UK house builders: Are Berkeley Group, Bellway and Persimmon a value buy or value trap?

Wednesday, Jun 01 2016 by
12

International Business Times Video

Can anyone solve the UK's growing housing crisis? The new Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has a huge challenge on his hands now that he is settled at City Hall. He promised during his election to make 50% of all new homes in London "genuinely affordable".

This is how bad matters have become in London: according to estate agents Savills, first-time homebuyers in the capital now require a deposit equalling 131% of their annual salary.

Only 36% of 25-34 year olds owned their own homes in 2013/14, compared with a massive 66% in 1991 (Chart 1).Just look at the way that adults aged up to 34 have seen home ownership fall as a result of increasingly unaffordable housing – just 9% of 16-24 year olds owned their own homes in 2013/14, compared with 36% in 1991.

To this end, Mayor Khan will use the £400m ($580m, €519m) that remains of the London Mayor's affordable homes budget to support housing associations to build more London homes.

The 16-34 Age Group Have Seen a Collapse in Home Ownership1. The 16-34 age group have seen a collapse in home ownership, ONS

This is not, however, exclusively a London problem. Indeed, back in 2004 the Barker Review concluded that the UK would need to build 250,000 new homes per year just to keep pace with the growing population.

But of course, this has not been achieved.

Matters are now so extreme that housing charity Shelter reported last year that a quarter of all adults under the age of 35 in the UK were still living in their childhood bedroom with their parents.

How big is the UK's housing shortage today?

Estimates vary, and the 2014 Lyons report estimated a shortfall of around 1 million homes.

Just look at the number of homes built per year since 2004, the year of the Barker Review. The National Housing Federation (NHF) assesses the need for new homes at 245,000 across the UK each year. But, in the last 11 years there has not even been one year where that many homes have been built.

Steady decline in house building volumes since the 1960s2. Steady decline in house building volumes since the 1960s
Department of Communities and Local Government

If…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

My opinions only, not investment recommendations: Please Do Your Own Research

Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
13 thumbs up
1 thumb down
Share this post with friends



The Berkeley Group Holdings plc is a holding company. The Company, along with its subsidiaries, is engaged in residential-led, mixed-use property development. Its segments include Residential-led mixed-use development and Other activities. Its brands include Berkeley, which creates medium to large-scale developments in towns, cities and the countryside, encompassing executive homes, mixed use schemes, riverside apartments, refurbished historic buildings and urban loft spaces; St George, which is involved in mixed use sustainable regeneration in London; St James, which handles projects that embrace private residential development, commercial property, recreational and community facilities; St Edward, which offers residentially led developments, and St William. Berkeley First is a division of the Company specializing in student accommodation and mixed use residential development within London and the South East. Berkeley Commercial is its commercial property developer and investor. more »

LSE Price
4177p
Change
1.1%
Mkt Cap (£m)
5,250
P/E (fwd)
12.2
Yield (fwd)
4.8

Bellway p.l.c is a holding company of the Bellway Group of companies. The Company is engaged in the building and selling of homes, ranging from one-bedroom apartments up to five-bedroom family homes, as well as providing social housing-to-housing associations. It focuses on providing traditional family housing outside of London and apartments within the London boroughs, in zone 2 and beyond. It operates in 19 trading divisions in England, Scotland and Wales: Durham, East Midlands, Essex, Kent, Manchester, North East, North London, North West, Northern Home Counties, Scotland, South London, South Midlands, South West, Thames Gateway, Thames Valley, Wales, Wessex, West Midlands and Yorkshire. It also offers second-hand homes of various types, such as detached, apartment, terraced, semi-detached, town house, bungalow and penthouse. It also offers various additions covering kitchens, electrical, fire surround and fire, ceramic tiling, flooring, bathrooms and gardens, among others. more »

LSE Price
3291p
Change
2.1%
Mkt Cap (£m)
4,053
P/E (fwd)
7.5
Yield (fwd)
4.7

Taylor Wimpey plc is a residential developer. The Company operates at a local level from 24 regional businesses across the United Kingdom, and it has operations in Spain. Its segments include Housing United Kingdom and Housing Spain. The Housing United Kingdom segment includes North, Central and South West, and London and South East (including Central London) divisions. The North division covers its East and West Scotland, North East, North Yorkshire, Yorkshire, North West, Manchester, North Midlands, Midlands and West Midlands regional businesses. The Central and South West Division covers its East Midlands, South Midlands, East Anglia, Oxfordshire, South Wales, Bristol, Southern Counties and Exeter regional businesses. The London and South East Division includes Central London and covers its East London, North Thames, South East, South Thames and West London regional businesses. It builds homes in various locations of Costa Blanca, Costa del Sol and the island of Mallorca. more »

LSE Price
165.55p
Change
3.0%
Mkt Cap (£m)
5,430
P/E (fwd)
8.1
Yield (fwd)
11.1



  Is LON:BKG fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


27 Comments on this Article show/hide all

cig 2nd Jun '16 8 of 27
1

In reply to post #133859

The shortage is of land with planning permission for residential buildings. Just abolishing the green belt(s) would do wonders. A lot of the existing urban housing stock is also low density, which could be rebuilt to higher density given the right tax/legal incentives. It's pretty difficult to do politically given vested interests, but that's not a physical space issue.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 9 of 27
2

In reply to post #133868

England is still most densely populated country in Europe. The south east is very densely populated. Yes you can build more houses but the natives will not like it. Much of that land is farm land so that could cause issues also. At the moment I think I would rather be a land owner than a builder.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Flackwell 2nd Jun '16 10 of 27
1

Nearly every post above is addressing the supply side

How about addressing the demand?

Vote Brexit

| Link | Share | 1 reply
BlueFrew 2nd Jun '16 11 of 27

In reply to post #133832

Suppose there is a group of people in the market who thought that property would only go up. They may own 1 or more properties already. They'd be willing to release "equity" from their existing properties to put towards a deposit on another property. They'd be willing to continually increase their borrowing. When it came to negotiation on another property they would be willing to pay whatever uplift in value they considered that their own properties had achieved within the same period. In fact it wouldn't be in their interest to drive a hard bargain and move prices down as they wouldn't be able to release any more "equity" from their existing properties. If they need any encouragement I'm sure Estate Agents would happily invent another buyer for them to bid against.

Sounds a bit like a ponzi scheme. It's also, I suggest, the UK housing market since the financial crash. There are figures which show that the lions share of the increase in mortgage lending since then has been Buy to Let. The madness is best demonstrated by the activity before the introduction of the extra 3% SDLT where houses were being bid up by 7,8,9% or more to avoid the extra. But when you're only putting up a 25% deposit, 3% on the entire purchase price means finding an extra 12% in actual cash.

The Government and the Bank of England have both indicated that they intend to kill highly leveraged BTL. What happens next is a matter of opinion and what makes a market. My opinion is that house prices are heading down and a damn good thing that will be too.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 12 of 27
3

In reply to post #133913

I think are are right that house prices will fall, the question is when? The vote in 3 weeks time maybe the the trigger if we vote leave. If house prices fall it does not really bother me, I only have 1 house, I have to live somewhere, it will only bother me if I emigrate.

| Link | Share
underscored 2nd Jun '16 13 of 27
1

If it is lack of supply someone needs to be able to explain nine elms disease. What we have is an enourmous speculative credit bubble. Fingers will be burned when it pops.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 14 of 27

In reply to post #133934

"nine elms disease" what is that?

| Link | Share
underscored 2nd Jun '16 15 of 27

Sorry can't post links on my phone. Just google it.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
TangoDoc 2nd Jun '16 16 of 27
1

In reply to post #133877

I'm not sure about England as a pure entity, but, considering the UK as a whole, it is only the tenth most densely populated but that is not the relevant issue. What matters is whether there is enough money to go around to feed and shelter us all, and there is, but, I am ashamed to suggest, not the will to share it reasonably and the behaviour of people when crammed together in competition with each other. Perhaps we could ask how Monaco copes?

