When Facing The Beast... Keep Calm And Carry On

16th Oct '14 by Edward Croft

29 comments 22602 reads

The recent share price volatility has rocked investors all around the world. The FTSE is now officially in correction mode, 11.5% down on just a couple of months ago with another terrifying plunge today. The viciousness of these price falls has led to huge trading volumes on exchanges as stop losses are hit and investors readjust their portfolios for seemingly escalating risk. At times like these shouldn't we just run for the exits?

The beast on wall street

Regular readers will know that I'm a fan of the late Professor Robert Haugen's work. Robert Haugen was one of the great financial academics who railed against the idea of efficient markets. Sadly much of his work has gone underappreciated by his peers due to his tendency for polemic, though more recently the rise of low-volatility funds has seen his star re-emerge.

One of the lesser known books he wrote was titled "Beast on Wall Street... how stock volatility devours our wealth". In it he illustrated with his custom panache how the prices of stocks are far more volatile than their underlying fundamentals can explain. What he found was that price volatility begets price volatility. The market watches and feeds on itself... to such an extent that it tends to be excessively volatile. He called this excess volatility 'the beast'.

During major volatility bursts I frequently get calls from the media asking for an explanation for the stock market's strange behaviour. In the case of 1987, they seemed to want to pin it on the federal deficit. Nonsense... The market was just going through a process of "scaring itself to death". It had done that many times before, and will do it many times again. The key thing to watch for is the dissipation of price-driven volatility. If it goes away things will be fine. And if it doesn't...

It's this excess volatility in the stock market which freaks everyone out, separates weak hands from their holdings and ensures that the stock market remains, on average, under-invested in. One of the main reasons the stock market outperforms other asset classes over the long term is how frightening the beast of volatility can be. It scares most investors off.

The press are of course scratching around to rationalise where this volatility is coming from. Ebola, German GDP, growth stutters, QE tapering etc etc. But this is what Nicholas Naseem Taleb in Black Swan calls…

Unlock with Email

Unlock with Google

Already have an account?
Login here

grumpy5

16th Oct '14

bsharman

'smart money'? I think you are endowing the closet trackers with too much craft! (Obviously as a herd they are slightly smarter than the most retail of retail investors...)

bsharman

This is why i put the 'smart money' in '' !! Perhaps it should be narrowed down to the likes of Warren Buffet, Neil Woodford, Mark Slater etc.. i.e. top performing managers. - see when they are moving into cash or buying in the market.

When will the Smart Money money module be available?

Thanks.

Cuthbert C

johnrosier

if you are invested in an index tracker then your approach is more robust

but if you are overweight in a sector which has just seen deterioration in some of the fundamentals then it is, IMHO, too optimistic to hope that it will recover with the rest of the market.

I see the current situation as the run up to an opportunity in sectors/stocks different from those I bailed out of.

Edward Croft

re. LTBH. Yes I am definitely an advocate of holding stocks through volatility. As long as :

1. You don't need the cash in the short or medium term.

2. Your portfolio is allied towards the core return drivers in the market - which can pull you out of trouble when it recovers.

Whatever you want to call it... GARP, QARP, QVM, Buffett's Alpha... buying quality, reasonably priced shares with growth potential builds a portfolio with the best chance of generating compounding, market beating & drop defying returns - again Haugen is particularly brilliant on this stuff, but so is Greenblatt or O'Shaughnessy. If you can practice a strategy like this in smallcaps or midcaps all the better. 2008 hurt everyone, but plenty managed to bounce back using the right approach.

Classic public examples are the records of any of the GARPY small cap fund managers like Giles Hargreave... 2008 was just a blip, within 3 years he was in credit again. He's managed 8.8% annualised over a decade - it's not massive returns but he did it owning 600 stocks and through the worst bear market in recent history ! That 8.8% compounded has led to 220% appreciation since 2004 (and 2009). Of course fund managers HAVE to stay invested... so they don't have any choice but keep their money in stocks - we on the other hand have to deal with the devil on our shoulder who keeps wanting to bail out.

