only one type of market in which trash stocks massively outperform and that's during the rebound from the pit of bear markets.

In the 2002 and 2008 bear markets trash stocks had seen such massive price falls that they rebounded en masse with huge force. A research paper by Kent Daniel showed that over the 3 months between March and May 2009 the stocks that had held up the best during the financial crisis rose by only 6.5% but trash stocks - while those that that had collapsed the hardest rose by 156% !

So the point is - why hold trash now? Where is the upside given the significant risk of further market volatility?

How to filter low quality stocks from your portfolio

Given all this, I would suggest it's vital to take the trash out now! There are a few red flags and filters that we like to use at Stockopedia to highlight stocks that are potentially at a high risk of reversal. Any stocks showing more than a few of the following signs should be seriously considered for sale in market rallies.

  • High Price to Sales, High Price to Book, High Price to Earnings (the most expensive 20% of stocks are always at risk of severe reversal)
  • Altman Z-Score in distress zone (<= 1.8) (high bankruptcy risk)
  • Piotroski F-Score <= 3 (poor fundamental health)
  • Recent EPS Downgrades
  • Low Relative Strength


An example of what I'd call a low quality and vulnerable stock is the snippet of the Stock Report on the right.

Another quick way to find stocks that might have some of the above red flags is to eyeball our short selling lists for any stocks you may own.

And for those readers who aren't yet subscribers to Stockopedia, we still offer a 2 week free trial, so please take advantage to reposition your portfolio while this window still lasts.

Filed Under: Value Investing,

About the Author's Blog

Edward Croft Profile Image Promotional
Follow @edcroft on Twitter

I post my day to day thoughts and ramblings on twitter - do join me.... more or visit website »


As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.

Do you like this Post?
9 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

About Edward Croft

Edward Croft

CEO at Stockopedia where I weave code, prose and investing strategies to help investors beat the stock markets. I've a background in the City and asset management but now am more interested in building great stock selection tools for the use of investors online.   Traditionally investors online have had very poor access to the best statistics, analytics and strategies for the stock market and our aim is to set that straight.  High Quality fundamental information has been prohibitively expensive in the past and often annoyingly dull. People these days don't just want to know the PE Ratio and look at a balance sheet. They expect a layer of interpretation over data, signal from noise and the ability to know at a glance whether a stock is worth investigating or not. All this is possible using great design and the insights gleaned from quantitative research.  Stockopedia is where we try to make it happen ! more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre

Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis