Click the following link to watch video:
http://insider.thomsonreuters.com/link.html?cn=share&cid=1162404&shareToken=MzphMzFkOTZjZS1hMjJhLTQ2OWQtOWMwNy0zYWRiNjQxMzFiMTQ%3D&playerName=ReutersNews
Source: Thomson Reuters
Description: Governor Mark Carney and other policy makers give
evidence on the Bank of England’s latest inflation
report.
(To access all exclusive Reuters Insider programming visit: http://insider.thomsonreuters.com)
Short Link: http://reut.rs/1ewbeD1
Transcript (May be auto-generated)
If you very much government and -- -- coming to give evidence. This morning we have
quite a lot of ground tough. My good morning we'll see. Being over meant by the exchanges
that is just the -- which are sort few minutes of full. About five minutes before
we went set. Between you and the -- -- -- -- it and you just a for the benefit of
those who -- -- engines that. Won't say. Ten. Yes. As as the -- aware in the committees
and in fact the first time I was before this committee committee asked questions
about -- ratio in the powers of of the banks specifically the FCC. Over it. The exchange
of letters. Proposes. And -- from. Our perspective my perspective agrees to. -- review
conducted by the FCC. On an expedited fashion of the implementation. -- leverage
ratio. Four banks in the United Kingdom. And there's several aspects of this you're
well familiar about this review it quickly the first is to have a leverage ratio.
As and our view the view via BC's the -- Bank of England my personal view is that
they leverage ratio was an integral part. Of the capital framework. Thanks so it's
absolutely necessary -- as I say in the letter there was if I could pick out one.
Element that was. Essential to the performance of the Canadian banking system. During
the crisis it was the presence of the leverage -- the first point is that it's integral.
To the capital framework and so we need to come to ground on the actual definition
and calibration arbitration the second point he is that. How delivered ratio should
vary. With changes in the risk based capital framework. As you are well familiar
there's two aspects of this the first is with respect to ring -- banks. The independent
commission on banking recommendations in the second. Is if the FTC review -- powers
of direction over counter cyclical capital buffer would the leverage ratio. Move
it proportionate fashion with those adjustments. Our view is it should. In the absence
of those movements there'll be incentives two game. The system again -- leverage
ratio was complimentary. Two the -- space. Framework now the third aspect of the
the letter is to give a sense around the time and if 00 finish with this -- my --
-- on the timing for the review. There a couple of important influence. Before the
FTC finalize its -- recommend recommendations about how to implement the leverage
issue. The first is in January and in Basel we would expect. The governors and heads
of supervision -- overseas to Basel committee to come to an agreement on the international
and international agreement on the definition of leverage ratio. And recommended
minimum calibration of that leverage ratio obviously knowing how it's defined internationally
important. Domestically for a level playing field secondly. Internationally as part
of the agenda of the F that this be very much supported by the bank in the treasury.
Is to to find what's called going concern loss absorbing capacity. Incident in simpler
terms although I confess not that much simpler being winnable that something we have
discussed around this. At this committee on on numerous occasions. And the interaction
between them available that. And the third element which is the final position that
they recovered resolution directive. The EU which will you -- and its application
here he is important. Toward questions around the calibration and application of
the leverage ratio for the arrangements. Bank as wells of the structure of that enter
-- group that is relevant there all of those factors should be finalized. Over the
course of the coming I would say three quarters. The resolution aspect we'll take
a little longer than an international definition. And so do what we intend to do
is the FBC. Is to work in parallel with that. Come up with an evidence based and
well reasoned recommendation to implement. To implement the leverage ratio. And the
chancellor and we welcome the chancellors that indication that he would. On that
basis -- the end the FBC -- of direction. -- -- New York respecting the work it expedited.
You're expecting that it PC. It should be granted this power. Way. We would expect
that it would be granted in this parliament. Comparable size that well we know you're
totally talking about somewhere in June. 15. The. Expectation would be that we would
provide our report I think given the international agenda in the timetable for that.
We would provide our report our assessment. By as late as this time next year because
I think particularly. Within a year and then. But. We would expect very quickly thereafter.
We will be granted that power so. -- -- -- -- Yes the community control problems
it. That's the timing question. Then there is the substance photography in two. The
first question is what this review. Is intended to do. You who saying you'll let.
That this review is about. How old. To operate in this race. That Jesus about questions
stuff is detonations. Education that partridge to bring it. Without. Others. Two
major what -- this. That. But -- -- no way indicates that that might be a positive
team could include. You don't regret this on the contrary. You'll. Basically its
-- -- mourners. Paraphrase that that period. But. So you. I'm I'm right in thinking.
That as far as the facts -- -- -- This. Is a done deal. You're right in thinking
that subject to parliamentary group thank you for the caveat yes. Yes well we re
we seizes this power is consistent in fact necessary. To properly implement. Robust
capital for him. Well if I can take into the Charles's. We'll take you to go live
-- it -- to. This doesn't seem to do -- say I. Correct me if I'm wrong I can -- repeat
that I -- just seen. These leftist and a few moments ago but this led to say is felt
tired -- fast -- I've grown -- page to. This is not an appropriate time for -- PCs
to consider whether. You need institutional. That is what you've just been telling
me is it. It's the appropriate time for us to consider whether and view of the PC
I expect. Certainly my personal view is we should. These additional. And but we will
undertake an evidence based review will make the recommendations. According to that.
And I am fully confident. That. The very broadly that the evidence will support my.
I'm confident that other independent members of the -- you compute similar conclusions
is just. Just the exact if I have -- me like there's a gap between. What is about
-- what and the others just house. Well one is written how true -- -- I cannot be
I can speak best to I was in my letter. Any opinions expressed -- And that I -- gossip
is a question -- leveraging. And I'd tell him to get. The. This. I feel politically.
-- This would be years have done what would. Making. -- can --
War. I think that it is featured in the fifties. An industry. Conference. We talked
about the size of assistance to. Thrust of that speech was. We don't have anything
to be -- A big went on to say that don't make it actually. What else. Let this issue
is needed to stay. The emphasis on the second part of the speech which is exactly
that point. There's certainly advantages to the financial system but it has to be
made -- has made me more resilient. In addition to leverage ratio highway to. Other
aspects there are more. The first relate to a series of measures around -- too big
to fail. They include implementing. Elements recovered resolution drafted but very
importantly change in the capital structure of the largest banks. So that. The cost
of failure is born first by the shareholders and and the management. But then by
the debt holders innocent in order to capital structure so that institutions can
be recapitalize. Through the debt structures so that they can. Recover without. Recourse
to public fu