REG - Baillie GiffordChina - Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Final Results
03/04/2024 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20240403:nRSC0616Ja&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 0616J Baillie Gifford China Grwth TrstPLC 03 April 2024
RNS Announcement
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc
Legal Entity Identifier: 213800KOK5G3XYI7ZX18
Results for the year to 31 January 2024
Regulated Information Classification: Additional regulated information
required to be disclosed under the applicable laws and regulations.
The following is the results announcement for the year to 31 January 2024
which was approved by the Board on 2 April 2024.
Over the year the Company's net asset value total return(†) was negative
40.9% and the share price total return(†) was negative 40.8%, compared with
a total return of negative 30.5% for the MSCI China All Shares Index (in
sterling terms).
¾ In the period from 16 September 2020 (the date of the adoption of the
China strategy), the Company's net asset value and share price returned
negative 49.3% and negative 50.5% respectively compared to a total return of
negative 39.4% for the MSCI China All Shares Index (in sterling terms).
¾ The portfolio's overwhelming exposure to non state-owned enterprise
companies, particularly in the financials space, plus its underweight
positions in energy and utilities (the two best performing sectors within the
companies universe), contributed to the Company's relative underperformance.
¾ Contributors to performance included all four state-owned enterprises
held in the Company's portfolio: Weichai Power, Brilliance China Automotive,
Kweichow Moutai and Zijin Mining however the largest contributor to
performance was ByteDance.
¾ The main stock detractors to performance were varied and included
Li-Ning, Glodon and Meituan.
¾ The Company has also bought a number of stocks over the year. These
include PDD Holdings, an ecommerce platform; BYD, a company that makes
electric vehicles; Silergy, a company that designs analogue semiconductors;
and Anker Innovations, a Chinese consumer electronic company.
¾ Over the period the Company has bought back 160,700 shares to be held in
treasury.
¾ Whilst investment in China may prove volatile over a short term horizon,
the Managers have a long-term investment approach and are optimistic about the
prospects for the future.
† Alternative Performance Measure - see Glossary of terms and alternative
performance measures at the end of this announcement. Source: LSEG/Baillie
Gifford and relevant underlying index providers.
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust aims to achieve long term capital growth
through investment principally in Chinese companies which are believed to have
above average prospects for growth. At 31 January 2024 the Company had total
assets of £125 million.
The Company is managed by Baillie Gifford & Co, an Edinburgh based fund
management group with approximately £230 billion under management and advice
as at 1 April 2024.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an
investment and any income from it is not guaranteed and may go down as well as
up and investors may not get back the amount invested. The Company may borrow
money to make further investments. This is commonly referred to as gearing.
The risk is that, when this money is repaid by the Company, the value of these
investments may not be enough to cover the borrowing and interest costs, and
the Company makes a loss. If the Company's investments fall in value, gearing
will increase the amount of this loss. The more highly geared the Company, the
greater this effect will be.
Investment in investment trusts should be regarded as medium to long term. You
can find up to date performance information about China Growth at
bailliegiffordchinagrowthtrust.com.
See disclaimer at the end of this announcement.
2 April 2024
For further information please contact:
Naomi Cherry, Baillie Gifford & Co
Tel: 0131 275
2000
Jonathan Atkins, Director, Four Communications
Tel: 0203 920 0555 or 07872 495396
Chair's statement
Performance
The 12 months under review have formed an extraordinary third consecutive year
of market falls that has tested the patience of many investors. A year ago,
the stock market looked set to embrace China's reopening: covid was becoming a
thing of the past, consumer spending was expected to bounce back, regulation
of large technology companies was abating, measures were being rolled out to
restore confidence in the property sector and there were hopes that
geopolitical tensions were easing and there may be some level of cooperation.
Some but not all of this has occurred but frustratingly we have not seen the
results benefit the Company's performance in this financial year.
Generally, the negative returns over the period have been driven by
macroeconomics and geopolitics rather than the performance of the underlying
companies in the portfolio. The listed holdings within the Company's portfolio
continue to perform well operationally, delivering 17.7% earnings growth in
the financial year.
During the financial year to 31 January 2024, the Company's net asset value
total return, calculated by deducting borrowings at fair value, was negative
40.9% and the share price total return was negative 40.8%. This compares with
a total return of negative 30.5% for the MSCI China All Shares Index (in
sterling terms).
Over the period from 16 September 2020 (the date of the adoption of the China
strategy), the Company's net asset value and share price returned negative
49.3% and negative 50.5% respectively compared to a total return of negative
39.4% for the MSCI China All Shares Index (in sterling terms).
The underperformance in 2023 can largely be attributed to the Company's lack
of exposure to the energy sector (the only sector which saw a positive return)
and financials (the third best performing sector and which returned a negative
15%) and overweight position in consumer discretionary which returned a
negative 37%. Foreign investors stayed away from China and domestic investors
moved into defensive sectors and state-owned enterprises ('SOE'). The FTSE
China SOE index outperformed the non-SOE index in calendar year 2023,
continuing a trend which began in 2021. Given that the Company invests for
growth and as such is not weighted towards SOE companies, it has resulted in
weaker performance relative to the benchmark.
As part of the Board's oversight of the Managers' investment approach, I
attended a Baillie Gifford trip to China to the investment team in Shanghai
and portfolio companies. In addition, the Board met with members of the
Shanghai team virtually at its annual strategy day. The Board remains
satisfied that the Managers are investing in accordance with its long term
growth approach.
There will be periods of underperformance during the investment cycle as the
Managers do not invest in trends, and as I have previously noted, the Managers
have a long-term investment approach, and we would ask shareholders to judge
performance over periods of five years or more. Further information about the
Company's portfolio performance is covered by our portfolio managers in their
Managers' Report.
Discount/premium and share issuance
The Company's share price discount to net asset value at the last financial
year end was 6.3%, and the shares continued to trade at a discount for the
duration of the financial year. The discount was volatile during the financial
period, 15.5% at its widest and 2.6% at its narrowest. The Company's share
price ended the year at a discount to net asset value of 6.2%.
No shares have been issued by the Company during the period as the shares have
traded at a discount to net asset value. The Company bought back 160,700
shares into treasury over the period. The buy backs benefit shareholders in
the Company by modestly enhancing the NAV per share. The Board continues to
keep its liquidity policy under close review and recognises the need to
address any sustained and significant imbalance of buyers and sellers. Details
of the full liquidity policy can be found on page 29 of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements. Between 31 January and 1 April 2024, no shares were
issued and 389,189 shares were bought back into treasury.
Dividend
Since the adoption of the China strategy and the appointment of Baillie
Gifford as Managers in September 2020, the Company's returns are now
predominantly generated from capital growth as opposed to income. During the
financial year, the revenue return per share increased by 13.1% from 2.14p to
2.42p.
The dividend policy of the Company, which became effective last year, is that
any dividend paid will be by way of a final dividend and be not less than the
minimum required for the Company to maintain its investment trust status.
The Board is proposing a final dividend of 2.0p, an increase of 17.6%, which,
subject to shareholder approval, will be paid on 24 July 2024 to shareholders
on the register at close of business on 21 June 2024, with the shares trading
ex-dividend on 20 June 2024.
Ongoing Costs
The ongoing charges figure for the year is 0.97%. Last year, the ongoing
charges were 0.94%.
Gearing
In April 2022, the Company entered into a $40m revolving credit facility with
RBSI. As at 31 January 2024, a relatively modest $7.5m has been drawn down
under the facility, and gearing stood at 4.2%. The Board consider that a
prudent level of gearing is advantageous given the long term returns forecast
in China equities by the Managers and is seeking to renew the loan facility in
April 2024.
Unlisted investments
The Company holds one unlisted investment, ByteDance, which represented 8.4%
of the total assets as at 31 January 2024. The valuation process is undertaken
by Baillie Gifford and supplemented by an independent assessment by S&P
Global, and is set out on page 52 of the Annual Report and Financial
Statements.
ESG
The consideration of ESG factors is an integral part of the Managers'
long-term investment approach. The Board reviews the Managers' engagement with
portfolio companies at each Board meeting. In addition, the Board has also
reviewed the Managers' approach to assessing geopolitical risks in 2023.
Further details can be found on pages 42 to 49 of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements.
The Board
As noted in my statement last year, I plan to step down from the Board on 30
April 2024 having completed my nine year tenure. I am pleased to confirm that
Nicholas Pink, who joined the Board in September 2023 following a search
undertaken with the support of an external recruitment consultant, will
succeed me as Chair with effect from 1 May 2024. Nicholas has extensive senior
management experience in financial services with previous roles at UBS
Investment Bank including Global Head of Research and Head of Asia Research.
Nicholas currently sits on the board of two other investment trusts.
I am also pleased to confirm that following a second search conducted by an
external recruitment consultant this year, Sarah MacAulay will be joining the
Board on 1 May 2024. Sarah is an experienced investment trust director and
former portfolio manager with knowledge of the Asian region. I am delighted
with both appointments and confident that the Company will be led by a
competent board with wide ranging skills.
All Directors are subject to annual re-election at the AGM in June.
Biographies of each of the Directors can be found on pages 59 and 60 of the
Annual Report and Financial Statements.
The Managers
Since the change of mandate in September 2020, Roderick Snell and Sophie
Earnshaw have been co-portfolio managers of the Company. Following a decision
by the Managers to separate their China and Global Emerging Markets teams, the
Board is pleased to announce that Linda Lin, partner at Baillie Gifford, will
be joining Sophie as co-portfolio manager with effect from 1 February 2024 to
replace Roderick who is stepping away to focus on his Emerging Market and Asia
responsibilities. The Board would like to thank Roderick for his contribution
to the Company over the last three and a half years.
Annual General Meeting
The AGM will be held at 4pm on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 at The Cavendish Hotel,
81 Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6JF. The meeting will include a presentation
from the Managers and all shareholders are invited to attend.
To accurately reflect the views of shareholders of the Company, the Board
intends to hold the AGM voting on a poll, rather than by a show of hands as
has been customary. This will ensure an exact and definitive result. The Board
encourages all shareholders to exercise their votes on the AGM resolutions by
completing and submitting the form of proxy enclosed with the Annual Report to
ensure that your votes are represented at the meeting (whether or not you
intend to attend in person). If you hold shares through a share platform or
other nominee, the Board encourages you to contact these organisations
directly as soon as possible to arrange for you to submit votes in advance of
the AGM. Alternatively, the Association of Investment Companies' ('AIC')
website theaic.co.uk/how-to-vote-your-shares has information on how to vote
your shares if you hold them via one of the major platforms. The following
link will also take you through to the AIC website where there is information
on how your platform can help you attend the AGM in person
theaic.co.uk/aic/ready-toinvest/shareholder-voting/attending-an-agm.
Should shareholders have questions for the Board or the Managers, or any
queries as to how to vote, they are welcome, as always, to submit them by
email to trustenquiries@bailliegifford.com or calling 0800 917 2112 (Baillie
Gifford may record your call).
Outlook
Investor sentiment and related share trading have significantly influenced
share price performance over the last three years, and share prices have
diverged from their fundamentals. It is the fundamentals that our Managers
remain focused on, as it is a company's operational progress over the long
term that will deliver outperformance.
The combination of an ambitious entrepreneurial culture and bold top-down
policies with the sheer scale of China's markets continues to provide a unique
opportunity given lower valuations. A long-term investment horizon underpins
our Managers' efforts as they seek to find the companies in China with the
best sustainable growth outlook, regardless of their size, sector or position
in an index. As I concluded in my Chair's statement last year, China is a
market where there is likely to be ongoing short term volatility however the
prospects for significant long term growth remain.
Susan Platts-Martin
Chair
2 April 2024
For a definition of terms, see Glossary of terms and alternative performance
measures at the end of this announcement.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
See disclaimer at the end of this announcement.
Managers' Report
The year under review was disappointing and painful for Chinese equities, with
our index falling by 30.5%. Indeed, it marks an extraordinary third
consecutive year of drawdowns in our asset class. In the main, returns over
the period have been driven by macroeconomics and geopolitics rather than
company fundamentals. The holdings within the Company's portfolio continue to
perform well operationally. Our listed holdings delivered 17.7% earnings
growth in the financial year versus index-level earnings growth of only 2.1%.
Despite this, the portfolio derated from a price-earnings multiple of 19x to
12x.
China's economy continues to transition away from its old model of property
led growth to a new model of innovation led growth. The economy has been weak
but is not in crisis. The country's GDP grew by 5.2% in 2023 and met the
official growth target for the year. The International Monetary Fund does
expect growth to slow in 2024, but only to 4.6%. The property market's drag on
nominal growth continues, with nationwide sales numbers at 40 %of the 2021
peak, while there has only been a tentative stabilisation in sales of the top
100 largest developers. Despite the mortgage rate falling by around 150 basis
points since 2021 and the pricing of property posting only single-digit
declines over two years (though this industry-level data masks double-digit
declines in some tier-one cities), the government is struggling to stimulate
demand. Thankfully, other segments of the Chinese economy, namely household
consumption and exports, were strong enough to offset this weakness. The
post-covid rebound in consumer spending and the fall in the savings rate in
the first quarter led to a welcome uptick in services growth. At the same
time, strength in the US economy and China's continued global competitiveness
saw robust export demand. Retail sales were up circa 15%, and real per capita
household income was up circa 20% in 2023 versus 2019.
Unfortunately, the rally in consumer spending softened materially towards the
end of the year, and the job market further deteriorated. In addition, the
government's support for the economy was thought by many to be underwhelming.
As such, market sentiment deteriorated as the year progressed.
Geopolitics was also a negative driver, with technological controls and
economic barriers increasing even as relations between the US and China
formally stabilised. December marked the worst net outflows of China/Hong Kong
equities in 2023 and the third-largest monthly outflows in history. Foreign
investors appear to be increasingly shunning China. Indeed, third-quarter data
indicated that inbound foreign direct investment ('FDI') fell close to
negative territory for the first time since 1998. FDI was only US$15bn for the
first nine months of the year - a 92% drop from 2022. On the current trend,
China may attract less FDI in 2023 than Poland.
This deterioration in sentiment was reflected in negative returns for our
benchmark after a brief rally in the first quarter. The only sector in
positive territory was energy, which posted circa 17% return over the year.
The next best sector was utilities, which fell circa 9%, followed by
financials at negative 15%. Domestic investors, faced with mixed economic data
and disappointing levels of policy support, moved into defensive sectors an
state-owned enterprises ('SOE'). The FTSE China SOE index outperformed the
non-SOE index by 12% in 2023(1) , continuing a trend which began in 2021. In
line with our investment philosophy, the portfolio's overwhelming exposure to
growth sectors and non-SOE companies resulted in weaker relative performance
than the benchmark.
Where does this leave us? In both absolute and relative terms, the valuation
of Chinese equities is low. Our benchmark, MSCI China All Shares, is trading
on circa 9x 2024 price earnings. This multiple is almost one standard
deviation below its 5 and 10 year average, less than half that of US equities
(MSCI USA is trading on 20x) and below that of both MSCI ACWI (16.6x) and
Emerging Markets (MSCI EM 11.7x). As noted above, the Company's listed
portfolio of holdings has derated to 12x over the year, despite delivering
double-digit earnings growth.
Towards the end of the reporting period, we saw further signs of a significant
government effort to address pockets of weakness in the economy and the rout
in the stock market. In July, Beijing announced a 17-point plan to increase
confidence in the private sector. This followed a concerted effort by Premier
Li and a flurry of announcements at the highest levels designed to reassure
the private sector of the government's continued support. Most importantly,
the regulatory backdrop was largely stable for some of China's largest private
sector companies, except for a quickly corrected misstep in gaming.
In February 2024, in response to the stock market rout, we saw Beijing begin
to intervene in the equity market via the purchase of stock index funds and
SOE buybacks while the former head of the China Securities Regulatory
Commission was replaced. Concerning property, context is important. The
government's long-term aim is to reduce the country's reliance on this sector
as an engine of growth. Most Western economists would agree that this
adjustment is necessary for the country's long-term economic health. With this
in mind, the government's refusal to stimulate aggressively and provide a
'quick fix' becomes understandable. The initial focus of policymakers was on
demand-side stabilisation measures. We saw mortgage rates fall to their lowest
level on record and restrictions on purchasing removed. As noted above, these
measures had limited success.
In the second half of 2023, we saw the government announce an increase in
public-sector construction spending via the 'three major projects':
• The expansion of social housing;
• The renovation of urban villages; and
• The construction of civil infrastructure to increase resilience to
natural disasters.
Then, finally, in January 2024, we saw the government begin to extend support
to private-sector developers, the most distressed subsegment of the industry.
Measures include:
• The People's Bank of China ('PBOC') announced RMB 350bn (circa US$50bn)
in priority sector lending for real estate developers to execute the 'three
major projects';
• The promise of additional credit support via banks; and
• Local governments in eight cities are beginning a pilot project to buy
up vacant apartments from developers to reduce inventory and help stabilise
cash flows.
Given China's pre-sale housing model(2), improving the public's confidence in
private sector developers' creditworthiness and ability to complete projects
is crucial to stabilising the industry.
With developer finances still deteriorating and the economy slipping in and
out of deflation, there is undoubtedly more work still to do. However, actions
taken to date suggest a course correction is well underway at a time when
pessimism about China is at an all-time high.
More importantly for us as active managers, China still offers a unique
opportunity for growth. For example, of all companies in MSCI ACWI forecast to
grow revenues at 20% per annum for the next three years, 40% come from China.
While headline GDP continues to slow, there are ample structural opportunities
in a variety of industries that continue to excite us. For example, in terms
of automation and advanced manufacturing, China is already the largest
industrial robotics market in the world. Yet robot density is only one-third
of that of countries like Korea.
Another example would be the rise of domestic brands. In a whole host of
industries, foreign brands still dominate. But this is changing. A good
example would be cosmetics, where domestic leaders such as Proya continue to
take share from mass-market foreign brands. A further example would be 'little
giants': companies with advanced expertise in strategically important
industries such as solar, batteries or semiconductors.
Indeed, because of our ability to avoid vast swathes of the index, our
portfolio holdings delivered double-digit earnings growth in 2023 despite
China's economic woes. For example, ByteDance, our largest holding at 8.4%,
and only unlisted investment, reported over 35% revenue growth in the nine
months to September, driven by continued monetisation of its vast userbase.
Kweichow Moutai, a 5.9% holding and our second largest overweight, delivered
circa 17% revenue and earnings growth over the same period, driven by the
phenomenal strength of its domestic baijiu brand. Tencent, another large
holding within the Company's portfolio, delivered 10% revenue growth in the
most recent quarter and treble-digit earnings per share growth as capital
allocation continued to improve. Or CATL, a 1.8% holding in the portfolio and
the world's leading battery manufacturer, pre-announced that it would deliver
38-48% year-over-year revenue growth in 2023. CATL has grown its revenue and
earnings by over 10x in the last four years and trades on less than 15x 2024
earnings. What comforts us during these challenging times is our holdings'
continued strong operational performance and the knowledge that, over
meaningful periods, share prices are likely to follow fundamentals.
However, we are anything but complacent and continue to interrogate the
investment decisions we made since Baillie Gifford won the Company's mandate
in 2020. For example, we have added two independent research providers to our
list of resources to bolster our ability to ascertain a company's alignment
with the Chinese state and the risks and opportunities of the broader
geopolitical environment. Both specialise in analysing Chinese and US policy.
We have commissioned work from our Risk Team on our trading decisions and have
interrogated the research process, quality and investment decisions that led
to our largest individual stock mistakes. We also continue to challenge our
historic preference for privately run companies instead of SOEs.
At the firm level, we'd also like to highlight Baillie Gifford's continued
support for our Chinese equities business. While some of our competitors are
closing their Chinese operations, Baillie Gifford continues to invest. Our
Shanghai office, which opened in 2019, has added resources yearly, with two
new graduates joining in the last two years alongside a dedicated ESG analyst.
We now have seven investment staff working out of Shanghai. We recently
established a dedicated China team that will be responsible for our Chinese
equity funds. As such, Sophie is excited to welcome Linda Lin, a partner at
Baillie Gifford and an investment specialist on China, as co-manager for the
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Linda will replace Roderick Snell who will
re-focus his attention on Asia Pacific. Establishing the dedicated China Team,
of which Sophie is a part, and adding Linda as a formal decision maker to our
China equity strategies, is a significant increase of resources.
Portfolio positioning and recent activity
Balancing global perspectives with local insights and ensuring a long-term
focus in our analytical framework is critical to finding China's best and most
innovative public and private growth companies. We undertook two joint trips
around China, one in May 2023 and one in January 2024. Linda Lin led our most
recent trip, and she was joined by managers from our Long Term Global Growth
team and our Emerging Markets team.
Our philosophy and investment horizons afford excellent access to company
leaders. Linda was fortunate to meet with founders and 'C-level' management
from PDD Holdings, one of the new purchases for the Company, along with
existing holdings Meituan, LONGi and KE Holdings.. We also met NIO, one of
China's leading electric vehicle brands and a competitor to BYD; Kuaishou, a
competitor to ByteDance; and Luckin Coffee, China's version of Starbucks. More
broadly, while the atmosphere was somewhat gloomy, with negative local
sentiment and weak consumer confidence, we found the trip uplifting at the
most basic level of what companies are doing regarding growth. The
entrepreneurial spirit that allows new companies to challenge entrenched
incumbents and the huge spoils available to domestic victors have not changed.
This type of growth is currently on offer at prices not seen in many years.
Our portfolio positioning remains relatively consistent compared to last year.
We retain exposure to the sectors and companies that we believe offer the best
long-term growth potential and upside. We have large overweight positions in
consumer discretionary and industrials, and large underweights in lower growth
sectors such as financials and utilities. We believe the portfolio is geared
toward the themes likely to drive China's next decade of growth including:
• The energy transition, advanced manufacturing and robotics;
• 'Little giants';
• Leading domestic brands; and
• Long-duration growth companies in both traditional and online
industries.
Portfolio turnover during the year was 7.9%, reflecting our confidence in our
holdings despite the negative returns we experienced in 2023. New purchases
during the period included PDD Holdings, Silergy, Anker Innovations and BYD.
PDD has done a terrific job servicing the sizeable cost-conscious consumer
market, taking share in areas increasingly vacated by Alibaba. Over the last
few years, they have carved out a formidable niche targeting low-income users
in lower-tier cities with a deeply-discounted 'treasure hunt' experience.
Recently, the platform has gained traction with higher-income users in China
and several overseas markets. The company has become increasingly
cash-generative as it has moved away from massive marketing promotions without
losing user traction. As one of the few Chinese ecommerce platforms that
retains the potential for massive operational upside, we felt PDD was worthy
of a place within the Company's portfolio. Silergy is an analogue
semiconductor designer and benefits from tailwinds similar to SG Micro,
including import substitution. We took advantage of the weakness in the shares
on the back of a cyclical slowdown to buy this high-quality, high-growth
business.
Anker Innovations is a Chinese consumer electronics company. Its record of
making quality products at fair prices has earned it a valuable brand
reputation among its Western customers. Indeed, the company leverages China's
supply chain advantages in electronics to make high-quality products at
reasonable prices. Our Shanghai office has worked over the past year to
understand the company's strategy and the founder's motivations, giving us
greater confidence in their ability to grow profitably and broaden their
product offerings. Given its predominantly overseas revenue base, the stock is
also a diversifier within the Company's portfolio.
We also bought an initial holding in BYD. BYD was founded in 1995 as a
manufacturer of lithium-ion batteries for consumer applications like
smartphones and notebooks. It grew rapidly to become one of the global battery
leaders by the early 2000s when it also moved into electronics manufacturing
services and autos. In retrospect, there was a much greater coherence to this
strategy than the company were credited with at the time - in each new market
that they entered, BYD has distinguished itself with a highly flexible, highly
integrated manufacturing process characterised by significant levels of
research and development ('R&D'), a focus on self- developed components
and very rapid innovation cycles. They were early movers into the electric
vehicle ('EV') market in 2006, where they leveraged their proprietary battery
technology and manufacturing experience to become the leading EV manufacturer
in China by 2018; in 2022, they overtook Tesla to become the world's largest
EV maker by volume. The recent surge in market share partly reflects the
advantages of having control over its supply chain when the rest of the
industry has been struggling. Still, we also suspect it reflects a more
enduring advantage as the company enters a virtuous circle of scale leveraging
high R&D spend, which in absolute terms now dwarfs most of their
competitors. If the company can remain one of the leading players in the
fast-growing Chinese EV market, then we think the shares look attractive; if
they can build on their more recent signs of progress in third-party battery
sales or autos outside China, then the rewards may be even greater.
Sales of Burning Rock Biotech, Dada Nexus, Geely Automotive, and Hangzhou
Tigermed funded these purchases. The US battle around Chinese American
Depositary Receipts and the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act provided
a technical challenge to our investment case for Burning Rock Biotech. We
remain convinced that the market for next-generation sequencing in oncology is
huge and that the data supporting Burning Rock's position was credible.
However, we underestimated how much financing was necessary for a loss-making
company, particularly via the equity market. This was a mistake. The company's
inability to issue equity in the US, their only listing location, and their
inability to obtain a secondary listing in Hong Kong due to their smaller size
led to a vicious spiral in which investors sold down on concerns around
delisting risk, the market capitalisation shrank, and the company's ability to
fund its operations diminished.
We sold our holdings in Geely and Tigermed. Geely's vehicles have historically
been popular with Chinese consumers who value its strong engine technology
(partly bought in via the acquisition of Volvo) and mid-range prices. We
believe the company's core advantage in engine technology has diminished with
the shift to EVs. Given substantial investments outside the listed entity, the
founder's alignment also appears to have shifted. We believe BYD's vertically
integrated model and core expertise in battery technology make it much more
likely to benefit from the shift to electric vehicles. Tigermed is a leading
clinical research organisation. We have decided to sell the holding largely
due to the increased risk of trade barriers overseas. We believe these
barriers could substantially impact the company's ability to grow in the
future.
Performance
The portfolio's performance was very disappointing in both absolute and
relative terms. It underperformed against a falling benchmark. The benchmark
for the period returned negative 30.5%, NAV negative 40.9% and the share price
negative 40.8%. The portfolio's overwhelming exposure to non-SOE companies,
particularly in the financials space, plus its underweight positions in energy
and utilities (the two best-performing sectors within our universe),
contributed to our relative underperformance. While this was undoubtedly
painful, our portfolio exposure is in keeping with our growth philosophy,
which has served us well over longer periods.
The main stock detractors to performance were varied. Li-Ning, a leading
domestic sportswear brand, faced increased competition from multinational
players such as Adidas and a weakening consumer backdrop. Discounting in the
channel and an inventory correction in the second half spooked the market,
resulting in a marked derating in the shares. This is a stock that we have
significantly reduced at much higher price points. After the correction and
the additional research we conducted, we are minded to continue holding the
shares.
We believe the brand remains relatively strong and that this is not reflected
in the 10x price-earnings multiple we are now being asked to pay.
Glodon, a software provider to the construction industry, and SG Micro, an
analogue chip designer, are examples of where cyclical issues have overwhelmed
the structural case in the short term. SG Micro operates in the analogue
semiconductor industry, which remains dominated by foreign players. China's
desire to reduce its import bill and establish a globally competitive,
homegrown semiconductor industry is a significant long-term tailwind for the
company. In the short term, however, we saw the company suffer as the industry
entered a cyclical downturn. We are confident that the company's competitive
advantage remains strong and that its position as a domestic leader will see
it benefit once the cycle turns. We added to this company in the first half of
the reporting period after the first correction in the shares. Glodon is a
dominant cost estimation software provider to the construction industry. Its
software helps its clients reduce costs and increase the efficiency of their
operations. Software penetration in this industry is low and rising, and we
believe Glodon is likely to benefit from this tailwind in the long run. In the
near term, however, cyclical weakness in property and construction resulted in
revenue and profit growth, disappointing the market.
Meituan was also a detractor. The shares fell markedly despite the company
delivering circa 25% revenue growth in the first nine months of the year and
turning profitable. Indeed, in the third quarter of 2023, its earnings grew by
almost 200%. We met Wang Xing, the founder of the company, in January of this
year and continue to hold him in high regard. Meituan retains a dominant
position in food delivery and is utilising its delivery network to expand into
adjacent categories. In top-tier cities, Meituan delivers products in under
half an hour. In addition, Meituan has a dominant position in restaurant
bookings and travel. Competition from ByteDance in this part of the business
has seen margins fall. However, growth has accelerated markedly due to
ByteDance's entrance and the subsequent rise in online penetration. The fall
in margins is yet to impact absolute profit growth materially. The company
also has loss-making initiatives such as ride-hailing and community group buy.
These are gradually turning profitable or being scaled back, leading to
exceptional profit growth for the company. Despite this, Meituan is only
trading on 15x price earnings. We are inclined to add to our holding.
Other detractors to performance included gearing which sits at around 3-4 %
and stocks such as Centre Testing International, Ping An Insurance and Estun.
Whilst gearing has been a detractor to performance over the near term, we
continue to believe that it should be value accretive over the long term given
our expectations for attractive returns in the asset class relative to the
cost of debt. We decided to add to our position in Centre Testing
International in January 2024, after the shares fell.
Centre Testing International is the leading private sector company in China's
testing and inspection market. The company derated substantially as part of a
general sell-off in growth stocks and in response to cyclical weakness in some
of its end markets. We believe the company is a high-quality operator with a
sizeable, long-term growth opportunity ahead of it, and, as such, we decided
to take advantage of share price weakness to build a more sizeable position in
the Company's portfolio. Ping An Insurance and Estun were reduced in the first
half of the reporting period due to concerns about changes in the regulatory
backdrop and increased competition, respectively.
Contributors to performance included all four state- owned enterprises held in
the Company's portfolio: Weichai Power, Brilliance China Automotive, Kweichow
Moutai and Zijin Mining. Of these, only Weichai and Brilliance China
Automotive delivered a positive return. Zijin, a leading gold and copper
miner, delivered 10 % revenue growth in the first three quarters of 2023, yet
the shares fell 11% during the period. On 12x earnings, we believe the company
has significant upside ahead of it driven by the energy transition. As noted
above, Kweichow Moutai delivered 17% revenue and earnings growth in the first
nine months of 2023, yet its share price fell 19%. Moutai is arguably the
strongest and most durable brand in China. It has 800 years of heritage and
can price its baijiu at a significant premium. The financial returns of this
business are also exceptional.
Brilliance China Automotive is something of a special situation. It is an
automaker and BMW's partner in China. The company was relisted in Q4 2022
after a period of suspension. The share price was at a very depressed level at
the point of relisting. In January and July 2023, Brilliance China Automotive
declared two special dividend payouts to shareholders totalling 1.92 Hong Kong
dollars per share, while the shares were trading around four Hong Kong dollars
on average. While a +40% yearly return is encouraging, the future case for
Brilliance China Automotive does rely on decisions around next year's special
dividend payment and its new management team's operational execution.
ByteDance was our largest contributor over the year. Despite delivering circa
35% revenue growth in the first nine months of the year, our independent
valuation team wrote the shares down by 11%, less than the benchmark decline.
This was due to a fall in the peer group valuation and supported by valuations
observed in the secondary market. We believe that ByteDance offers outstanding
growth potential even if one excludes the US business. ByteDance continues to
monetise its vast user base in China and to take a substantial share within
ecommerce. We are confident that its exceptional operational performance will
be rewarded by substantial share price returns over meaningful periods.
Silergy and Midea were also contributors to performance. Silergy is an
analogue semiconductor designer and benefits from similar tailwinds to SG
Micro (discussed above). Due to its exposure to different end markets, the
cycle turned down earlier for Silergy relative to SG Micro. It experienced a
marked correction in its share price as demand weakened. The cycle for Silergy
has now turned, and, as such, its shares have begun to recover. We bought
Silergy during its cyclical correction and are pleased to see it rebound after
purchase. Midea is a leading white goods manufacturer and a high-quality
compounder. It delivered 7% revenue growth and 10% earnings growth in the
first nine months of the year, and the shares were flat during the period. It
trades on circa 11x price-earnings and will likely continue growing at high
single-digit and low double-digit rates for a long time.
Outlook
As discussed above, China's economy continues to transition away from its old
model of property led growth to a new model of innovation led growth. There is
clearly a risk that the government fails to manage this transition
successfully. However, we remain cautiously optimistic. In terms of the old
growth model, policy is increasingly focused on stabilising the most
distressed segments of the property industry. Any stabilisation here could be
very meaningful for consumer confidence, which could in turn be very
meaningful for domestic demand. In terms of the new growth model, China has
made significant progress in areas such as renewable energy, electric vehicles
and, increasingly, semiconductors. The days of recycling export earnings into
infrastructure led growth are over and China is now exporting capital around
South- east Asia and into other developing regions. This gives enormous growth
opportunities to Chinese companies whose business strategies are aligned to
China's national objectives.
These growth opportunities are reflected in the operational performance of the
companies we own within the Company. As noted above, our listed holdings
delivered 17.7% underlying earnings growth. Despite this, the portfolio's
value fell by c. 40%. This extraordinary divergence between earnings and value
is a reflection of sentiment, rather than operational performance. Sentiment
is driven both by the economic transition alluded to above and by geopolitics
between the US and China. As China's success in transitioning to its new
growth model becomes clearer, it is likely that sentiment will improve and
that other pools of capital, in addition to the US, will become materially
invested in the attractive returns on offer in China.
Despite a difficult couple of years of performance, Baillie Gifford continues
to believe that China remains an exciting hunting ground for growth investors.
As such, we continue to invest in our capabilities here and have added
significant resource. With valuations low in both an absolute and relative
sense, we believe that the opportunity in China has becoming even more
compelling. As such, we remain optimistic about future returns.
Roderick Snell
Sophie Earnshaw
Baillie Gifford & Co
2 April 2024
(1) The period of performance referred to for both the FTSE China SOE index
and the FTSE China non-SOE index is the year 2023 versus the Trust reporting
period which is 31 January 2023 to 31 January 2024.
(2) Chinese consumers pay significant amounts upfront before construction of
the property is finished.
For a definition of terms, see Glossary of terms and alternative performance
measures at the end of this announcement.
Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
See disclaimer at the end of this announcement.
Review of investments
A review of the Company's ten largest investments as at 31 January 2024.
ByteDance (valuation £10,551,000, 8.4% of total investments at 31 January
2024)
ByteDance is a social media and short form video company and it represents the
Company's first private investment. It was founded in 2012 by Yiming Zhang and
the company has grown to rank amongst the world's largest companies of its
kind. Its short form video app, Douyin, is a market leader in China, and
TikTok, its global equivalent, is dominating the format globally. ByteDance
benefits from a technological edge in machine learning which it uses to bring
out new applications tailored to different media forms and different
demographics. The company's ability to innovate in this space is exceptional
and we believe one of the key drivers of its likely future success. We believe
ByteDance has the potential to be a generation defining media company.
Tencent (valuation £9,330,000, 7.4% of total investments at 31 January 2024)
Tencent is a leading social media and entertainment platform. It has a
dominant position in online gaming and an ecosystem in WeChat that we believe
is one of the strongest in China. Monetisation of WeChat's over one billion
monthly active users represents one growth driver for the company. Further
growth opportunities are provided by Tencent's strong positions in cloud
infrastructure and consumer and SME lending, along with its portfolio of
investee companies which span online music streaming, ecommerce, and short
form video. Pony Ma, the founder and Chairman of the company, is indelibly
focused on the long term and has executed exceptionally well in one of China's
fastest moving industries.
Alibaba (valuation £9,249,000, 7.4% of total investments at 31 January 2024)
Alibaba is a leading online retailer. Its ecommerce business is returning to
growth after a period of intensified competition and share loss. Steadily
increasing online penetration in segments such as grocery and Fast Moving
Consumer Goods remains a long term driver for the business, whilst the
company's efforts to integrate live streaming and social media into the
platform aim to revitalise the platform following stiff competition for
customers and merchants attention from competitors. In addition, Alibaba
retains a strong position in infrastructure as a service, or the cloud, where
it has a similar business to Amazon Web Services. The company has taken the
decision to focus on profitable growth as opposed to growth at any cost.
Alibaba's partnership structure and its capable and experienced management
team are well-aligned with shareholders.
Kweichow Moutai (valuation £7,447,000, 5.9% of total investments at 31
January 2024)
Kweichow Moutai is one of the most important and iconic Chinese brands. It
manufactures premium baijiu (white alcohol) which has a heritage and respect
embedded within Chinese culture. Its unique brewing conditions and process
provide a core competitive advantage. When combined with supply scarcity and
limited competition in the very high- end market, Moutai is able to price at a
premium and maintain a loyal customer base. It is an extremely profitable
business. We believe in the strength and heritage of the brand, the
sustainability of revenue growth, and the longevity of its core competitive
advantage.
China Merchants Bank (valuation £4,133,000, 3.3% of total investments at 31
January 2024)
China Merchants Bank is a leading consumer bank in China with a lengthy track
record and solid market share. It has outcompeted its state-owned rivals via a
relentless focus on the consumer. As such, it has built up an enviable
position in consumer lending and in wealth management, both segments with
strong growth potential. In terms of lending quality, this has been strong
through the cycle and we believe this is a bank that will continue to offer
attractive returns to shareholders.
Zijin Mining (valuation £3,969,000, 3.2% of total investments at 31 January
2024)
Zijin Mining is a Chinese gold and copper company with ambitious volume growth
plans through organic expansion and M&A, particularly in its copper
business. Copper is an economically sensitive commodity that should benefit
from economic activity globally but should be further boosted meaningfully by
green investment (be it renewable generation or electric vehicles). Indeed,
copper is an essential enabler of the green revolution. We do not think the
upside to the commodity price, nor Zijin's growth potential, is being
adequately factored in by the market.
Ping An Insurance (valuation £3,741,000, 3.0% of total investments at 31
January 2024)
Ping An Insurance is one of China's leading financial services groups. It is
China's second largest life insurer, a market with growth potential driven by
China's emerging middle class and rising disposable income. It also has a
leading position in property and casualty insurance where it has consistently
delivered strong returns. In addition, it has consistently invested in
artificial intelligence and machine learning in order to increase the
efficiency and long-term viability of its core business. Again, this is a
company with a long-term, growth mind-set that we believe will deliver
substantial returns to shareholders.
NetEase (valuation £3,220,000, 2.6% of total investments at 31 January 2024)
NetEase is one of the most successful gaming companies in China, second only
to Tencent, with a proven track record of developing popular, high-quality
titles on both mobile and PC. It has successfully monetized its titles whilst
protecting the gamer experience and its brand name and the company culture
continues to attract and retain the best game developers in China. Its
financials are attractive and it is a well-managed company. The gaming
industry in China continues to grow, particularly on mobile, and NetEase
appears well placed to benefit from this for many years.
Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls (valuation £3,202,000, 2.6% of total
investments at 31 January 2024)
Zhejiang Sanhua is one of the world's largest manufacturers of controls and
components for heating, ventilation and air conditioning ('HVAC') systems,
electric vehicles and home appliances. Sanhua has a global customer base of
top tier manufacturers, with half of their revenues generated from China and
half from overseas. The company has over 50% market share in its key products.
Sanhua's ability to produce quality at scale is a key competitive advantage.
This is a founder-owned company whose global position has been
underappreciated in a China context. We expect Sanhua to benefit from
consumption growth in general, as well as growth in the electric vehicle
market, and an industry shift in home appliances towards stricter
environmental standards.
Midea (valuation £3,077,000, 2.5% of total investments at 31 January 2024)
Midea is the world's largest home appliance business, listed in Shenzhen. It
is a great quality business, investing for growth and appears very cheap. Home
appliance businesses are dull yet make great returns (28-29% return on
equity), require little capital, have brand equity and throw off a healthy
level of cash, some of which is returned to Midea shareholders via a 4%
dividend yield. This company stands out given its category leadership and
desire to grow the business in a meaningful way. It is investing in
technology, is at the forefront of innovation (22,000 patents and counting),
is expanding its product range and geographic reach and also buying in
additional brands at good prices. The move into robotics though the
acquisition of Kuka, a world leader, could be particularly interesting, not
least due to efficiency gains likely in its own business.
List of investments at 31 January 2024
Name Business Value % of total assets
£'000
ByteDance (u) Social media and entertainment company 10,551 8.4
Tencent Social media and entertainment company 9,330 7.4
Alibaba Group Online retailer, payments and cloud business 9,249 7.4
Kweichow Moutai Luxury baijiu maker 7,447 5.9
China Merchants Bank Consumer lending and wealth management 4,133 3.3
Zijin Mining Group Renewable energy enabler 3,969 3.2
Ping An Insurance Life and health insurance 3,741 3.0
NetEase Gaming and entertainment business 3,220 2.6
Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls Heating and cooling component manufacturer 3,202 2.6
Midea Group White goods and robotics manufacturer 3,077 2.5
BeiGene Immunotherapy biotechnology company 2,811 2.2
Meituan Online food delivery company 2,759 2.2
Weichai Power Construction machinery and heavy duty trucks 2,756 2.2
Fuyao Glass Industry Group Automotive glass manufacturer 2,550 2.0
PROYA Cosmetics and personal care company 2,527 2.0
PDD Holdings Broadline Retail 2,354 1.9
Shenzhou International Garment manufacturer 2,290 1.8
CATL Electric vehicle battery maker 2,263 1.8
ENN Energy Gas distributor and provider 2,138 1.7
Silergy Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment 2,118 1.7
Shandong Sinocera Functional Material Advanced materials manufacturer 2,044 1.6
Centre Testing International Electrical Components and Equipment 1,953 1.6
Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics Diagnostics company 1,933 1.5
Shenzhen Inovance Technology Factory automation company 1,850 1.5
Brilliance China Automotive Automotive makers and BMW partner 1,784 1.4
Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Power electronics manufacturer 1,764 1.4
KE Holdings* Online real estate 1,726 1.4
Anker Innovations Technology Hardware, Storage and Peripherals 1,721 1.4
Ping An Bank SME and consumer lender 1,714 1.4
Li Ning Domestic sportswear manufacturer 1,594 1.3
HUAYU Automotive Systems Automotive parts manufacturer 1,556 1.2
Estun Automation Robotics and factory automation company 1,438 1.1
BYD Automobiles 1,312 1.0
SG Micro Corp Semiconductor designer 1,208 1.0
Yifeng Pharmacy Chain Drug retailer 1,162 0.9
Yonyou Network Technology Software for SMEs and corporates 1,141 0.9
Sinocare Diagnostics and diabetes company 1,124 0.9
Asymchem Laboratories (Tianjin) Life sciences contract research organisation 1,074 0.9
Kingdee International Software Software for SMEs and corporates 1,058 0.8
Robam Appliances White goods manufacturer 1,037 0.8
Sungrow Power Supply Component supplier to renewables industry 944 0.8
WuXi AppTec Life sciences contract research organisation 922 0.7
Sunny Optical Technology Electronic components for smartphones and autos 909 0.7
LONGi Solar energy provider 830 0.7
Kingsoft Software for SMEs and corporates 815 0.7
Pop Mart Toy and collectibles maker 811 0.6
Minth Automotive parts manufacturer 800 0.6
JD.com Online retailer 797 0.6
Glodon Software provider to the construction industry 654 0.5
Jiangsu Azure Air Freight and Logistics 629 0.5
Beijing United Information Tec Industrial ecommerce platform 627 0.5
Topchoice Medical Dental services provider 588 0.5
Medlive Technology Medical dictionary and marketing organisation 574 0.5
Hua Medicine (Shanghai) Diabetes drug manufacturer 546 0.4
New Horizon Health Early cancer detection 449 0.4
Dongguan Yiheda Automation Co Industrial Machinery 443 0.4
Kinlong Building Products 396 0.3
Yunnan Energy New Material Component supplier to renewables industry 339 0.3
Total investments 124,751 99.5
Net liquid assets† 550 0.5
Total assets 125,301 100.0
Borrowings (5,890) (4.9)
Shareholders' funds 119,411 95.1
(u) ( ) Denotes unlisted holding (private company).
(*) Includes investments in American Depositary Receipts
('ADRs').
†( ) For a definition of terms used,
see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures at the end of this
announcement.
Listed Unlisted Net liquid Total
equities Securities Assets Assets
% % % %
31 January 2024 91.1 8.4 0.5 100.0
31 January 2023 94.0 5.7 0.3 100.0
Figures represent percentage of total assets.
Baillie Gifford - statement on stewardship
Baillie Gifford's overarching ethos is that we are 'Actual' investors. That
means we seek to invest for the long term. Our role as an engaged owner is
core to our mission to be effective stewards for our clients. As an active
manager, we invest in companies at different stages of their evolution across
many industries and geographies, and focus on their unique circumstances and
opportunities. Our approach favours a small number of simple principles rather
than overly prescriptive policies. This helps shape our interactions with
holdings and ensures our investment teams have the freedom and retain the
responsibility to act in clients' best interests.
Long-term value creation
We believe that companies that are run for the long term are more likely to be
better investments over our clients' time horizons. We encourage our holdings
to be ambitious, focusing on long-term value creation and capital deployment
for growth. We know events will not always run according to plan. In these
instances we expect management to act deliberately and to provide appropriate
transparency. We think helping management to resist short-term demands from
shareholders often protects returns. We regard it as our responsibility to
encourage holdings away from destructive financial engineering towards
activities that create genuine value over the long run. Our value will often
be in supporting management when others don't.
Alignment in vision and practice
Alignment is at the heart of our stewardship approach. We seek the fair and
equitable treatment of all shareholders alongside the interests of management.
While assessing alignment with management often comes down to intangible
factors and an understanding built over time, we look for clear evidence of
alignment in everything from capital allocation decisions in moments of stress
to the details of executive remuneration plans and committed share ownership.
We expect companies to deepen alignment with us, rather than weaken it, where
the opportunity presents itself.
Governance fit for purpose
Corporate governance is a combination of structures and behaviours; a careful
balance between systems, processes and people. Good governance is the
essential foundation for long-term company success. We firmly believe that
there is no single governance model that delivers the best long-term outcomes.
We therefore strive to push back against one-dimensional global governance
principles in favour of a deep understanding of each company we invest in. We
look, very simply, for structures, people and processes which we think can
maximise the likelihood of long-term success. We expect to trust the boards
and management teams of the companies we select, but demand accountability if
that trust is broken.
Sustainable business practices
A company's ability to grow and generate value for our clients relies on a
network of interdependencies between the company and the economy, society and
environment in which it operates. We expect holdings to consider how their
actions impact and rely on these relationships. We believe long-term success
depends on maintaining a social licence to operate and look for holdings to
work within the spirit and not just the letter of the laws and regulations
that govern them. Material factors should be addressed at the board level as
appropriate.
Income statement
For the year ended 31 January
Notes 2024 2024 2024 2023 2023 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Losses on investments - (83,606) (83,606) - (12,378) (12,378)
Currency gains/(losses) - 105 105 - (216) (216)
Income 2 2,599 - 2,599 2,407 - 2,407
Investment management fee 3 (255) (765) (1,020) (311) (932) (1,243)
Other administrative expenses (523) - (523) (550) - (550)
Net return before finance costs and taxation 1,821 (84,266) (82,445) 1,546 (13,526) (11,980)
Finance costs of borrowings (136) (408) (544) (116) (347) (463)
Net return before taxation 1,685 (84,674) (82,989) 1,430 (13,873) (12,443)
Tax (187) - (187) (105) - (105)
Net return after taxation 1,498 (84,674) (83,176) 1,325 (13,873) (12,548)
Net return per ordinary share 5 2.42p (136.61p) (134.19p) 2.14p (22.37p) (20.23p)
The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the
Company. The supplementary revenue and capital return columns are prepared
under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.
All revenue and capital items in this statement derive from continuing
operations.
A Statement of Comprehensive Income is not required as all gains and losses of
the Company have been reflected in the above statement.
Balance sheet
As at 31 January
Notes 2024 2024 2023 2023
£'000
£'000 £'000 £'000
Fixed assets
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 6 124,751 209,499
Current assets
Debtors 23 26
Cash and cash equivalents 8 926 1,000
949 1,026
Creditors
Amounts falling due within one year: (6,289) (6,585)
Net current liabilities (5,340) (5,559)
Total assets less current liabilities 119,411 203,940
Capital and reserves
Share capital 17,087 17,087
Share premium account 31,780 31,780
Capital redemption reserve 41,085 41,085
Capital reserve 22,775 107,748
Revenue reserve 6,684 6,240
Shareholders' funds 119,411 203,940
Net asset value per ordinary share* 193.06p 328.87p
Ordinary shares in issue 5 61,852,282 62,012,982
* See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures at the end of
this announcement.
Statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 January 2024
Share Capital
Share premium redemption Capital Revenue Shareholders'
capital account reserve reserve reserve funds
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Shareholders' funds at 1 February 2023 17,087 31,780 41,085 107,748 6,240 203,940
Dividends paid during the year - - - - (1,054) (1,054)
Net return after taxation - - - (84,674) 1,498 (83,176)
Ordinary shares bought back into treasury - - - (299) - (299)
Shareholders' funds at 31 January 2024 17,087 31,780 41,085 22,775 6,684 119,411
For the year ended 31 January 2023
Share Capital
Share premium redemption Capital Revenue Shareholders'
capital account reserve reserve reserve funds
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Shareholders' funds at 1 February 2022 17,087 31,780 41,085 121,621 7,768 219,341
Dividends paid during the year - - - - (2,853) (2,853)
Net return after taxation - - - (13,873) 1,325 (12,548)
Shareholders' funds at 31 January 2023 17,087 31,780 41,085 107,748 6,240 203,940
* The capital reserve unrealised includes investment holding losses of
£96,532,000 (2023 - losses of £26,491,000) as disclosed in note 9.
Cash flow statement
For the year ended 31 January
2024 2024 2023 2023
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Net return before taxation (82,989) (12,443)
Adjustments to reconcile company profit before tax to net cash flow from
operating activities
Net losses on investments 83,606 12,378
Currency (gains)/losses (105) 216
Finance costs of borrowings 544 463
Other capital movements
Changes in debtors 3 74
Changes in creditors (97) (25)
Taxation
Overseas withholding tax suffered (198) (181)
Overseas withholding tax reclaims received 11 76
Cash from operations* 775 558
Interest paid (541) (451)
Net cash inflow from operating activities 234 107
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisitions of investments (14,521) (27,760)
Disposals of investments 15,663 25,723
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities 1,142 (2,037)
Cash flows from financing activities
Equity dividends (1,054) (2,853)
Shares bought back (299) -
Net cash outflow from financing activities (1,353) (2,583)
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 23 (4,783)
Exchange movements (97) 287
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year 1,000 5,496
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 926 1,000
* Cash from operations includes dividends received of £2,576,000 (2023 -
£2,402,000) and interest received of £23,000 (2023 - £5,000).
Notes to the Financial Statements
1. Basis of accounting
The Financial Statements for the year to 31 January 2024 have been prepared in
accordance with FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK
and Republic of Ireland' on the basis of the accounting policies set out in
the Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year 31 January 2024 which
are consistent with those applied for the year ended 31 January 2023.
2. Income
2024 2023
£'000 £'000
Income from investments
Overseas dividends 2,576 2,402
Other income
Interest 23 5
Total income 2,599 2,407
3. Investment manager
Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford
& Co, was appointed as the Company's Alternative Investment Fund Managers
('AIFM') and Company Secretary on 16 September 2020. Baillie Gifford & Co
Limited has delegated portfolio management services to Baillie Gifford &
Co. Dealing activity and transaction reporting has been further sub-delegated
to Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong)
Limited.
The Investment Management Agreement between the AIFM and the Company sets out
the matters over which the Managers have authority in accordance with the
policies and directions of, and subject to restrictions imposed by, the Board.
The Investment Management Agreement is terminable on not less than three
months' notice or on shorter notice in certain circumstances. Compensation
would only be payable if termination occurred prior to the expiry of the
notice period. The annual management fee is (i) 0.75% of the first £50
million of net asset value; plus (ii) 0.65% of net asset value between £50
million and £250 million; plus (iii) 0.55% of net asset value in excess of
£250 million, calculated and payable quarterly.
4. Net return per ordinary share
2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Net return per ordinary share 2.42p (136.61p) (134.19p) 2.14p (22.37p) (20.23p)
Revenue return per ordinary share is based on the net revenue return on
ordinary activities after taxation of £1,498,000 (2023 -£1,325,000), and on
61,981,380 (2023 - 62,012,982) ordinary shares, being the weighted average
number of ordinary shares in issue during each year.
Capital return per ordinary share is based on the net capital loss for the
financial year of £84,674,000 (2023 - loss £13,873,000) and on 61,981,380
(2023 - 62,012,982) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of
ordinary shares in issue during each year.
There are no dilutive or potentially dilutive shares in issue.
5. Ordinary dividends
2024 2023 2024 2023
£'000 £'000
Amounts recognised as distributions in the period:
Previous year's final dividend (paid 26 July 2023) 1.70p 4.60p 1,054 2,853
Also set out below are the total dividends paid and proposed in respect of the
financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of section 1158
of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered. The revenue available for
distribution by way of dividends for the year is £1,498,000 (2023 -
£1,325,000)
2024 2023 2024 2023
£'000 £'000
Dividends paid and proposed in the period:
Proposed final dividend per ordinary share (payable 24 July 2024) 2.00p 1.70p 1,229 1,054
6. Investments
Investments in securities are financial assets held at fair value through
profit or loss on initial recognition. In accordance with FRS102 the tables
above provide an analysis of these investments based on the fair value
hierarchy described below which reflects the reliability and significance of
the information used to measure their fair value.
Fair value hierarchy
The levels are determined by the lowest (that is the least reliable or least
independently observable) level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement for the individual investment in its entirety as follows:
Level 1 - using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in an
active market;
Level 2 - using inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that
are directly or indirectly observable (based on market data); and
Level 3 - using inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is
unavailable).
The valuation techniques used by the Company are explained in the accounting
policies on page 99 of the Annual Report and Financial Statements. The
Company's unlisted ordinary share investment at 31 January 2024 was valued
using the market approach using comparable traded multiples. A sensitivity
analysis of the unlisted security is on page 110 of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements.
As at 31 January 2024 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Securities
Listed equities 114,200 - - 114,200
Unlisted equities - - 10,551 10,551
Total financial asset investments 114,200 - 10,551 124,751
As at 31 January 2023 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Securities
Listed equities 197,546 - - 197,546
Unlisted equities - - 11,953 11,953
Total financial asset investments 197,546 - 11,953 209,499
7. In the year to 31 January 2024 no shares were issued from treasury (in
the year to 31 January 2023 - no shares were issued from treasury). The
Company's shareholder authority permits it to hold shares bought back in
treasury. Under such authority, treasury shares may be subsequently either
sold for cash (at a premium to net asset value per ordinary share) or
cancelled. At 31 January 2024 the Company had authority to buy back 9,135,046
ordinary shares. During the year to 31 January 2024, no ordinary shares (2023
- nil) were bought back for cancellation and 160,700 ordinary shares (2023 -
nil) were bought back into treasury. Under the provisions of the Company's
Articles of Association share buy-backs are funded from the capital reserve.
8. Analysis of change in net debt
1 February Cash flows Exchange movement 31 January
2023
£'000
£'000
2024
£'000
£'000
Cash and cash equivalents 1,000 23 (97) 926
Loans due within one year (6,092) - 202 (5,890)
(5,092) 23 105 (4,964)
1 February Cash flows Exchange movement 31 January
2022
£'000
£'000
2023
£'000
£'000
Cash and cash equivalents 5,496 (4,783) 287 1,000
Loans due within one year (5,590) - (502) (6,092)
(94) (4,783) (215) (5,092)
9. The Annual Report and Financial Statements will be available on the
Company's website bailliegiffordchinagrowthtrust.com(†) on or around 11
April 2024.
10. The financial information set out above does not constitute the Company's
statutory accounts for the years ended 31 January 2024 or 2023 but is derived
from those accounts. Statutory accounts for 2023 have been delivered to the
Registrar of Companies, and those for 2024 will be delivered in due course.
The auditor has reported on those accounts; their reports were (i)
unqualified, (ii) did not include a reference to any matters to which the
auditor drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report and
(iii) did not contain a statement under section 498 (2) or (3) of the
Companies Act 2006.
† Neither the contents of the Company's website nor the contents of any
website accessible from hyperlinks on the Company's website (or any other
website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this announcement.
Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures ('APM')
An alternative performance measure ('APM') is a financial measure of
historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows,
other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable
financial reporting framework. The APMs noted below are commonly used measures
within the investment trust industry and serve to improve comparability
between investment trusts.
Total assets
This is the Company's definition of adjusted total assets, being the total
value of all assets less current liabilities, before deduction of all
borrowings.
Net asset value
Net asset value is the value of total assets less liabilities (including
borrowings). The net asset value per share ('NAV') is calculated by dividing
this amount by the number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury
shares).
Net liquid assets
Net liquid assets comprise current assets less current liabilities, excluding
borrowings.
Discount/premium (APM)
As stockmarkets and share prices vary, an investment trust's share price is
rarely the same as its NAV. When the share price is lower than the NAV it is
said to be trading at a discount. The size of the discount is calculated by
subtracting the NAV from the share price and is usually expressed as a
percentage of the NAV. If the share price is higher than the NAV, it is said
to be trading at a premium.
2024 2023
Closing NAV (a) 193.06p 328.87p
Closing share price (b) 181.00p 308.00p
Discount ((b)-(a)) / (a) (6.2%) (6.3%)
Total Return (APM)
The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the net
dividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend.
2024 2024 2023 2023
NAV Share NAV Share
price price
Closing NAV per share/share price (a) 193.06p 181.00p 328.87p 308.00p
Dividend adjustment factor* (b) 1.006801 1.007763 1.014030 1.014557
Adjusted closing NAV per share/share price (c = (a) x (b) 194.37p 182.41p 333.48p 312.48p
Opening NAV per share/share price (d) 328.87p 308.00p 353.70p 339.25p
Total return (c) ÷ (d)-1 (40.9%) (40.8%) (5.7%) (7.9%)
* The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the
dividend of 1.70p (2023 - 4.60p) paid by the Company during the year was
reinvested into shares of the Company at the cum income NAV/share price, as
appropriate, at the ex-dividend date.
Ongoing Charges (APM)
The total expenses (excluding borrowing costs) incurred by the Company as a
percentage of the average net asset value. The ongoing charges have been
calculated on the basis prescribed by the Association of Investment Companies.
A reconciliation from the expenses detailed in the Income statement above is
provided below.
2024 2023
Investment management fee £1,020,000 £1,243,000
Other administrative expenses £523,000 £550,000
Total expenses (a) £1,543,000 £1,793,000
Average daily cum-income net asset value (b) £158,468,461 £190,419,970
Ongoing charges ((a) ÷ (b) expressed as a percentage) 0.97% 0.94%
Gearing (APM)
At its simplest, gearing is borrowing. Just like any other public company, an
investment trust can borrow money to invest in additional investments for its
portfolio. The effect of the borrowing on shareholders' funds is called
'gearing'. If the Company's assets grow, shareholders' funds grow
proportionately more because the debt remains the same. But if the value of
the Company's assets falls, the situation is reversed. Gearing can therefore
enhance performance in rising markets but can adversely impact performance in
falling markets.
Gearing is the Company's borrowings adjusted for cash and cash equivalents
expressed as a percentage of shareholders' funds.
Gross gearing is the Company's borrowings expressed as a percentage of
shareholders' funds.
2024 2023
Gearing* Gross Gearing† Gearing* Gross Gearing†
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Borrowings (a) 5,890 5,890 6,092 6,092
Cash and cash equivalents (b) 925 - 1,000 -
Shareholders' funds (c) 119,411 119,411 203,940 203,940
4.2% 4.9% 2.5% 3.0%
*Gearing: ((a)-(b)) divided by (c), expressed as a percentage.
(†) Gross gearing: (a) divided by (c), expressed as a percentage.
Leverage (APM)
For the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM)
Regulations, leverage is any method which increases the Company's exposure,
including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as
a ratio between the Company's exposure and its net asset value and can be
calculated on a gross and a commitment method. Under the gross method,
exposure represents the sum of the Company's positions after the deduction of
sterling cash balances, without taking into account any hedging and netting
arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the
deduction of sterling cash balances and after certain hedging and netting
positions are offset against each other.
Active share (APM)
Active share, a measure of how actively a portfolio is managed, is the
percentage of the portfolio that differs from its comparative index. It is
calculated by deducting from 100 the percentage of the portfolio that overlaps
with the comparative index. An active share of 100 indicates no overlap with
the index and an active share of zero indicates a portfolio that tracks the
index.
Unlisted (Private) Company
An unlisted (private) company means a company whose shares are not available
to the general public for trading and not listed on a stock exchange.
Variable Interest Entity ('VIE')
VIE structures are used by some Chinese companies to facilitate access to
foreign investors in sectors of the Chinese domestic economy which prohibit
foreign ownership. The purpose of the VIE structure is to give the economic
benefits and operational control of ownership without direct equity ownership
itself. The structures are bound together by contracts and foreign investors
are not directly invested in the underlying company.
Treasury shares
The Company has the authority to make market purchases of its ordinary shares
for retention as treasury shares for future reissue, resale, transfer or for
cancellation. Treasury shares do not receive distributions and the Company is
not entitled to exercise the voting rights attaching to them.
Third party data provider disclaimer
No third party data provider ('Provider') makes any warranty, express or
implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data contained
herewith nor as to the results to be obtained by recipients of the data.
No Provider shall in any way be liable to any recipient of the data for any
inaccuracies, errors or omissions in the index data included in this document,
regardless of cause, or for any damages (whether direct or indirect) resulting
therefrom. No Provider has any obligation to update, modify or amend the data
or to otherwise notify a recipient thereof in the event that any matter stated
herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.
Without limiting the foregoing, no Provider shall have any liability
whatsoever to you, whether in contract (including under an indemnity), in tort
(including negligence), under a warranty, under statute or otherwise, in
respect of any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of or in connection
with any opinions, recommendations, forecasts, judgements, or any other
conclusions, or any course of action determined, by you or any third party,
whether or not based on the content, information or materials contained
herein.
MSCI index data
The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be
reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or
a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the
MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a
recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment
decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should
not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis,
forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an 'as is' basis
and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of
this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved
in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information
(collectively, the 'MSCI Parties') expressly disclaims all warranties
(including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy,
completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a
particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of
the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any
direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including,
without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages (msci.com).
Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation ('SFDR')
The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation ('SFDR') does not have a
direct impact in the UK due to Brexit, however, it applies to third-country
products marketed in the EU. As Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is marketed
in the EU by the AIFM, Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, via the National
Private Placement Regime ('NPPR') the following disclosures have been provided
to comply with the high-level requirements of SFDR.
The AIFM has adopted Baillie Gifford & Co's stewardship principles and
guidelines as its policy on integration of sustainability risks in investment
decisions.
Baillie Gifford & Co believes that a company cannot be financially
sustainable in the long run if its approach to business is fundamentally out
of line with changing societal expectations. It defines 'sustainability' as a
deliberately broad concept which encapsulates a company's purpose, values,
business model, culture, and operating practices.
Baillie Gifford & Co's approach to investment is based on identifying and
holding high quality growth businesses that enjoy sustainable competitive
advantages in their marketplace. To do this it looks beyond current financial
performance, undertaking proprietary research to build up an in-depth
knowledge of an individual company and a view on its long-term prospects. This
includes the consideration of sustainability factors (environmental, social
and/or governance matters) which it believes will positively or negatively
influence the financial returns of an investment. The likely impact on the
return of the portfolio from a potential or actual material decline in the
value of investment due to the occurrence of an environmental, social or
governance event or condition will vary and will depend on several factors
including but not limited to the type, extent, complexity and duration of an
event or condition, prevailing market conditions and existence of any
mitigating factors.
Whilst consideration is given to sustainability matters, there are no
restrictions on the investment universe of the Company, unless otherwise
stated within in its Investment Objective & Policy. Baillie Gifford &
Co can invest in any companies it believes could create beneficial long-term
returns for investors. However, this might result in investments being made in
companies that ultimately cause a negative outcome for the environment or
society.
More detail on the Investment Managers' approach to sustainability can be
found in the ESG Principles and Guidelines document, available publicly on the
Baillie Gifford website bailliegifford.com and by scanning the QR code on page
125 of the Annual Report and Financial Statements.
The underlying investments do not take into account the EU criteria for
environmentally sustainable economic activities established under the EU
Taxonomy Regulation.
Taxonomy Regulation
The Taxonomy Regulation establishes an EU-wide framework of criteria for
environmentally sustainable economic activities in respect of six
environmental objectives. It builds on the disclosure requirements under SFDR
by introducing additional disclosure obligations in respect of alternative
investment funds that invest in an economic activity that contributes to an
environmental objective. The Company does not commit to make sustainable
investments as defined under SFDR. As such, the underlying investments do not
take into account the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic
activities.
Regulated Information Classification: Additional regulated information
required to be disclosed under the applicable laws.
- ends -
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END FR UPUBACUPCPUPRecent news on Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
See all newsREG - Baillie GiffordChina - Transaction in Own Shares
AnnouncementREG - Baillie GiffordChina - Net Asset Value(s)
AnnouncementREG - Baillie GiffordChina - Net Asset Value(s)
AnnouncementREG - Baillie GiffordChina - Net Asset Value(s)
AnnouncementREG - Baillie GiffordChina - Net Asset Value(s)
Announcement