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 17 of 27
2

In reply to post #133946

OK you can pick out countries like Malta and Monaco. But Monaco has a population of under 40,000, thats just a small town, its a bit different from 55m. Yes we can have 200m I'm sure but who wants to live like that. Its one reason why I moved away from Essex, its getting too built up, its becoming like London. But it will get worst if we stay in Europe, once countries such as Albania and Turkey join our population could soar and if we have to pay them benefits and provide housing we will start to feel the pinch.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 18 of 27
1

In reply to post #133943

Yes I have found it but that is about supplying the wrong sort of property, I would not want to live in a flat, certainly not an overpriced ugly one. If you supply the wrong product then people will not buy it.

| Link | Share
TangoDoc 2nd Jun '16 19 of 27
1

In reply to post #133883

An increase in population because of immigration is modest in comparison to the persistent survival of baby boomers, a trend towards smaller numbers living under each roof and less extended families, the birth rate, the extreme wealth of some who own more than one home and, in London and the South-east particularly, the phenomenon of homes being bought by foreign investors but not inhabited. Voting Brexit won't change things enough to offset the considerable drain of investment money from uK stocks, as prudent foreigners wait a few years to see how well we renegotiate all our trade deals. If fear of Brexit has already blighted the market, just wait and see what the real thing would do. Of course, we could always restore our nation's glory by a return to piracy, slavery and gun-boat diplomacy that served our ancestors so well. Avast behind!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
herbie47 2nd Jun '16 20 of 27
3

In reply to post #133955

Not sure that is correct, 2015 uk population grew by 500,000 net migration was over 300,000.

| Link | Share
TangoDoc 2nd Jun '16 21 of 27

In reply to post #133949

While we insist that all life in the UK is London-centred, then it could well be unpleasant to live near there. I'd hate it though lived there in the 60's as a student when the London population was 11 million. Of course, we didn't all own a car each then. I have two daughters living in London after being raised in a hamlet in Leicestershire and they just love the melee.
No likelihood of Albania or Turkey ticking enough of the boxes to get admitted to the EU in our lifetimes. In my view, all the social ills we face in the uk are brought about by our own governments and can just as well be managed by them too.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
TangoDoc 2nd Jun '16 23 of 27

In reply to post #133973

I stand corrected. i don't know why that figure was stuck in my head.

| Link | Share
ken lowes 13th Jun '16 24 of 27
2

I don't know why TangoDoc is getting a hard time, so you might not agree, that doesn't make it a thumbs down does it? London has always been a special case and out of kilter with the property cycle that affects the rest of the country If young people can't afford to live in the city then it will have an adverse effect over time. As for land Cordea Saville's, who you would expect to be knowledgeable about land prices started a land fund around 2005 and it was liquidated at zero value and investors lost 100%. Now you could say that gearing was the cause or they bought at too high a price, it doesn't really matter it happened and gave a new meaning to "buy land they aren't making anymore". Everyone has an opinion some will be right and some wrong but not at the same time and certainly not forever. We have the biggest property bubble ever seen in this country and it will burst like all bubbles and that's my opinion. You don't need a lot a facts when figures like" 131% of a years salary is required for a deposit" and at an interest rate of 3% a tiny 1% rise means a 33% increase in repayment.

| Link | Share
underscored 13th Jun '16 25 of 27
2

http://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/Restoring-a-Nation-of-Home-Owners.pdf

Worth a read...

"Many experts believe that this unprecedented and deeply damaging ‘fourth house price boom’ has been caused mainly by our failure to build enough houses. They blame this on land hoarding by developers, greedy landowners, and conservative planning authorities which respond to pressure from local residents by refusing development permits."

"There are, however, strong reasons for arguing that restricted supply was not the key cause of this crisis of
housing affordability, and that even if we increased construction as many have urged, the impact on house
prices would be small."

"The main causes of our problem have been on the demand side. The failure to control the explosion of credit from the late 1990s onwards grossly inflated house prices, and the historically low cost of credit since 2008
has kept them inflated and prevented the price correction which is necessary to restore the link with earnings (as occurred in the three previous house price booms). The growth of buy-to-let has further fuelled demand, and this has been reinforced by an influx of foreign money into the luxury London market, the strong growth in immigrant numbers, and an increase in the number of parents’ drawing down their own housing equity to help their children buy"

On topic of the housebuilders. This thing is becoming a mighty hot political hot potato, a serious rage is building in the young professional class damaged by this non-sense.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
BlueFrew 14th Jun '16 26 of 27
1

In reply to post #135512

Very much agree. Another day, another story about the way high house prices are blighting young people's lives. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/renting/generation-rent-young-married-pregnant-and-stuck-in-a-house-shar/

It's easy to imagine for those not badly affected by this, that things will carry on the way they are. But a look at the demographics of the UK show that things will change. The number of retirees slows down quite dramatically soon. While by 2025, the largest voting bloc will be those of voting age under the age of 40. They will not put up with being weighed down by student debt, low interest rates making it impossible to save or paying 10x joint salaries for a property somebody purchased 30 years earlier for less than 3x single salary.

It's no accident that George Osborne has staggered the implementation of Clause 24 until 2020. I'm sure his strategic plan is to get the keys to Downing Street in May 2020 and kick off the mother of all house price crashes the day after. I'm sure attempts will be made to try and stop the bubble from popping until that time, but I doubt they will succeed.

| Link | Share
VegPatch 14th Jun '16 27 of 27
2

4 factors worry me with housebuilders at the moment
1. Historically high mortgage to income ratios of c5x outside of London, inside London it's about 10x according to HSBC research. This is the same as the 07 peak. So we look like we are at peak price.
2. The market is very much being supported by Help to Buy. One sales agent for Charles Church said to me you will hear the market grind to a halt if HTB is stopped.
3. As a result of peak prices, we have peak margins and peak ROCE for virtually the entire sector.
4. The entire sector, Bovis Homes aside, is trading at peak PRice to book, with Berkeley and persimmon trading at over 2x.

I have analysed this sector since 1997 and most metrics look to be at peak. So while there may not be a crash soon, the margin of safety doesn't appeal to me. The sector has typically traded between 0.9x TNAV to 2x in non stress periods. In stress periods the lower end of the range is 0.3x on average.

The one stand out value play to me is Bovis which is on c1.2x FY16 TNAV (tangible NAV Ie excluding goodwill). It has a c4.5 year land bank of consented land and its 19k consented plots represent just over 1 years volumes for Barratt (15k) and Taylor Wimpey (13.5k). It has a 23k land bank of strategic land and converted c10% of these into consented units last year. Its problems appear to be in the building side rather than the price at which the land was bought. This will be a focus for management. If the market remains ok but Bovis doesn't improve its margins it is not out of the question it gets bought (memories are painfully short I assure you in this sector). So I see a rerating potential here that I don't really see in the rest of the sector. On the downside I see it going to 0.9x book, c25% downside, but I think if the others derate it could be much more savage.

This sector will be fun and games until The Referendum is decided!

Good luck...


| Link | Share

Please subscribe to submit a comment



 Are LON:BKG's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »



About Edmund Shing

Edmund Shing

Edmund Shing is currently Global Head of Equity & Derivative Strategy at BNP Paribas, and formerly a Global Equity portfolio manager at BCS Asset Management. Edmund focuses on a combination of high-level investment themes and fundamental stock-picking, with a dash of technical analysis in the mix. He has a book published in 2015 by Harriman House, “The Idle Investor”, which provides investors with three simple, easy-to-implement strategies using low-cost ETFs to give a good combination of portfolio performance at a measured level of investment risk. Edmund has previously worked at Barclays Capital (as Head of European Equity Strategy), BNP Paribas (as a Prop Trader), Julius Baer, Schroders and Goldman Sachs over a 21-year career in financial markets based in Paris and London. He also holds a PhD in Artificial Intelligence from the University of Birmingham. You can follow him on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheIdleInvestor more »

Follow



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis