Naps

Monday, Feb 11 2019 by
24

Dear Ed,
Would you pick the same NAPS stocks today?
(So far not good)
RMcG


Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
8 thumbs up
32 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




36 Posts on this Thread show/hide all

HumourMe 12th Feb 17 of 36
1

In reply to post #446353

So I am asking would Ed pick the same stocks today, a month and a half later?

The answer is yes, if he went back in time, but no if it were picked today.

See https://www.stockopedia.com/co... for the underlying strategy and how thinking has evolved.

| Link | Share
herbie47 12th Feb 18 of 36

In reply to post #446393

Why are you only showing 6.88% gain on Redrow (LON:RDW), I have it up 21%? Price on 2 Jan was 488p?

Mondi (LON:MNDI), I have up 12%.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
mmarkkj777 12th Feb 19 of 36
2

Hi Herbie,

I've got all 20. Bad paste by me!

I bought 19 just a few days into the new year, around the 3rd or 4th. (D4T4 was a few days later).

With HL I paid £5.99 for each transaction, plus spread and Stamp duty (not applicable for many), so most of the cost would not actually be affected by size of transaction (being a straight percentage).

I don't know what you mean by your statement "costs would be about 10%, so much lower". This would be really high. Did you mean 1%?

I'd be gutted if I had to pay anywhere near 10% costs. I did on one stock once, because I hadn't noticed the high spread.

I think Nick has hit the nail on the head.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
mmarkkj777 12th Feb 20 of 36

In reply to post #446468

Herbie,

The numbers you are looking at in my Portfolio are just today's numbers.

I have similar to you YTD.

| Link | Share
herbie47 12th Feb 21 of 36

In reply to post #446473

Sorry I meant transaction costs would be about 10% of your transaction costs, as a % of the amount paid, ie £6 on £500 is 1.2%, £6 on £5,000 is only 0.12%.

| Link | Share
investor27 12th Feb 22 of 36

A couple of fundamentals...
These guys are bright.
They don't do anything else.
They produce a huge range of variables and opinions to assist picking stocks that will increase in value.
They have no prejudice or incentive to be anything other than objective.
If FTSE100 is a reasonable benchmark, I don't suppose being over 6% adrift after 6 weeks is quite what was planned!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 12th Feb 23 of 36

In reply to post #446503

Why don't your figures tie up, did you buy all the shares on or soon after 2nd January? I have it up over 2%, the FTSE100 is weighted so not a very good benchmark, better to use the FTSEAllshare. Some of your difference will be the spread on buying and selling prices, this will not be shown on an index.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
investor27 12th Feb 24 of 36
2

Dear Herbie47,
The HL spreadsheet is above. The purchase date was 16/1 .
If One uses the all share as you suggest the underperformance from benchmark is still more than 5%.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 12th Feb 25 of 36

In reply to post #446568

16/1 will explain it. You can't really do a NAPS selection and then 2 weeks later buy it. That is why you are getting different results. If you did a NAPS selection on 16/1 you will probably have about 50% different shares. As said Redrow (LON:RDW) was up 21% this morning, Mondi (LON:MNDI) was up 13%, if you had bought on 2/1/19. Less than 4 weeks is no time to judge, NAPS is set up for 1 year. NAPS have outperformed the benchmarks every year so far, of course that may not happen every year.

| Link | Share
investor27 13th Feb 26 of 36
5

My point is this...if one invented the perfect system to select the most likely stocks to succeed one would invent Stockopedia, or something very similar. As it is, following their advice, one's investment would have been better off in Vanguard tracker.....so far. I take your point on time....lets hope you're right...the housekeeping depends upon it!!

| Link | Share | 2 replies
herbie47 13th Feb 27 of 36

In reply to post #446783

There is no perfect system but there are systems that help people improve their performance, Stockopedia is not just about NAPS.

| Link | Share
millen 13th Feb 28 of 36
1

In reply to post #446518

?? Surely all modern indices are market cap weighted, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Certainly the All Share is and there has to be a consistency between the 100, 250, 350 etc. I thought the only major price weighteds are the historic FT30 (does anyone use that now?) and the Dow.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
andrea34l 13th Feb 29 of 36
1

In reply to post #446783

I find it hard to believe that "the housekeeping depends upon" the performance of your NAPS investment, if you have £100,000 just lying around to plough into this.

It is comments like this which make me think I am out of my league on this site and the affordability of Stockopedia is something that I should not be expending my significantly more modest income on :-(

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 13th Feb 30 of 36
1

In reply to post #446848

Yes most of them are weighted, but the FTSE100 is only the largest 100 UK companies and is heavily weighted towards certain oil companies and banks, so to use that as a benchmark when most of NAPS is outside the FTSE100, only 3 out of 20 and none of those are large oil companies or banks, I don't think it is a good benchmark to use. The AllShare I think is better. Yes it's unfortunate that there are no unweighted indexes readily available. The other problem with the FTSE100 is much of the revenue is in foreign currencies, so if the £ falls then those companies will benefit, which is what happened after Brexit vote.

| Link | Share
mmarkkj777 14th Feb 31 of 36
3

In reply to post #446858

Hi Andrea,

I;m sure investor27's "housekeeping" comment was intended to be tongue-in-cheek!

Stockopedia is intended to be for investors of all means (Mark Minervini started out with just $5K and look at him now).
£13/month is quite reasonable and could pay for itself helping with 1 good investment (or helping to prevent a bad one).
I've read your posts and you are definitely not out of your league.

My view is Stocko is for all investors who wish to improve at all levles (and starting capital does not equate to investing ability by any measure).

| Link | Share
investor27 Sun 8:22pm 32 of 36

Then there is another explanation.....the brightest brains, the most sophisticated systems, access to the world's revered gurus....all distilled into a group of 20 stocks that surely must stand the best chance.....
simply doesn't work.
The measuring comparator, the yardstick, the benchmark,( whichever one chooses) has gone up... the chosen stocks intended to BEAT the benchmark , not match it , have lost value.......so far.....but not by a little...by a lot!
Hmmmm...one has to wonder....
The capital loss will be helpful I suppose to set against the gains made on the trackers... but was not what I had in mind!

| Link | Share | 2 replies
shipoffrogs Sun 10:41pm 33 of 36
2

In reply to post #449278

I think Bernie Madhoff had an investment fund that always went up if that's what you're after, although it's no longer available.

| Link | Share
Edward Croft Mon 10:43am 34 of 36
3

Hi there investor27.  Firstly, sorry - I don't check the boards every day, so I missed this question last week.

In answer to your question (which is easily misinterpreted)

So I am asking would Ed pick the same stocks today, a month and a half later?

Obviously by definition no.  A NAPS Portfolio (if selected today) would be very different - as the stocks that qualify today are not the stocks that qualified on December 31st.

Many stocks are still the same, but the (unvalidated) list comes through like this:


NameCapStockRankSector
EVRAZ770799Basic Materials
SCS9299Consumer Cyclicals
Barratt Developments571699Consumer Cyclicals
Ocean Wilsons Holdings40399Industrials
Elegant Hotels6399Consumer Cyclicals
Solid State3398Industrials
James Latham14198Basic Materials
BT2294198Telecoms
RM20198Industrials
International Personal Finance44798Financials
Watkin Jones58997Financials
Carr's14997Consumer Defensives
NWF7897Energy
3i921496Financials
OPG Power Ventures9296Utilities
D4t4 Solutions8093Technology
Pennon316092Utilities
Nichols55189Consumer Defensives
Symphony International Holdings24588Healthcare
Spirent Communications90786Technology


It's worth reiterating that I don't 'pick' the stocks.  It's an entirely mechanical process.  

But if we went back in time to December 31st - yes the NAPS would be exactly the same as published. 

| Link | Share
Edward Croft Mon 10:54am 35 of 36
5

In reply to post #449278

@investor27

The NAPS are lagging the market year to date - but are up about 3.6% versus about 7.5% for the FTSE All Share.  They were ahead, or matching the index until PLUS had a drop. 

5c6a8cf86ba01Image_2019-02-18_at_10.46.1


But since inception the NAPS are up 97% versus 13% for the All Share. It's only mid February, so it's too early to judge the year.  

The issue that you've got personally is that you bought a list generated at year end on the 16th January - at an interim high for the portfolio.  So the NAPS shows a loss from the 16th, but a profit year to date.  It's a matter of perspective. 

As I've stated many times,  the NAPS are an illustration of a method - they are not a buy list, and they are not recommendations.   Equities have risk and we all must make our own decisions.  

I'll be reviewing this in more detail at the half year mark. 

| Link | Share
Snoo Mon 11:47am 36 of 36
2

Perhaps the term 'NAPS' needs to be revisited?

I know the acronym here is for No Admin Portfolio system but I think the choice (whether intentional or not) to make it the same as the betting term might mean someone could potentially see it in a different light.

| Link | Share

What's your view on this thread? Log In to Comment Now

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis