Picture of KGI Financial Holding logo

2883 — KGI Financial Holding News Story

0.000.00%
tw flag iconLast trade - 00:00
FinancialsBalancedLarge CapTurnaround

Fitch Assigns 'A+(EXP)' to CDB Leasing's MTN Notes

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)


Fitch Ratings-Taipei-March 03: Fitch Ratings has assigned an expected rating of 
'A+(EXP)' to China Development Bank Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.'s (CDB Leasing, 
A+/Stable) proposed senior unsecured US dollar notes, which will be issued by 
CDBL Funding 2 under CDB Leasing's USD3 billion medium-term note (MTN) 
programme.

CDBL Funding 2 is an offshore SPV established by Metro Excel, the core operating 
platform directly wholly owned by CDB Leasing for its overseas non-aircraft 
leasing business domiciled in Hong Kong. The ultimate parent of both Metro Excel 
and CDB Leasing is China Development Bank (CDB, A+/Stable). 

The proposed notes, to be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, will be 
supported by a guarantee from Metro Excel and benefit from a keepwell and 
asset-purchase deed undertaking by CDB Leasing. Proceeds will be used for 
working capital and general corporate purposes. The maturity structure will be 
finalised upon settlement. 

The final rating is contingent upon the receipt of final documents conforming to 
the information already received. Fitch first rated CDB Leasing's MTN programme 
'A+' on 18 July 2017 and the rating was recently affirmed on 30 January 2019. 

KEY RATING DRIVERS 

The expected rating on the proposed notes is driven by our assessment of an 
extremely high probability of support from CDB Leasing and its ultimate parent 
bank, CDB, to the notes. The guaranteed notes will represent Metro Excel's 
direct, unconditional, unsubordinated and unsecured obligations and rank at 
least pari passu with all its other current and future direct, unsecured, 
unguaranteed and unsubordinated debt. 

Metro Excel is highly integrated with CDB Leasing and we expect an extremely 
high level of support from its parent. We believe a default of the notes or 
Metro Excel would create significant reputational risk for CDB Leasing and its 
ultimate parent, CDB, as counterparties generally see Metro Excel as an integral 
part of CDB Leasing.

The keepwell and asset-purchase deeds commit CDB Leasing to ensure CDBL Funding 
2 and Metro Excel have sufficient liquidity to meet their obligations under the 
guaranteed notes and remain solvent and going concerns at all times. The 
repurchase agreement serves as an important mechanism to allow CDB Leasing to 
provide foreign-currency liquidity to Metro Excel and the keepwell deed suggests 
a strong propensity for CDB Leasing to support Metro Excel, if required.

CDB Leasing's ratings reflect our view of an extremely high level of support 
from CDB based on the parent's legal obligation as a founder, which is stated in 
the subsidiary's articles of association and required by the China Banking and 
Insurance Regulatory Commission. This view also reflects CDB Leasing's strategic 
importance and high level of integration with CDB as the bank's core subsidiary. 
CDB Leasing's Issuer Default Ratings were first assigned on 10 July 2014 and 
last affirmed on 30 January 2019. For more information on the rating action, see 
Fitch Affirms Ratings 
for Chinese Bank-Leasing Subsidiaries /a .

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The rating on CDBL Funding 2's proposed guaranteed notes is directly correlated 
with significant changes in CDB Leasing's and CDB's willingness or ability to 
support Metro Excel and CDBL Funding 2, if required. Any significant changes in 
the perceived willingness or ability of China's sovereign (A+/Stable) to support 
CDB and CDB Leasing in a full and timely manner is also likely to affect the 
rating on the proposed guaranteed notes to the same magnitude.

Any change in regulation that causes CDB Leasing to encounter practical 
difficulties in exercising the keepwell and asset-purchase deeds to support 
Metro Excel will also likely trigger a downgrade of the notes. 

 

Contact: 

Primary Analyst

Katie Chen

Director

+886 2 8175 7614

Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Taiwan Branch

Suite 1306, 13/F

205 Tun Hwa North Road 

Taipei 105, Taiwan

Secondary Analyst

Shirley Hsu 

Associate Director

+886 2 8175 7606 

Committee Chairperson 

Mark Young

Managing Director

+44 (0) 20 3530 1318

Date of Relevant Rating Committee: 29 January 2019

Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: 
wailun.wan@thefitchgroup.com.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria 

Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044407

Additional Disclosures 

Solicitation Status 

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10062036#solicitation

Endorsement Policy 

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. 
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:  
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING 
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S 
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND 
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF 
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, 
AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF 
CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE 
AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE 
PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD 
PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED 
IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS 
ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its 
subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, 
(212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or 
in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and 
maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast 
information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and 
underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch 
conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it 
in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification 
of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are 
available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's 
factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains 
will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the 
requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is 
offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of 
relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its 
advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as 
audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, 
engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, 
the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources 
with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the 
issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports 
should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any 
third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on 
in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. 
Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the 
information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and 
other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the 
work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial 
statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings 
and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking 
and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature 
cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current 
facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that 
were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. 

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or 
warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or 
any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the 
report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. 
This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and 
methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, 
ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, 
or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or   a report. The 
rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, 
unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or 
sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals 
identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible 
for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes 
only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute 
for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer 
and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be 
changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. 
Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a 
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the 
adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular 
investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to 
any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other 
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from 
US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In 
certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular 
issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a 
single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 
(or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or 
dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to 
use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed 
under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act 
of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular 
jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and 
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to 
three days earlier than to print subscribers. 

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd 
holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which 
authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit 
ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who 
are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 
"NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on 
Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on 
behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other 
credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and 
therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf 
of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit 
ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO