Small Cap Value Report (30 Dec 2016) - PXS, SGI

Friday, Dec 30 2016 by
66


Morning! Paul is off today, so there's no need to look for a Part 2.

The LSE is closing very soon - at 12.30pm.

It feels very quiet in terms of RNS announcements, as should be expected before the long weekend to ring in 2017.




Provexis (LON:PXS)

Share price: 0.87p (-6%)
No. shares: 1,750m
Market cap: £15m

I don't normally cover early-stage pharmaceuticals - the lack of news this morning has forced me into covering this one!


Half-year Report (for six months to 30 September 2016)

Make of it what you will, but this company has announced results on the very last day before it would have broken exchange rules. Not exactly confidence-inspiring to me!

Provexis develops Fruitflow®, a tomato extract which is scientifically proven to improve blood health.

It has been listed on AIM for 11 years, but revenues remain limited, despite trebling in the current period.

Key highlights

  • Total revenue for the period £123k (2015: £41k), a threefold increase from the prior year. Revenue for the half year to September 2016 exceeds revenue for the full year to March 2016.
  • Revenue from profit sharing Alliance for the period £88k, a 115% year on year increase (2015: £41k).

(GN note: The "Alliance" is the profit-sharing arrangement by which the company outsources manufacturing, marketing and selling)

  • Underlying operating loss* reduced to £128k (2015: £196k), a record low for the Group


There are plenty of encouraging announcements/initiatives included in the statement, but I find it somewhat hard to believe that the company is on the cusp of major financial success, so many years after discovering its technology.

That said, the share price has performed extremely well this year (up about 200%), so investors have clearly been impressed by news flow.

On a bigger-picture view, the number of shares outstanding has increased by about five times over the last ten years, and dilution is set to continue in the short term:

Funding

The Company remains keen to minimise dilution to shareholders and it is focussed on moving into profitability as Fruitflow® revenues increase, but while the Company remains in a loss making position it will need to raise working capital on occasions...

Based on its current level of cash it is expected that the Group will need to raise further equity finance in the coming four months. The funding proceeds which the Company expects to receive will help…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

All my own views. I am not regulated by the FSA. No advice.

Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
66 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



Provexis plc is engaged in developing and licensing the Fruitflow heart-health functional food ingredient for the global functional food sector. Fruitflow is a tomato extract, which inhibits platelet aggregation that causes heart attack, stroke and venous thrombosis. The syrup and powder versions of Fruitflow are used in foods, beverages and supplements. The powder version is used in a range of products, including soft gels, capsules, tablets and stick packs. The Company also offers Fruitflow + Omega-3 dietary supplement product, which is a two-in-one supplement in an easy to take capsule supporting healthy blood flow and normal heart function. Fruitflow + Omega-3 dietary supplement product is available through its e-commerce Website www.fruitflowplus.com. The Company's subsidiaries include Provexis Nutrition Limited, Provexis Natural Products Limited and Provexis (IBD) Limited, which are engaged in providing functional food, medical food and dietary supplement technologies. more »

LSE Price
0.5p
Change
-2.9%
Mkt Cap (£m)
9.4
P/E (fwd)
n/a
Yield (fwd)
n/a

The Stanley Gibbons Group plc is engaged in trading in collectibles; dealing in antiques and works of art, auctioneering; the development and operation of collectible Websites, philatelic publishing, mail order, retailing, and the manufacture of philatelic accessories. The Company's segments include Investments, Philatelic, Publishing and Coins & Medals. The Company's Flexible Trading Portfolio (FTP) allows users to invest in rare tangible assets. It allows users to discuss their options and objectives with one of its Investment Portfolio Managers. more »

LSE Price
8.63p
Change
 
Mkt Cap (£m)
15.4
P/E (fwd)
n/a
Yield (fwd)
n/a



  Is Provexis fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


23 Comments on this Article show/hide all

rhomboid1 30th Dec '16 4 of 23
3

Really liked the dissection of Stanley Gibbons (LON:SGI) , I've never been able to understand the buy case here as the elephant in the room is inventory valuations which are incredibly subjective given how slow moving it has been over the years. If a disinterested 3rd party was doing the valuation I'd bet the provision resulting would tip the company into insolvency. As it is the Bank is showing remarkable forbearance imho.

Good luck to holders - my god you're risk tolerant!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 30th Dec '16 5 of 23
3

In reply to rhomboid1, post #4

Yes but Stanley Gibbons (LON:SGI) was well supported by a certain tipster in Investors Chronicle, I had quite a big argument with him about his reviews, they were all one sided. I longer subscribe to that publication. If you can see his reports then you will see the buy case.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Fangorn 30th Dec '16 6 of 23

Some superb articles,many thanks.

Stanley Gibbons, game over - most of its clientele no longer collecting stamps, and the new generations have scant interest to engage in such. It's therefore relied too much on "massive margins" on selling the rarer stamps to Chinese customers for example...

Dying hobby unfortunately thanks to technology?Xbox/Playstation et al.

Pity - was a great way to enhance ones geography knowledge in the first instance!

| Link | Share
JohnEustace 30th Dec '16 7 of 23
3

In reply to herbie47, post #5

I think when reading that tipster's articles we have to work on the basis that he is just writing down what the company management is telling him and reporting it without adding any judgement or value of his own. His Globo articles would be the best example of that.
I'm a lot happier with the sometimes opinionated debates here, but then I am someone who can enjoy a heated argument with himself before breakfast.

| Link | Share | 2 replies
herbie47 30th Dec '16 8 of 23

In reply to JohnEustace, post #7

I partly agree but he was just taking the good parts from a trading update or results and hyping them up and not mentioning any of the negatives, I really don't see the point, he does not even own any shares in companies he reports on. I was going to mention Globo, I fell out with a few people on their even got accused of being a shorter. Never did hear from them after it all blew up. I remember his headline "Short sellers in for shock treatment" I just knew what was going to happen.
I agree it's far better on here having debates on shares and much better for my investments. Stockopedia maybe a more expensive subscription but it is well worth it.

| Link | Share
Paul Scott 30th Dec '16 9 of 23
3

Hi Graham,

Excellent report, many thanks.

I've not looked at Provexis (LON:PXS) before - I agree with your general scepticism. Blue sky shares are usually a dead loss, apart from as speculations in a bull market, when you can catch a nice move up.

Stanley Gibbons (LON:SGI) - I totally agree with your conclusions. I think the balance sheet valuations are highly dubious. Stamp collecting is on its way out - the next generation are not likely to covet old stamps to anything like the sort of valuations that have previously pertained. Stamp collecting actually looks rather daft, in the modern world. What's the point?!

An interesting & well-written report, I enjoyed it. Thank you!

Best wishes, Paul.

| Link | Share
Paul Scott 30th Dec '16 10 of 23
5

In reply to JohnEustace, post #7

Hi,

Are you talking about Simon Thompson at the IC? If so, I think he's a great guy - does some really good reporting, and he covers a lot of ground. He's also a really nice chap - I met him in 2016 at a dinner, and found him a little shy at first, but I soon brought him out of his shell lol!

However, as he admitted himself, he's too trusting. So if a company or adviser tells him something, he believes it, and doesn't seem to stop and think whether things pass the common sense test.

That's a big flaw with UK small caps - where liars & con artists abound, so we have to be sceptical about everything, and I mean EVERYTHING.

I was more than a bit miffed that ST won the "journalist of the year" award for the 4th year on the trot, despite making disastrous & naive calls on Globo & Chinese AIM stocks. That made me realise that the award isn't worth winning!

Regards, Paul.

| Link | Share | 2 replies
JohnEustace 31st Dec '16 11 of 23
3

In reply to Paul Scott, post #10

Hi Paul,
Yes, that's him. I made a point of telling him "I told you so" about both the Chinese AIM and Globo debacles so I'm not saying anything I didn't already say directly to him both in advance of and subsequent to those things blowing up.
His response was that he was entitled to rely on the things that he was told by company management. I prefer your approach even if willingness to speak your mind wins less awards - it's the investment returns that really matter.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
jonesj 31st Dec '16 12 of 23
2

In reply to Paul Scott, post #10

Hi Paul,

A lot of material written by financial journalists is simply not worth reading. Also, they frequently have problems with basic numeracy. A classic example is the common use of linear scales on long term stock index graphs, when any fool can see a log scale is required.

The longer IC articles are usually worth reading, but I learn a lot more here.

In the last couple of years, the best material I have seen has been written by yourself. So thank you.

Best regards

Jeff

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Paul Scott 31st Dec '16 13 of 23
8

In reply to JohnEustace, post #11

Thanks John,

I like ST, so don't want to slag him off.

However, his approach is that of a studious bookworm - poring over the numbers, and believing any old crap that management & PR companies tell him. I'm a bit more street-wise, having actually run businesses & got stuck into major difficulties myself. So I can see through promoters & liars. Dodgy accounts stick out like a sore thumb to me.

The accounts tell the story very clearly - lots of stray debits on the balance sheet, is always a sign of inflated profits & management on the fiddle. Inflated debtors usually, plus excessive & rapidly growing intangible assets.

Daft people ignore all the evidence, and worse still they try to aggressively shout down critics.

I recall here, where I published 29 critical articles about Globo, there was a wobbly point, where bulls in the fraud tried to persuade Ed & Dave to sack me! They stuck to their guns, and backed me, and of course I was correct. We haven't heard from those muppets since.

Best wishes, Paul.






| Link | Share | 1 reply
Cisk 31st Dec '16 14 of 23

In reply to jonesjeff, post #12

Jeff, interesting comment about scales in graphs. Personally I've always preferred linear scales - why do you prefer log scales?

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Howard Adams 31st Dec '16 15 of 23
6

In reply to Paul Scott, post #13

Paul

You get my awards, without hesitation, and I'm sure many others of us.

