Over the past few weeks, I have generated value investing ideas using the Stockopedia screening tools. This week that quest continues with an earnings-based screen.

Most of the mainstream academic finance research has focused on the Price-to-Book metric, which was the focus of my last screen. However, it has been known for some time that using earnings-based metrics may overcome some of the issues that Price-to-Book faces as a measure of value. Most of the published data has come from “quant practitioners,” who use their research to manage money via quantitative strategies. While I am not aiming to generate a purely quantitative screen, understanding the history of this research helps ensure I pick the right screening factors.

Earnings-Based Value Metrics – A Brief History

Perhaps the best-known of the early quant practitioners are David Dremen and James O’Shaughnessy. In 1980, Dremen wrote a book called Contrarian Investment Strategy, which highlighted that a low Price-to-Earnings strategy was the best-documented way to beat the market. In 1998, he followed this up with a book called Contrariarian Investment Strategies: Beating the Market by Going Against the Crowd. He looked at more up-to-date data for Price/Earnings, Price/Cash Flow, Price/Book Value, and Dividend Yield, finding Price/Earnings to still come out on top.

O’Shaughnessy’s book What Works on Wall Street was first published in 1997 and is now in its 4th Edition. O’Shaughnessy conducted a more thorough analysis and included the Sharpe ratio in his findings. The Sharpe ratio takes the excess return that a strategy generates and divides it by the volatility of those returns. The idea is that a higher return doesn’t gain investors anything if it comes at the cost of higher volatility. If the Sharpe ratio of a strategy was the same as the index, investors could simply leverage up the index to get the same result with less effort. Although the idea isn’t without its issues – leveraging the index is not cost-free, and investors don’t mind upside volatility – it makes sense to conclude that a strategy only outperforms another if it has a higher Sharpe ratio.

What Works on Wall Street contains some interesting findings. The first was that in the period studied (1951-2003 in my Third Edition of the book), Price-to-Book-Value and Price-Sales came out with the highest Sharpe ratios. The second was that the outperformance was concentrated in the largest stocks, which goes against the…

Unlock the rest of this article with a 14 day trial

Already have an account?
Login here