Pension Deficit

Tuesday, Nov 21 2017 by
1

Just wondering of people's approach to pension deficit's as I seem to like many business's but they often have large Pension deficits that put me off.

Is there a good metric to use to enable decicsion making ?



Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
1 thumb up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



Macfarlane Group PLC is a United Kingdom-based company, which is engaged in designing, manufacturing and distribution of packaging products. The Company's segments include Packaging Distribution, which is engaged in distribution of packaging materials and supply of storage and warehousing services in the United Kingdom, and Manufacturing Operations, which is engaged in designing, manufacturing and supplying of self-adhesive labels to a range of fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) customers in the United Kingdom, Europe and the United States. The Company's business operates approximately 18 Regional Distribution Centers (RDCs) supplying customers with a range of packaging materials and services. The Company's Macfarlane Packaging Distribution serves in various sectors, such as Internet retail, third party logistics (3PL) and aerospace. Its Macfarlane Labels serves in various sectors, such as health and beauty, food and household goods. more »

LSE Price
98p
Change
 
Mkt Cap (£m)
154.4
P/E (fwd)
13.9
Yield (fwd)
2.4

Avon Rubber p.l.c. is a United Kingdom-based technology group. The Company specializes in respiratory protection systems and milking point solutions through its two businesses, Avon Protection and milkrite InterPuls. The Company designs, tests and manufactures specialist products and services. Avon protection is the advanced chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) respiratory protection systems for the military, law enforcement and fire markets. The milkrite InterPuls is providing complete milking point solutions to customers across the world. more »

LSE Price
1430p
Change
0.7%
Mkt Cap (£m)
443.6
P/E (fwd)
19.6
Yield (fwd)
1.3

AA plc (AA) offers roadside assistance service. The Company's segments include Roadside Assistance, Insurance Services, Driving Services, Ireland, Insurance Underwriting and Head Office costs. The Roadside Assistance segment sends patrols to members stranded at the side of the road and repairs their vehicles. The Insurance Services segment includes the insurance brokerage activities of the Company, primarily motor and home insurance. The Driving Services segment consists of the Company's Driving School and the British School of Motoring, as well as AA Drivetech, which provides driver training and educative programs. The Ireland segment primarily offers insurance services and roadside assistance in Ireland. The Insurance Underwriting segment reinsures private motor insurance business, which is originated from its Insurance Services segment. Head Office costs segment includes its information technology, finance, property and other back office support functions. more »

LSE Price
136p
Change
-0.4%
Mkt Cap (£m)
831.7
P/E (fwd)
8.8
Yield (fwd)
1.5



  Is Macfarlane fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


2 Posts on this Thread show/hide all

Effortless Cool 21st Nov '17 1 of 2
3

Good question. I have spliced together a couple of comments that I left on a SCVR a few days ago to get the ball rolling.

.......

I allow for pension deficits in my valuations the same way I allow for debt. I add back the contributions to fund the deficit (net of tax) to income before applying a valuation multiple and I deduct the deficit (net of deferred tax credit) from cash in making my cash/debt valuation adjustment.

…....

Yes, a pension deficit involves a high level of potential variability that is very different from a debt. I think that the only way to try and model this accurately would be through stochastic simulation using an economic scenario generator, but this is hardly realistic for most of us.

If you want to impose a "charge" on your valuation to reflect the potential for the deficit to increase, I would suggest basing that on the sensitivity tests in the full results. These sensitivity tests cover the discount rate (+/- 0.5%), inflation rate (+/- 0.5%) and life expectancy (possibly +/- 0.5 years). Take the biggest of these, which is the discount rate for T Clarke (LON:CTO), with a 0.5% decrease increasing the pension liabilities by 12%, which is £6.4m.

You would need to give some thought as to how to calibrate this adjustment, as sensitivity tests are not standard. For example, Macfarlane (LON:MACF) reports on movements of 0.1% and 0.1 years and quantifies the impact on the deficit, rather than the obligations alone. (This makes sense for them as they hold substantial liability driven assets that are intended to hedge against movements in the value of the liabilities).

Anyway, suitably calibrated, this method would provide a sensible adjustment for DB pension risk that would also reflect the riskiness of individual schemes.

It's all too complicated for me, however. At the moment, I just take the view that any discount rate shocks are much more likely to decrease the deficit (higher discount rates than implied by the current yield curve) and that, therefore, future uncertainty on the pension deficit is biased on the favourable side.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
simoan 21st Nov '17 2 of 2
1

In reply to Effortless Cool, post #1

It's all too complicated for me, however. At the moment, I just take the view that any discount rate shocks are much more likely to decrease the deficit (higher discount rates than implied by the current yield curve) and that, therefore, future uncertainty on the pension deficit is biased on the favourable side.

Agree completely. This exactly follows my own thinking with regard to my holding in Norcros (LON:NXR) i.e. that the pension deficit could gradually be melted away by higher discount rates.

All the best, Si

| Link | Share

What's your view on this thread? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter




Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis