Small Cap Value Report (12 Oct 2016) - VTU, PHD
Good morning!
Let's have a day when I don't mention sterling. EDIT: sorry, I didn't manage this. See below.
Vertu Motors (LON:VTU)
Share price: 46.88p (up 1.9% today)
No. shares: 397.3m
Market cap: £186.3m
(at the time of writing, I hold a long position in this share)
Interim results, 6m to 31 Aug 2016 - it looks as if investors are beginning to realise that new car sales are not the be all & end all for car dealerships. Most of the money is made from used car sales and aftersales (i.e. warranty & repair/servicing) - both of which look buoyant for Vertu in today's numbers. Those items combined generate 71.8% of gross profit.
There's a short results presentation video here from BRR Media, very helpful.
Some key points;
New car sales to private buyers, down by 4.2% on a LFL basis.
Profit before tax rose 14% to £18.7m.
Diluted adjusted EPS rose a smaller amount, up by 1.8% to 3.98p. This is because the company issued more shares during the period, to finance growth.
Net cash is reported at £12.9m, but bear in mind there are huge liabilities from manufacturers to finance Vertu's stocks of cars, so I'm sure this figure would move around a lot in the normal course of business. Remember that a balance sheet is only ever a snapshot on one particular day, so may not be typical.
Net assets are £238.4m, less intangibles of £96.4m, results in NTAV of £142m. The shares therefore trade at what seems a fairly modest premium of 31% to NTAV.
The bulk of fixed assets are valuable property assets - freeholds & long leases, which amounted to a net book value of £124.8m at end 2015 (note 18 to the last Annual Report here), so this is a soundly financed group in my view.
The all-important outlook comments are reassuring;
The Board anticipates that the Group's full year results will be in line with market expectations.
Current trading sounds fine;
September is a key month for the Group's profitability in the second half of the financial year, being a registration plate change month.
Profit in the month was ahead of prior year levels on a like-for-like basis and recent acquisitions further bolstered the Group result.
The Group's service and used car performance continued to demonstrate strong underlying growth trends in September.
Like-for-like new car private volumes for the Group were down 1.7% year on year, in line with the SMMT registration data.
Note that the decline in new private sales of -1.7% for Sept 2016 has moderated from the -4.2% figure noted for H1.
Forex - for me, this is the key issue with car dealers, and many other importers. With sterling having dropped so much, then it's inevitable that European manufacturers will have to raise prices in 2017.
The key questions then are, how much will sterling prices of imported cars rise by? What impact will that have on demand? What level of margin reduction will European manufacturers be prepared to absorb in order to maintain healthy UK sales? (they have to keep those factories operating, even if it means less profit per unit).
Domestically produced cars will probably also have to rise in price, due to the higher cost of imported components, but UK producers like Jaguar/LandRover and Nissan will certainly be under less pressure than the European manufacturers to raise prices.
I've noticed in the past, during periods of inflation, that car manufacturers can be quite clever at adjusting product specifications, model denominations, discounts & financing deals, to disguise the fact that customers are having to pay more than before. Have you noticed how many manufacturers are replacing 6-cylinder models with cheaper 4-cylinder engines that are tweaked to produce almost as much power as the old models?
Anyway, this is what Vertu says today;
The latest SMMT forecast for 2016 UK new vehicle registrations stands at 2.64 million (2015 : 2.63 million) and the Board sees no reason to disagree with the underlying market stability implied by this forecast.
The market is starting to see vehicle price increases reflecting the manufacturers' reaction to declining Sterling exchange rates against all major currencies.
Lower margin channels for manufacturers and retailers alike, such as Fleet car supply and Motability, are likely to see more impact than higher margin retail channels.
There are diverging economic forecasts with regards to Sterling's currency outlook and this leads to uncertainty over future manufacturer volume strategies and pricing.
The Board shares the outlook on the new car market given by the SMMT which anticipates a fall in 2017 registrations of around 6%. This would equate to a historically robust new car market of around 2.5 million units.
Valuation - the PER here is really low. Stockopedia shows a broker consensus of 6.17p for FY2017 (ending 28 Feb 2017). This puts the share on a PER of 7.6 - hardly demanding, especially when you consider that it has little bank debt, and owns a lot of freeholds outright.
Dividends - the yield is currently reasonable at about 3.2%.
My opinion - these are good results, and a sound outlook.
I was concerned about the impact of weaker sterling, but am comforted from Vertu's remarks today.
The other risk is if the UK economy moves into a general recession next year. It may do, we don't know. That would reduce consumer & business confidence, and lead to reduced purchases of vehicles, both new & secondhand. So it is a risk.
I think it's safest to assume that there probably won't be any earnings growth next year. Interest rates are very low, which is making vehicle purchases so much more affordable than they used to be. Young people are often buying new or nearly new cars, because a monthly payment of say £100-200 for a personal finance lease probably works out better value than buying some old banger that constantly requires costly repairs. Cheaper insurance, tax, and fuel economy too. So the market has changed.
Therefore, my belief is that the next downturn in the car market may not be as bad as people fear. The wild card is interest rates of course. If sterling really collapses, and the Govt has to take emergency measures to boost it, by jacking up interest rates considerably, then all bets are off.
Overall, I reckon the low PER and good asset backing factor in a lot of bad news already, so I'm happy to hold at this level. We're in one of those patches where there's a lot of scaremongering going on. Last time that happened in June, those of us who held the line and remained optimistic, cleaned up. So I'm taking a similar view of things at the moment. As always that is subject to change, if events change.
Proactis Holdings (LON:PHD)
Share price: 141p (up 1.1% today)
No. shares: 39.8m
Market cap: £56.1m
(at the time of writing, I hold a long position in this share)
Results, y/e 31 Jul 2016 - the financial highlights here look positive. I won't repeat them all here, as you can just read the RNS for that.
Things I like:
- High recurring revenues - a much sought-after feature by investors, as this should protect the downside risk (i.e. little chance of a serious profit warning in future)
- Strong growth in order book, up 32% to £26.1m
- Adjusted EPS up 20% to 7.3p - good growth, but PER maybe now up with events at 19.3
- Exciting future potential for its new service to automate client supplier interactions, and accelerated payment service (a bit like Tungsten, but done sensibly & profitably)
- Development spend - £2.1m was capitalised in the year, but the amortisation charge of £2.5m was higher, so that's fine - capitalisation isn't flattering the operating profit.
- Adjusted earnings figures look reasonable - and don't differ too much from basic earnings.
Things I don't like:
- Balance sheet looks weak to me - current ratio of 0.63 is well below where I would normally be comfortable. Although extent of recurring revenues here does give some comfort. Similarly, NTAV is negative, at -8.6m.
- Operating profit after all costs is £1.9m - not a huge amount for a £56.1m market cap company - so valuation is clearly anticipating further profit growth.
Things to note:
- Negative tax charges have boosted EPS in last 2 years.
- Restructuring costs pushed into exceptionals in both years, but not excessive at c.£0.3m p.a.
My opinion - I don't see much immediate upside here, as the shares have done very well over the last 3 years. Today's results look good, but not spectacular. Once you normalise the tax charge, the rating looks fairly punchy, but not excessive in a market that is rating growth companies highly.
Overall, I'm happy to hold for another year, but am keeping this as a fairly small position in my personal portfolio. If there's subsequently evidence of faster growth, and the new services really taking off (they are currently being trialled with 3 customers), then I'd look at it again, and would be prepared to pay more for faster growth if that scenario plays out.
Sorry, I ran out of time today, so many things going on, so didn't get round to looking at Walker Greenbank (LON:WGB) or Telecom Plus (LON:TEP) - my apologies.
Regards, Paul.
(usual disclaimers apply)
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.


25 comments
Can anyone suggest why CAMB has diverged from LOOK or VTU?


Or why VTU and ITV have performed so similarly?
Re. Staffline (LON:STAF) , recruitment agencies in general seem to be out of favour as a sector at the moment (and have been post the Brexit vote). I hold Gattaca (LON:GATC) (formerly Matchtech) which has decent fundamentals and a good market position but whose share price has also been heading south for the past few months.
Gus.
On a general note, I think the fall in sterling could prove to be one of the most beneficial consequences of the Brexit vote in all sorts of ways, and particularly in starting to alleviate the dire trade imbalance. It had proved impossible to devalue previously.
As regards pricing of imports I would expect manufacturers to price according to markets. You already see this if you are buying a Nikon D750 on Amazon Germany where you pay more than if buying on Amazon Spain (€1,999 versus €1,699). The British customer has always been expected to be a top end payer, perhaps not for much longer.
Hi Paul,
Bit off topic but do you use Level 2 in your trading?
Cheers
Hi Paul,
I know this is off topic but I wanted to ask you last night at Brighton but the event was cancelled. The landlady sends her greetings btw
Can you comment on the seemingly inexorable fall in Staffline (LON:STAF) share price. All the indicators are good there seems determined selling - today down to 800p. Is there a big profit warning in the offing or is it the thought a 2017 brexit induced recession?
Every day seems to start strongly only for the SP to fall and end lower
I have a small toehold in this and will look to average down if I can figure out when it will stop
Regards
Steve
Steve
I also hold Staffline (LON:STAF).
I guess the main reason why the stock is falling again is the perceived focus on "hard Brexit" and limits on immigration. Indeed, sell-off seemed to gather speed following Amber Rudd's speech proposing naming and shaming companies employing large numbers of non-British staff. (Admittedly the stock still is falling after the Govt rowed back on this proposal.). A high % the 45,000 workforce that Staffline provides for its clients are EU Eastern Europeans.
Staffline management have appeared confident they can adapt to changes on immigration law - but it looks like some adaptation will be needed. To me this, and any changes to Work Programme renewal, are the key points for the stock. Since 70% of revenues come from the domestic food sector, Staffline might be less exposed to a general recession than you might think.
I hold Staffline.
I thought that the fall was fear that the government would no renew the Access to Work scheme which is very profitable and STAFF is a market leader, Andy Hogarth say no chance.- too profitable to gov.also.
Seems very strange that STAFF is down because of a perceived fall in the employment of immigrant labour when it is the one Company who would greatly benefit by the substitution of British workers (oxymoron??) through this scheme. Surely it is in a win win situation.
Judging by SP I am alone with these thoughts.
I'm relaxed about Staffline (LON:STAF) .
The jobs they service are not going away. Also, nor are Eastern Europeans - they're going to be allowed to stay here, so I'm not really sure what all the anxiety is about.
Regards, Paul.
Everyone especially wimbledonsprinter et al. Many thanks to those who replied about Staffline (LON:STAF). The got schemes to get people into work will surely not go away. If they do they will be announced (as per norm with govt) as a new initiative. As long as the economy holds up there will be people going for coffee.
waiting to average down with a second toe at 750p
Steve
Paul,
I hold some Proactis too, but am more bullish. The reason for this is their substantial order book increase and their hefty 82% GM, (up from 80% GM last year). Most of the Proactis costs are fixed and the overhead costs are virtually identical for 2015 and 2016, despite +13% sales increase during 2016.
The current broker consensus is for a 24% sales increase in 2017, which if achieved should enable operational gearing to kick in and push much of the increased sales revenue to the bottom line. Strikes me that Proactis could be on the cusp of a substantial EPS jump.
Proactis (£PHD)
To me some of the forward looking value of PHD revolves around the much trailed income they think they may be to get from their supplier chain. This would derive from a fee the supplier would (circa £50) to have a limited version of the Proactis software loaded on their systems, so that they can provide electronic invoicing to their main supplier. This saves costs of admin for the main supplier, and also gives transparency on the tracking of their due payments.
This gives further opportunity for them to asses their cashflow, and get invoice finance from a Proactis sponsored finance house (from which Proactis presumably gets a small cut). So two potential bites of the revenue cherry.
Given the size of the Customers supply base (Screwfix etc) the potential revenue boost is large.
Its very early days, and Proactis haven't opened up how much revenue is currently coming from this revenue source, but is promising more information in the near future.
Most of that income will go to the bottom line, I guess, so that is a big potential. However, at this stage there is not much visibility of it.
The manufacturers have supported volume for the last few years - with cheap finance deals. Whose to say that they now won't support the volume through accepting a lower margin.
But the key point in the article for me which then seems to have been forgotten about - is that 72% of the margin came from repairs/servicing/used car sales.
One thinks you've missed the thrust of that message
It may be a mistake to assume that car companies based in the UK are not under as much pressure to raise prices as EU companies. It rather depends on the metric of the business and the consolidation currency.
For example if the KPI is ROCE and the CE is already set, in let us say Yen, then the R will need to increase almost as quickly as the £ falls against the Yen to maintain the KPI.
Equally if you are measured in profitability per vehicle and that is consolidated into a single currency for international factory comparators, let us again say Yen, you are going to need to raise prices by the amount sterling falls to compete with sites in Spain etc.
So only if you are a genuinely British owned and headquartered firm is a fall in the currency not a measurement issue when you talk to your boss.
I accept that there are a lot of nuances to this. But in the world of international motor manufacturing I do wonder whether the figures are looking as +ve for the UK as some like to think.
Paul, I hold Telford Homes and I'd love to hear your thoughts on today's update in your own usual and welcoming 'say it as it is' way! :-)
aiminvesting
a vote to disapply pre-emption rights, is a vote to suspend the rights of existing shareholding to be first in the queue of being offered new shares. New shares may be issued, say to raise placing monies.
It means the Company can quickly go to institutions to raise the money without consulting or waiting on shareholders.
The Company usually votes on this in parallel with a vote on the limits of new share capital it can raise. Typically this is about 10% of the issued share capital, but can be higher.
So a vote against disapplying pre-emption rights, generally means the company must first offer new shares to existing shareholders.
Both these powers have to be voted on every year, as they time out after a stipulated period.
Thanks for this very thorough explanation Trident! The big fall in the share price is still a bit of a mistery to me. I guess the no-vote shows some break of confidence between shareholders and management, but it looks like a side issue with no impact on the profitability of the business...
At least now I know exactly where pre-emption rights are!
Hi Paul,
As always, thanks for the great reports (worth mentioning it, they are very very useful for private investors, as are the discussions in the comments section - usually well argued and balanced stuff - not what you find in forums and discussion boards).
I though I may pick your brains on today's 12% fall in share price by John Menzies (LON:MNZS) ? Do you think it is because of the no-vote in the general meeting (but that was published yesterday at 1 pm) "Resolution 5 sought general authority to disapply pre-emption rights in connection with any future issue of shares on a pre-emptive basis or on a non pre-emptive basis up to approximately 5 per cent. of the enlarged issued share capital." Or could it be due to the admission of new shares today, but then that was announced last month... I don't really get it.
Anyway, I thought it could be a great opportunity for you to explain to beginner investors what "disapply pre-emption tights" implies in reality. From what I can guess, it can't be something you like to much given what I heard from you about the lack of open offers etc.
If you don't have time to cover this, I completely understand!
Thanks,
Thomas
Re: the 'fall' - the shares are trading ex-rights today. Up until yesterday, if you bought a John Menzies share, you also received a right - a right to buy another portion of a John Menzies share at a discounted price (£3.43) in the rights offering. Clearly the right to buy a share at a discount has a value.
As of today, the shares now trade ex-rights... so the 'embedded value' in those rights that were attached has now fallen off of the share price.
It's just an optical thing - the market hasn't changed its mind on the value of the company.
Trident covers the pre-emption rights nicely.
Nice. Thank you for the explanation!
Re domestic car production costs, does Nissan UK, for example, actually pay for imported parts using £s? Assuming it has loads of Euros in its bank accounts anyway, because people buy the cars using Euros, why wouldn't it just purchase the parts using Euros (or dollars, or whatever).
StepOne
My experience of investing leads me to conclude that 'cheap' shares usually need a catalyst to become less cheap. And the most common catalyst is (expectations of) rising profitability. Vertu Motors (LON:VTU) potentially faces a triple headwind in 2017:
So where will the profit forecast upgrades come from? Further M/A seems to be the only hope.
For me, the key risk with investing in the company today is that we are/must be close to the peak of the economic cycle and yet the company is earning EBIT margins of just 1.1%. Profitability will quickly disappear if revenue declines.
Re Vertu Motors (LON:VTU) The Altman Z score at 0.69 is a concern to me also.
Interesting point re local car producers, I wonder what % of parts are sourced from outside the uk ?
and of that percentage, how much could be sourced locally given the difference in exchange rates ?
I think they like to have their cost base roughly in the same ratio as their sales, so if they sell 25% of their output in the U.K. they will have 25% of their costs in £GB. This gives them a natural hedge and some stability in doing business.
That said I expect there will be some tweaking in favour of UK supply if the drop in the pound looks likely to persist.
Hi Paul , I think you might have mentioned Sterling but you seem to have got away with it so far....