I trade most global equity markets and find a lot of attractive stocks in the UK small cap space but the spreads just make them unbuyable - 5-10% on a small cap is quite common. I don't see this in any other market. Why is this?
Thanks,
Dave
-->
I trade most global equity markets and find a lot of attractive stocks in the UK small cap space but the spreads just make them unbuyable - 5-10% on a small cap is quite common. I don't see this in any other market. Why is this?
Thanks,
Dave
Small stocks tend to be illiquid as they are traded in small volumes. By widening the spread, market makers can buy and sell at a substantial premium. This makes the market more liquid, and it also makes a lot of money for the market makers. A sort of win-win. If it weren't for the large spreads, ordinary retail investors would have little access to promising small caps.
Sure, but the question is why is this so amplified in UK markets. Almost without exception, a 30m market cap stock in Sweden, Singapore, HK or Turkey will usually have a MUCH smaller spread than a typical 200m market cap stock in the UK, so perhaps the UK market markers have a certain control that does not exist in other markets.
This is something of a mystery to me too. Because of the high UK spreads, I trade mainly US stocks and the spread is seldom more than 50 bps on small companies, and negligible on large companies. If we assume that trading volumes and liquidity are equal for small caps in the countries you mention, then the answer must be that the UK market makers are expensive or inefficient, or that the LSE needs an overhaul.
The UK market makers effectively create a false market. When a retail buyer places an order on some platforms eg ii the RSP (Retail Service Providers) will quote a different price from the quoted spread.
Of course, the UK regulators are all over this discriminatory practice and always have the client rather than financial institutions interests as a priority, as was the case with the likes of mini bonds etc etc etc.