Good morning!

I was rather late in completing yesterday's report, but in the evening I reviewed results/trading updates from 4 more companies, so 8 companies in total. Yesterday's full report is here.

I'm out all afternoon & evening today at a shares conference & dinner, so today's report is shorter & earlier than usual, and there won't be any late updates.


Sprue Aegis (LON:SPRP)

Share price: 264p (down 9.7%)
No. shares: 45.9m
Market cap: £ 121.2m

Update on supply terms - Sprue has agreed to revised terms with its main supplier, full details are given. Helpfully, the company also quantifies the P&L impact. I wish more companies would be as transparent as this, by giving an estimate of profit for the current year, even if it's a wide range;

Retrospectively with effect from 1 January 2016, Sprue has agreed to amend supply terms with DTL, as a result of which the Board now expects that the Company's operating profit for the year ending 31 December 2016 will be approximately £8.3 million, slightly below market expectations

Stockopedia is already showing reduced broker estimates for 2016, since a decline in last year's bumper sales to France is not expected. So a consensus of £ 8.06m profit is currently showing. That's in the same ballpark as the £ 8.3m operating profit from the company today, so the financial impact seems modest.

The detail given of changes to contract terms look perfectly reasonable to me - adjustments have been made to prices, based on increased wage costs in China, exchange rate movements, etc.

However, what concerns me is how dependent Sprue seems to be on Jarden;

Sprue (AIM: SPRP), one of Europe's leading home safety products suppliers, today issues an update on the supply terms with DTL, owned by Jarden Corporation ("Jarden"), the supplier of all of Sprue's own branded smoke alarms and accessories, which also supplies the smoke and carbon monoxide alarms and accessories of BRK Brands Europe Limited ("BRK"), also owned by Jarden, and a substantial shareholder in the Company.

BRK owns 23.6% of Sprue, so their interests are aligned with shareholders in terms of the share price. But there's a massive conflict of interest here, since they will also want to make as much profit as possible on product sales, on which Sprue seems to be highly dependent.

This is not a new issue, I recall discussing this…

Unlock the rest of this article with a 14 day trial

Already have an account?
Login here