30
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2019 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

A strategy for finding fast-moving growth stocks

One of the standout trends in the stock market over the past decade has been the success of strategies that look for fast growth and momentum. In generally bullish conditions, investors have gravitated to firms with rapidly growing profits. And while these stocks can often look expensive, the momentum in their prices is incredibly powerful.

Growth strategies are popular with traders and investors looking for quick, upward price moves. It’s the territory of the multi-bagger. But make no mistake, when conditions change, it’s an approach that takes no prisoners. Unlike value strategies, which rely on a gradual correction of market mispricing, growth stocks and strategies can be much more sensitive to the market mood. So they need careful handling.

Some of the masters of this kind of investing are the likes of Mark Minervini and William O’Neil. Both of these American trading gurus have made careers out of buying stocks where earnings momentum and price momentum are rising in tandem.

O’Neil’s 1994 book How to Make Money in Stocks is an investment classic that followed years of research into the background of some of the best performing shares of all time. Its appeal lies in the excitement of finding companies that are seeing their profits rise and where the market is just starting to notice.

The popularity of this approach meant that O’Neil, a stockbroker by trade, could build a mini empire for what he called the ‘CAN SLIM’ strategy, which is driven by his online news and research portal, Investor’s Business Daily.

CAN SLIM represents the seven factors that O’Neil looks for in a stock. His strategy blends conventional ‘growth’ measures such as Current and Annual earnings growth and New product innovation with ‘technical’ indicators like the Supply and demand for shares, whether it’s the Leader in its specific sector, whether it has Institutional support allied with overall bullish Market strength.

Importantly, O’Neil tends to disregard valuation measures like price-to-earnings ratios when it comes to analysing shares. His studies of the market found that it was actually those companies that looked very expensive based on these measures that went on to be some of the greatest winners.

For that reason, the approach also carries a potentially high degree of risk, which is why he also insists on setting strict 8 percent stop-losses on entry points, which limits the financial damage that can be done if the price does fall.

A pre-costs strategy based loosely on CAN SLIM rules tracked by Stockopedia has easily beaten the FTSE All Share over the past three years - although it’s had a much tougher time over the past year. It’s important to note that when market sentiment comes under pressure - as it did last October - growth strategies like this can suffer.

5d309e1a3aca0oneil_perf.png

Here are some of the stocks that currently share the characteristics of what O’Neil looks for in his CAN SLIM strategy:

Name

Mkt Cap £m

EPS Gwth % Q on Q

EPS Gwth %

EPS Gwth % Forecast 1y

1 Year Relative Strength

% vs. 52w High

UP Global Sourcing

69.0

301.7

71.5

51.6

+99.9

-7.59

Churchill China

175.2

92.2

27.6

6.03

+57.7

-4.49

Judges Scientific

222

58.2

76.0

22.7

+53.5

-2.19

Kainos

745.7

42.2

44.1

24.5

+51.9

-9.94

Elektron Technology

94.9

147

106.5

41.8

+26.3

-3.77

EKF Diagnostics Holdings

160.1

374

195.3

40.4

+22.8

-11.2

Liontrust Asset Management

404.8

68.1

27.5

56.2

+22.2

-1.48

Relx

38,318

17.3

16.0

20.2

+17.8

-0.78

Kingspan

7,680

27.9

14.7

16.1

+15.6

-5.88

Integrated Diagnostics

594.3

32.0

34.2

18.8

+12.0

-4.55

One of the interesting features of this strategy is that it finds stocks from all areas of the market. Just in terms of size, this list ranges from the mega-cap information and analytics group Relx to the small-cap distribution business UP Global Sourcing. All of them are trading close to their 52-week high prices, which means that these are some of the fastest moving stocks in the market.

So overall, O’Neil’s focus on a blend of earnings growth and price strength has played well in the bullish market conditions of recent years. But it’s still a strategy that calls on investors to keep a close watch over the companies it picks up. The market decline that set in last October had a big impact on the strategy performance because sudden changes in sentiment can see these kinds of shares fall sharply. But as a guide, this kind of approach is a useful pointer to stocks that are growing fast and starting to capture the imagination of the market.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

8 comments


Avatar for Rusty2

You can run it through the checklist and see why it fails. But yes some are going on and off the screen frequently, it can be 50MA, you can also see when they enter and exit the screen. However as the screen is only adjusted quarterly it does not actually happen on the screen results.

0
Avatar for RichardEllis

I often run CANslim, & what worries me it is that a stock can pass the screen, but a short while later, when nothing material has changed, it fails. This of course is simply due to the binary nature of the rules & probably this issue is not confined only to the CANslim screen. Take for example Timken, a US stock. It passed CAN slim on 28th Jun but failed it a few days later on 10th July. Its not easy to see why this, is as the financial data (revenue, eps etc) are unchanged & the Q,V,M values hardly moved: 90,75,91 to 94,79,87.

0
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes of course there are times of under performance but you don't need to invest at that time, Minervini chooses when to invest in growth stocks, not sure what he is doing at the moment as I have not followed recently, a while ago he had very little invested and was shorting the market. The problem with these Guru screens is you don't know which shares are included in the screens.

Why can't I do reply on here anymore?

0
Avatar for iwright7

Herbie - All screens suffer periods of under-preformance.  The point with annualized % is that they include the rough and smooth and circa 19% annualised (since 2004 in the AAII case) is very good.  With the rapid flow of digital information I would be more concerned that Value won't rebound, rather than Growth screens. 

1
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes a good article but it should be pointed out CANSLIM screen is down 12.8% in the last year, will it rebound in the next year or fall even more?

2
Avatar for iwright7

Yet another excellent article Ben. Others might be interested to note that the AAII has been running 2 US Can Slim screens since 2004 (Original and 3rd book edition) showing a impressive cumulative gain of 20% and 18%/annum, positioning Can Slim in 4th and 6th place out of some 70 tracker screens.

https://www.aaii.com/stockideas/performance?sort=TOTAL&order=0

O'Neil believes that stocks with low PE ratios are probably correctly priced by the market. Nor is he interested in balance sheets, or intrinsic values. What matters for him is that a stock must be growing fast and the markets must recognise this. For this reason Can Slim should best suit active investors/traders, although with the AAII and the Stocko Can Slim screens all showing circa 19% annualised returns, a less active approach would tend to be indicated. Ian



1
Avatar for Trevor47

Very useful, Thanks

0
Avatar for Jack Corsellis

Great post Ben, thanks.

1
Get the free newsletter