By Nivedita Bhattacharjee
MUMBAI, Nov 18 (Reuters) - The head of Future Group, one of
India's largest and most established retailers, admits he can't
keep up with web sites like Snapdeal and Flipkart when it comes
to spending money to entice shoppers to buy online.
Private investors have poured $2.3 billion into India's
e-commerce companies so far this year, according to consulting
firm Technopak, giving them financial firepower to overwhelm
shoppers with bargains and deals that brick-and-mortar retailers
like Future Group, which runs a host of chains including Future
Retail Ltd FURE.NS and Future Lifestyle Fashions FLFL.NS ,
cannot match.
"It's all about money. The e-commerce guys have money to
experiment - I don't have this kind of money to blow," Kishore
Biyani, who pioneered modern retail in India and is chief
executive of the Future Group, told Reuters in an interview.
In an attempt to match up, traditional retailers are forging
partnerships with well-funded websites such as Flipkart.com,
Amazon.com Inc AMZN.O and Snapdeal to put their wares on the
web without investing heavily in their own online
infrastructure.
This tentative approach to e-commerce, however, leaves
traditional retailers vulnerable to being completely overtaken
by their better-funded online rivals in a country where a
rapidly expanding middle class is doing more and more shopping
on the web.
In October, Future Group tied up with Amazon's Indian arm to
sell its brands online. A month earlier, electronics retailer
Croma, owned by the Tata Group, struck a similar arrangement
with Snapdeal.
According to Technopak, organized retail in India is
expected to grow to $182 billion in 2020 from the current $46
billion. E-tailing is forecast to expand at a faster clip, to
$32 billion by 2020 from $2.3 billion now.
India's protectionist government policies have long shielded
established retailers from competition. As a result, they never
felt the need to invest in state-of-the-art technology, said
Bhavit Desai, a U.S.-based strategy consultant who has worked
with companies such as Walmart International, the global unit of
Wal-mart Stores Inc WMT.N , and Target Corp TGT.N .
"Many huge players in the market have invested very little
in technology and have been followers at best," Desai said.
MOM-AND-POP TO ONLINE SALES
In 2012, then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government
opened India's retail industry to foreign operators, allowing
companies such as Wal-Mart and Tesco Plc TSCO.L to own
majority stakes in Indian chains for the first time.
But the government left it to individual states to decide
whether to let in foreign retailers. Few have stepped up, and
the big foreign chains that might have shared their online
expertise with India's stores are largely absent.
Instead, local online marketplaces have proliferated, backed
by billions of dollars coming in primarily from abroad. Last
month's $627 million investment by Japan's SoftBank Corp
9984.T in Snapdeal illustrated a widening gap. The portal has
also attracted funds from eBay Inc EBAY.O and Indian
billionaire Ratan Tata.
Flipkart.com raised $1 billion earlier this year, in a round
of funding from Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC GIC.UL ,
along with existing investors Tiger Global Management LLC and
South African media company Naspers Ltd NPNJn.J .
That leaves traditional Indian retailers vulnerable, say
industry advisers. Online marketplaces don't need to pay high
commercial rents or build stores to serve India's 1.3 billion
people, and they're soaking up outside investments and expertise
from their international backers that can help them move faster
to profit.
Organised retail is still developing in India. More than 90
percent of shopping is done at informal roadside shacks and in
bazaars. These small shops are seen as the lifeblood of India's
economy and successive governments have protected them.
But the same policies have also shielded much larger players
like Shoppers Stop Ltd SHOP.NS , Future Retail and others. At
the same time, online stores are racing ahead, modernising the
retail industry at a pace that traditional chains cannot match.
"It is exactly like what happened in telecoms," said
Harminder Sahni, managing director of Wazir Advisors. "In India,
we never took landlines to every single home - mobiles came in
and leapfrogged that."
($1 = 61.6200 Indian rupee)
(Reporting by Nivedita Bhattacharjee; Editing by Clara Ferreira
Marques, Emily Kaiser and Miral Fahmy)
((nivedita.bh@thomsonreuters.com; +91 22 6180 7123 ; Reuters
Messaging: nivedita.bh.reuters.com@reuters.net, follow me on
twitter @tweetsfromnivi))
Keywords: INDIA RETAIL/