FTSE 100 forecast and valuation – June 2015

Friday, Jun 19 2015 by
17

It’s time for another one of my semi-regular FTSE 100 valuation and forecast updates, using the latest data for both the index’s price and its earnings.

Valuing the FTSE 100 using CAPE

My tool of choice in the valuation game is Robert Shiller’s CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted PE). CAPE is basically the same as the PE ratio that most investors are familiar with, except that is uses 10-year inflation adjusted earnings as the “E” part of the ratio.

It does that because the 10-year earnings average is a much more stable number from one year to the next than just a single year’s earnings. That’s important because we want something nice and stable to compare the FTSE 100’s price to.

In other words:

CAPE is like measuring the distance between two points on the ceiling while stood on a solid table, whereas the standard PE is like doing the same measurement stood at the top of a wobbly step-ladder.

You’ll get an accurate measurement with one and a dangerously inaccurate one with the other (dangerous if you fall off the ladder anyway).

Calculating “fair value” for the FTSE 100

Today, the FTSE 100’s 10-year inflation adjusted earnings stand at 530 index points. I’ve put the value into index points because that’s how the index is measured.

So with a current price of 6,700 index points, the FTSE 100’s CAPE is 12.6.

That’s actually pretty low. The long-term average, across multiple international markets, is somewhere in the mid-teens, around 15 or 16.

If the market were at “fair value” today, i.e. with a CAPE ratio of 16, it would be at 8,500. At that level it would have a dividend yield of 2.8%.

That sounds a little high (i.e. low yield) to me, but not significantly so as the market’s long-run average dividend yield is about 3% (we’re at 3.5% at the moment).

I could just stop there and say that the FTSE 100 is slightly below the typical long-run average of 16, and therefore it’s “slightly cheap”.

But that’s a bit dull, so here are a couple of visual tools to illustrate what the market’s valuation means for future returns.

CAPE is “mean reverting”, and that’s a good thing

First though I’ll take a little detour into the world of “mean reversion”, as that underpins everything else (skip this bit if you already know all this).

The FTSE 100’s CAPE is a mean reverting statistic, which simply means that the further it is from…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

This article is for information and discussion purposes only and nothing in it should be construed as a recommendation to invest or otherwise. The value of an investment may fall and an investor may lose all their money. Any investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors.  Investors should always seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
17 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




17 Comments on this Article show/hide all

brinrich 19th Jun '15 1 of 17

I liked the presentation very clear,how do we apply the cape to individual stocks ?

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 19th Jun '15 2 of 17

Thats interesting. I would like to see one for the FTSE250 I suspect that will be higher. I did find one for the FTSE All Share and that was similar to the FSTE 100. Apparently the USA Cape is very high.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
UK Value Investor 19th Jun '15 3 of 17

In reply to post #101399

Hi brinrich, generally people use PE10 rather than CAPE for individual stocks, which is basically the same but not adjusted for inflation.

You can use PE10 anyway you like, just as you can the standard PE.

You could use it in isolation, comparing it to the PE10 of similar companies, or any other company, or against the market's PE10, or against pre-defined maximum or minimum values.

Or you could combine it with other ratios that take growth or gearing into account. The options are endless (which may or may not be a good thing).

I don't want to promote my own stuff here on Stockopedia too much, but you can find some ideas on how to use PE10 on my website, as well as some related spreadsheets.

At the end of the day it's just another ratio, but one that is well suited to blue chip stocks and similar companies with long histories of profit.

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share
UK Value Investor 19th Jun '15 4 of 17

In reply to post #101402

Hi herbie47, I have looked at doing the same thing for the FTSE 250 but the data is even harder (i.e. impossible) to get hold of for that index.

If someone can find the data I can do the analysis.

The S&P 500 CAPE is about 27, which is pretty high and way above the average of 16. I think it's only been higher on two occasions (without double checking the data) - in the boom of the late 1920s and the boom of the late 1990s, neither of which ended well!

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 19th Jun '15 5 of 17

In reply to post #101407

That is worrying, even if our market is good value I'm sure if the USA bubble bursts we will be affected by the fallout.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
UK Value Investor 20th Jun '15 6 of 17

In reply to post #101408

Perhaps, although the US market could just have weak returns for a decade rather than go through a boom and bust period.

However, even if the US market did fall by 50% and the UK market by, say, 30%, why should that be worrying?

If you're investment horizon is more than a decade, what does it matter if the stock market falls this year? All it means is that you'll be able to pick up good companies cheaper than you could before.

And if you investment horizon is very close (perhaps you're about to become financially independent?) then you shouldn't have a large allocation to equities if you're worried by capital volatility.

Either way, a falling market should not, in and of itself, be a reason to worry. Although that's not to say you shouldn't worry about the economic factors underlying a market collapse, such as a recession, but that's an entirely different matter.

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share | 2 replies
herbie47 20th Jun '15 7 of 17

In reply to post #101431

I understand what you are saying but if your investments fall 30% and it takes 5 or more years to recover that is quite a large loss. The problem is if you sell shares you may have to pay capital gains tax. Yes I have moved more into cash and Im considering other investments such as gold.

| Link | Share
pka 20th Jun '15 8 of 17

Thanks for a very interesting and useful article.

Does the CAPE approach take into account very long-term trends? For example, in the 20th century, there was a long-term trend for institutions like pension funds and insurance companies to have a gradually increasing percentage in equities in their portfolios, which presumably caused a gradual increase in typical price-earnings ratios of equities.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 20th Jun '15 9 of 17

Is the FTSE100 a good investment anymore? Yes it had good years up to 1999 but since then it has not gone anywhere, if there is another fall even after 15 years you would be worse off. Yes you can add in dividends which are about 50% over 15 years but then inflation is 55% over that time.

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EFTSE

| Link | Share | 2 replies
pka 20th Jun '15 10 of 17

In reply to post #101438

Herbie47 wrote: "Is the FTSE100 a good investment anymore? Yes it had good years up to 1999 but since then it has not gone anywhere, if there is another fall even after 15 years you would be worse off. Yes you can add in dividends which are about 50% over 15 years but then inflation is 55% over that time."

Perhaps the fact that the FTSE 100 has had poor performance over the latest 15 years means that it is now relatively good value (which is also indicated by its current CAPE as pointed out by this article), so its performance over the coming 15 years is likely to be a lot better than over the latest 15 years.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 20th Jun '15 11 of 17

In reply to post #101446

Yes good point but looking at the charts looks like a fall is due? Who knows. My concern is more the other markets and economies such as China and USA, not to mention Greece and the Europe.

| Link | Share
Patxi 21st Jun '15 12 of 17
1

I have an interest in the use of CAPE as a reference to the value of a particular market. There was an article in the Telegraph earlier this month (the follow up to an article 12 months previously) which gave the CAPE value of many global markets - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/11654508/Revealed-The-worlds-cheapest-stock-markets-2015.html It may help to put the UK market value in perspective on a global measure.

After reading it I considered a punt on Turkey using an ETF, but then looked a bit more, got scared and changed my mind! I'm still looking into something, perhaps Baring Emerging Europe Closed Fund (LON:BEE) or Blackrock Emerging Europe (LON:BEEP). The value of the US market does look very high (but it has for some time) and if this were to fall would have far reaching consequences with many UK 'global' Investment Trusts which have big stakes there.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
UK Value Investor 22nd Jun '15 13 of 17

In reply to post #101437

Hi pka, I would say only to a small extent.

If PE ratios are going to be at permanently higher levels than in the past then that will push up CAPE's long-term average. This will effectively increase the "fair value" level of the market, although any increase would be very gradual.

This is one reason why I prefer to measure CAPE's "long-term" average over a fixed 100 year period (where the data is available, e.g. S&P 500) rather than from the earliest possible point, which is the 1870s I think, going by Shiller's data.

Calculating the average over 100 years rather than "forever" will make the average a bit more volatile (although hardly) but it will also follow recent trends more closely (although not that closely as it's still an average over 100 years).

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share
UK Value Investor 22nd Jun '15 14 of 17

In reply to post #101438

I would second what pka said. The 15-year period since 2000 in which the FTSE 100 has largely been flat was made possible by its extremely high starting valuation. As my charts hopefully show, the market's "normal" valuation has been steadily increasing, the the point where it is now above the "market" value. However, that process took 15-years or so (with obvious ups and downs in the market) precisely because of the high starting level of the FTSE 100.

It is possible that the FTSE 100 could face another 15 years of zero capital gains, but it would be very unlikely. If that's what happened then we would probably have a FTSE 100 in 2025 with a dividend yield of 5% or more, which would make the market very attractive to investors (i.e. buyers who are likely to increase demand and push the price up).

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share
UK Value Investor 22nd Jun '15 15 of 17

In reply to post #101461

Hi Patxi,

I think the best way to implement that sort of strategy is to hold all of the market indices in question, or at least, say, 30 of them, and weight them according to CAPE.

So rather than buying the cheapest market, you "tilt" a portfolio towards it, which is a much less risky approach.

There are various ways to calculate weightings based on CAPE, and I think there are some ETFs becoming available which do all of this for you. So you just buy the ETF and it holds dozens of international market indices, weighted by CAPE, or dividend yield or whatever.

John

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share
Richard Goodwin 3rd Jul '15 16 of 17

In reply to post #101431

The logic of the benefits only applies if you have fresh supplies of investable capital. If you have a single relatively fully invested portfolio into which you aren't feeding new money then whatever your time frame falling prices are unarguably a bad thing or at best a neutral thing, certainly never a good thing.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
UK Value Investor 4th Jul '15 17 of 17
2

In reply to post #102296

Hi Richard, you're right, but only if dividends are being drawn down too. If an investor is in drawdown mode with no intention to invest new funds then falling markets are undoubtedly a bad thing, or at least they're bad for whoever will receive the capital value when the portfolio it is finally sold.

However, if dividends are being reinvested then lower valuations are likely to produce higher returns on those reinvested dividends, which of course is a good thing in the long-run.

Blog: UK Value Investor
| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About UK Value Investor

UK Value Investor

My name is John Kingham and I'm the editor of UK Value Investor, a blog and investment newsletter for defensive and income-focused value investors. I'm also the author of The Defensive Value Investor.I invest mostly in large and mid-cap dividend-paying stocks. My investment goal is to build and maintain a high yield, high growth, low risk portfolio. more »

Follow


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis