BP Marsh - Profiting from an unglamorous but lucrative niche

Here’s another brief stock pitch for you! BPM joined my watchlist this year, and I have recently invested in it for the second time. Here is an overview.

Disclosure: At the time of publication, I have a long position in BPM.


6b465814-ab81-462d-a00e-5b4c52efde05.png

The Pitch

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) is a specialist investor in the insurance sector, typically investing in early-stage managing general agents (MGAs) and related insurance sector operators: brokers, underwriting agents, and other intermediaries.

It’s not an “exciting” or “hot” investment sector, but it has generated very considerable returns for BPM and its shareholders since inception in 1994. Focusing on the last ten years only, the annualised total return for shareholders is in the region of 17%.

4ff910e3-7014-4e79-ad26-8b144f307376.png

With the share price having paused for breath since reaching £7 for the first time in December 2024, I think it again offers very interesting risk:reward possibilities at the current level.

The most recent half-year results, to July 2025, showed the company having a net asset value of £349.5m, or NAV per share of 956.1p. That compares with a market cap today of £237m, and a share price of 658.5p.

If I adjust the NAV per share for the 29p of dividends that the shares have earned since then, and assume no underlying growth in the past six months, I get a current share price discount to NAV of 29%.

The Big Picture

As of July 2025 the company’s portfolio, including cash, looked like this:

8ba2dbef-5b9b-4c55-9bf3-4f7edee727a9.png

Pantheon: not to be confused with the private equity firm Pantheon Ventures and its various investment vehicles, this is Pantheon Specialty Group Limited (website). This important holding, where BPM has a 39% stake, is valued at £105.5m. Pantheon has been highly profitable in recent years and contributed nearly half of BPM’s operating income in FY January 2025.

Cash: I should also highlight the large cash balance. After previous successful investments generated heavy cash flow, BPM has been engaging in a mix of dividends, buybacks and new investment activity, with new investments remaining front and centre. The recent trading update for FY January 2026 disclosed that BPM had funds of £49.5m even after making £37.8m of new equity investments and increasing the value of its loan portfolio by over £12m.

It is planned that the company will pay £13m of dividends in FY27, and then perhaps as little as £5m in FY2028 (in the absence of major disposals). Staying largely invested in an appreciating portfolio of insurance investments remains the priority, as always.

A tradition of stewardship

Brian Marsh OBE was Executive Chairman of BPM from 1990 to 2025, only recently becoming non-Executive Chairman.

The change in leadership might be seen as a risk were it not for the fact that Mr. Marsh has been preparing his successors for many years.

  • CEO Dan Topping joined the company in 2007, and has been Chief Investment Officer since 2016.
  • COO Alice Foulk joined the company in 2011, becoming Managing Director in 2016.
  • The relative "newcomer" on the team is the CFO Francesca Chappell, who didn’t join the company until 2013.

The Bear Case: Risks to Consider

  • Key man risk: the company has proven itself to be remarkably successful at retaining talented individuals for many years, and I would not expect any sudden departures, but it’s important to be aware of the key roles played by top management.

  • Insurance sector risk: in its recent trading update, the company said “The fee- and commission-based revenue of brokers and MGAs provide a degree of insulation from rating pressures”. Nevertheless, the insurance sector is inherently cyclical and this can lead to uneven performance.

  • Concentration risk: the portfolio’s diversification can only be described as moderate at best, given the large exposure to Pantheon and to one or two other key holdings. Therefore any uncertainties around the valuation or performance of these holdings could have a material impact on the value of BPM as a whole.

  • Growth risk: as the company has grown, it may find that there are additional challenges when it comes to deploying larger amounts of capital. Competition for the most attractive investments may become more intense. So far, however, management has indicated no shortage of opportunities in their pipeline, and their results continue to be excellent.

The Bottom Line

Whenever examining a vehicle such as this, it’s important for me to understand not just the level of returns that have been achieved in the past, but what has made these returns possible.

I think the two major factors have been 1) highly committed management (e.g. Brian Marsh with a 39% ownership interest in the company that bears his name); 2) a faithfulness to the mission of investing within a neatly-defined circle of competence within the insurance sector. This is an unglamorous but lucrative niche, where specialist expertise is rewarded.

The new managers do not have the same level of ownership interest in BPM as their founder, but they have shown commitment through many years of dedication to the company. While there can never be a guarantee, I expect that they will continue the company’s track record of generating decent returns for their shareholders. And even if they do not, I am satisfied that the current discount to NAV offers a pleasant margin of safety against this risk.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

22 comments

Avatar for carmensfella
carmensfella

BPM will be presenting at Mello next week 3rd June. Great chance to meet Dan Topping and he will be available for questions after his presentations. 

Avatar for CG16
CG16

Like it - am a holder but a case of what have you done for me lately - share price not moved for 18 months so we are waiting for a catalyst & the discount to NAV to be realised either by some external party getting involved or wider flows into the small market space - which may/ may not happen. Would be nice to know when something is afoot to get some price action.

Avatar for rmillaree
rmillaree

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM)

Like it - am a holder but a case of what have you done for me lately - share price not moved for 18 months so we are waiting for a catalyst & the discount to NAV to be realised either by some external party getting involved or wider flows into the small market space - which may/ may not happen. Would be nice to know when something is afoot to get some price action.

what a bizzare comment 

directors deliver the increase in NTAV - they dont dictate the shareprice.

you have picked ridiculously biased timframe here - if we go back 2 years shareprice at this time in 2024 was 450p - so its up 50% in 24 months and you are bitching - unbelievable

if we look at diluted NAV per share we have 959.8p per share at 31/1/2026 - that was 909.8 at 31/7/20265and 847.3p at 31/1/2025. with 31/1/2024 having been around 660p. whats not to like about that kind of deliverance?

so we are waiting for a catalyst & the discount to NAV to be realised either by some external party getting involved or wider flows into the small market space

imho thats not how you should expect this share to work - historically its not secured "premum rating" - i make my money here by waiting and them delivering 10% pa compounded returns on average back to us sharholders - they have done that in buckets recently. You are in the wrong share if you expect quick rerate. dont get me wrong you might get rerate - or preimum takeover etc - there are far worse shares to be invested in - but  imho its the wrong company to expect "quick buck returns from" they have arived in the PAST but you might have to wait five years to they have bumper cash inflows on sales like they have had approx 12-18 months ago. Its very much not a share for quick buck imho - exactly the opposite.

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

I believe, Alice Foulk is Brain Marsh's daughter. 

Some may consider family appointments a good thing, others (myself included) view it as nepotism. That doesn't make it a "good" or "bad" thing from an investment perspective. Merely something to be aware of.

Avatar for littledavesab
littledavesab

news today - investing in the Cyber cover area   - https://www.investegate.co.uk/...  

B.P. Marsh & Partners Plc announced that its portfolio company, Sodalis Capital Limited, has launched Brecon Specialty Limited, a new London-based wholesale insurance broker focused on Cyber and Technology Errors & Omissions risks.......

Avatar for rmillaree
rmillaree

myself included) view it as nepotism. That doesn't make it a "good" or "bad" thing from an

what happens IF (i dont know)  she got then job on merits through process that Brian was excluded from - do you still see that as nepotism or do you accept that she may have got the job on merits and that may have been demonstrated internally.

ultimately if she has high level of experience  working internally for a long period of time - seems plausible she might have been by far the best candidate for her role.

personally when the main man owes as much of the company as he does - one has to accept its possible nepotism may be at play  - note it could be Brian knows she was the best for the job and therefore takes the viewpoint he doesnt need to prove it to anyone else.

Anyway its not a  secret and company can be asked the score if they want - everything points to the proof of the pudding being fine and dandy here. 

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

We'll never know what the process was behind her getting the job. Even if it was 'cloak and dagger' (and I have no reason to suspect it was) we will be told it was all above board. 

I'm not sure speculation on various scenarios will be of much benefit to anyone. 

I view nepotism as an orange flag, something to be noted. It can work it. It may work here. It can also reflect an overbearing parent or weak internal controls. That may or may not be the case here, I have no evidence either way.

I agree, when a founder owns so much of the company this is a potential issue.

My understanding is Daniel Topping runs the majority of the business now, and given it is a company that invests in other insurance start ups and the 'worth' of those investments can take multiple years to show, it's too soon to comment accurately.

Regardless, they do seem to be doing fairly well at the minute and I hope that continues.

Avatar for Graham Neary
Graham Neary

It's been a while since your comment Jeremy but I contacted the company's representatives at the time, and asked them to verify this. They informed me that Brian and Alice are not related. G

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

Thanks for getting back to me on that Graham, that does surprise me. 

I had it on good authority they were, there is also a more than passing resemblance, but I happily stand corrected.

Avatar for rmillaree
rmillaree

how is it good authority if its plain wrong info ? 

does that good authority admit what they told you was bullshit?

note there can be "looser ties" than formal family connections - so if there is some loose connection i am happy for that to be flagged up and go back to sleep. I dont think idle tittle tattle helps though when it appears at face value to be nonsense. 

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

"Good authority" CAN be wrong! As it was in this case. 

No one is infallible. Sadly, I don't think the person who told me this did so after checking both their passports and her birth certificate. In future I will ask that they do, just to keep you happy!

I passed on a piece of information I thought would be of use. It turned out to be wrong, for which I apologise. 'Good intentions...' and all that.

I thought the idea was we tried to help fellow investors out by sharing information we had.  I find you a particularly difficult person to interact with. I suggest in future we ignore each other.

Avatar for rmillaree
rmillaree

"Good authority" CAN be wrong! As it was in this case.

i would agree - just trying to robustly defend the process here - i very much get it that reliable people can make a mistake. but if you post "falsehoods" on then net with narative that its from trusted source when it was bullshit  you have to expect some blowback - thats just life. 

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

Graham,

Inspired by a nagging doubt that what you were told wasn't true, I did a little digging.  A quick question for Google's AI brought me up the following....

Yes, Alice Foulk is widely reported to be the daughter of Brian Peter Marsh OBE (the founder and former Chairman of the finance firm B.P. Marsh & Partners Plc). [1, 2]Corporate and Professional Relationship. While corporate disclosures naturally focus on her operational credentials rather than family connections, the relationship is well known within financial and investor circles. Key details regarding their professional timeline include: [1]

  • B.P. Marsh & Partners Plc: Alice Foulk joined her father's firm in 2011. She moved up from an executive assistant role to become Managing Director, and was subsequently appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO) in December 2025.
  • Marsh Charitable Trust: Both father and daughter serve closely together outside of the public company, acting as co-committee trustees for the Marsh Charitable Trust (formerly the Marsh Christian Trust).
  • Brian Marsh's Status: Her father, Brian Peter Marsh, founded the specialist investment firm in 1990.

Additionally, "Market Screener" has her personal connection with Brian Marsh as being over 36 years. She is in her late 30's. Granted it could be a typo. However personal connections with the other BP Marsh staff are all approximately since hers or their start dates with the company (11-19 years).

Google tells me Brian has two daughters, the other Antonia, is also a trustee for the Marsh Charitable Trust.

It is quite possible that these are all coincidences, but I doubt it. I am more baffled as to why the company's reps told you what appears to be a lie. Is it that they couldn't be othered to check/didn't really care, or is it some big secret that only the family..... and the ever so discrete Mr Google ....know!?


Avatar for Graham Neary
Graham Neary

Jeremy, very interesting. It looks like Gemini is using this article - effectively your comment! - as the source for the claim. That's pretty funny!

Avatar for Graham Neary
Graham Neary

You are now the source for the claim on Google!

8d43c39e-8292-4193-b2c1-da263f1527ae.png

Avatar for Jeremy Rea
Jeremy Rea

Lol, now that is funny, if that is where Gemini got it from.

Albeit, "the relationship is well known within financial and investor circles" would imply it wasn't just me.

Avatar for peterg
peterg

Not funny, scary!

Avatar for Krishan 1
Krishan 1

Dan Topping seems extremely competent so I would not worry about Brian Marsh himself eventually going. 

Avatar for gwigglesdarton
gwigglesdarton

Think they have shown themselves to be shrewd investors in this unglamorous but cash generative sector - which always seems to be shifting, shaping and consolidating with plenty of long term  PE interest to fuel things. 

Avatar for Brucie5
Brucie5

Delighted to see this write up as I've just returned to a holding in this.  I'm mainly a dividend investor but as you point out, there is a useful discount to NAV here. Its regular dividend payouts are indeed low but it also gives specials.  However, my interest was also caught by what I see as a consolidating chart - pattern, which looks promising for a Michael Taylor type breakout. That said, would need careful watching in case it breaks the other way below 600, which under current market conditions is also possible, should the markets take a further lurch south. Given that it more than doubled in the two years between 2023 -25, it can indeed move quickly. Not sure if that's helpful - but thanks for the article,

Avatar for Brookeda
Brookeda

Have held this on and off (mostly on) for over five years and done very well from it. I sold it mistakenly last year after the realizations only to buy back in when it dipped. Its a really simple model really of buying into new Insurance (Mainly) companies supporting their growth both financially but also technically and then selling 5 years or so later. It shouldn't really be seen as a dividend play and only pays out when realizations have happened. Its a compounder and hope it continues to go well 

Avatar for Bouden54
Bouden54

The discount is around 30% (or closer to 40% on a cash-adjusted basis) - this  is at the higher end of its historic range (typically 20-30%) so I'd be very surprised to see any significant lurch downwards in the share price. In other words, the NAV should put a floor on the share price. 

Get the free newsletter