Small Cap Value Report (Thu 24 May 2018) - MKS, SHOE, HEAD

Wednesday, May 23 2018 by
149

Good morning,

I didn't get round to commenting on Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) results yesterday, which a reader asked me to do. I haven't looked at MKS properly for a long time, so thought it would be interesting. So here goes, this is what I wrote last night;


Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS)

Share price: 307p (up 5.2% yesterday, on results day)
No. shares: 1,624.8m
Market cap: £4,988m

Results for 52 weeks ended 31 Mar 2018

It would take too long to comment on everything, so here are just some interesting points that I jotted down whilst reading the results.

  • Revenue up slightly, 0.7%, to £10,622m
  • Adjusted profit remarkably resilient, at £580.9m - down only 5.4% in a market where much of the competition is seriously struggling.
  • Adjusted free cashflow is a stand out item, at £582.4m - remember this is after capex, so MKS remains a highly cash generative business.
  • Huge adjustments though, covering various reorganisational costs, totalling £514.1m - so how you view these results depends on whether you accept the adjustments or not.
  • Adjusted EPS of 27.8p = PER of 11.0
  • Net debt is £1.83bn - large, but I think MKS has a substantial freehold property portfolio. I would normally disregard debt that relates to freehold properties

Property - the 2017 Annual Report shows "land & buildings" with a book value of £2,588m at 1 Apr 2017. The word "freehold" is not mentioned anywhere in the Annual Report. I've googled it, and this article from 2013 suggests that 65% of MKS's retail space was freehold. If anyone has more information on what MKS's freehold properties might be worth, then please post it in the comments below.

MKS seems to be permanently reorganising, but the narrative with yesterday's results sounds impressive for its directness - admitting that many things are wrong with the business, but can be fixed.

International profit has more than doubled to £135.2m, due to exiting from loss-making sites/countries, and forex benefits. That's an impressive improvement. I wonder what profit growth might be possible from overseas expansion?

Store closures - this is being accelerated, and will result in 25% of the "legacy" clothing and home space being closed. Whilst brutal, this should considerably boost future profits, I imagine. It also means there will be less competition in many…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested. ?>


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
150 thumbs up
1 thumb down
Share this post with friends



Marks and Spencer Group plc (M&S) is a retailer in the United Kingdom, with over 1,380 stores around the world. The Company is the holding company of the Marks & Spencer Group of companies. The Company operates through two segments: UK and International. The UK segment consists of the United Kingdom retail business and the United Kingdom franchise operations. The International segment consists of Marks & Spencer owned businesses in the Republic of Ireland, Europe and Asia, together with international franchise operations. The Company is engaged in delivering own brand food, clothing and home products in its stores and online both in the United Kingdom and internationally. The Company sells womenswear, lingerie, menswear, kidswear, beauty and home products, serving customers through approximately 300 full-line stores and Website, M&S.com. It has approximately 910 United Kingdom stores, including over 220 owned and approximately 350 franchise Simply Food stores. more »

LSE Price
298.1p
Change
-0.1%
Mkt Cap (£m)
4,847
P/E (fwd)
11.1
Yield (fwd)
6.3

Shoe Zone plc is a footwear retailer in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The Company offers women's shoes, men's shoes, boy's shoes and girl's shoes. The Company's online offering combined with its store network enables customers to shop through multiple channels. The Company operates from a portfolio of approximately 550 stores. Its customers purchase all of the products available in stores, as well as an additional approximately 400 product styles. The Company sells over 20 million pairs of shoes per annum. The Company has operations in various countries, including Germany, Italy, Spain and France. The Company's distribution center is located in Leicester, England. The Company's subsidiaries include Castle Acres Development Limited, Shoe Zone Retail Limited, Zone Property Limited, Zone Group Limited, Shoe Zone (Ireland) Limited, Shoe Zone Pension Trustees Limited, Stead & Simpson Limited, Zone Footwear Limited, Zone Retail and Walkright Limited. more »

LSE Price
169.9p
Change
1.4%
Mkt Cap (£m)
83.8
P/E (fwd)
10.2
Yield (fwd)
6.3

Headlam Group Plc is a United Kingdom-based company, which is engaged in the marketing, supply and distribution of a range of floorcovering products. The Company's operations are focused on providing customers, principally independent floorcovering retailers and contractors, with a range of floorcovering products supported by a next day delivery service. The Company operates through 56 operating segments in the United Kingdom and five operating segments in Continental Europe. Each operating segment is a trading operation aligned to the sales, marketing, supply and distribution of floorcovering products. The Company's activities and facilities are located throughout the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland and the Netherlands. Its business in France operates from approximately two distribution centers and over 20 service centers, and the businesses in Switzerland and the Netherlands each operate from a single distribution center. more »

LSE Price
448.64p
Change
0.4%
Mkt Cap (£m)
378.1
P/E (fwd)
10.2
Yield (fwd)
6.0



  Is LON:MKS fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


57 Comments on this Article show/hide all

herbie47 24th May 38 of 57
1

In reply to post #367089

I have to slightly disagree about the quality of Aldi and Lidl, they win many awards (cheese, wines, spirits, Christmas puddings, face cream and in Which often come out top on basic products such as washing up liquid and washing detergents). Yes some of their products are poor but generally they are fairly high quality, compared to Morrisons and Tesco I think overall they are better quality. Aldi are opening many new stores so yes could be a problem for other food retailers. I need some compost so I will pick some up at Lidl next time I go.

| Link | Share
mark1308 24th May 39 of 57
2

Paul you are a star , sir. Really enjoyed your piece on Marks but you are always a great read. Like you and others i thought Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) a basket case especially on fall from ftse100 but after your piece i am not so sure and am considering a small purchase !

| Link | Share
ridavies 24th May 40 of 57
2

In reply to post #367004

Re Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE), all good points and the conclusion I reached via the long route. Especially I take your point about computers, though much more seems to be done by mobile these days and it appears very few people - rich or poor - don't have a smart phone,most do use it a lot and spend a lot on it, both the contracts and their income. In fact Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE) makes the point that a very high % of their Multi Sector I think they call it - ie internet - is via mobile.

| Link | Share
ridavies 24th May 41 of 57
1

I know Paul prefers to focus on the facts and not get too bothered about M & A possibilities, at least that is the way I read it so forgive me Paul if I am misrepresenting you!
However I did read an interesting speculative article in Money Week recently, where someone was considering what might be the next few combinations in retail after the JS/Walmart deal. He thought that Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) and John Lewis would be a natural. He did recognise that there are the issues of ownership of the John Lewis Partnership but believed that for the experts in the City of London would be able to come up with a deal which would be beneficial to both.....so probably a defensive merger rather an acquisition. Thoughts anyone?

| Link | Share
ridavies 24th May 42 of 57
1

In reply to post #367114

Re the comparisns between Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) and Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE) Stocko scores, I understand that Herbie. It was primarily a point of near coincidence and the way an individual element in the Q/V/M range can affect the overall figure so markedly - and fairly so. Not worth further discussion I suggest, if my comment was worth discussion at all! If not, I apologise for wasting others' time!

| Link | Share
Trident 24th May 43 of 57

Could someone seeing the underlying value that Paul has pointed in Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) bid for it? I suspect it would be someone who could be bringing the delivery infrastructure but perhaps doesn't have the good brand element.

Morrisons must have been in the same position but rather than try and build out a delivery infrastructure, just went for a deal with Ocado.

| Link | Share
aflash 24th May 44 of 57

MKS (Marks & Spencer) from Technical Analysis point of view:

Break Out above 12 month downtrend at beginning of May
If breaks out above yesterday's Hi of 312p will motor to 330p

Near 200 day Moving Average but closed below it. I read 200MA as 308p. Anyone have another number?

Close today probably just above psychological 3 pounds and Pivot Point but not posted yet

(Above Pivot Point = support, below means PP acts as resistance but PP moves with price changes)

RSI depends on your time frame. In the 60s five days, dropping below 50 two days.

