BLACKROCK THROGMORTON TRUST PLC (LEI: 5493003B7ETS1JEDPF59)
All information is at 31 October 2018 and unaudited.
Performance at month end is calculated on a cum income basis
One Three One Three Five
Month months year years years
% % % % %
Net asset value -11.7 -13.8 -2.6 44.3 78.1
Share price -13.3 -14.2 5.0 57.4 80.6
Benchmark* -8.3 -9.4 -8.8 19.5 34.4
Sources: BlackRock and Datastream
*With effect from 22 March 2018 the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM
(excluding Investment Companies) Index replaced the Numis Smaller Companies
excluding AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index as the Company’s
benchmark. The five year period indices have been blended to reflect this.
At month end
Net asset value capital only: 521.49p
Net asset value incl. income: 529.43p
Share price 475.00p
Discount to cum income NAV 10.3%
Net yield (1): 2.0%
Total Gross assets (2): £387.2m
Net market exposure as a % of net asset value (3): 103.0%
Ordinary shares in issue (4): 73,130,326
2017 ongoing charges* (excluding performance fees) (5,6): 0.9%
2017 ongoing charges* ratio (including performance fees) (5,6,7): 2.2%
*Ongoing Charges: The management fee rate reductions, as detailed in the notes
below impact management fees in 2017 and onwards. The impact of the new fee
arrangements, assuming the same level of performance from the manager and
assuming all other charges remain the same, would be to reduce the level of
Ongoing Charges borne by the Company.
1. Calculated using the 2018 interim dividend declared on 26 July 2018 and
paid on 29 August 2018, together with the 2017 final dividend declared on 12
February 2018 and paid on 29 March 2018.
2. Includes current year revenue and excludes gross exposure through contracts
for difference.
3. Long positions less short positions as a percentage of net asset value.
4. Excluding 7,400,000 shares held in treasury.
5. Calculated as a percentage of average net assets and using expenses,
excluding performance fees and interest costs for the year ended 30 November
2017.
6. With effect from 1 August 2017 the base management fee was reduced from
0.70% to 0.35% of gross assets per annum.
7. Effective 1st December 2017 the annual performance fee is calculated using
performance data on an annualised rolling two year basis (previously, one
year) and the maximum annual performance fee payable is effectively reduced to
0.90% of two year rolling average month end gross assets (from 1% of average
annual gross assets over one year). Additionally, the Company now accrues this
fee at a rate of 15% of outperformance (previously 10%). The maximum annual
total fees (comprising the base management fee of 0.35% and a potential
performance fee of 0.90%) are therefore 1.25% of average month end gross
assets on a two year rolling basis (from 1.70% of average annual gross
assets).
Sector Weightings % of Total Assets
Industrials 26.1
Financials 21.4
Consumer Services 17.0
Technology 11.8
Health Care 7.1
Consumer Goods 6.2
Basic Materials 3.0
Oil & Gas 1.1
Net current assets 6.3
-----
Total 100.0
=====
Market Exposure (Quarterly)
30.11.17 28.02.18 31.05.18 31.08.18
% % % %
Long 116.9 119.6 115.9 119.4
Short 6.3 8.4 10.0 9.6
Gross exposure 123.2 128.0 125.9 129.0
Net exposure 110.6 111.2 105.9 109.8
Ten Largest Investments
Company % of Total Gross Assets
Ascential 3.3
Hiscox 2.8
Dechra Pharmaceuticals 2.8
SSP 2.8
Craneware 2.7
Bodycote 2.6
Workspace Group 2.4
Aveva 2.3
4imprint Group 2.3
Robert Walters 2.1
Commenting on the markets, Dan Whitestone, representing the Investment Manager
noted:
During October the Company’s NAV per share fell 11.7%(1) to 521.49p on a cum
income basis, underperforming our benchmark, the Numis Smaller Companies plus
AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index, which fell by 8.3%(1); the large
cap FTSE 100 Index fell by 4.9%(1) (all performance figures are in sterling
terms with income reinvested).
October proved to be another challenging month for the Company. Equity markets
globally experienced a sharp sell-off during month, with the UK market
recording its worst monthly return in over three years. While the short book
contributed a positive return of 70 basis points, this was unfortunately not
enough to offset the underperformance of the long book. There was also a
notable rotation away from highly rated shares (i.e. those that look expensive
at face value), and higher momentum shares (i.e. those that have performed
well), resulting in growth shares underperforming value. This dynamic acted as
a significant headwind to performance given our growth orientated style. As
the sell-off was most pronounced in growth assets like tech companies, or
small and mid-caps, several of our longs fell more heavily than the benchmark
without any specific negative newsflow, e.g. Fever-Tree, Integrafin, Learning
Technologies and Xero.
We are also of the view that the share price falls of many of our longs was
further exacerbated by the vacuum of newsflow during the month. October in the
UK is always light on company specific news given there is no formal Q3
reporting season, therefore we believe this quiet period only served to
heighten uncertainty over the outlook for many corporates.
It’s worth noting that where companies have reported, we have been on the
right side for the majority, with trading patterns continuing to support our
investment thesis, however share price falls not corresponding to the updates.
YouGov for example reported a 10% upgrade however the shares fell more than
15% during the month. So despite the underperformance, this is a not a period
where we can point to several shares that profit warned thereby compromising
our investment theses, and where we have risked permanent loss of capital for
our shareholders. As we believe the majority of the underperformance of our
investments was driven by style and factors, as opposed to material negative
company news or a change in the corporate outlook for a particular company of
industry, we remain optimistic that long term value is not impaired and that
the long book will recover with renewed trading updates over time.
Positive contributors to performance were predominantly companies that simply
outperformed the falling market, however we did also benefit from several
short positions that issued material profit warnings and therefore saw extreme
share price falls, and where we have locked in some of these gains.
A lot has been written about the cause/causes of the falls during October;
rising bond yields in the US, concerns around the pace of US interest rate
rises, ongoing trade conflict between the US and China, and Brexit related
concerns to name a few. Regardless of the initial catalyst, it is now far more
important for us to determine what the implications are for global economic
growth and what, if any, impact there will be on the earnings power of our
investments. We still view October more as a correction than the start of a
bear market or sustained GDP (Gross Domestic Product) weakness, and think
there remains enough growth out there for differentiated companies to prosper.
As such, overall portfolio positioning remains broadly unchanged. Given the
increased level of market volatility we have deliberately reduced the
portfolio’s gross and net exposure, and we have also used volatility to add
to a number of our holdings where we believe that recent share price moves, do
not reflect the performance of the underlying businesses. For example we have
added to our holdings in Aveva, Craneware and Dechra Pharmaceuticals.
(1)Source: BlackRock as at 31 October 2018
29 November 2018
ENDS
Latest information is available by typing www.blackrock.co.uk/thrg on the
internet, "BLRKINDEX" on Reuters, "BLRK" on Bloomberg or "8800" on Topic 3
(ICV terminal). Neither the contents of the Manager’s website nor the
contents of any website accessible from hyperlinks on the Manager’s website
(or any other website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this
announcement.
Copyright (c) 2018 PR Newswire Association,LLC. All Rights Reserved