As Brexit beckons… what’s in store for the market?
It’s been just over three years since the EU referendum but it’s still not clear what Britain’s exit from the EU will really look like - assuming, of course, that it happens at all.
This week, as we edge closer to the next notional departure date on October 31st, we might learn more about the details. And from that, it may just be possible to make a few predictions about how the stock market will react (although there are still plenty of unknowns).
Brexit has been an enigma for equity investors since the starting gun was fired in June 2016. Back then, the 52/48 victory for ‘leave’ wrongfooted the market and caused sterling to slump and index prices to tumble.
Stocks sensitive to the UK economy were hit very hard the day after the vote. Banks like Barclays and Lloyds saw their prices fall by around 20 percent. There were similar swings in cyclicals like the housebuilder Persimmon, recruitment group Hays and the car dealer Pendragon.
But the effects were short-lived and the FTSE All-Share, although volatile, has gone on to rise by 23 percent since then.
Among the many questions now - with an exit possibly just days away - is how much of the impact of Brexit is priced-in to the market? And what kind of upside or downside could be on the cards in the weeks ahead?
Reality starts to bite
Trying to infer anything from the morass of political briefings, media reports and ‘expert’ commentary (let alone social media) is hard work when it comes to Brexit. But as the clock ticks down, there is evidence that the market is paying close attention to the mood music around the negotiations.
One important barometer here is the value of sterling, which has tended to be sensitive to which way the Brexit wind is blowing. The prospect of a deal between the UK and the EU, with the relative certainty that would bring to the domestic economy, has generally lifted the value of the pound. Indeed, with the possibility of a deal in sight, there’s been a relatively sharp rise in the value of sterling over the past week. That said, if a deal fails to materialise, it’s arguable that the pound will come under pressure. But what does all this mean for shares?
Source: IG Group
Well, in tandem with the rise in sterling in recent days, the mid-cap FTSE 250 index has seen the strongest gains versus the FTSE 100 and FTSE SmallCap. Part of the reason for this is down to the nature of the stocks in that index.
You sometimes see the FTSE 250 described as a proxy for the UK economy. It’s fair to say that it’s nowhere near as internationally exposed as the FTSE 100. But revenues across the FTSE 250 index are actually evenly split between domestic and international sources. So there’s an argument that the FTSE 250, as a whole, has a lot to gain from a deal because of the certainties over international trade that would come with it.
By contrast, the FTSE 100, with its financial strength and international outlook, is perhaps generally better insulated from a no-deal event. After all, it’s home to a number of stocks that aren’t overly-exposed to the UK and derive a large proportion of their revenues in foreign territories.
Another reason why the FTSE 250 may have picked up on the prospect of an agreement is that it’s more cyclical in nature than the FTSE 100. John Kingham (UK Value Investor) has done an excellent summary on the sector weighting of the UK market’s main indices.
In essence, the FTSE 100 is a naturally defensive index given its exposure to sectors like healthcare, tobacco, beverages and utilities. By comparison, the FTSE 250 is much more heavily weighted in cyclical and sensitive sectors like support services, financials, retail and construction. These sectors, among others, would benefit from the pound holding up and the economy remaining relatively unscathed by Brexit.
Being precise about how things may go is tricky, but some researchers have given it a shot. Work by the index provider MSCI last week, stress-tested different potential scenarios that may follow Brexit. It found that a disruptive no-deal could weaken the UK stock market by 15 percent and see the pound fall by 10 percent against the dollar. But in the case of a last-minute deal between the two sides, the UK market could bounce by 10 percent, with the pound rising by eight percent against the dollar.
Taking a defensive position
So what is the market saying right now? The classic safe haven stocks in times of economic strife tend to be those defensive names that don’t do so well in booms, but hold up a lot better in uncertainty. You can find them among the healthcare, consumer defensives and utilities sectors.
In this screen table you can see the fastest moving defensive stocks in the FTSE 100 over the past month (on a relative price strength basis). Selecting those with a RiskRating of either Balanced or Conservative (the lowest volatility stocks on the RiskRatings spectrum) it’s the usually unremarkable utilities stocks that are leading the pace in the current conditions. With reasonable yields, utilities are probably among the most defensive of safe havens when it comes to shares.
Name | Mkt Cap £m | Yield % Rolling | Stock Rank™ | Risk Rating | RS 1m | Sector |
13,641 | 6.7 | Balanced | +12.5 | Utilities | ||
5,901 | 4.8 | Balanced | +11.8 | Utilities | ||
5,360 | 4.3 | Balanced | +11.7 | Utilities | ||
31,099 | 5.4 | Conservative | +9.32 | Utilities | ||
23,916 | 3.0 | Balanced | +2.97 | Consumer Defensives |
But are are other trends. Recent signals of a possible Brexit deal saw shares in housebuilders, banks, insurance groups and even some retailers rise sharply. You can see a flavour of that in this screen table, which looks for the strongest 1-month performers in FTSE 350 cyclical stocks with Balanced, Adventurous and Speculative RiskRatings. Despite the unpredictable conditions, some cyclical stocks are seeing strong gains.
Name | Mkt Cap £m | Yield % Rolling | Stock Rank™ | Risk Rating | RS 1m | Sector |
830.2 | 3.6 | Adventurous | +16.9 | Consumer Cyclicals | ||
7,581 | 9.9 | Balanced | +14.6 | Consumer Cyclicals | ||
1,067 | 5.6 | Balanced | +14.2 | Basic Materials | ||
9,060 | 2.5 | Adventurous | +13.7 | Consumer Cyclicals | ||
2,033 | 2.2 | Adventurous | +13.6 | Consumer Cyclicals | ||
1,772 | - | Adventurous | +13.3 | Consumer Cyclicals | ||
42,590 | 5.48 | Balanced | +12.9 | Financials |
Ready for anything?
Putting politics to one side, the prospect of Brexit (or whatever follows from negotiations between the UK and the EU) presents some interesting challenges to stock market investors. These could be short-term in nature or have longer-lasting repercussions, but anticipating the prospect of volatility could be a helpful way of managing it. Over the coming weeks, the market could be in for an unpredictable ride - so it’s worth considering whether your portfolio is ready for it.
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

16 comments
UK Agriculture is very vulnerable to Brexit and although companies like NWF and Wynnstay are well managed i am staying clear of them
More ports issues reported, this is a trend that doesn't seem to be getting any better.
Honda pauses production after UK port woes
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/bus...
Seems an appropriate time to resurrect this thread with just over three weeks to go until the UK leaves the EU.
I was talking to a window shutters supplier yesterday that is facing delays as his containers can't be delivered into the UK, and were diverted to Antwerp with no new shipping date in sight as the UK ports are full of empty crates and don't have the capacity right now. This is corroborated by numerous articles I've seen:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/dec/07/builders-run-short-of-supplies-as-uk-port-holdups-raise-brexit-concerns
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54908129
https://theloadstar.com/congestion-problems-at-uk-ports-stacking-up-as-rising-imports-drive-delays/
So in theory this should affect any importer of unfinished or finished goods who won't be able to supply their end customers until well into next year, which I'm sure is a pretty long list. Of my holdings I suspect Tandem (LON:TND) might suffer, whilst house builders reliant on the import of much of their produce and tools will slow their completion rates... What might be a quicker exercise is to know which of your holdings do not rely on importing into the UK and are producing and selling goods in or close to their end market. Volex (LON:VLX) is probably a good example of this.
Am i being overly simplistic in my view or are there other complexities and nuances to consider? And which firms will suffer less, or perhaps flourish, from 1st January ??
Am i being overly simplistic in my view or are there other complexities and nuances to consider? And which firms will suffer less, or perhaps flourish, from 1st January ??
Simplistic perhaps, but I sympathise, it's genuinely difficult to say what the impacts will be. The choice is really between a Hard Brexit with a deal and no deal, probably the main difference will be the attitude of the two sides when they recommence negotiating next year. As my Swiss friends delight in telling me, negotiations with the EU are never finished, it's a constant and ongoing process.
Personally I avoid most manufacturing companies so the import / export issues don't really worry me as an investor. What is concerning is the lack of detail on services. As an example (and I'm afraid this is tortuous) consider financial services.
The UK has granted full passport rights to European financial firms so they can operate in the UK without setting up here but the EU has so far declined to reciprocate and to offer equivalence. Effectively that means that any UK financial services company has to set up a subsidiary (no boilerplate companies allowed) in each EU state it wishes to operate it (or move to Europe, which is unlikely for most).
Obviously the UK can withdraw passporting rights from European firms. However, that still means that a Euro domiciled company only has to set up in the UK once, while any UK company will have to set up in as many countries as they wish to operate in. This difference doesn't seem to be appreciated by a lot of commentators who persist in discussing the EU as though it's one country.
For a lot of things - including financial services - the EU can significantly increase the costs of operating for UK companies by dint of simply doing nothing. In most areas European nations have their own regulations which, where applicable, are overridden by EU directives so a major major benefit of an EU trade deal is that companies in third countries only have to deal with one set of regulations rather than 27.
In financial services the EU has only granted equivalence on clearing houses and that is clearly out of self-interest. Other areas such as investment banking and trading stocks and derivatives have not been included so, for instance, European investors won't be allowed to use the LSE to trade stocks in their own currency (they can use sterling but that's only 1% of EU trading activity).
The counterpoint to this, potentially, is that Brexit allows us to sign deals covering financial services with other countries. It would be a better argument if we'd seen any such deals in the five years since we were able to start negotiating (noting that such deals could only be signed from the beginning of this year). We have agreed a deal with Japan but no one actually seems to be able to say what that means for financial services even though it's explictly called out. Other than that the deal appears to be a cut and paste of the EU's deal with Japan with the UK getting any quotas left over from what the EU doesn't use in its deal.
Anyway, we are where we, it will be what it will be. I'm hopeful that most of the damage has already been done and that any kind of settlement will see a bounce in the UK markets. But nobody really knows, this is only the end of the beginning, the hard work starts next year.
timarr
Poms have the best humour.
I have been moving capital from UK shares to US/European (& particularly Swiss stock) since 2016 .. a slow process in the attempt to buy on dips. I wonder how many have been doing likewise?
It's clear that SP of the big UK companies trading outside the UK has done well due the weak pound and my portfolio has benefited. The last week though has seen the big defensive names have come under pressure (e.g. Diagio/Unilever etc) ... very hard to predict what's next ... sure domestic mid stocks may benefit... but beyond that who knows?
Three and a bit years ago when we had the vote to leave, the house builder share prices dropped dramatically. At this same time I had been helping my son to find a new house in the South Manchester area. I could see how the help to buy scheme had created massive demand from first time buyers, and the builders had stopped keeping waiting lists. When a new house was released you had to turn up sharpish with a deposit and letter from the bank to show you could get a loan. To me it was clear that the city had over reacted. I bought into 4 different house builders the day after the downgrading and made a very nice profit over the preceding 3-4 months.
A deal to leave the EU will be another boost for house builders, as so many have delayed buying a house because of the Brexit uncertainty. I am poised to buy into house builders again if Boris gets his deal today.
Brexit with a deal by 31 October can still result in a No Deal Brexit - as John Barron MP outlined on Newsnight. He and other ERG spartans are likely to block the legislation needed for the deal to take effect (if they can), resulting in leaving on WTO terms at the end of 2020. How long will it take the markets to realise this?
Be great to get an Aussie perspective.
" if we end up with 'No Deal' our FTSE 100, commodities and US investments will perhaps gain a quick 10%."
were hoping for an American deal while theyre simultaneously putting trade tariffs on us, particularly scotland for some reason
... if we end up with 'No Deal' our FTSE 100, commodities and US investments will perhaps gain a quick 10%. If we get a deal, or just stay in the EU, the same investments could fall overnight by 8%.
Not necessarily. We don't know how disruptive no-deal will be in terms of tariffs and friction at the border.
Up until now movements in sterling have fed directly through to company profits, but obviously that won't be the same once we're trading on WTO terms. Backlogs at the border due to issues importing from the EU could also have knock-on impacts on non-EU imports.
And, of course, as most of us have at least some investments in non-overseas assets any gains would have to compensate for the +15% fall elsewhere.
But it's all nonsense really. There are simply too many moving parts to come up with any realistic forecasts.
timarr
Thanks Ben. In summary, if we end up with 'No Deal' our FTSE 100, commodities and US investments will perhaps gain a quick 10%. If we get a deal, or just stay in the EU, the same investments could fall overnight by 8%. Everything hinges on. the GBP:USD ratio.
Exciting times, especially for anyone who's heavily leveraged.
Hi Ben,
“With reasonable yields, utilities are probably among the most defensive of safe havens when it comes to shares”
Not sure these traditional rules will apply in the event of a Corbyn/McDonnell led Labour government. A defensive safe haven that runs the risk of being expropriated at less than market value doesn’t look much of a safe investment! Buying utility stocks is surely a gamble on the probability of a Labour government and given the recent history of ‘shocks’ (Brexit referendum, Trump election, etc. ) it is not a gamble I am prepared to take.
Too true, I sold SSE on 2nd August due to poor results, cut in dividend and fear of a Labour government led by JC and that awful McDonnell who has no economic nouse whatsoever. Master stroke on my part as since then SSE has been on a ride up and my next investment hasn't performed so well.
Looking at the unreliable polls though suggests that Boris has a notable lead over Corbyn which reduces the risk of a Labour government. "A week is a long time in politics" and I shouldn't really let it influence my investment decisions too much (?).
I suspect Labour have little chance of forming a majority after the next GE and therefore of implementing their policy of nationalisation.
Damn it.... I just made a longish post.....went to another page to check a memory of The Zulu Principle and lost the lot....yes I know I should have used Ctrl-C, usually do because of this.
Might face up to it again later.......Grrrrrr......