Improving on the Altman Z-Score, part 2: The Ohlson O-Score

Wednesday, Feb 13 2013 by
6

In this series of posts we’re exploring some of the alternatives to the 45 year old Altman Z-Score for successfully predicting bankruptcies. So far we’ve looked at the 2010 CHS model which is generally regarded as the best all-round replacement. Today we’re going to take a look at the 1980 Ohlson O-score, followed by the 1974 Merton ‘Distance-to-Default’ (DD) method in the third and final instalment. The O-score is still heavily referenced in academic literature and has its place in the arsenal of analysts around the world. All together it sounded like it was worth taking a closer look at.

Ohlson O-score

Similar to the Z-score, the O-score can be described as a statistical bankruptcy indicator generated from a set of balance sheet ratios. Where it differs from Altman’s original is in its application of a much larger sample of corporate successes and failures to inform the model. The wider pool of just over 2000 companies gives it a more robust sample for basing the scaling factors applied to its nine variables with the aim of increasing its accuracy. The difference in this sample size is especially apparent when compared to Altman’s original whose statistical technique of pair matching limited him to just 66 companies (it’s amazing it’s still as successful as it is!). Subsequent studies have generally found the O-score to be a better forecaster of bankruptcy than the Z-score, however neither has been able to regularly beat Merton’s DD or the CHS model since their discoveries.

How It Works

To begin with, let’s take a look at each of the variables and think about why they’ve been included.

  • Adjusted Size: Ohlson measures a company’s size as its total assets adjusted for inflation. Smaller companies are deemed to be more at risk of failure.
    • AS = log(Total assets/GNP price-level index)
    • Where GNP price-level index = (Nominal GNP/Real GNP)*100
  • Leverage Measure: Designed to capture the indebtedness of a company, the more leveraged the more at risk the company is to shocks.
    • LM = Total liabilities/Total assets
  • Working Capital Measure: Even if a company is endowed with assets and profitability, it must have sufficient liquidity to service short-term debt and upcoming operational expenses to avoid going bust.
    • WCM =  Working capital/Total Assets
  • Inverse Current Ratio: This is another measure of a company’s liquidity.
    • ICR = Current liabilities/Current assets
  • Discontinuity Correction for Leverage Measure: Dummy variable equalling one if total liabilities exceeds total assets, zero otherwise. Negative book value in…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
6 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Jonathan Stokes

Jonathan Stokes

Research writer for Stockopedia. I'm a recent graduate of Imperial College London with a background in civil engineering but I've always had more of a passion for understanding stocks than structures. After stumbling across Stockopedia and getting chatting to founder Edward Croft I explained to him my intention to work as a full-time financial analyst, he very kindly offered me the chance to become the company's first ever intern. I'm now hoping to repay the favour by conducting research into topics that could one day become useful indicators or screens to help people throughout the investment community. As a relative novice to the blogging scene, any feedback or advice is more than welcome. I look forward to hearing from you! more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre


Related Content
Sage has rediscovered its mojo
Sage has rediscovered its mojo
Sage 10th May '15

How to sell stocks short profitably
How to sell stocks short profitably
Short Selling 30th Jan '12

Can Avanti Communications break even
Can Avanti Communications break even?
Avanti Communications 18th Nov '15


Now it is easier to see what risk is
Now it is easier to see what risk is
Value Investing 1st Aug


Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis
Foliobuilder