Hi,
If it's not too much of a personal question, what do other people use as a minimum amount to invest in a share, to consider it worthwhile? (otherwise fees and stamp duty means it takes longer to get into profit)
For example, with one of my brokers a trade size of £2,000 results in an entry cost of 1%. Worked out as:
£10 for the broker fee,
plus 0.5% stamp duty (another £10)
equals £20/£2000 or 1%.
Anymore than 1% (eg, less than £2,000 stake) and I feel I am not being efficient with market entry. I like the idea of holding 20-30 stocks for diversification, but that's a little out of reach for the short term based on £2K lots. I intend to hold and grow my portfolios for the next 10-15 years.
Am I being overly restrictive on myself for no good reason? Obviously I can increase portfolio diversity by relaxing my rule and allow trading with £1,000 sizes ...
Many years ago, when starting I had a minimum trade size of £1500, although the limit was slightly flexible.
I was quite prepared to have just a few stocks & not diversify much, as there would be many years of adding capital to follow.
With a much larger portfolio, I now deal in a minimum of 1% of portfolio size.
Another factor is how often do you intend to trade? If it is every 6-12 months, losing 1% is too much for people with average stock selection skill. If you are holding for 10 or more years, then 1% lost in fees when you buy doesn't matter much.