Value Investing & Housebuilders, Part 1: Industry Statistics and the Government

Thursday, Dec 01 2011 by
1
Value Investing  Housebuilders Part 1 Industry Statistics and the Government

his month has certainly been the most unproductive in the short history of this blog. My stock of ideas has kept growing but my willingness to actually act on these ideas has continued to shrink. I have continued to cut back on risk with the latest big changes in the VH portfolio being my disposal of all my retail stocks (Marks & Spencer (LON:MKS), Debenhams (LON:DEB), and JD) apart from a small position in Greggs and my acquisition of a massive short ETF position which should hedge around 50% of my ‘market risk’. I wouldn’t say that I have turned more bearish but it seems clear to me that although a 10% earnings yields is nice enough the risks involved are just too great.

As a result, I have begun to turn my mind to those sectors that haven’t really recovered since 2008. One of my first ideas was banks which seem to be the favourite value stock of choice amongst those investors of skill and reputation. I took a brief look at BAC’s 400-odd page 10Q and, unsurprisingly, concluded that I really didn’t know what I was doing. The other two perennial value sectors are pub stocks and house builders stocks. One of these areas has been done to death here so we will turn to the other.

I will split this topic up into two posts. In the first, I am going to give a general overview of the industry and the sort of  numbers involved. I am also going to look at the house building programs announced by the government recently and try to find out how important this is going to be for the industry. In the second post, I am going to attempt to value a house building company, Barratt Dev. and look at some of the potential problems/challenges involved in actually valuing these companies.

—–

Summary:

  • Both housing starts and completions have fallen dramatically in the past few years. Housing starts tend to lead to completions by roughly two years. Housing starts bottomed in the first quarter of 2009 and completions have stopped declining in recent quarters.
  • However, at current levels it seems there is a significant shortage in new housing. If we are to believe the government’s 2008 projections then current starts need to grow slightly more than 140%…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
1 thumb up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




2 Comments on this Article show/hide all

schober 2nd Dec '11 1 of 2
1

you appear to hav e missed out that all houses built after 2016 have to be zero carbon houses.

......... According to official estimates in the Code for Sustainable Homes, this will increase the cost of building a house by up to £37,793. ..................
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8917737/Is-the-global-warming-scare-the-greatest-delusion-in-history.html#disqus_thread

Zero carbon homes ‘too expensive’ to build
http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/sustainability/zero-carbon-homes-%E2%80%98too-expensive%E2%80%99-to-build/6518051.article

| Link | Share | 1 reply
general2011 6th Dec '11 2 of 2
1

In reply to post #62423

@schober: It does raise the question, in an environmental rather than strictly economic sense: "is the cure worse than the disease?" Yet more ill-considered feel-good government edicts - or am I just being cynical - as if.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About valuhunteruk

Valuhunteruk

I'm a private investor based in the UK. I run Valuhunteruk a value investing blog started in March 2011 which is a continuation of a private blog I have been running since mid-2010. I publish the research and key ideas behind my decisions and the performance is tracked in a portofolio. more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis