By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON, Jan 12 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on
Monday declined to hear an appeal filed by several banks
objecting to a lawsuit filed by a federal regulatory agency over
their alleged role in selling mortgage-backed securities to
now-failed credit unions.
The litigation against the lenders, including units
of Royal Bank of Scotland PLC RBSRB.UL and Wells Fargo &
Co WFC.N , can now go forward.
The other defendants in the case are units of Nomura
Holdings Inc 8604.T and Novation Companies Inc NOVC.PK .
The National Credit Union Administration is the independent
federal agency that regulates, charters and supervises federal
credit unions.
The regulator had sued on behalf of two failed credit
unions, U.S. Central Federal Credit Union and Western Corporate
Federal Credit Union. The regulator has separate litigation
pending against other defendants over securities sold to other
failed credit unions.
The government agency placed several credit unions into
conservatorship following losses they incurred when what were
considered low-risk investments in 2006 and 2007 were
significantly downgraded following the 2008 financial crisis.
The regulator says the lenders made misrepresentations, in
violation of federal securities laws, when selling the
securities.
The case has already made one trip to the Supreme Court. In
June, the justices threw out a previous appeals court ruling
that allowed the lawsuit to go forward.
The lenders sought high court review for a second time after
the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2014 that
the regulator did not wait too long before filing its lawsuit.
The case is Nomura et al v. NCUA, U.S. Supreme Court,
14-379.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
((lawrence.hurley@thomsonreuters.com; 202-809-3080;))
Keywords: USA COURT/MBS