Budget 2011: Why small-cap funding issues & private investors are inextricably linked

Sunday, Mar 06 2011 by
17
Budget 2011 Why smallcap funding issues  private investors are inextricably linked

The Coalition Government has repeatedly expressed its commitment to increasing the funding capacity in this country for entrepreneurship and we await with great interest the forthcoming Budget. One would hope that, in determining measure to increases funding capacity for SMEs, the Government is reflecting carefully upon the role of public equity markets. The UK has a limited venture capital sector willing to take real risk on early stage businesses. It is predominantly a development capital industry. The PLUS and AIM markets are the de facto suppliers of venture capital in the UK, so any effort to increase SME funding options must look seriously at the issues in these two markets.

Why the SME Market is under pressure

While there is much to be proud of, the London markets have suffered from a worrying lack of liquidity for smaller companies in recent times that has deterred new listings. We speak frequently with small cap company managers who are frustrated by the lack of liquidity, visibility and recognition that they are afforded on the London market and who are actively considering either delisting altogether or shifting to markets that they perceive to be more suited to their needs, such as the TSX (Canada) or ASX (Australia). Clearly, the LSE move to merge with TSX may help to limit the potential damage here in the near term, but the underlying issue remains. 

From the beginning of Q4 2008 to Q2 2010, 427 companies have delisted from the AIM market. [1]  While this wave of delistings was partly cyclical and driven by the recession, it also seems to have been structural. A rising market covers a multitude of problems, but when the tide goes out, the underlying issues become apparent. 

According to research by Trowers & Hamlins, 90 of those companies that have delisted have explicitly stated that AIM was too expensive/ burdensome or have chosen to move to another exchange without retaining their AIM listing. Looking through a sample of these delistings announcements, the releases frequently cite the following issues:

  • Valuation – “the relatively small total market capitalisation” 
  • Liquidity – “the limited trading volumes in the Company's shares”
  • Compliance Costs – “the significant direct and indirect costs of compliance with the AIM Rules” [2]

While compliance costs are often cited, we do not believe that the AIM listing requirements are themselves onerous.…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
20 thumbs up
3 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




1 Comment on this Article show/hide all

DaveL 11th Mar '11 1 of 1
1

I consider that one of the most important points highlited in your 'Possible Policy Solutions' is the fact that AIM shares are not eligible to be held in an ISA.

I assume that the Government do not wish to encourage savers to speculate their savings on 'risky' investments. But as you mention earlier in the article Lloyds and RBS were assumed to be sound investments and despite what has happened are still allowed within an ISA.

Even more bizzare is that you can hold AIM sharesin an ISA that are also quoted on another market! I have recently purchased shares in WAS and found that these were eligible.

Can somebody inject some sense. I suppose this is too much to ask!

DavidL

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Stockopedia Features

Stockopedia Features

Stockopedia Features covers in-depth stories on strategies, companies and themes that are relevant to online investors. Investing is hard work. We don't try to over-simplify complex concepts - we prefer to try to help you navigate the detail.  more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre


Related Content

Plans for an eventual bear market
Plans for an eventual bear market?
Portfolio Management 16th Sep

IFRS 15  Investors Beware
IFRS 15 - Investors Beware!
Market Outlook Mon 6:04am

Are we living in dangerous times
Are we living in dangerous times?
Market Outlook 14th Feb

Is Inflation Here
Is Inflation Here?
Market Outlook 15th Nov


Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis