Finkelstein's Checklists: 7 Habits of Spectacularly Unsuccessful Management
On the subject of investing checklists as an aid to better decision-making, we also noted some interesting research done a while back (post the Tech bubble) by Sydney Finkelstein. Finkelstein is the Professor of Management at Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business. Rather than focus - as most researchers do - on the reasons behind management success, he chose to look at corporate failures. In what he calls the largest research program ever devoted to corporate mistakes, he spent six years studying more than 50 companies – including Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, Rubbermaid and Schwinn - and conducting some 200 interviews to ascertain what they did to become complete failures.
If you share Charlie Munger's view that a key part of good investing is learning to make fewer mistakes than the next guy, this is pretty interesting from an "alarm bell" perspective - "I don’t want you to think we have any way of learning or behaving so you won’t make mistakes. I’m just saying that you can learn to make fewer mistakes than other people – and how to fix mistakes faster when you do make them" (Munger).
So what were the conclusions of Finkelstein's work?
When do Businesses Fail?
Firstly, Finkelstein's work found that most businesses failed during four major business events, namely: i) new ventures, ii) dealing with innovation and change, iii) managing mergers and acquisitions, and iv) addressing new competitive pressures. This is perhaps unsurprising as these are all times of major corporate change, which might put stress on an organisation. Secondly, he found that failures are caused by four destructive patterns of behaviour that typically set in, well before a business goes under. These four syndromes involve:
- Flawed executive mind-sets that throw off a company’s perception of reality
- Delusional attitudes that keep this inaccurate reality in place
- Breakdowns in communications systems developed to handle potentially urgent information
- Leadership qualities that keep a company’s executives from correcting their course
Thirdly, he found that spectacularly unsuccessful people had seven personal qualities in common.
7 Habits of Spectacularly Unsuccessful Executives
Nearly all of the leaders who preside over major business failures exhibit four or five of the following habits. The truly "gifted" ones exhibit all seven. They are usually found in conjunction with admirable qualities, such as unusual intelligence, talent, charming, personal magnetism, and the ability to inspire others. So what are they?
Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account
Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your wayDisclaimer:
As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested. ?>


4 Comments on this Article show/hide all
Good article.. but I wonder how many of the "7 Habits" Steve Jobs possessed? ;0)
Perhaps the qualities that lead to spectacular failures are also necessary for spectacular success - which would explain why they're admired?
So perhaps businesses with leaders exhibiting those habits are high risk/high reward situations, from investors' points of view?
Hi marben,
Maybe Jobs is just the exception that proves the rule !?
In my banking days, we (the BOLSA boys, if that means anything to anyone) used to be wary of companies that :
- had portraits of the founder in the foyer or fountain in the driveway;
- had management with personalised number plates and 'glamorous ' secretaries;
- showed an unhealthy interest in 'tax minimisation' strategies;
- had ex-military on the board ;
- appeared on the 'society' pages.
All a bit 'silly', but it seemed to have stood the test of time !
ATB
In reply to post #63846
Indeed it does. One of the jewels in Lloyds' crown. Main London office in Queen Vic St, IIRC (which I may not, since 25 years ago is a while) ;-)
Very good list of warning signs for bankers (though the ex-military bit was pretty SA-specific ;-))
Re the article, I can easily recognise all the 7 habits listed from many examples of failure (especially Enron, IIRC). However, I think the checklist for avoiding bad managers is pretty difficult to apply in practice, especially if one is a retail investor who never sees the management in action, first-hand. And I don't think it is easy for institutional investors either......
....much easier for bankers to get a reasonable view of the company, though - but extrader's list is easier to apply, and just as useful. I remember applying it myself when visiting various UK company HQs.....1980s Tesco being "impressively" located in a shed in a cheshunt industrial estate.
The main thing I look at, from a retail investor perspective, is the general demeanour of the CEO. But that isn't reliable either - and has certainly put me off at least one investment that could have proven very successful (though possibly the company just got lucky). It has, however, saved me money on a number of occasions.
ee
In reply to post #63846
Hi ex,
Quite agree. Your "red flags" sound eminently sensible & wise to me!
In most of the "high risk/high reward" situations, the risk tends to outweigh the reward, IME
Best,
Mark