You, and now latterly Graham, are a significant value-add to Stockopedia and I applaud Ed et al for having such intelligent, experienced (in the real world), honest and insightful writers.

Happy New Year
Howard

| Link | Share
jonesj 31st Dec '16 16 of 23
4

In reply to Cisk, post #14

Cisco, any long term index graphs of a few decades will, if plotted on a linear scales, look like there has been no performance for decades and huge returns late in the period. Even if performance has been relatively stable. If you had a hypithetical market which doubled every 10 years and plotted returns for a century on a log scale, you would get a straight line, which accurately represents steady returns.
If plotted on a linear scales, the line would be exponential, so you would not get an accurate perspective.

| Link | Share
garbetklb 31st Dec '16 17 of 23

I recall trying to engage with Simon about one of the more obvious wrong uns and i couldn't get anywhere, which I found disappointing. Some of his stuff is very useful, but some is naive.

I'm relatively new to investing (but not to the financial world) and have learned a lot from my mistakes - but even more from reading the articles by Paul & now Graham. And, especially, from the well written & intelligent comments, initially on Fool, now Stockopedia. I'm very happy with my Stockopedia sub - but would be interested in a level 2 extension, which was mentioned at some point? Another very useful service for PIs are the interviews by Paul, Share Radio & others - and the range of videos produced by my friends Tim & Tamzin.

Just to wish a Happy & Successful New Year to all!

Andy

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 31st Dec '16 18 of 23
1

In reply to garbetklb, post #17

The problem I found with him is he is reluctant to admit he has made a mistake and even when things are going wrong he is still promoting the positives, I'm sure this has cost investors a lot of money, I did get caught with one of his in the early days, think it was Thalassa Holdings (LON:THAL), you can read his reviews at 300p, 250p, 200p etc down to around 100p. I think his pick rate is not that good but if you exclude foreign companies and oil related it's probably fairly good. If I followed him I would probably have a stop loss at around 20% and I would ignore his reviews on falling shares. You can look at Globo, Stanley Gibbons (LON:SGI), Thalassa Holdings (LON:THAL), Vislink (LON:VLK), IOF reviews if you have an IC account. I can't remember a share where he has advised selling when it has only made a small loss, most of his sells after big hits. It's a pity because he does find some gems such as Ab Dynamics (LON:ABDP) and Burford Capital (LON:BUR) although he does seem to miss most of Paul's winners.

| Link | Share
jonesj 31st Dec '16 19 of 23
4

Concerning yourself with Simon Thompson's pick rate is not an effective use of time.
Even worse, trying to have a dialogue over the ones which didn't work. Ultimately they need to sell magazines & hence portray a positive stock picking record. Just keep that in mind and don't bother challenging it.

Much better to look at the analysis of the company & where it is coherent, consider buying.

I do prefer the style here. Short articles when there is nothing interesting to write about (or if Paul had a few the night before). No pressure to write to fill pages is much better than writing any old rubbish.
Then really high quality analysis.& some very good picks

| Link | Share | 1 reply
iwright7 1st Jan 20 of 23
3

In reply to jonesjeff, post #19

Yes I agree about ST's reluctance to call a sell and to spin a +ve story when the market says there their isn't one there. I have also noticed that Simon seems to take a lot of note of  brokers optimistic forecasts (maybe so he doesn't attract as much personal flack when things go wrong), rather than reporting on particularly attractive (or negative) fundamental metrics that he has uncovered. This is where Paul's commentary comes into its own to help identify (or not) companies with likely positive outcomes.

The 5 IC "Tips of the Week" are little better than random musings. Far better to paddle your own canoe and use the Stocko screening metrics and blog to identify the type of improving companies you prefer to invest in.  A very big thanks to the Stocko team and wishing all Stocko readers a very successful 2017.    Ian


| Link | Share
smatthews1 1st Jan 21 of 23

In reply to ridavies, post #3

Regardless whether they are rubbish shares, you can still learn alot . I know very soon if i like the company but will carry on reading just for the valuable analysis.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Wildrides 2nd Jan 22 of 23
1

For a long time SG have been buying up big stamp collections and creating a market that was not really there . Now its come back to bite them on the arse . The balance sheet is a giant stamp "ponsy" . Tom Winnifrith is a long term supporter though ..........work that one out ?

| Link | Share
ridavies 2nd Jan 23 of 23

In reply to smatthews1, post #21

Hi smatthews1. Agree ckmpletely. Read the reports form beginning to end though some I start with Opinion and work backwards. Admit to being biassed towards Provexis. A reco from a friend left me with egg on my face a while back, if you can suffer that fate from investing a small amount in a tomato based company and losing much of it. How a company can keep going achieving so little for is long is justa mazing to me!

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

 Are Provexis's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »



About Graham N

Graham N

Full-time investor and independent analyst. Prior to this, I spent seven years in the financial markets as an analyst and institutional fund manager. I'm CFA-qualified and hold an audited, FTSE-beating investment track record.  Away from finance, my main interests are recreational poker and everything to do with China, especially Mandarin Chinese. more »

Follow



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis