Myopic loss aversion and portfolio returns - look away now

Monday, Jun 20 2016 by
21
Myopic loss aversion and portfolio returns  look away now

When it comes to exploring the ways in which human emotions cause investing mistakes, a simple illustration can be a big help. With that in mind, here’s a question…

Let’s say you and I play a game based on the flip of a fair coin. If you call it correctly, you win £110. But if you lose, you pay me £100. Does that sound like an appealing proposition?

Research suggests that you’ll probably tell me where to go. In fact, when presented with this gamble most people demand a much, much higher potential payback. Tests have shown that the average player offered this type of challenge demands a win of around £200 to accept it (and often a lot more).

The reason for that comes down to human emotion. Typically, we feel the pain of a loss much more than the satisfaction of a win. So what’s needed is a gain-to-loss ratio of something like 2-to-1 for the average punter to feel comfortable with this game. In behavioural science this is the essence of something called loss aversion.

The pain of losing

On its own, loss aversion has been blamed for one of the reasons why investors sell winning positions too readily and hold losing positions too long. Put simply, crystallising a loss, and accepting failure, seems to be much harder than taking profits on a winner - even though it can damage returns.

But there’s more. Loss aversion can also trigger other decisions that don’t work well in investing. For a start, it can cause investors to sell positions at the wrong time, particularly when faced with uncertainty. It may lead us to become too risk-averse and forget that, as an asset class, stocks do endure short term volatility but still tend to outperform other assets over the long term.

This problem is made worse when you combine loss aversion with another well known emotional tendency of constantly watching portfolio performance. When that happens you get something called myopic loss aversion.

To start untangling what all this means - and why it’s important to be conscious of loss aversion - it’s worth taking a flick through the research...

A whistle-stop tour of loss aversion

Our introductory coin flip test has its roots in work dating back to the 1960s by Paul Samuelson. But loss aversion was really…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
21 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




8 Comments on this Article show/hide all

RedRon 20th Jun '16 1 of 8
2

I agree with the conclusions reached but, when you have an investment plan which incorporates stop losses or intersecting MA's then I find it necessary to be aware of what the market and particular shares are doing on a daily basis. Also, if the plan includes 'buy' signals then you do not want to be late in recognising their existence. The problem is separating your emotional reaction from your plan rules and this, I agree, can be a danger in constantly monitoring the market. It all comes down to personal discipline,

| Link | Share
ChesterChow 21st Jun '16 2 of 8
3

In 2008 I panicked and sold a large portion of my portfolios, at a loss, only to see the Market rise soon afterwards. I now spend more time on deciding what stock to buy, and holding for the long term, even though I do monitor my portfolios daily.

| Link | Share
Dearg Doom 21st Jun '16 3 of 8
3

Hi Ben,

Thank you for your interesting article above. I wonder have you by accident given the result of the Brexit vote to us.  

"So what’s needed is a gain-to-loss ratio of something like 2-to-1 for the average punter to feel comfortable with this game. In behavioural science this is the essence of something called loss aversion."

People who intend to vote to leave would like to receive twice the likely benefits versus the downsize risks. Do ordinary people feel that they would enjoy better wages, better job security, lower interest rates, higher property prices, greater influence on home affairs that matters to them personally etc.

For each voter it is their own Brexit benefits they are voting on. Unless the benefits are tangible and the downside risks underplayed, than in their minds than a vote to remain is most likely.

The case for Brexit can't be made with the certainty of future outcome required. People would have to have seen another country leave the EU and see how they got on 10 years from the time of leaving.

I suspect this brief analysis indicates a bigger margin of victory for the Remain support than actual bookmakers, political pundits and polls are showing.

We will see,


Dearg Doom

| Link | Share
FREng 22nd Jun '16 4 of 8
2

You write: "It may lead us to become too risk-averse and forget that, as an asset class, stocks do endure short term volatility but still tend to outperform other assets over the long term. "

The FT last Saturday reported research that showed that the best cash deposit accounts outperform equities over most time periods.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Edward Croft 22nd Jun '16 5 of 8
1

In reply to FREng, post #4

FREng... that's a laugh ! I googled for the article - https://next.ft.com/content/75ad9d30-345c-11e6-bda...

The comparison was versus the FTSE 100 ... I don't think too many here use a FTSE 100 tracker as their primary investment vehicle.  The FTSE 100 is a very poorly composed index and has been highly overweight mega cap mining stocks etc. 

If they'd done the comparison against the FTSE 250 or FTSE All Share there would have been a very different outcome.   If they'd done it against a Quality Income index, or sensible small cap fund managers or the equity value premium it would have had a different winner.

Anyway - who'd really want to own fiat currencies as an investment strategy?  ...Surely it's a fast road to the poor house. 

Blog: Follow @edcroft on Twitter
| Link | Share | 2 replies
herbie47 22nd Jun '16 6 of 8

In reply to Edward Croft, post #5

The All share has not done much better over the last 10-16 years and no doubt the dividends will be lower.

| Link | Share
FREng 22nd Jun '16 7 of 8
1

In reply to Edward Croft, post #5

Ed,

I agree that the article in no way undermines the Stockopedia / StockRank approaches to stock selection - but it does seem to provide evidence that it's not enough just to put your money in FTSE 100 trackers or collective funds that are covert trackers (which is where most pension money perhaps is invested, and where many financial advisors might suggest as a low-risk strategy). "In the long term, shares are best" is perhaps over simplistic advice.

Personally, I find I have too much cash in my ISAs and SIPPs (because the market feels overvalued in the UK and USA) and I haven't found a low-risk way to get a positive return on spare cash, that can be held in the ISA/SIPP and give easy access for investment opportunities as they arise.

Are you able to suggest anything? Where do you, yourself, put cash inside these tax-free wrappers?

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 22nd Jun '16 8 of 8
1

In reply to FREng, post #7

I think you can switch money now between cash and share ISA's but its a good point, as I sold about 1/3 of my ISA shares that money is not earning anything. I thought maybe preference shares which pay about 6.5% a good investment but not sure how safe they actually are.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Ben Hobson

Ben Hobson

Strategies Editor at Stockopedia. My goal is to help private investors learn and invest with confidence through the articles, ebooks and other resources we publish on site. I also occasionally bunk off to interview famous investors at expensive restaurants. I studied History at Aberystwyth University, trained as a journalist and covered business news and corporate finance before settling in as one of the first staff members at Stockopedia.  Away from Stockopedia I'm a mountain bike junkie. more »

Follow


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre


Related Content

Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis