35
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2019 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Good stocks hitting new highs: A set of rules to pinpoint market leaders

Momentum investing strategies have a natural dislike for bearish, unsettled conditions. So it’s no surprise that some of them have been on the ropes this year. But with the market clawing its way back from the summer slump, one of our most beloved momentum screens - the 52 week highs list - is starting to look a bit healthier. It comes as new research shows that a simple addition to this strategy could improve its returns. 

New ideas from new highs

Momentum - arguably one of the market’s most powerful profit drivers - has been the name of the game in the stock market over the past decade. Value strategies have suffered at the hands of popular growth stocks, which have been on a relentless march, notching up multibagger-like returns.

But over the past year or so, the tables have shifted. Strategies that surf the upward price drift caused by momentum catalysts like earnings surprises and broker upgrades have struggled to find shares. In the past, this has signalled the start of a change in market direction. A different view might be that momentum has just hit a bump in the road, rather than completely crashed.

One of the most popular momentum strategies is the 52 week high, which is an approach I often pick up on, with good reason. For a start it brings together a very simple, accessible data-point with some intriguing academic research into the way investors think and behave...

The idea is that stocks at new highs are prone to being priced incorrectly. Holders who have ‘anchored’ at a previous price may be slow to buy at the new high (and may even sell to lock in profits). Meanwhile, others may be hesitant to buy stocks that have already risen sharply. Over time, this fog of uncertainty clears and the price of 52 week high stocks can drift higher.

But the 52 week highs list is interesting for other reasons, too. It’s like the stock market’s gossip column. It’s the list that everyone likes to look at, whether or not they act on it. It’s a window into the market’s latest big winners, recent takeover targets and the sectors and industries that could be on the up. For technical traders, the 52 week high is like an age-old friend - always there to offer new ideas.

Quality and momentum join forces

New research this summer casts a slightly different light on the 52 week highs strategy by introducing ‘fundamental quality’ as an extra filter. The paper (which you can find here) pairs up new highs with companies that score well against the all-weather nine-point checklist of fundamental strength: Joseph Piotroski’s F-Score. 

This combination of factors turns what was a momentum-only strategy into something that resembles much more of a quality & momentum ‘High Flyer’ approach. 

The F-Score itself was originally conceived back in 2000 by Piotroski (an accounting professor) as a way of rooting out value stocks with the potential strength to re-rate. It works by looking for an improving health trend across areas like profitability, operating efficiency, and leverage. Its popularity means that it’s now a go-to quality benchmark for just about any strategy. 

In this new paper, the researchers (Zhu, Sun and Chen) wanted a better way of measuring the degree of investor underreaction to fundamental news about stocks trading close to new highs. To do it, they used the F-Score as the measure of a firm’s fundamental strength. Those with F-Scores of 7, 8 and 9 were classified as “high F-Score” stocks.

Ultimately, the research found that stocks with high F-Scores that were trading at new highs went on to deliver superior returns. In fact, they apparently saw nearly double the average returns of portfolios that were sorted only by 52 week highs. The findings confirmed the view of the researchers that investor ‘anchoring’ is a big driver of the 52 week high anomaly. 

So what kinds of stocks pass these rules? Here’s a revised take on the 52 Week Highs approach, sorted for stocks with the highest F-Scores (you can find the screen here). 

Name

Mkt Cap £m

Price vs 52w High %

Piotroski F-Score

Stock Rank

StockRank Style

Sector

Judges Scientific

232.3

-0.944

9

89

High Flyer

Industrials

Norcros

181.0

-3.43

8

99

Super Stock

Consumer Cyclicals

Haynes Publishing

39.6

-1.50

8

97

Super Stock

Consumer Cyclicals

Meggitt

4,947.7

-1.52

7

74

High Flyer

Industrials

Diploma

1,912.6

-0.764

7

83

High Flyer

Industrials

Strix

333.3

-3.63

7

94

Super Stock

Industrials

Mitchells & Butlers

1,607.2

-0.925

7

96

Super Stock

Consumer Cyclicals

SCS

103.6

-2.26

7

99

Super Stock

Consumer Cyclicals

Britvic

2,590.9

-0.318

7

81

High Flyer

Consumer Defensives

Hotel Chocolat

417.5

-3.39

7

62

High Flyer

Consumer Defensives

As it stands, high F-Score stocks trading close to new highs come from right across the market-cap range and from across industry sectors.

For investors looking for a barometer of market sentiment and a sense of where investor excitement is focused, the 52 week highs strategy is an interesting source of ideas. In buoyant conditions, as we’ve seen in recent years, the momentum in a strategy like this can be powerful and predictive. But in less certain conditions, where investor sentiment can turn very quickly, momentum needs to be watched closely. 

Adding the F-Score as a quality checklist to focus on stocks with the strongest trends in improving fundamentals could be a useful way of reinforcing the strategy and defending it from the risks of sudden disappointments.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

15 comments


Avatar for john horner

Interesting and worth further investigation.

0
Avatar for HumourMe
How do you get back to the old site?

Go to your profile top right ... then select Switch to old site

5d8db9e800b60old.jpg


0
Avatar for paralax19

Ah OK. Looks like you can only do that if you were a customer when the old site was live. I'm new and don't have that option. 

0
Avatar for kennzo2020

We keep being encouraged to move across to the new site for 'better functionality' and keep having errors like this with the link not working....... Frustrating to say the least. Back to the old site! 

4
Avatar for paralax19

How do you get back to the old site?

0
Avatar for HumourMe

The reason I like the F Score is that it is a fuzzy criteria with a bit of ambiguity. It looks at 9 'good' fundamental aspects and for each delivers a pass/fail. We then get to decide how many we want to pass, although >=7 is the go to threshold. However, it doesn't require all aspects to pass which current screening does. I think that I've read that this threshold approach will eventually be rolled out for screens and I look forward to being able to group criteria and being able to specify at least X of Y criteria in the group be met. In effect this is what the stockranks already do too.

3
Avatar for iwright7

HumourMe - Similar distraction for me - Cheap, low PE Value stocks in my case. But after a lot of study I turned this on its head and double/treble the PE, improving Quality companies with upward Momentum are now the shares I buy.  I will put more emphasis on 52 Wk High screening having read the Zhu conclusions, because unlike other Momentum factors it has a  particular behavioral bias that can be exploited. 

The QM approach seems counter intuitive and too simple, but is entirely logical.  Often unsaid but maybe much more important than we think Momentum takes account upward share price  due to insider trading, where others have +ve company information that I don't. In this case I too can join the club of "sophisticated" institutional investors taking insider advantage of my fellow "unsophiscated" amateurs. 

I joined Stocko back in 2013 and since adopting QM as a principal investing strategy some 4 years ago it has beaten the market by a mile.

0
Avatar for HumourMe
if they upgrade EPS the share price tends to rise in tandem.

That would tend to imply that F score changes, rather than absolute levels, might be a good lead indicator.

A point to consider is the distance from 52 Wk High vs. Volume. In his screen Ben has used Top 10% market closeness to 52 Week High 9 (i.e. close) vs. the Zhu paper that used 20% (not as close). Which to use as a screener and does it matter?

Volatility might also be considered. I use %price <= -1*volatility in some screens.

When I joined Stocko as a paid member, QM, essentially using the F score, valuation and relative strength was my settled strategy. I then became 'distracted' by all the other strategies, however, I keep on returning to this as it just seems to make sense. 

1
Avatar for HumourMe
3. High/Low F-Score predict both future returns and future institutional demand. - Have seen this many times

Do broker upgrades precede or lag this? Or run in parallel.

I can see the path of improving fundamentals -> broker upgrades -> institutional demand -> price rises -> momentum ... till the last bull is on board

I just don't know if broker upgrades & institutional demand are mainly sequential, complementary or independent. Demand can occur independently of broker upgrades/targets and I've frequently seen broker targets lag price. 

Which brings us to volume as a measure of 'true' activity and this potentially neglected stocko metric that might be worth adding to screens https://www.stockopedia.com/ratios/10-day-vs-3-month-average-volume-5009/

0
Avatar for iwright7

Objective evidence suggests that whatever brokers predict about earnings - they can't be trusted to accurately predict earnings increases, but that if they upgrade EPS the share price tends to rise in tandem.

A point to consider is the distance from 52 Wk High vs. Volume. In his screen Ben has used Top 10% market closeness to 52 Week High 9 (i.e. close) vs. the Zhu paper that used 20% (not as close). Which to use as a screener and does it matter?

0
Avatar for iwright7

Ben,
A really interesting article of yours. I have read and re-read the Zhu paper link to try summarise a Quality/Momentum Take Home message for myself.

1. Anchoring by amateur (unsophisticated) investors create the 52Wk High anomaly - That most of us!
2. Momentum (inc 52Wk High) ceases to work when investor sentiment is low. - Entirely agree
3. High/Low F-Score predict both future returns and future institutional demand. - Have seen this many times
4. High F-Score works irrespective of market sentiment. - I am not surprised
5. 52 Wk High works better when combined with an F-Score >7 and market sentiment is high. - This is when QM type investing rocks

4
Avatar for Velo

Once again as per a prior article (Dividend Checklist) I too accessed the screen link without problem - on the old system
- (haven't tried flicking over to testing the link on the new system).

0
Avatar for Rusty2

The link works on the old system but won't load on the new system.

3
Avatar for ambrosia

when I click on the link for the screen, it wont load

3
Avatar for Fegger

It does now click through for me on the new site

0
Get the free newsletter