Chamberlin (CMH): This time it's different

Wednesday, Apr 10 2013 by

Continuing with the manufacturing theme here, today I'm looking at an company ostensibly similar to Castings. Chamberlin (LON:CMH) is also in the business of castings and related machined products - credit has to go to them for making it easy to find relevant and interesting information about their business. I like it when companies cater to ignorant laymen like me, for instance by breaking down their revenue into end-markets; 30% passenger and commerical cars, 31% in construction, safety/security and hydraulics, and the rest in smaller markets like mining, power generation, oil & gas and so on. It gives me a quick and easy feel for the business, which appears to be more diversified than Castings with a wider spread of products and less stock in a few major customers.

While what they do is a little similar to Castings in a broad sense, how they do it evidently isn't, as we quickly get to the cusp of the differences between the two companies: Castings and, it should be noted, Tricorn (another manufacturing company) interested me because of their stability of returns. The recession was noticable from their reports and their performance, but they continued to turn out operating profits. Outside of the recession, both of those companies earned good returns. Chamberlin's strength is less evident. Over the '07-'11 period in its totality the company lost money, and returns even before that were hardly spectacular - they were throwing off something like 8 and a half percent on their operating assets, with leases capitalised.

In a hoo-rah for market efficiency, you might say that's why Chamberlin is significantly cheaper than Castings. This is true. A question surrounding the relative valuations of the two, then, hinges on whether you think Castings's returns will get worse, or Chamberlin's will get better. It's notable that Chamberlin's share price has come down from ~190p in October 2012 - about double the current price. At the risk of succumbing to a generous helping of hindsight bias (everything's obvious when it's already happened!), I think that price substantially overvalues the company as it stands.

Here's the problem - we're presented with a company which has, over the last 10 years, made £9.7m in operating profits. My adjusted, after-tax operating profit figure sits at £7.7m for that time period. Given the amount of assets employed in the company - operating assets have hovered around £15m over that time period - this is a poor return. Last year's performance, the first 'good' one in the last 6 years, simply pushes returns back into reasonable territory - about 10%. On top of that, there surely must be some sort of penalty for volatility - the fact that Chamberlin's profits are so difficult to decipher. Management, as one might expect, talk about most of the variation over the last few years as being down to economic conditions. That might well be true, but it's not what investors want to hear - it simply suggests a business with no real competitive advantage, one which is buffeted by market forces.

I'm simply not sure the promising first impressions are borne out by the figures. They say they operate in markets with high barriers to entry, protected by 'process know-how' - a sign that they should have some sort of intangible capital inside the business built up from years of operations, but we don't see any sign of that in the profits they've been making. Given the end-markets they're involved in, they're probably right in saying that macroeconomic conditions have been a big dampener on trade - but, given their history, I'm not really too comfortable with any sort of mean reversion narrative. Even getting back to an optimistic 10% that they (sometimes) earned pre-crisis wouldn't make the company particularly undervalued.

Realistically, the most interesting thing I've taken away from reading Chamberlin's reports for the last few years is how much I can be swayed by presentation. Consider even the investor relations pages; Castings first, and then Chamberlin. Bear in mind the latter is a company with a market cap of ~£8m, and the former is well over £100m. Open up a few annual reports if you want a better demonstration. Castings's presentation of information is no-frills and to the point. They list what they are required to by the regulatory bodies and very little else. Chamberlin's is far more engaging - there's more discussion of the business, more explanation, and the usual little anecdotes. I hope I maintain neutrality and an even head, but I wonder if there's a valuation difference for small-cap companies based on how free they are with the information they disclose and how far they go out of their way to help investors find information they want.

One final note - their pension deficit, of £3m, is extremely large relative to the size of the company. As I've mentioned a few times, this figure is volatile - and if we assume that times are unusual enough so as to exaggerate the level of deficit (by inflating the liability and by assets being undervalued - not given assumptions, I'd add) we have an non-operational factor that enormously impacts on the valuation.

About the Author's Blog

ExpectingValue Profile Image Promotional

Expecting Value is a value investing blog which publishes regularly on different topics. Generally, the coverage will focus on specific shares and feature a discussion and analysis of its potential, but also includes some 'bigger picture' concepts. more or visit website »


As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.

Do you like this Post?
2 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends

Chamberlin plc is a United Kingdom-based engineering company. The Company operates through two segments: Foundries and Engineering. The Foundries segment is a supplier of iron castings, in raw or machined form, to a range of industrial customers who incorporate the castings into their own products or carry out further machining or assembly operations on the castings before selling them on to their customers. The Engineering segment provides manufactured and imported products to distributors and end users operating in the safety and security markets. The products fall into the categories of door hardware, hazardous area lighting and control gear. Its subsidiaries include Chamberlin & Hill Castings Ltd, Russell Ductile Castings Ltd, Exidor Ltd and Petrel Ltd. Its subsidiaries are engaged in manufacture and sale of engineering castings, emergency exit equipment, door closers, switchgear and electrical installation products. more »

Share Price (AIM)
Mkt Cap (£m)
P/E (fwd)
Yield (fwd)

  Is Chamberlin fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »

2 Comments on this Article show/hide all

Paul Scott 10th Apr '13 1 of 2

I also looked at Chamberlin after the recent plunge, to see if it was an oversold bargain. Decided not to buy any, as I think they have a very questionable business model - is this a viable business at all? It's only managed to eke out a wafer thin profit margin in some years, and has been loss-making in others.

So without any reliable level of base profits, I don't see how you can value it on a PER basis at all really, as the E part of the equation cannot be predicted on a reliable basis.

It's probably the type of company where one would need to meet the management, and get them to explain the business in a Q&A, then it might be possible to judge whether they have a viable strategic plan for the business with a reasonable chance of success. But for the time being, it doesn't appeal to me, although I only had a 10 minute review of its numbers.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
ExpectingValue 12th Apr '13 2 of 2

In reply to Paul Scott, post #1


Agree with everything you say. It's not immediately obvious to me what, if anything, is their competitive advantage. Their returns don't suggest they really have one.

You're probably right in saying this is one of those cases where you'd want to meet management and attempt to judge, though I wonder if that has much value-adding power that has. I suspect that depends on the person. For me - likely not very much!

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

About ExpectingValue


Private investor turned hedge fund analyst, looking predominantly at global small caps. Sector agnostic.


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre

Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis