How to sell stocks short profitably
Short selling is a practice with a bad name. In times of financial crisis, regulators and governments take aim at short sellers as pirates only out for themselves. But in reality short sellers face far greater risks and as a result practictioners tend to be some of the most financially savvy and literate investors in the market - often acting as 'policemen' against financial shenanigans. By learning some tricks to highlight good candidates for short selling the practice can possibly enhance your returns and lower your portfolio volatility.
What is a short sale?
Short selling is the practice of selling borrowed shares in order to buy them back at a cheaper price when the share price falls thus bagging a profit. Short sellers don't own the shares they sell, so they need to borrow them for a fee from a current shareholder.
The profit/loss equation for short sellers is very different to owning shares. When short selling your maximum gain is capped at 100% if the share price falls to zero, whereas the potential loss could be infinite as share prices can theoretically rise indefinitely.
Shares also need to be borrowed from owners before a sale can be made meaning that short sellers also face ongoing interest costs. These costs make it absolutely vital that short sellers only enter positions when the timing is perfect as it can be a very expensive business when it goes wrong.
How short selling can improve your returns
Ever since the dotcom bubble burst in 2000, equity investors have been subject to a dirty dozen years of volatile sideways markets. In this time there have been 2 great bear markets providing vicious swings to the downside and great opportunities to short sellers.
In sideways markets with deflating credit conditions the traditional philosophy of buy and hold is shortsighted and smart investors hedge their long portfolios with a smaller proportion of short sales. Strategies such as 130:30 which add a 30% leverage to a long only portfolio in order to short the market are becoming more popular amongst fund management community providing greater upside potential and downside protection.
The art of a smart short sale
While high P/E ratio stocks have been shown to underperform low P/E ratio stocks, in the long run high P/E stocks still have had **positive returns**. In other words shorting high valuation stocks isn't necessarily a profitable strategy!
But that's what many short sellers do - going after high P/E 'glamour' stocks that they feel are too highly valued by the market - time and again they lose their shirt to the fact that the market prizes its 'stars' on ever higher ratings.
A short seller needs a quantifiable edge and the odds can only be swung in his favour by shorting stocks that are not only highly valued but also amongst the financially weakest in the market.
How to find financially weak companies - 3 Shorthand Red Flags
While forensic accounting and credit analysis are beyond the ability of most individual investors, there are some excellent short cuts that have been developed by professors of finance to highlight high risk shares. Our research and reading in the area have uncovered the following three red flags that every investor should understand to narrow the universe of potential short sales.
- High Bankruptcy Risk - the so called 'Altman Z-Score' is a scoring system developed by Prof. Edward Altman in the 1970s to highlight companies with a significant risk of financial distress. Companies with a Z-Score < 1.8 have been shown to have a 75% risk of financial distress within 2 years. Obviously when companies go bust their share price goes to zero making them keen short sale candidates!
- High Earnings Manipulation Risk - glamour and growth are alluring not only to investors but also to company management whose compensation is dependent on a continuation of the trend. Accounting tricks such as booking sales early, changing depreciation rates and so on are all available for managers to massage earnings figure. The Beneish M-Score was developed to highlight these companies. An M-Score > 2.22 highlights companies that may be inflating their earnings artificially increasing the likelihood they will have to report lower earnings in the future.
- Poor financial health trend The now very renowned Josef Piotroski came up with his 9 point scoring system in order to figure out which of the cheapest companies in the market were most likely to recover. The so called F-Score spans nine tests of changes in profitability, efficiency and leverage from year to year which highlight improving or declining financial health trends. James Montier and others have found that glamour stocks with F-Scores < 3 and poor capital discipline make good short sale candidates.
By focusing your short selling activities on the small group of stocks in these baskets, you can significantly increase your odds of turning a profitable short sale.
Enhancing returns with Technical Analysis
The final piece of the short selling puzzle is to understand the optimal technical timing of a sale when a stock is due to roll over. The best brief on the subject was published by Bill O'Neil - founder of Investors Business Daily - 'How to Make Money Selling Stocks Short'. Essentially O'Neil states that the best time to short a stock is when it is struggling to recover back from a fall beneath its 50 day moving average. If attempts to rally back above the 50 day MA fail on multiple occasions on weakening volume you may have found the best time to lay on a short. Further information for technicians is available at the link.
What kind of returns can you expect and where can you find ideas?
The average stock in James Montier's short selling strategy mentioned above fell by 8% per annum over a 22 year period from 1985 to 2007. The M-Score used in tandem with some other indicators to create a compound O-Score was found to predict price declines of 25% p.a. while the Z-Score has been shown to predict companies going into financial distress with a 75% success rate.
If you are looking to find good short selling candidates you can find lists of stocks qualifying for these indicators at the screening tools available at Stockopedia Premium. We print the three indicators mentioned above on all of our Stock Reports providing you not only with greater short selling confidence but also greater clarity for when you should sell your longs.
Investors should always beware the risks of short selling mentioned above, and understand that trading baskets of financially weak shares is the most optimal way to harvest the returns available in this area.
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

7 comments
Reviving this old thread.
Considering current market conditions I was looking into short selling and came across this article.
I drafted a simple screener that brought up 26 UK stocks. Also, FAANG stocks seem to be ready for shorting.
Found some short-selling screens as well https://www.stockopedia.com/sc...
Your comments are very welcome. Thanks.
Ed,
You said "Strategies such as 130:30 which add a 30% leverage to a long only portfolio in order to short the market are becoming more popular amongst fund management community providing greater upside potential and downside protection." Can you expand on this please? How does it work? What are the benefits? And how would one implement it in practice?
Thanks.
Well! the past year has been a SHORTERS PARADISE, even my pet cat could make money going short, although the shorting screeners on stockpedia are not very good. I go on bad news x3 -- first bad news; price goes down, then you get bad news number 2 price goes down and I exit the position after bad news number 3. Banks are a good thing to short right now with interest rates going down, airlines with all the terrorist activitie and oil going up - its not as hard as the article makes out, plus some brokers will allow you to short a stock for free but charge you a daly rate to keep a position long and there's no stamp duty. Some of the 99 - 100 on stockopedia have been good short targets, but you have to take them in the in the context of a shrinking market.
If companies are extremely overvalued while simultaneously flagging either poor momentum or poor earnings quality then that is likely telling you something. When short interest rapidly rises at the same time then that is a double confirmation that something is afoot.
I'm not sure one can say that there is a flaw in those measures if they were or are flagging on stocks before they suffered large price drops? Sometimes a single red flag in the data is all that one has to go on. That's why we are developing the 'smart money' toolkit - sometimes it's the company insiders or shorts who act as the canary in the coalmine when most of everything else looks ok.
I think it's doubly important to realise that valuations 'mean revert'. Expensive stocks (in general) find their valuations revert back to the mean, while cheap stocks gradually normalise too. But the opposite happens in bull markets which is why so many get caught out. The weighing machine that Ben Graham talked about is in full force at the moment. We have seem glamour stocks correct violently, but the value shares relatively outperforming.
I often talk about making sure that one fishes in higher probability waters. The stock market is a game of odds... and the odds are against expensive stocks showing flagging quality or momentum. James Montier talked about an unholy trinity of 1. High Valuation, 2. Weak Fundamentals, and 3. Poor Capital discipline in one of his short screens - it's worth reading up on - http://www.stockopedia.com/screens/james-montier-unholy-trinity-screen-12/
Hi Ed,
I know this article from a while back but thought it worth a question or two given the short selling situations that seem to have emerged over the last month or so with regard to two (and possibly three if press comment is to be believed) AIM shares held by many private investors - at least if the number of discussion postings on iii are anything to go by! The two shares I refer to are Blinkx and Quindell in which I have small and not financially threatening holdings (unlike some PIs who haven't read Paul Scott on the subject of Diversification!) Using Stockopedia's various short selling strategies and relevant cheatsheets these companies only appear in Earnings Downgrade Momentum screen (Blinkx) and Benish-M Score categories (Quindell). Does this suggest that their is a flaw in these measures or is it just not possible to 'red flag' the stocks on account of both being 'special situation' given that the short selling coincided with extremely negative comments on Blinkx from an associate professor at Harvard (Edelmann) and from Gotham City Research on Quindell. The third stock is Plus 500 which the today's Times Newspaper implied might be the next target for the shorters due to its exceptional rise since last years flotation. Because of its relatively recent flotation none of the relevant measures can be calculated so no 'Red Flag' is possible. One final thought are there any measures which take into account a rapid rise/overvaluation in the share price as an indicator of a potential short selling situation. I guess these probably already exist if one wants to look at PE ratios and momentum and interpret them differently!
I would be interested to here your thoughts on this type of situation
AN INTERSESTING concept BUT I WONDER FROM WHERE one borrows stock to Enable a sale to be made
MAYDAY member
Hi Mayday.
Personally rather than actively shorting stocks, I track short selling lists as indicators of which stocks are fundamentally weak and worth avoiding for risk of reversal. I use them as indicators to 'not be long'. Some people do successfully short the market using spread betting and CFD techniques, but granted there is a very immature options market in the UK and there's not much stock available for loan.
It's worth adding that while you find lots of people peddling technical indicators for selling, many are unproven and of marginal benefit. The upside to our short selling lists is that they are all focused on common sense criteria that look for over-valued, financially weak companies. While individually these companies may work out ok, as a basket they are likely to underperform.
Just a quick look at our short -selling screens based on the work of James Montier, Professors Altman, Beneish and so on shows that there's much merit in avoiding these kinds of stocks - these sfhorting strategies have all massively underperformed the market as baskets of stocks.
As a member you can review the lists here:
http://www.stockopedia.com/screens/category/short-selling-6/