On fundamental side yield support until May 31 when X-div.

In 2016 bought 348p and sold 367p .

Bought today 303p.

GLA


| Link | Share
wildshot 24th May 45 of 57
2

In reply to post #366904

Newriver Reit (LON:NRR) would be an interesting read for Paul and those wanting to get a feel for the traditional retail market. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the average rental per square foot of NRR properties has only slightly declined, especially in light of all the stories Paul shares on CVAs and renegotiated rental agreements.

Also the NRR occupancy rate is really high and consistent (97% from memory, please correct me if I'm wrong).

The share price of Newriver Reit (LON:NRR) has been on a decline for a number of months, I think maybe due to the washed up state of traditional retail, however these results seem to suggest that as a retail REIT maybe NRR is very well mananged.

I did however note the rate of dividend growth has declined from previously 5%. Maybe management are applying an element of caution going forward?

| Link | Share
Steves cups 24th May 46 of 57

Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS)
Was in the store yesterday with Mrs Steve. Thought it was quite noticeable how many "good value" and "reduced prices" labels there were above the racks - not seen that before

| Link | Share
Edward John Canham 24th May 47 of 57
1

For once I disagree with you Paul.

My view is Marks and Spencer (LON:MKS) and Next (LON:NXT) will contract over the coming years - but I have the sneaking suspicion that Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE) will grow.

Time will tell.

Phil

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Howard Marx 24th May 48 of 57
6

"The key advantage of holding the larger caps, is that you can buy or sell, in any size, whenever you want. So if something awful happens, and the markets plunge, you would be unable to unwind a medium size, let alone a large position in SHOE, and would have no choice but to take the losses. Whereas with NXT or MKS, you can sell any size instantly. That makes a big difference to risk:reward, if you have anything other than a small portfolio."


Paul, what you write here sounds intuitively correct. 

However, empirically I think you're wrong on this, no doubt scarred by your experience with illiquid stocks during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008.


It is certainly true, I think, that most investors fear illiquidity. But the consequence of this aversion is that illiquidity is a big driver of returns - illiquid stocks perform best, liquid stocks perform worst - the so-called ILLIQUIDTY PREMIUM. 


Low liquidity stocks offer better returns (both absolutely & adjusted for volatility).


This is true for all market-caps: large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap & micro-cap.


To underline this point, the following table was posted recently by the US Microcap investor, Ian Cassel:

5b0716858c160ILLIQUIDITY_PREMIUM_Ian_Cas


I guess we all are guilty of being tempted to trade off profit maximisation with emotional well-being.




| Link | Share | 2 replies
mickemmanuel 24th May 49 of 57
1

great article on M&S.The high street is a minefield at the moment but possibly not as bad as many think.
Mick e

| Link | Share
Paul Scott 24th May 50 of 57
8

In reply to post #367244

Hi Howard Marx,

However, empirically I think you're wrong on this, no doubt scarred by your experience with illiquid stocks during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008.

I lost all my money in 2008 precisely because I couldn't sell illiquid shares!

So no amount of academic studies or statistics will ever change my mind on this - because this actually happened to me. Isn't that what "empirically" means?

Admittedly, my toxic mixture was illiquidity AND gearing - the two combined are disastrous.

I use gearing now, but I'm very wary of liquidity - I have to be able to get out of any of my holdings in 1-2 days, otherwise I won't buy them. If that had been my policy in 2008, I wouldn't have lost all my money.

So forget the academic studies, and focus on real life experience!

Best wishes, Paul.

| Link | Share
daveinthelakes 25th May 51 of 57
2

In reply to post #367244

Ian Cassel data presumably relates to USA definition of micro caps, under £200M and small caps £200-1,500M. So the relative liquidity of the UK micro and small caps may be questionable when compared to the market caps in US?

Today, on no news, three of the micro/small caps I hold moved 6-22%. The liquidity of such stocks can't be compared to USA data.

| Link | Share
Lgarvey 25th May 52 of 57

In reply to post #367229

I don't know if you read Robbie's blog (The Naked Trader) but he had this to say about M&S

"Sad to see Marks and Sparks doing so badly. I really
think within five years it will have gone.

Its clothing side will be closed down or go all online. The
food side is ok but I think it will simply be taken out
buy Waitrose and the Waitrose and M and S food offerings
will be merged.

It just didn't move with the times. The 84-year-old lady I speak
to for the lonely old charity says she stopped buying clothes there
ages ago. It doesn't know which market it is going for.

It needs to immediately close all its clothing departments,
concentrate on food only. And become half the size to survive.

Sadly this is just the start, in a few years time shopping centres
will disappear except for the very biggest. "

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Damian Cannon 25th May 53 of 57
2

In reply to post #367359

Interesting comments from Robbie but there's a sentence in there which is directly relevant to Newriver Reit (LON:NRR):

"Sadly this is just the start, in a few years time shopping centres will disappear except for the very biggest."

Now Newriver Reit (LON:NRR) are very focused on the local shopping centre market which is essentially those smaller centres which are within 30 minutes of their customers and have solid stores. From talking to Allan Lockhart, CEO, I learnt that they see these as a high return, low risk opportunity precisely because they're not the top-end, mega-centres that are competing to be the biggest and the best. So I don't think that Robbie is right on this point at least!

Damian

Blog: Ambling Randomly
| Link | Share
Fangorn 25th May 54 of 57
5

In reply to post #367024

"If M&S did food deliveries we would buy off them regularly but we are not prepared to go out to get groceries."

Wow, seriously.
How lazy.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
doublelutz 25th May 55 of 57

In reply to post #367409

Fangorn - a tad late in your response which I don't think anyone but us will now be aware off! M&S are not next door to us and to visit involves getting the car out and doing a 10 mile round trip. The greens would be horrified!
I would just go there for a brisk walk but I am afraid I can't manage that any more.

In the event we use Ocado to deliver mainly Waitrose product which we think is second best to Marks.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Fangorn 25th May 56 of 57

In reply to post #367439

"M&S are not next door to us and to visit involves getting the car out and doing a 10 mile round trip. The greens would be horrified!"

Snigger.

I'm sure they'd make exception given I guess you must be beset my some affliction that prevents you taking that brisk walk(Old age I am presuming) 10 miles is certainly some distance, even more so mit heavy shopping, More Greens use their cars for far shorter journeys I'd wager.

I use delivery services as well, but not for fresh produce - wouldn't dream of such and deem a visit to the supermarket a necessity in this regard.

Big fan of Waitrose too...but each supermarket has its "superb offerings"

We are spoiled for choice.

| Link | Share
momentofclarity 22nd Jun 57 of 57
1

Got a voucher today 'M&S Foodhall now deliver to your door. Shop online for all your favourites'....For a limited time, get £10 off and free delivery on your first shop. Simply spend £50 and use the code*:

I think this is new, not sure I have seen this before....small step in the right direction if so.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

 Are LON:MKS's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »



About Paul Scott

Paul Scott

I trained as an accountant with a Top 5 firm, but that was so boring that I spent too much time in the 1990s being a disco bunny, and busting moves on the dancefloor, and chilling out with mates back at either my house or theirs, and having a lot of fun!Then spent 8 years as FD for a ladieswear retail chain called "Pilot", leaving on great terms in 2002 - having been a key player in growing the business 10 fold. If the truth be told, I partied pretty hard at the weekends too, so bank reconciliations on Monday mornings were more luck than judgement!! But they were always correct.I got bored with that and decided to become a professional small caps investor in 2002. I made millions, but got too cocky, and lost the lot in 2008, due to excessive gearing. A miserable, wilderness period occurred from 2008-2012.Since then, the sun has begun to shine again! I am now utterly briliant again, and immerse myself in small caps, and am a walking encyclopedia on the subject. I love writing a daily report for Stockopedia.com on most weekday mornings, constantly researching daily results & trading updates for small caps. Cheese! more »

Follow



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis