The S32 52 week high shows -33%. This seems to be incorrect as the highest price is about 121p and the current price is around 116p. Can anybody explain this?
Since I am holding this share it is an error, it should be about - 3.3%.Possibly the decimal point was not entered.
At that rate - 33% would mean the share price would be around 80p which it is not.
I have notified Stockopedia for you on the feedback button, so it should be rectified shortly.
Hi all - if you look at the high in the price history it was an intraday high of 170. I'm not sure if this is a misprint from the stock exchange or not. We'll look into it.
You can see the same print on Google Finance - https://www.google.co.uk/finance?cid=1124000552310...
Hi Ed, No it's not a misprint, you are right. On 11/7 it did spike up to 170.25p. It only shows up on a candle chart and not a line chart as we usually see in Stockopedia charts.Figures checked out with Vector Vest.
Seems I need to keep an eagle eye on this share as a second spike appears a few days later.
The last engulfing candle looks set for another uptrend.
Thanks Ed for responding so swiftly.
Update here - I just got this from Thomson Reuters.
Hi Ed, Upon checking RIC we confirm that the high prices for the trade dates 11th and 25th July, 2016 were incorrect. The data has now been amended to show 108.75 and 105.25.
Good news... we've reimported the prices, but the momentum indicators won't get updated till tonight.
Thanks for the spot on this datapoint @nickwild. Frankly I think this is why the Stockopedia database is better than any hedge funds... there's nothing like having thousands of people focusing on individual stocks... it keeps the integrity high.
Data is hard... but the community here make it much easier !
