Chemring – bid abandoned

Friday, Nov 09 2012 by

Bloomberg news reported that Carlyle Group walked away from a potential bid for CHG (Chemring). Negotiations had been extended twice, and there were two downgrades by Chemring.

Chemring said today after Carlyle pulled out that it will continue to feel the strain from governments cutting defense budgets. “Carlyle realized Chemring’s problems were far deeper than expected,” Oliver Sleath, a London-based analyst at Credit Suisse, said in a telephone interview. Another bidder is not likely to emerge in the short term, he said.

The CEO had resigned a few weeks ago due to its latest profit warning.

CHG closed at 258p -12.90 (-4.8%). Ouch.

I note that there was an article on Stockopedia suggesting it as a value idea. In my view, it was an extremely dangerous tactic to buy whilst there was a potential bid. It is so incredibly easy to come unstuck by buying on bid speculation. It’s true that if there was a bid, shareholders would likely have done well. But there’s always a non-trivial risk of something going wrong. That, alas, is what happened. Simple moral: don’t buy on bid talk. That way you don’t have to see a significant percentage of your holding go up in smoke.

In his “Genius” book, Greenblatt lists risk/merger arbitrage in the chapter “Don’t try this at home” – which, as the title states, is an area to avoid. He gives a couple of case studies. Florida Cypress Gardens is the first example. A bid was announced, approved by the shareholders, and it looked almost certain the deal would go through. Before the deal closed, Gardens fell into a sinkhole, which scuppered it. Another case was Combined International, where a controlling shareholder got cold feet even at the meeting where the deal was to be ratified. Even during “done deals” – for which CHG falls far short – there is enough that can go wrong.

Should be interesting to see how this plays out. The analyst’s comments sound rather ominous to me, and my hunch (and Iet’s face it, it’s only a hunch) is that we haven’t seen the bottom of this, in multiple senses of the word. In my inexperienced and simplistic view, this one is going to be very tricksy and dangerous, despite the seeming attractive PE of 5.

We shall see.

Happy investing to you all.

About the Author's Blog

Mark Carter Profile Image Promotional
Mark Carter's Blog

Investment blog of an amateur private investor. The blog also contains non-investment related posts. more or visit website »


As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.

Do you like this Post?
7 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends

Chemring Group PLC is a United Kingdom-based company engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of threat detection and energetic material products, and countermeasures for the defense, security, and safety. The company operates through four business segments: Countermeasures, including  expendable active and passive countermeasures for naval and air platforms and land based electronic warfare equipment; Sensors & Electronics, including improvised explosive device (IED) detection equipment, chemical and biological threat detection equipment, IED countermeasures and explosive ordnance disposal equipment; Pyrotechnics & Munitions, including signals and illumination devices and payloads, cartridge/propellant actuated devices, pyrotechnic devices for satellite launch and deployment, missile and ammunition components, propellants, warheads, fuzes, medium and large caliber ammunition, and Energetic Sub-Systems, including  Separation subs-systems, actuators and energetic materials. more »

Share Price (Full)
0.8  0.3%
P/E (fwd)
Yield (fwd)
Mkt Cap (£m)

  Is Chemring fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »

1 Comment on this Article show/hide all

Miserly Investor 9th Nov '12 1 of 1

Hi Mark,

My article on Chemring (linked to above) was written from the point of view of a long term buy and hold income investor. Whether or not CHG proves to be successful in such a strategy will therefore be dependent only on whether there is progress on earnings and dividends over several years and whether the current price is an attractive entry point relative to that assumption.

The strategy has no regard for short term price volatility as there is no intention to exit in the short term. Buying due to the existence of a bid was not at all relevant to the main thesis; and consequently the withdrawal of the bid is equally of no relevance even if it means the price falls. The risk with such a strategy is not price volatility, it is whether there is business progress over a long period.

I can see how the price fall would be "dangerous" for a trader speculating his capital on a takeover and looking for a quick exit, but the real danger for me is a dividend cut which is why the article focused more on dividend growth history, cover and cash flow.

I think CHG will be a very interesting story to watch unfold!


| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? to Comment Now

You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

About Mark Carter

Mark Carter


I am a private investor living in Scotland. I am a computer programmer by trade.

Stock Picking Tutorial Centre

Related Content

Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.

Get started
or Take a Tour to find out more.