543fe1751d1d4Fundswire__Giles_Hargreave_

All of the above comes with the caveat that if the world ends and the financial Ponzi scheme implodes I am not to be held responsible for the failure of above mentioned strategies.

raggedtp

It all depends on your natural psychological make-up, but dare I say, this is when over-diversification can help? I read your article on that with interest, Ed, and I follow John's Investment Chronicle as well. I know I am "over-diversified", but with c. 35 high-yield stocks and 10 growth or speculative ones with little or no yield, and a portfolio-wide nett current yield around 5%, I feel OK. Yes, I can kick myself for not having more cash, but what's the point? Market-timing is the hardest thing of all. Even Stockopedia's excellent Guruscreens are having a tough time recently.

Multi-baggers are the siren-call. With most stocks varying 40% in a year anyway (which itself disproves EMT for me), who needs them? Just make sure this is 'patient' capital, though.

iwright7

tournesol,

Re your comment about going back to cash and waiting it out...

"I have spent the past few hours compiling a list of good quality stocks with solid yields which have fallen significantly and already look like bargains".

I curious which are the top 3 shares you have earmarked as being bargains now and why?

Ian

rick

I think tournesol has a valid point. Many times in the past I have got to the "bottom" (however you want to define it) only to find the bombed out stocks that I currently own are not the ones I want to own. They may have had their "day" so to speak and do not either meet my investment criteria anymore or are not in the sectors that are currently performing the best in the new market environment. So in a market like this having a high cash position is actually not such a bad thing IMO.

nigelpm

Superb post. I've been amazed at the recent panicking by so called investors who one minute are singing the praises of the latest oil stock and then the next selling everything. Each to their own but if you are invested in highly geared sectors you have to expect volatility.

Question for those who sell - when are you going to buy back in? The market doesn't hold aloft a flag saying buy me now.

emptyend

I'm pretty surprised at the reaction of (apparently) a good number of retail investors. Granted I'm in the unusual position of my second-largest holding having gone up significantly in recent weeks and my largest holding having fallen by "only" 20% net (in a sector where 25-50% has been quite common), but I do find it curious that there is a rush to dump stocks.

I'm a bit surprised that nobody (this time!!) seems to have invoked the ghost of Black Monday to explain yet another sharp fall in October - but perhaps it is because it is an odd number of years ago rather than a headline-friendly 25 or 30 years!?

It seems to me that the trading community must take a fair share of the blame (or credit?) for kicking things off in October. Low VIX has been pretty common in recent years, so arguably the market is easy to catch off-guard if a major move can be generated out of nothing. Personally I don't think it is a coincidence that October seems a favourite time for these surprises - being a couple of months before books close for year-end, this is the last opportunity in a year to trigger a big move because we have a short window of relatively high liquidity between the summer hols and the year-end book-closing.

This time around, there has been some real economic concerns overlaid on the harder-to-read OPEC politics and ebola epidemic.....so if a bit of uncertainty and concern can be generated by traders then it is quite easy to start a panic.

So well done the Saudis (and, no doubt, their bankers and insider friends in hedge funds). But I don't think there is any change to the 12 month view of markets - just that many stocks are now 10-20% cheaper than they were. So perhaps a good base to build from?

muckshifter

17th Oct '14

Surely there is nothing inconsistent in a LTBH strategy but occasionally getting out and into cash when you are convinced that a crash is imminent. The problem then becomes, how imminent is imminent, but usually when you take such action it is after a long spell of expectation and resisting the urge to sell when it would be too early.

I've sold out twice, in July of 87 (think that was the year - the October crash year) and October 07, and sat through the most obvious one - the TMT bubble bursting, because I had no relevant shares. It used to be made more difficult because of ISA rules about staying in cash, which meant that you had to subsequently "show willing" within a reasonable period, but that rule has been dropped in a short burst of common sense within the political establishment.

Twice in forty years doesn't negate LTBH as a strategy, imho, but it should be a rare occurrance .
Regards.

PS. Nice article ED.

FWIW, Muckshifter, I did similarly.

October 2007 was one I was very glad to have spotted - but then I didn't sell absolutely everything (except in the pension fund) - and then I didn't buy back in in 2009 either, as I'd originally thought. Inertia often is a factor, when there are few alarm bells being rung.

DJLJ23

Long term hold is a great idea, but sometimes you have to think about wether or not a stock is going to recover suffiently to get your money back in a realistic time frame. Overcoming your own convictions can sometimes be the most difficult decesion. The simple chart below helps me to be focused.

Investment Reduction "Increase
required"
£1,000.00 25% £750.00 33%
£1,000.00 30% £700.00 43%
£1,000.00 35% £650.00 54%
£1,000.00 40% £600.00 67%
£1,000.00 45% £550.00 82%
£1,000.00 50% GBP500.00 100%
£1,000.00 55% £450.00 122%
£1,000.00 60% £400.00 150%
£1,000.00 65% £350.00 186%
£1,000.00 70% £300.00 233%
£1,000.00 75% £250.00 300%
£1,000.00 80% £200.00 400%

Paul Scott

Hi,

Learning from mistakes I've made in the past, these days I tend to liquidate (or heavily reduce) any geared positions when the market starts to wobble. Or if this is not practical due to wide bid/offer spreads and/or lack of market liquidity, then I might hedge by buying Put Options on an Index.

However, for ungeared accounts, then I wouldn't react to a market correction at all. I'd just re-assess each position in turn, and providing the fundamentals are unchanged, then I would ride out the downturn and not do anything.

Then as the correction reaches its capitulation phase (which we had a day or two ago, when the Dow spiked down almost 500 points intra day, then bounced strongly), I would make a list of stocks that have been spuriously sold off and are now too cheap, and then plunge in with my geared account & buy up everything on my list! (that's what I've done this morning incidentally, and have picked up some excellent bargains).

So in a way, the above is a hybrid approach that seems to side-step serious problems by not being geared in a downturn. But the availability of gearing gives scope to buy bargains at the lows.

This strategy would only go wrong if the market was going to do a series of sell-offs, like it did in 2007-8 due to some major underlying fundamental factor going wrong. But in all other circumstances, it should work well for market corrections - so to summarise, I'm suggesting holding long-term positions in ungeared accounts, but dumping geared/trading positions at the first sign of trouble, and then re-deploying that capital once the market has capitulated on the downside & the forced sellers have been cleared out.

Regards, Paul.

Like it paul. Takes guts to gear up in volatile markets but that's what made you your first million. If I recall correctly?

MichaelFBS

18th Oct '14

'nobody (this time!!) seems to have invoked the ghost of Black Monday'. Maybe because 27 years ago most of today's traders were in short pants?:-).

Hi Paul,

I'd agree with all of that - though I don't run any gearing at all myself. As I noted many years ago, there is enough embedded leverage in an E&P portfolio anyway ;-)

One thing that these sharp corrections do (as your comments and those of others elsewhere illustrate) is blow away all the leveraged and stale positions and cut the market back to a decent base.

As I've also previously noted, when I can spot a 20% move in advance (as in Oct 2007 and 1989) I will try to trade out and back in myself - but I have to say that I didn't see this one coming (and it hasn't got to 20% down for me anyway).

I'm pretty relaxed, especially as I'm expecting some fundamental good news (re SOCO International (LON:SIA) ) in the coming months

rgds

flyinghorse

20th Oct '14

Reference SOCO,its interesting that the directors aren't filling their short's (with shares) suggesting that they may be party ("interested party") to something that restricts them from trading. The Congo well results are out and the share price is very tempting.
regards,
FH

21st Oct '14

The well "results" aren't out yet, FH. I'd be sure they still consider themselves to be in a close period - and may well still be so until after next month's IMS.

Yes indeed-I was jumping the gun on my mental interpretation of fracing a tight zone. At least we can top up.
FH

When facing the beast... keep calm and carry on

The beast on wall street

Unlock the rest of this article with a 14 day trial

About the Author

Edward Croft

29 comments

Unlock the metrics for all these stocks and more...

Unlock the metrics for all these stocks and more...