31
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2017 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Why it can pay to accept the discomfort of buying stocks hitting new highs

There are very few stock market signals that catch the attention of investors quite like the 52-week high. Lists of shares making new highs are published in newspapers and on websites around the world every day. But while 52-week high data is easy to get hold of, what does it really tell you and how can you make the most of it?

One of the surprising traits of the 52-week high is that it can have a major impact on the minds of investors - and sometimes that makes it more of a hindrance than a help.

While the information is readily available, evidence shows that it can cause a kind of momentary paralysis in investors that leads to a slow reaction in prices. And when you get the extra kicker of a positive earnings surprise from a stock that’s trading at a 52-week high, this so-called ‘post-earnings announcement drift’ has been shown to be even more extreme. But while all this sounds quite negative, it arguably creates an opportunity for investors who are aware of it.

The lowdown on new highs

I cover the subject of 52-week highs periodically, and it’s one of those areas that provokes a lot of interest. For a start, new highs have the credibility of being used by popular investors like Mark Minervini and William O’Neil. Yet when you look at the research into new highs, the explanation for why they’re important is quite intricate.

Influential research on them was published by Thomas George and Chuan-Yang Hwang in 2004, which found that they were a major driver of momentum. Momentum is the tendency for price trends to persist over the short to medium term, and it’s often linked to how investors think and behave.

George and Hwang reckoned that investors used the 52-week high as a reference point, or anchor. They found that when new-news comes along about a company, it can take days, weeks or even months for the price to shift upwards because of this ‘anchoring’ effect. In essence, existing investors are simply slow to bid the price higher, while onlookers are reluctant to buy at the new high. This is where the term post-earnings announcement drift comes from.

Now this kind of investor irrationality isn’t restricted to 52-week highs. There are other events that cause investors to hesitate that have also been linked to momentum. One of them is the ‘earnings surprise’, which is a classic example of a stock market event that can throw investors into turmoil. In this case, better than expected news can actually make investors slow to bid prices up. To get to grips with this, we last covered earnings surprises here.

Mixing new highs and extreme surprises

While the 52-week high and earnings surprises are both components in Stockopedia’s Momentum Rank, what you often find is that they’re treated as separate events. But this shouldn’t be the case at all. It makes sense that a stock trading at a new high is capable - and even likely - to produce an earnings surprise. In fact that’s exactly what we’ve seen in high performing shares like Boohoo.Com and Fevertree Drinks over the past year. In those cases, broker estimates couldn’t keep up with each company’s earnings momentum and they just kept hitting new highs.

To bring this full circle, the most recent academic evidence supports the view that post earnings announcement drift is most extreme when you get stocks trading at 52-week highs and delivering earnings surprises.

This is exactly the conclusion of a follow-up 2015 paper by George, Hwang and Yuan Li. Their research found that, on average, companies that issue extreme positive surprises see more muted share price action the closer their prices are to their 52-week high. But crucially, this corrects itself over time and the prices of these shares rise much more strongly on subsequent announcements.

So the lesson for investors, as far as this evidence goes, is that it can pay to accept the discomfort of buying stocks hitting new highs - especially when they’re beating earnings expectations, too.

Putting new highs and earnings surprises to work

At Stockopedia, we track momentum strategies that focus on both 52-week highs and earnings surprises. So it’s simple to take the key features of both and combine them in a new screen - which subscribers can find here.

In terms of rules, this screen looks for shares ranking in the top 10 percent in the market based on how close they are trading to their 52-week high. Those companies must also have produced an earnings surprise of at least 5 percent at the last half or full year results (we’re ideally looking for extreme surprises). In this case we’ve excluded financial stocks and set a minimum market cap threshold of £25 million.

Name

Mkt Cap £m

Percent vs. 52w High

EPS Surprise %, Last Interim

StockRank Style

Sector

Robert Walters

404

-

7.3

Super Stock

Industrials

B&M European Value Retail

3,832

-0.21

5.8

High Flyer

Consumer Cyclicals

BCA Marketplace

1,687

-0.23

15.0

Style Neutral

Consumer Cyclicals

Next

7,629

-0.57

7.6

Style Neutral

Consumer Cyclicals

J D Wetherspoon

1,348

-1.01

12.2

Style Neutral

Consumer Cyclicals

Quantum Pharma

134.4

-1.01

12.4

High Flyer

Healthcare

Card Factory

1,212

-1.06

5.1

High Flyer

Consumer Cyclicals

PureCircle

886

-1.07

22.3

High Flyer

Consumer Defensives

X5 Retail NV

8,816

-1.13

306.7

High Flyer

Consumer Defensives

Inchcape

3,503

-1.97

6.0

Super Stock

Consumer Cyclicals

Right now, one of the interesting features of the list is that the stocks on it span a wide range of market caps. The highest achiever based on proximity to the 52-week high is one of the smallest stocks, Robert Walters, which beat earnings forecasts by just over 7 percent in its most recent numbers. But it’s chased by much larger companies, including B&M Retail, BCA Marketplace, Next and JD Wetherspoon. But care is needed - the next stock on the list is Quantum Pharma, a pre-profit drug developer that is hitting new highs but is bouncing back from a low level. So as ever, it’s worth digging into the details with this kind of screen.

Considering that the 52-week high is one of the most accessible data-points about a share, it offers some interesting insights. The momentum effects that are triggered by new highs have been found to be powerful and can continue to drive prices higher over many months. Combined with another momentum driver - strong positive earnings surprises - the most recent research points to a more pronounced upward drift in prices over time. Buying shares hitting new highs is undoubtedly a tough strategy for some investors, but the evidence still points to momentum being one of the most powerful drivers of returns in the market.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

33 comments


Avatar for Redrichmond

I use this 52 week high along with p/s and 52 week low. It works..

Minivera in his book suggests using the 52 week low when its over a 100 and 52 week high is 15 or less

I have found tweaking this to also use other metrics but filtering cheap shares (p/s less the 1) and 52 week low 100 or more and spread bps less than 300 bps(thats the part that lose just buying the shares- so if 300bps thats 3 %...the lower bps the better) and 52 week high 5 or less.. also i look at FCF (free cash flow over the last 3 years to see if the cash flow is growing)

From this list I can then filter more on how many screens they relate to and if any of them are the negative red rated screens

A wonderful tool stockopedia is :)

0
Avatar for rpannell

I have been running a few SR portfolios, started every few months. The results at year end have ranged between +6% and +38%. One year ago I started a portfolio, just using momentum as the deciding parameter (buy 10 shares, MR greater than .90, SR.greater than 70. Sell if MR less than 75). Over the past year this has returned 62%.

As someone else said, 1 swallow does not make a summer but on this limited sample the MR portfolio has outperformed all of my SR portfolios. However, as Ben mentioned, it's not easy psychologically to by momentum stocks.

0
Avatar for Peter Craven

I'm an investor not a trader and my volume of transactions is about 6-8 per year. Not enough experience or investigation of momentum trading to have confidence in using this metric.

Companies where dividend forest increases for Year 1 and Year 2 of more that 5% PA are worth looking into.

0
Avatar for The Phoenix

Any chance of another interview with the momentum master Robbie Burns been about 18 months since the last one.

3
Avatar for ricky65

I agree with this article. It's unnatural for most people to buy highs. Most people's natural instinct is to buy weakness, they can't resist a bargain. I think this is a major mistake a lot of people make. I used to be like this but, after reading Minervini's book, I've trained myself to the point where I'm now the opposite - it feels natural for me to buy highs and unnatural to buy weakness. Consequently, my performance improved considerably. Most of my biggest winners have been made from buying breakouts to all time highs.

A good illustration of the phenomenon of people buying weakness is the Hargreaves Lansdown webpage where they show the buy:sell ratios for the top ten most traded shares traded by their clients. You normally see 80-70% buy after a profit warning. Today for example I see 86:14 for Card Factory (LON:CARD) after its 18% drop yesterday on results.

5
Avatar for GrahamF

Stockopedia have back tested their formulas that comprise the overall stock rank. Their NAPS portfolio has shown strong returns based on using this ranking system and selecting a diverse group of stocks. So, it is pretty clear that overall this type of strategy works. To say that it has no predictive capability seems rather strange. Momentum has been included because it has a predictive capability.

It is very clear from the performance screen that Momentum rank tracks well with share price performance.

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/?exchanges=LSE%2CISD&field=_MomentumScore_lo∩=10&period=1&buckets=deciles

Stockopedia have provided many write ups and videos discussing how the Stockranks have been used to select the NAPS portfolio and analysing the performance of it. They have checked to make sure they were not just lucky with their selection.

I recommend a review of those videos and reports if there is doubt that this system works.

What people seem to struggle with is that a share with a good Stockrank or good Value rank etc. can then subsequently perform badly. In the universe of high rank shares there will be some that do not perform well but they are outnumbered by those that do.

Stockranks are a way to build a portfolio of a basket of shares not to select an individual share.

3
Avatar for imranawan

Hi Ben,

Interesting article. Are you able to quantify what you mean by earnings surprise. For example Card Factory (LON:CARD) is listed as having an interim earnings surprise of 5%+. Given yesterday's lacklustre results, I assumed this was related to the FY results issued in March 2017: https://www.investegate.co.uk/card-factory-plc--card-/rns/final-results/201703280700106757A/

However, this shows whilst there was growth across all metrics, underlying EPS was up 3.8% on 2016 levels. Is the earnings surprise a beat on EPS forecasts?

Regards,
Imran.

1
Avatar for Gromley

Very interesting article, thanks Ed.

I too though have a question about how you identify "earnings surprises".

I can get that this is when published results exceed "market expectations" , but often strong results will have been preceded by a trading update flagging the fact - which will sometimes (dependent on timing, coverage etc.) result in increased market expectations.

If a TU flags over-performance against expectations but the forecast are raised by more than the actual performance, would you analysis miss this as an "earnings surprise" and instead regard it as a "disappointment".

Genuine question as I have found it interesting in the past that the market can sometimes seem to ignore a quite explicit TU but then react positively when the results are published and also the converse.



1
Avatar for sharw

....and a lesson to be learned from Card Factory (LON:CARD) - on your list - which reached a new 12 month high on Monday and today (Wednesday) is closer to the 12 month low.

2
Avatar for weycome45

I think momentum is important BUT after being in DFS a month before their surprise profit warning and getting crushed and burnt in the fallout I think you have to be very careful with stocks that have Stocko high momentum ranking and numbers !

0
Avatar for rick

Ben,

What is the rationale for excluded all financial sector stocks please?

0
Avatar for Ben Hobson

Hey Rick,
When I did the screen, financials (specifically funds) were adding lots of noise to the results. So really it was an editorial decision rather than a screening one (but I think it's helpful to show that the rules for these screens can be adapted however you like).
Cheers, Ben

0
Avatar for Peter Craven

I'm not a fan of Stockopedia's Momentum Rank as I am not aware that it has any predictive component regarding the future forecast performance of a stock.
I would also like to know what formula Stockopedia use to calculate Momentum Rank.
Ditto all the other Stockopedia Ranks.

-8
Avatar for ISAallowance

http://help.stockopedia.com/product-guide/stockranks/basics/the-momentum-rank

Shows all the parameters used to make it (as rank in market for each parameter). The only bit missing is the weightings applied to each parameter rank, given they don't state "equally weighted" I assume that there might be some secret sauce applied to the weightings.

2
Avatar for Peter Craven

The devil is in the detail as always?

0
Avatar for ISAallowance

To the best of my knowledge, the premise of the momentum rank is that it is based on academic research that shows that the momentum factors used *do* have a predictive component regarding the future performance of a stock. There's some good research linked from the momentum rank page.

1
Avatar for Peter Craven

Hello ISAAllowance

WPP and Reckitt and Benckiser are two perfect examples of stocks which were momentum stocks this earlier this year, but not any more. However, my little anecdote does not prove that momentum factors *Don't* have a predictive component. As we are all aware one swallow does not make a summer.

We will have to agree to disagree on this one.

Regards,
Peter.

0
Avatar for pka

Peter Craven wrote: "I'm not a fan of Stockopedia's Momentum Rank as I am not aware that it has any predictive component regarding the future forecast performance of a stock."

Well, the performance record of the Momentum Rank in the UK has been much better than the UK market as a whole over the last four years, since it was first introduced by Stockopedia, as this graph shows:

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/?exchanges=LSE%2CISD&field=_MomentumScore_lo∩=10&period=1&buckets=deciles

We should bear in mind, however, there hasn't been a major bear market over that period.

0
Avatar for Peter Craven

Not sure what the graph is actually telling me?

Your word of caution "We should bear in mind, however, there hasn't been a major bear market over that period." is most significant.

0
Avatar for Howard Marx

The empirical evidence suggests that Momentum is the king of all factors

Cliff Asness (AQR) wrote an insightful paper "Fact, Fiction and Momentum Investing" in which he notes that momentum’s return premium is evident over 212 years of U.S. market data and can
be seen in studies covering 40 other countries and more than a dozen other asset classes (e.g., bonds, currencies, commodities).

Over the 86 years between 1927 and 2013, for example, the spread of recent winners over recent losers averaged 8.3% a year.

https://www.aqr.com/library/journal-articles/fact-fiction-and-momentum-investing

3
Avatar for Peter Craven

Howard,

I trust you use momentum metrics as a component of you investment decisions?

0
Avatar for Howard Marx

Yes sir.

The factors I prioritise are Quality & Momentum.

Value is the key determinant of long run returns but in the short run is a supporting variable.

2
Avatar for tradermark

Mark Minervini, Robbie Burns and Bill O'Neil might beg to differ, all multi-millionaire masters of momentum...

1
Avatar for Peter Craven

tradermark1968,

Would be interesting to learn if the likes of Warren Buffet, Neil Woodford and other fund managers are momentum investors. very unlikely?

In the meantime I'll stick to reading company reports, balance sheets and looking at dividend forecasts and so on.

0
Avatar for ISAallowance

"In the meantime I'll stick to reading company reports, balance sheets and looking at dividend forecasts and so on."

There's absolutely nothing wrong with that.  Different folk like/suit different styles.  I would much rather buy things cheap as well, and filled my boots with UK financials immediately after Brexit.

However, learning not to be scared of stocks breaking new highs (largely through reading Stockopedia in the last couple of years) has most definitely improved my returns - many of my best returns are firmly in the high flier classification (quality + momentum, not so much value).  Previously my price-anchoring tendencies were most definitely holding me back.

Momentum investors (or at least some of them) read company reports and balance sheets as well.  Taking momentum into consideration isn't simply an excuse to buy any old crap that's going up!  I believe that the evidence suggests that momentum in conjunction with either Q, V or Q+V is an even better indicator of future return than momentum in isolation.

Dividend forecasts - what are you looking for?  If you are looking for a forecast of an increased dividend, I would consider that a momentum indicator.



2
Avatar for pka

ISAallowance wrote: "I believe that the evidence suggests that momentum in conjunction with either Q, V or Q+V is an even better indicator of future return than momentum in isolation."

Actually the evidence from the UK past performance graphs for Stockopedia's various ranks suggests that the 90-100 Momentum Rank has performed slightly better over he past 4 years than any of the 90-100 QM, VM and QVM ranks:

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/?exchanges=LSE%2CISD&field=_MomentumScore_lo∩=10&period=1&buckets=deciles

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/?exchanges=LSE%2CISD&field=_QMScore_lo∩=10&period=1&buckets=deciles

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/?exchanges=LSE%2CISD&field=_VMScore_lo∩=10&period=1&buckets=deciles

http://www.stockopedia.com/stockranks/performance/

1
Avatar for ISAallowance

Hi pka,

Thanks for pointing that out, that's quite a surprising result but certainly for the last few years that appears to be the case.

0
Avatar for pka
0
Avatar for pka
0
Avatar for cig

The past 4 years is not a particularly reasonable sampling period, given how benign the market has been.

Also it doesn't work so well in the US, which is a bit worrying, e.g. you could say it's because the US market is saturated with quant investors, which are doomed to go to other markets sooner or later (both existing quants expanding their universe, and local investors adopting the same methods).

0
Avatar for Howard Marx

Peter

There are five proven factors. And there are multiple ways to combine them.

You are correct that Buffett, Woodford (and Greenblatt) favour combining Quality & Value (Q + V) & on the surface de-emphasise Momentum (M).

But plenty of successful investors have centered on Momentum (M), including O'Neil, Driehaus & Minervini.

59cc094f87f9fvenn2.jpg

More than one way to successfully bake a cake!

6
Avatar for Peter Craven

Howard,

I was not aware that Buffet, Woodford and Greenblatt use Quality and Value per se. Your post and associated diagram provide a very useful insight.

Cheers,
Peter.

1
Get the free newsletter