How portfolio rebalancing can help avoid the risk of style-drift

Wednesday, Dec 06 2017 by
21
How portfolio rebalancing can help avoid the risk of styledrift

With just a few weeks to go until the end of the year, it’s inevitable that thoughts start turning to portfolio housekeeping and making new investment resolutions for 2018.

Overall, it’s been a strong year for equities. Strategies that target small-cap growth companies have done particularly well, and we’ve seen noticeable strong returns in higher quality value strategies, too.

But the consequence of these kinds of trends is that they can leave some portfolios drifting well away from their intended investment target. If you were an investor in small GARP (growth at a reasonable price) shares in early 2017, you might now be holding a group of larger and more expensive looking stocks. While that’s clearly a good thing, your exposure to that successful small-cap GARP strategy would have drifted away. To continue with that investment style you’d need to tackle the thorny issue of rebalancing.

Why rebalancing causes confusion

Even if you do nothing with a portfolio, its initial weights will slide out of balance over time as valuations change. The idea with rebalancing is that it cuts the risk of being overexposed to a small number of large positions, where an unexpected disaster could be seriously damaging.

Yet rebalancing is one of those subjects that rankles with some investors. That’s because, conventionally, it means trimming back successful holdings and feeding funds into lagging stocks. This kind of trading is counter-intuitive to many investors because it racks up trading fees, spread costs and potentially even taxes. Plus it doesn’t sit well with the idea of running winners and selling losers. All these reasons are enough to send rebalancing to the bottom of the list of priorities.

Indeed, rebalancing not only has disadvantages, but it’s arguably unnecessary for some types of investors. In Stockopedia’s Four Investor Suits, active traders and stock market ‘hunters’ (like our own Paul Scott) build and weight portfolios based on detailed analysis and conviction. In some ways, this kind of constant adjustment dispenses with the need for periodic rebalancing.

Staying focused on investment styles

But for more passive ‘owners’ and ‘farmers’, rebalancing can be a very important part of some strategies - especially those that aim to harvest powerful market premiums like value and momentum. For stock market ‘farmers’ who run portfolios based on these kinds of investment styles, there is a constant risk of style drift without rebalancing.

What this means…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
22 thumbs up
1 thumb down
Share this post with friends




3 Comments on this Article show/hide all

cwoodrow555invest Wed 4:34pm 1 of 3
1

Every investment pundit and his dog is always banging on about 'rebalancing'. I am a buy and hold investor and have never 'rebalanced' in my life and have no intention of doing so!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
underscored Wed 7:23pm 2 of 3
4

In reply to cwoodrow555invest, post #1

Thanks for the directly relevant commentary supported by empirical evidence, and comparison of returns.

| Link | Share
Ian Booker Thu 9:45pm 3 of 3
1

I think the article is appropriate for all.
It made me appreciate that considering myself a 'pruner' on a more or less monthly basis can see a dangerous drift into inaction through smugness over my winners and love of my carefully selected losers which will surely come good in the fullness of time!
Regrettably ruthlessness does not come easy even over stock selection which has been much reduced to strait number comparison.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Ben Hobson

Ben Hobson

Strategies Editor at Stockopedia. My goal is to help private investors learn and invest with confidence through the articles, ebooks and other resources we publish on site. I also occasionally bunk off to interview famous investors at expensive restaurants. I studied History at Aberystwyth University, trained as a journalist and covered business news and corporate finance before settling in as one of the first staff members at Stockopedia.  Away from Stockopedia I'm a mountain bike junkie. more »

Follow


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre

Most Popular Now

Related Content
I Read The News Today Oh Boy 1Dec2017
I Read The News Today Oh Boy! 1-Dec-2017
Portfolio Management 1st Dec

Investment Trusts
Investment Trusts
Portfolio Management 27th Nov


Plans for an eventual bear market
Plans for an eventual bear market?
Portfolio Management 16th Sep



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis