12
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2015 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

An analysis of Laura Ashley

Laura Ashley (ALY) has been catching my eye on a number of screens for a good while now and I have finally decided to have a closer look. The company, at first glance, appears to be modestly valued, is paying generous dividends and has excellent returns on capital; all characteristics I look for in a business.  While the business is involved in fashion and retail, which are generally industries that I dislike, there is clearly something about Laura Ashley that allows it more consistent revenues and returns on capital than its average competitor.

Screen Summary:

  • At a PE ratio of 11.9x, the business appears to be trading cheaply relative to earnings.
  • A PS ratio of 0.72 confirms this further.
  • The return on capital of 39% is fantastic, and while the operating margin of 8% is less so, it is still good for the industry.
  • The PB ratio of 4.93x is very high, but once you consider that most of earnings are paid out as dividends, and therefore that little is taken to retained earnings, this makes a bit more sense.

Company Background

Laura Ashley began operating in the mid 1950’s and has since grown to be a well known and respected brand that is popular throughout the UK.  In addition to fashion, where the company’s roots lie, Laura Ashley has spread out and their divisions now include furniture, home accessories and decorating.  In fact, fashion currently makes up only about 17% of UK revenue, with a further 60% coming from furniture and home accessories combined, and the remainder belonging to decorating.

In addition to broadening its operations in the UK, the business has also grown overseas, with franchise operations all over the world currently generating around 10% of group sales. Efforts have been made to improve the company’s online presence too, with 17.8% of UK sales now coming from online sales.

The Market

The fashion industry is one that I intuitively am not very comfortable with, largely because I do not understand it.  For example, if you were to show me two dresses, I would be totally unable to predict which would sell and which would not.  A fundamental rule I follow is that if I don’t understand the product and why it sells, then I won’t invest – I know that dresses seem simple but don’t be fooled.

I suppose I believe that the companies themselves have a hard time making such predictions, and I just feel that a business where the management do not even know what their customers will want next year is far more likely to make serious mistakes than one that does.

The Business Model

So it is for the above reason that I usually ignore fashion companies but Laura Ashley, as touched on before, appears to have something a little bit different.  It has created a small niche for itself within the UK market through establishing a recognisable and distinct style and brand name.  While I think this strategy will forever limit the maximum size of the business (not everyone wants Laura Ashley), it appears to have succeeded in providing more consistent sales and profits which appeals to me greatly as an investor.  While I am no fashionista, I am able to understand that there is consistent demand for the products, and this is substantiated by the company’s revenue and the dividends it pays.

The business has performed a similar trick with it’s furniture and home accessories divisions, with all products being distinctly in the Laura Ashley style to appeal to its target market.  While still not my favourite sector, I much prefer this side of the business as I think that the industry is a little more predictable – thankfully it represents the majority of sales.  Further supporting this part of the business are the two hotels that Laura Ashley is now involved with.  The hotels are Laura Ashley branded and all the furniture in the hotels is supplied by Laura Ashley; the hotels therefore act as show rooms in addition to providing an extra couple of million pounds in revenue which is quite a neat idea I think.

Finally, international operations have been successful to date, although there is certainly further room for growth here.  As has been evidenced by the relative success in Japan, there is demand for British designs in some parts of Asia, particularly where the middle class is growing rapidly.  I would argue that the predominantly Malaysian shareholders are well aware of this and there may be some welcome expansion in the region over the years to come.

Recent Concerns

The company recently announced that it was buying a ~ £31.1m property in Singapore, which came as a surprise to many investors and prompted a dramatic 10% fall in the share price.  I have read both positive and negative speculation regarding the decision, and am still unsure as to what the true motivation behind the move was.

If the purchase was the result of a simple capital budgeting decision, and it was determined that with current interest rates it would be cheaper to buy a property instead of renting one, then the move could prove sensible in the long run.

If the purchase was a speculative one, and the management team made the purchase simply with the intent of leasing the property out or turning a profit on its sale, then I would argue that this is not a responsible use of shareholder’s funds.

Alternatively, the deal could potentially be seen as cover for fraudulent behavior of some kind and the office space does seem large for a company that is generating the vast majority of it’s revenue in the UK.

With current information, the picture is not at all clear so I will have to do a bit more work before making a decision.  We have now seen, with this transaction, that the management team and majority shareholders are happy to do as they wish without prior warning.  Therefore, should we invest, it is vital to try and understand their incentives to avoid a scenario where unfavourable action is taken without warning, leaving us nursing losses.

Concluding Thoughts

Overall, I like the company and am impressed by it’s consistent revenue and dividends.  The dividend yield alone, at 6.72%, is one of the best out there and offers attractive returns by itself.  Other sources of gains could be any growth in earnings or book value, assuming the business is successful in expanding further overseas, and any increase in the earnings multiple from it’s relatively low current position.

Potential agency issues, however, are a big concern for me and I will have to conduct additional research to obtain an understanding of the real intentions of the directors and majority shareholders, in addition to my usual analysis.

Hope you enjoyed the article, if so then please share it with your network and feel free to leave any comments or questions below!

At the time of writing I do not hold a position in Laura Ashley Holdings – LON:ALY


It is important to note that all opinions expressed in this piece are the opinion of the author only and do not, in any way, constitute investment advice.  Any individual seeking to make investments of any kind should conduct thorough proprietary research so as to fully understand the risks they are taking.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

7 comments


Avatar for hawkipa

Good article and very much enjoyed hearing your thoughts Jane. I look forward to seeing your further analysis Tom.

2
Avatar for janebolacha

Tom, thank you.
I look forward to reading your further analysis.

You might be interested in this case study paper on Laura Ashley,
mostly covering the 1990's but giving some background
into how MUIB came to be involved in Laura Ashley:

https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/KOLB/downloads/private/grant/lauraashley.pdf

It's a management paper, rather than strictly a "figures" one but I found much that is relevant still to Laura Ashley today.

As a kind of outsider, not having lived in UK for quite some time,
I tend to be fortunately detached from "brands" that are within the UK experience
and so perhaps I look at companies such as Laura Ashley in a different way.
In that paper, I was struck by the fact that their annual turnover has been in the range
of £250m-350m for the last twenty-five years! So I question the real growth value within
the name and the brand internationally. That paper also refers to failed overseas
expansion in North America (which would, one would think, be just the market
for such a quintessentially British brand).

Good luck with your investing,
Jane.

0
Avatar for Tom Firth

That looks like a good read, thanks for the link and I will be sure to have a look as soon as I can. If revenue has been stuck in that kind of range for so long then I certainly don't view that as a positive - I was aware it had been quite stagnant for a number of years but 25 is something else altogether!

It's interesting what you say about not having lived in the UK for some time, I don't view myself as being enamoured with the Laura Ashley brand by any means (I've never bought a product), but the fact that I am British, have seen the shops and am aware of its presence quite possibly does have some psychological influence on my decision making.

Ben Graham put it far better than I ever could: "The investor's chief problem - even his worst enemy - is likely to be himself."

Good luck to you too,

Tom

0
Avatar for janebolacha

Tom, I view different shares as being competitors for my money and go with those I find fundamentally convincing as businesses and as managements, perhaps irrespective of what may well be momentary snapshots of their finances and results (although I tend towards the classic "growth and value" stock but only, only after having done my "business and management" exercise).

I have doubts over the experience, capacity and capability of MUIB, the 40% Malaysian shareholder now effectively running the business, to implement a major expansion of the international franchising business. The last results seem to demonstrate that the Laura Ashley brand is far from being resistant to general economic turndowns in individual countries in Asia. In addition, I fear that they are coming to the party in China really very late indeed, perhaps just when the punchbowl is being taken away. India, well perhaps, but do they or MUIB have any ideas about that particular market that would bring success?

I don't understand the Singapore property purchase which seems to have been presented as somehow necessary to achieve this expansion ambition in Asia. We're talking of a franchising operation, remember. Why would a property of this size, costing (with fees) close to £35m, be needed to administer the Asian end of a pure franchising operation? It presumably would not be an intermediate warehouse, businesses don't work that way these days. So why? A few commercial and admin staff, perhaps but no more. No answers why.

The UK end of the business has recovered over the last few years. I can understand ALY thinking, well, what's next? Their strategy does not convince.

1
Avatar for Tom Firth

Excellent, thanks for the response again. I view shares in a fairly similar way to you but I like your competitor analogy, haven't phrased it quite like that to myself before! In particular, I am with you 100% on the necessity of understanding and evaluating a business's strategy in order to determine the sustainability of current earnings and the likelihood of future growth. As an auditor by trade I am perpetually reviewing accounts a year in arrears and have seen all too many times how recent results are not indicative of future performance.

I have nothing to add on MUIB at this point as I don't know much about them - I will do my homework and get back to you on that one or try to address it in a later piece of analysis.

Yes, the property transaction is odd and I agree with your logic, it doesn't quite add up in my eyes either. Further work is also required on this before any kind of decision can be made. I do feel that it is better to be safe than sorry though and unless some transparency is brought to bear on the situation I think I will just have to give this one a miss.

The only point I have to add/emphasise is that I don't think the business requires enormous growth to represent a good investment opportunity - I am viewing the potential for growth internationally as a real option thrown in with the rest of the deal. If the UK business continues as it has done and keeps paying out the current dividends, then simply the dividend yield is appealing.

Further, if the UK business is undervalued (and please note that I haven't done the work on this point yet beyond reviewing earnings multiples), then simply the market recognising the fair value of the UK business could provide satisfactory capital gains in addition to the dividends. However, if the company do pursue an ineffective international growth strategy (as you fear they will), then I do think that the UK business would suffer as a result.

2
Avatar for janebolacha


Tom, I know that international expansion via franchising is the route the directors of ALY seem to have embarked on but is it really proving to be successful?

This is from their latest accounts:

"International Operations

Generating 10.3% of total Group revenue, our international Franchising operations are a very important part of our business and, as at 31 January 2015, there were 303 (2014: 286) franchised stores in 30 territories worldwide. Further franchise agreements are expected to be signed later this year.



In spite of overall store growth, franchise revenues fell by 1.5% to £27.8 million over the year. This was largely due to a weaker Japanese economy and the challenges facing some mainland European economies.



Licensing income increased by 3.0% to £3.4 million reflecting good levels of organic growth amongst a stable Licensee base. Several new License agreements are expected to be approved during the current year."

Number of international franchised stores up by 6% but revenues from them down by 1.5%?
This needs further thought, imo.

1
Avatar for Tom Firth

Hi Jane,

Thanks for your comments - I have read the accounts and agree with everything you have said and I appreciate the balance as always. Certainly, at the current point in time, the business is not a fast growing one and hasn't been for a long time. UK operations in particular are undoubtedly mature and unlikely to grow significantly I think.

What interests me most about the opportunity is not that growth is guaranteed, however, but that the security may be priced at a level that provides downside protection in addition to the possibility of a growth scenario going forwards.

If you were to hold the shares from the current price, and assuming the current dividend is sustainable, then the dividend yield in and of itself will provide quite a satisfactory return. Add to this a potential growth scenario, and you have what may be a good investment case.

As Mohnish Pabrai likes to say, it could be a "heads I win, tails I don't lose much" type of situation. The chance for capital gains come from the possibility of growth, while income from the stable, mature UK business would protect to the downside.

Of course, I have yet to perform a valuation myself to gain further comfort over the current price. Additionally, I have not done significant work on the sustainability of cash flows for dividends. These would be the critical questions to answer I feel for the investment thesis I've outlined here.

What are you thoughts on this? Out of interest, do you have any opinions on the recent property acquisition too?

Have a good day for now,

Tom

1
Get the free newsletter