Qatar is one of the world’s fastest growing economies. From 2005 to 2010, GDP growth averaged 16%, and the IMF forecasts Qatar’s real GDP growth will be 18.7% in 2011. The Qatar stock market is currently trading on about 10x 2012E earnings and a dividend yield of about 4.4%, which IMO are attractive for the economy's prospects. The prospects for LNG prices are clearly important to the economy, but I don't see that as a problem at the moment.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/a1cb02ae-f9a1-11e0-a805-00144feab49a.html#axzz1ck8x8uDA or google "Qatar market looks a quality play"
http://www.economist.com/node/21536659
The Qatar Investment Fund QIF is a London main market-listed fund currently priced at about US$0.85, with NAV on 1 Nov 2011 of US$1.03, a discount of about 17% which is slightly greater than the recent average. It owns about 17 holdings, of which 16 are quoted in Doha and 1 in Muscat.
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201110270700339073Q
http://www.qatarinvestmentfund.com/the-fund/
Like many emerging market funds, at about 57% it is overweight financials, but I don't see that as a problem in the Qatar context.
I think of it as a very long term emerging markets holding, occupying the same role in my portfolio as such favourites as Templeton Emerging Markets IT. Arguably a diversified play on the Qatar economy will outperform both global and emerging market indices, whilst probably being fairly uncorrelated.
Any thoughts?
Hi SirL,
I had a look at QIF as well following the FT article - have been hesitant as I don't think it's particularly diversified, specifically with respect to financials (although I agree that Qatari financials are likely to be far more sound than their western brethren) and Qatar having so few listed companies. This has implications for liquidity (& hence justifies QIF's discount to NAV), not for my small potential investment but in terms of attracting institutional investment - over your very long term, that's likely to be a key driver of performance so I may be unnecessarily concerned on this point.
I would agree that correlation with developed markets may be lower than it would be for the large emerging markets, but I would have thought that Chinese and Indian growth would have some effect on demand for Qatari LNG, and so the correlation with EM is higher than you might think?
Do you know what TEMIT and other GEM funds are allocating to Qatar as I would probably be happier with a GEM fund that is thinking along these lines than buying QIF itself as I'm a much less active investor than I would guess you are?
Regards