* India banned 344 drug combinations over the weekend
* Next Pfizer case hearing slated for March 21
* Abbott also challenged ban on cough syrup combination -TV
* Pfizer says banned syrup brought in $26 mln in Apr-Dec
(Adds statement from Pfizer's India unit)
By Zeba Siddiqui and Aditya Kalra
MUMBAI/NEW DELHI, March 14 (Reuters) - An Indian court
granted U.S. drugmaker Pfizer PFE.N PFIZ.NS an interim
injunction on a ban on its popular cough syrup Corex, days after
the government ordered it to be prohibited citing a potential
risk to humans.
India's health ministry banned the combination of
chlorpheniramine maleate and codeine syrup, which Pfizer sells
as the cough syrup Corex, in a notice over the weekend.
Pfizer's Indian subsidiary appealed the ban through a writ
petition in the New Delhi High Court, which granted the company
a stay on Monday, pending the next court hearing, Pfizer said in
a statement.
Pfizer's Indian business said earlier on Monday it had
stopped selling Corex, and expected its profit to be hit, as the
brand generated sales of about $26 million in the nine months
through December. Pfizer shares closed down 9 percent in Mumbai,
before the stay order was issued.
The court said the government had not issued Pfizer a "show
cause notice" before banning the medicine, two lawyers for the
drugmaker told Reuters, declining to be named.
The next hearing by on Pfizer's plea is slated for March 21.
The ban also applied to Abbott Laboratories' ABT.N
Phensedyl cough syrup and Abbott's Indian subsidiary also filed
a writ petition at the same court, which will come up for
hearing on Tuesday, local television channels said.
Sanjay Jain, a lawyer representing the health ministry,
wasn't immediately available to comment.
Abbott's Phensedyl commands around a third of India's cough
syrup market and makes up over 3 percent of the company's $1
billion in revenue in India. The shares of Abbott's Indian arm
fell about 3 percent after it said it would comply with the ban.
Abbott declined to comment on its case.
As the cough syrup contains the narcotic codeine, India has
been privately pressuring manufacturers to better police supply
chains to tackle smuggling and addiction, Reuters reported last
year. urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL3N12E1W6
Akun Sabharwal, drugs controller for the southern state of
Telangana which last year detected an "illegal diversion" of
Phensedyl worth about $8.5 million, said he believed the ban
would end the syrup's abuse.
PATCHY REGULATION
The medicine was among 344 fixed-dose combination drugs
India banned, saying a panel of experts found the drugs lacked
"therapeutic justification". urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL3N16M1SX
Market researcher AIOCD AWACS estimated it could cut sales
in the local pharmaceutical industry by up to $522 million, with
Pfizer and Abbott among the worst hit.
The sale of fixed dose combination medicines in India
requires the approval of the central government. But several
drug combinations have entered the market over the years based
solely on approval from individual states. urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL4N16K0CV
India has made intermittent efforts to shut this avenue, but
success has been limited. In 2007 it ordered states to recall
about 300 such combination drugs, but drugmakers challenged it
in court and the order was stayed. (http://reut.rs/1J9azFo)
In 2014, India set up a panel of experts to review over
6,000 such drug combinations, and asked companies to submit data
to prove safety and efficacy of their drugs. 344 of those have
been banned.
OPPI, a lobby group for multinational drugmakers, criticised
the move, saying codeine-based combinations under the ban have
the approval of India's drug controller, and companies were
never made aware that these were being reviewed. Pfizer's India
unit also said its Corex had the central government's approval.
Drug Controller General G.N. Singh was not immediately
available to comment.
The Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, which represents Indian
drugmakers, said the review process was not transparent.
Health ministry official K.L. Sharma told Reuters he
disagreed, saying, "we are not prepared to tolerate anything
that will (adversely) affect patients."
(Additional reporting by Suchitra Mohanty in NEW DELHI; Editing
by Mark Potter and Susan Fenton)
((zeba.siddiqui@thomsonreuters.com; +91-9769624550; Reuters
Messaging: zeba.siddiqui.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net))
Keywords: INDIA PFIZER/MEDICINE