Car Dealerships (VTU, CAMB, LOOK, PDG)

Wednesday, May 22 2013 by
9
Car Dealerships VTU CAMB LOOK PDG

Part 1: Introduction and basic value

I like doing sectoral comparisons between companies. I think most of us intuitively understand that, at the most basic level, similar companies should command similar prices in the market - though defining 'similar prices' (what metric? how similar?) is slightly more slippery than I've made it sound. The necessary clarification is that the companies involved really do have to be alike. It might sound obvious, but sectoral comparisons are only really relevant when the companies involved have very analogous business models - comparing the supermarkets, or the large national housebuilders, for instance. This is something which I suspect is often forgotten when trying to justify a small-cap 'rerating', for instance - the old chestnut of putting X next to the more lavishly valued Y, and forgetting the myriad things which make the businesses two entirely different entities.

Car dealerships are a good example of where I think comparisons are relevant. These companies tend to have those similar business models - though with obvious internal differences and some different segments. Given that, I plunge on into the abyss of car company accounts seeking some sort of logic that'll deliver me a winner - a best value car dealership, only for the equity and not a second-hand Ford Focus. Before that, though, some industry thoughts.

On car dealerships

There's a reason car dealerships interest me, and it's not because I like cars. My interest is more financial - it's a sector that seems to be moving quickly in one direction, and whenever there's a rush of capital I'm curious to see where it's headed and why. In the case of car dealerships, it's the trend towards acquisition and empire-building; take a glance at the annual reports or strategies of these companies and you're guaranteed to see talk about 'fragmented' markets. Most of these companies have grown or are actively growing throw acquisition. From Vertu's AIM admission document back in 2006:

The UK motor retail sector is fragmented; in 2005 there were over 5,400 motor dealerships in the UK, of which the ten largest motor retail groups represented less than 19 per cent.

Granted that was a little while ago now, but the history of how all these competitive forces whirled out is interesting, too, as it's all to do with legislation attempting to muscle a rather anti-competitive industry apart - look up the Block Exemption Regulation and the '02/'03 EU regulations for more on that, as I'm far from an expert. Still, we're concerned about the businesses we're left with today, and I can find 4 relatively similar listed firms - Vertu Motors (LON:VTU), Cambria Automobiles (LON:CAMB), Lookers (LON:LOOK),  Pendragon (LON:PDG) . Initially I had penciled Inchcape into this post, but their global reach and distribution agreements (they're more cosy with manufacturers, basically, and add more value because of it) make them a different kettle of fish entirely.

For our remaining four, then, the business model is pretty simple - they have ranges of garages representing different manufacturers, and make their money from three main sources - new, used and aftersales. You might also split off fleet & commercial sales, depending on how you want to slice it up.

Basic comparisons

The first comparison to make is size. I choose the two simplest metrics to measure this by, revenue and market cap, to give a general feel:

Apologies for the slightly awkward and unintuitive axis - my Excel wasn't behaving as I was expecting it to and I was tired of wrestling with it! The conclusion is fairly obvious, though - Pendragon is the largest group, with its market cap only held down by the fact it has a larger amount of debt in its capital structure. The other three companies have significantly lower debts compared to equity, and as such the size differences are fairly clear - Pendragon and Lookers are large groups, Vertu is more 'medium sized', and Cambria is significantly smaller. Cambria is also the most recently formed.

 Special Offer: Invest like Buffett, Slater and Greenblatt. Click here for details »

Broadly, the smaller stocks are cheaper, too. One does expect this - they are more volatile, after all:

But P/E and PTBV are imperfect yardsticks. They are nice ones - I use them as first stopping points, because the two of them combined tells you a lot about what the market thinks of the business - but they are certainly imperfect. We can deduce some insight from them, though. Lookers is the most expensive by both P/E and PTBV - we might suspect this is the highest quality of the four companies. Pendragon has a significantly negative tangible book value while remaining relatively cheap in earnings terms - given what I said above, this is because Pendragon uses a lot of leverage to make the money it does.

Vertu is perhaps the most interesting because it trades on a PTBV of about 1 - you pay no more for the business than the value of its tangible assets. This is interesting, since I've already mentioned these businesses are fairly similar - why is capital inside Lookers worth 3 times its book value and Vertu's only worth what it's stated at? The market ratings in earnings terms aren't that different; so the answer isn't simply that Lookers is much more expensive than Vertu. Rather, that similarity I talked about at the start breaks down at the most important point:

The most important point is, of course, returns on capital. What does the company do with my money inside the business? How well does it use it? Lookers uses it very well indeed - they earn consistently higher returns on capital than their competitors, even while acquiring (you might expect it to take a while for big acquisitions to get 'firing' and drag down returns in the interim).  Vertu's lowly valuation in asset terms is also explained - its returns on capital sit stubbornly at a rather low 6%.

This, then, becomes the critical point of the comparison - deducing what the differences are between the businesses that make them earn such different returns. The value in that question is obvious; if Vertu's returns could double to the levels Lookers sits at, the business is worth multiples more - the equity rises to be significantly more than twice as valuable. If the differences between the companies appear to be transient, we might expect competition to drive them together. These are pretty big companies, after all, not specialised niche players.

My next post will focus on that big question, then. What really separates the performance of these businesses, and where are they likely to go?


About the Author's Blog

ExpectingValue Profile Image Promotional
expectingvalue.com

Expecting Value is a value investing blog which publishes regularly on different topics. Generally, the coverage will focus on specific shares and feature a discussion and analysis of its potential, but also includes some 'bigger picture' concepts. ...read more or visit website »


Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
9 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



Vertu Motors plc is engaged in the provision of new and used vehicles, together with related after-sales services. The principal activity of the Company is the provision of management services to all subsidiary statutory entities. The Company operates in a number of different business streams, such as new vehicle sales, used vehicle sales and after-sales operations. Its subsidiaries include Vertu Motors (Finance) Limited, Boydslaw 103 Limited, Vertu Motors (Durham) Limited, Bristol Street Group Limited, Bristol Street First Investments Limited, Bristol Street Fourth Investments Limited, Grantham Motor Company Limited, BSH Pension Trustee Limited and Vertu Motors (Property) Limited Property company Bristol Street Commercials (Italia). In May 2014, the Company acquired Hillendale Group Limited. more »

Share Price (AIM)
59p
Change
0.5  0.9%
P/E (fwd)
11.2
Yield (fwd)
1.7
Mkt Cap (£m)
200.8

Cambria Automobiles Plc is engaged in the sale and servicing of motor vehicles and the provision of ancillary services. The Company’s brand portfolio include Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Aston Martin, Chrysler Jeep, Citroen, Dacia, Ford, Fiat, Honda, Jaguar, Mazda, Nissan, Renault, Seat, Vauxhall, Volvo and Triumph. The Company also supplies parts on behalf of the manufacturer brands, which the Company represents for cars being repaired and as a supplier to other car dealers and independent traders and repairers. The Company also provides accident repair facilities for its customers either through its own accident repair centre in Kent or through sub-contract to other accident repair centers. The Company carries out warranty repairs under the manufacturers control and guidance. more »

Share Price (AIM)
47p
Change
-0.8  -1.6%
P/E (fwd)
9.6
Yield (fwd)
1.4
Mkt Cap (£m)
47.0

Lookers plc is a United Kingdom-based motor retail and after sales service company. The Company operates in two divisions: motor distribution and parts distribution. The Company’s motor division consists of 121 franchise dealerships representing 32 marques from 70 sites. The business generates revenue from the sale of new and used cars and aftersales, which are vehicle servicing and repair together with the sale of franchise parts. The parts division operates through three companies: FPS Distribution Limited, Apec Braking Limited and BTN Turbocharger Service Limited, each supplying hard parts to the independent automotive aftermarket, the customer base being primarily motor factors who, in turn, supply the independent repair sector. In October 2013, Lookers PLC announced the acquisition of Chipperfield. Effective March 10, 2014, Lookers PLC acquired Colborne Garages Ltd. In July 2014, Lookers PLC sold its Jaguar and Land Rover business. more »

Share Price (Full)
128p
Change
-0.3  -0.2%
P/E (fwd)
10.4
Yield (fwd)
2.4
Mkt Cap (£m)
498.1



  Is Vertu Motors fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


5 Comments on this Article show/hide all

alterego 22nd May '13 1 of 5
2

looking fwd to your next post on this - very interesting

| Link | Share
intuitive6191 22nd May '13 2 of 5
2

I hold a modest amount of Lookers so this is of interest. My understanding of the industry is that profit on new car sales is quite slim and the key is to keep the customer for aftersales.

I think that the Block Exemption was introduced so that customers had the freedom to go to other garages for aftersales (other than the garage that sold them the car) and not invalidate their warranty.In actual fact customers seem to be quite sticky and if the selling garage does a good job of aftersales then the customer seems to stay with them.

I doubt that many customers understand the freedom that Block Exemption gives them, or if they do, are not willing to take a chance with another garage.

Small independent service and repair garages seem to be a lot cheaper for aftersales but have difficulty in attracting aftersales business from the big retailers. In this respect it’s probably a case of reputation and brand.

| Link | Share
alterego 22nd May '13 3 of 5
2

One of the reasons why people stick with main dealer servicing is that when you come to trade in your car, the absence of a main dealer stamp will be used to justify a lower trade in value in my experience. I hold VTU who are clear that customer retention and after sales are key to increasing profitability. They seem to be having some success on this front too.

| Link | Share
corrsfan 22nd May '13 4 of 5
2

While were on the topic of dealers and retention. Is it not also to do with the manufacturers making certain tools and other diagnostics harder for the independent garage to obtain and more costly to use too so it can appear a false economy. Eg the ford tool costs 700 for the laptop and probe then theres the 3000 in licencing that a garage has to pay per year to use it. And none of this includes training that the official deakers would get for grattis. This resource would be unique to ford, and they arent the only makes..

Also 2 of the last brand new cars my parents have bought had a 3 year options for servicing and parts at nominal discounted costs to cover the services as required to keep the warranty good. Each time they go for this. Its usually like 3-400 for three years or something like that.

| Link | Share
ExpectingValue 22nd May '13 5 of 5
1

Thanks for the comments all.

Re: 2/4: " My understanding of the industry is that profit on new car sales is quite slim and the key is to keep the customer for aftersales."

Don't want to jump the gun on my next post but I suspect and have a little evidence so far to support this being the case. A more in depth question is how Lookers are able to do it so well. Is their advantage in this field replicable? One would think car dealerships as businesses are quite difficult to differentiate and 'protect'. If I have a particularly nifty way of making sure customers give me all that margin on aftersales, anyone else can just copy it.

Can't disagree with all the stuff on the BE. Consumers always tend to be more sticky than policy makers (or economic theory) would like, and companies always tend to be more protective of their monopolies than anyone else would like..!

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? to Comment Now

 
 
You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About ExpectingValue

ExpectingValue

Follow

I'm a private investor looking to broaden my horizons and constantly develop as a stock picker. I run expectingvalue.com to help me better track and understand my own performance, and open my decisions up to discussion. I focus mainly on small - mid caps; I'd say my usual target band is from £10m - £800m, but there are obviously exceptions to this. more »



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.


Get started
or Take a Tour to find out more.