16
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2014 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

The Best of AIM, the Worst of AIM

The Alternative Investment Market (AIM) is seen by many as a hunting ground for stocks that can generate vast returns. These are the types of fast-growth small-caps that ex-Fidelity fund manager Peter Lynch once called 10-baggers. Over the past five years they’ve included the likes of Judges Scientific, Walker Greenbank and ASOS. But despite these successes, many AIM companies are hugely speculative, pre-earnings ‘story’ stocks. That means they often go on to disappoint their shareholders. Last weekend we helped The Telegraph track down some of the best and worst quality shares that AIM currently has to offer. This is what we found...

Many investors look in the wrong place

Changes to tax rules last year made it much more appealing for investors to trade AIM stocks. But while their allure might have grown, our research shows that many investors go about finding the best AIM shares in completely the wrong way. A general rule in the stock market is that good, cheap companies tend to outperform expensive, speculative companies. But if you look at this bubble chart - it shows that the most discussed AIM stocks on bulletin boards have a completely different profile to what works.  

Focus on Quality and Value

Good quality, attractively priced companies were precisely what hedge fund manager Joel Greenblatt set out to find when he devised his Magic Formula in ‘The Little Book that Beats the Market’. His system ranks companies using just two metrics - return on capital (good) and earnings yield (cheap) - to find those with the best combination of both.

Stockopedia’s StockRanks take these ideas even further by ranking shares not only for their quality and value but also their ‘momentum’. Many studies have shown that adding share momentum to a value investing approach has historically reduced risk and improved the consistency of returns.

The aim is to highlight good, cheap and improving stocks, while shunning speculative, expensive, deteriorating stocks. The results since we launched the rankings a year ago have been quite eye-catching - with the top 20% of stocks above a £20 million market cap returning 34% while the bottom 20% returning a negative 16%. Please do join our StockRanks webinar next Wednesday to learn more.

Finding the best of AIM

Using these quality and value principles, we put together a pair of stock screens to filter for the ‘Best of AIM’ and ‘Worst of AIM’ (subscribers can see the full results by clicking those links).

To make it on to the Best of AIM screen, companies need a minimum market cap of £100m. They also need consistent and high profitability - with a current and 5-year average return on capital of over 10%, operating margins in the top 50% of their sector and a Piotroski F-Score of over 6/9 (which illustrates strong and improving fundamental health). Few of the stocks on the list are clearly ‘cheap’ anymore because the market has been bidding them up. But many have P/E ratios that are falling below 20x next year due to expected profit growth. Most of them also have improving broker forecasts.

Among them is Sprue Aegis (LON:SPRP), the company that makes consumer safety products like fire alarms under brand names such as Fire Angel and First Alert. Supply deals with the likes of B&Q, Tesco and Boots contribute to a strong return on capital of 30.4%. According to our StockRank calculations, Sprue ranks in the top 2% of the whole market based on the most common signs of quality in a business.

Recruitment company Staffline (LON:STAF) has seen its price soar on improving economic conditions. Its current P/E of 31 falls to 16 next year and its return on capital of 16% is around double the average for the recruitment sector. Unsurprisingly, it ranks very highly when you score it against multiple measures of quality, value and momentum, with a StockRank of 94/100.

Profitable niches and a defensible edge

Heating and cooling equipment hire business Andrews Sykes (LON:ASY) boasts some eye-catching quality credentials and likes paying dividends too. Its high return on capital and operating margins suggest this is a business in a strong position to squeeze profits from its hire services. In terms of value, Stockopedia’s Value Rank merges six common valuation measures to get an overall ranking score. In this case, Andrew Sykes scores 78 out of 100, which puts it in the top 22% cheapest shares in the market. The expected dividend yield for next year is 4.4%.

Elsewhere, Advanced Medical Solutions (LON:AMS) operates in another profitable niche - developing woundcare dressings - essentially providing adhesives to ‘glue’ wounds rather than stitch them. The shares have risen strongly over the past year but unlike many healthcare companies on AIM, this one has the hallmarks of a strong balance sheet and achieves high margins from product sales.

Finally, earnings have been growing a double digit rates at Italian food chain Prezzo (LON:PRZ) in recent years. Restaurant groups that hit on a winning concept can often go on to produce exceptional shareholder returns. Just by opening new outlets they can ‘clone’ their operations. This is what happened at Frankie & Benny’s owner Restaurant (LON:RTN) and it could be happening at Prezzo too. A return on capital of 15.6% an overall StockRank of 84/100 point are positive signals.

Avoiding the worst of AIM

By contrast, the Worst of AIM screen simply looks for companies with very poor fundamental profiles. A return on capital of less than zero highlights those that are loss making and an F-Score of less than 5 means they have poor and deteriorating fundamental health. A further filter used here is the ‘M-Score’, which can flag up poor accounting quality.  Filtering further to look in the bottom 20% of the market according to the Stockopedia StockRank reveals the more expensive and weak of these speculative companies.

These include Nanoco (LON:NANO), which makes nanoparticle technologies that are used in lighting and solar. Nanoco has seen its net losses grow every year for the past five years as it invests in its futuristic tech. On conventional valuation metrics like price-to-book and price-to-sales, it looks very expensive even though its share price has fallen by 44% over the past 12 months. That negative price momentum suggests investors may be losing enthusiasm for it. There are very few signs of a strengthening balance sheet, with an F-Score of just 3/9 and a poor showing against the M-Score.

Heavy promotion to private investors led to a rapid rise in price at web commerce company Blur (LON:BLUR) in 2014. However, two profit warnings in quick succession sent the shares tumbling. For many months it has also been flagging highly for accounting risk based on the M-Score. The classic signs that can indicate aggressive accounting are very visible - growing receivables, low accruals and super-high sales growth. Overall it achieves a low StockRank of just 1/100. The company is now in discounted funding talks at barely 10% of its high price reached only four months ago.

Overstretched and deteriorating

Also flagging on this screen is defence and security business Westminster (LON:WSG). Its shares rose strongly last year but a sharp fall since April suggests the market is now uncertain. Westminster has lost money over the past three years. With a price-to-book value of 61x, it is one of the most expensive companies in the market on this basis. It also has a very poor showing against the Beneish M-Score of accounting risk. Given these factors, it’s unsurprising that Westminster scores just 3/100 for its combination of quality, value and momentum.

With a market cap of £170 million, Silence Therapeutics (LON:SLN) is among the largest of a number of predominantly loss-making drugs developers on AIM. But with no sales and wide losses, Silence’s quality characteristics are naturally negative and it achieves a low StockRank of 17/100.

Finally, shares in cloud-based IT and business communications business Outsourcery (LON:OUT) have fallen sharply in recent weeks. The company is endeavouring to sell cloud services to major organisations, but it’s an arduous process. Sales are growing but ongoing losses mean the it is flagging as an insolvency risk and also shows signs of accounting weaknesses. Overall it achieves a StockRank of just 1/100.

Tread carefully with AIM companies

With changes to tax rules making AIM stocks more appealing to private investors, it’s worth remembering that smaller companies need careful handling.  So many investors throw money at speculative or blue sky companies without an understanding that these areas of the market are low probability bets best left to venture capitalists. While our screening uncovered a number of potentially strong businesses that are able to profit from defensible niche positions their share prices are reflecting this strength.  

Of course as Warren Buffett once said: “it’s far better to buy a wonderful business at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price”. The challenge of deciding which are the wonderful businesses amongst those that indicate strength is what makes stock market investing so pleasurable to so many. DYOR and Safe Investing!

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

13 comments


Avatar for vik2001

must be something wrong with the filters on best of aim, when you run it shows companies with market cap less than 100m. well 2 are showing up with 82 and 90m

0
Avatar for lightningtiger

In the last hour, having a look around the Aim stocks VIS at 11:30 has got Chris Ingram putting 180K inti the company and the share price has jumped over 45% in this last hour!
There are 63 shares in the Aim market that have risen more than 20 % this month. 19 are above 30%. and 16 are above 50%. I have not counted the number this month that have gone up by more than 10% but it is a lot..
Most of the 63 shares have not got a good stock rating overall but the momentum for some is good..
TAIH was up today again by another 20.6%.
7DIG has had a n excellent turn round still up another 16.8% It is worth a bit of time fishing.

Time now 1:00PM VIS is up 70.9%

1
Avatar for John

Staff line does not have stock rank of 94
Joe

0
Avatar for lightningtiger

There are some good stocks in the aim market. you have to keep an eye in them. Some of my best ones are TTR ,DTG, have done well and today FFWD has shot up again with 17.7% on 1.5M shares traded on an average volume of 596K. A similar happenings has been CNR with a 46.5% gain today with 3M shares traded, when average volumes have been 295K.
Of course some are bad and the spread can be also a killer. The good thing is there is no stamp duty to pay.
I also like to sort with using the 50 day MA.

The best Aim stock has been FRM with a gain over 52 weeks of a staggering 624%.

The worst Aim stock MTV 98% down!

0
Avatar for Prof Calculus

Ed, the best /worst of AIM filter is this updated daily ?

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

Hi Tony - yes - when these articles link to stock screens, the screens update daily.

[Do note that this is an old article !]

0
Avatar for PhilHofGrowYourDough

Hi,

I used to use the screen parameter 3m average voulme > 40000 to screen out illiquid stocks but even that isn't really helpful. What is required is the ability to calculate the value of the volume as there are wide variations in shares prices particularly if you look at European stocks. So I'd prefer to use 'share price * normal market size (nms)' > some value'

On a Stockreport normal market size is the figure with a grey background to the right of the price info in the top left hand corner. Unfortunately nms isn't available for non-uk stocks.

For the time being I've removed filtering of this and consider it on a case by case basis.

With respect to Sprue Aegis (LON:SPRP) they were so cheap when I bought them that the risk reward (even given the spread and liquidity issues) seemed positive. I'm currently sat on a 244% gain and it is my largest single holding. With a fwd p/e of 9.4, a forecast EPS Growth rate of 34% and a forecast risk adjusted peg of 0.37 I'm not intending to sell however I'm watching the momentum closely given recent downward eps adjustments.

Best of luck with your screening and investments
Regards
Phil

0
Avatar for TheWatchmaker

Hi Seasons - I can see why you'd need that 'illiquid filter' if I was applying the rules you state you follow. I look forward to being in the position where I need to include this factor in my decisions but my portfolio is 10 to 20x lower value than those you manage.
But your comments have made me re-assess the costs of high bid-offer spread (BOS) on AIM shares such as SPRP (which I do hold).
The following calculations are based on close price of 269.5p for SPRP and spread of 11p on 05-June-14, purchase of £5000, trade cost of £5 in each direction and ignoring any dividend :


Share Price %Gain (My % Gain after transaction costs)

-10% (-14.0%) , -5% (-9.1%) , 0% (-4.2%) , +5% (+0.7%) , +10% (+5.6%) , +20% (+15.4%) , +30% (+25.2%)

This helps illustrate the additional risk of shares with high BOS. If share price goes nowhere - I lose 4.5%. I need nearly 5% gain to break even.

Therefore, it is only sensible to trade these shares where you have a high confidence of large % gains in share price over your investment period. For myself, this still makes sense providing I manage to pick the winners and the % contribution to my portfolio is significant.

For your situation, I can see that the risk may outweigh the possible gains given that it would comprise just 1.5% of portfolio.

 

0
Avatar for seasons

I am a very happy user of the Quality and StockRanks.

While there is no doubt that LON:SPRP is a great stock, it is way too illiquid for me. I do not invest more than 5% of the average daily pound sterling changing hands (and no more than 0.5% of the market cap but that's usually not a problem :D).

According to my calculations, I should invest max 1.5% of my portfolio in SPRP. And then of course comes the prohibitive high broker cost in comparison to the money invested (as I have two smaller accounts under my management)

As a result 2/3rd of the stocks I am following I cannot invest in... This is currently 99 out of the 146 stocks I am following. Still, I have to follow them as I can't filter them out in the screeners.

With the long awaited US stocks finally coming on board I will have even more information to cope with.

I would appreciate if you could implement the following simple field so it could be applied on the stock screeners:
http://help.stockopedia.com/forums/18977-stockopedia-pro-feedback/suggestions/5715320-filter-out-illiquid-stocks

Thank you very much.

2
Avatar for ACounsell

Not sure about the bubble chart as a guide. Interestingly Blinkx and Plus 500 are in virtually the same position on the chart yet their performance has been diametrically opposite YTD. Plus 500 is up about 73% and Blinkx is down by about 63%. I look forward to the 'add on' on institutional buying/selling, insider activity and short selling that was previewed in a webinar recently. Overlaying that sort of information, particularly short selling, might highlight how these apparently similarly ranked shares are likely to perform in very different ways.

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

Andrew... the important thing to understand about the StockRanks (which generate the bubble charts) is that they are designed to be used to construct portfolios. When picking individual stocks there is a wide variability of returns, as you show with BLNX and Plus 500, but a portfolio of 15 or 20 of higher ranked stocks has performed more consistently over the last year. Individual shares have very idiosyncratic performances - that's why we always preach to use wide diversification.

The performance chart of the StockRanks since inception in the article above shows that it's been the good, cheap, improving stocks which have performed the best over the last year. Within that mix of course there are many that have done wonderfully and many that have done dreadfully, but the portfolio mix has outperformed well as there have been more good performers than bad. It's all about the batting average.

We'll be publishing more stats from the last year in next Wednesday's webinar - do sign up here.. http://www.stockopedia.com/webinar

3
Avatar for Analysis

Best of AIM 1 Qualifying in UK

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

Yep - sorry the AIM filter wasn't working for a few hours - it's back now though.

http://www.stockopedia.com/screens/best-of-aim-22076/

0
Get the free newsletter