Burberry shareholders back CEO pay boost, but 37% vote against (updated)

Burberry

15/07/2026 16:03

Executive pay overhaul gets 63% of votes
Proxy advisers ISS and Glass Lewis recommended vote against
Burberry acknowledges pushback, plans to engage with investors
Adds Burberry statement in paragraphs 5-6
By Helen Reid

    LONDON, July 15 (Reuters) - A majority of Burberry BRBY.L investors on Wednesday supported an executive pay overhaul allowing CEO Joshua Schulman to get much bigger share awards, significantly increasing his compensation if performance and share price targets are met.
Many shareholders rebelled against the change, however, with 37% of votes at the company's annual general meeting against and 63% in favour.
Under the new policy, Schulman would get performance ​share awards worth up to 300% of his salary, ‌with ⁠his total potential package reaching £12.24 million ($16.41 million) if the brand achieves maximum performance targets and its share price rises by 50%.
Influential proxy advisers Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis had both recommended investors vote against the change and vote against the resolution on directors' remuneration policy.
In a statement acknowledging the investor pushback, Burberry said its board had been consulting with shareholders in the run-up to the AGM and would continue to engage to respond to their concerns, and provide an update within six months — as required by UK governance rules for any resolution with less than 80% support.
Burberry said both resolutions were supported by its 10 largest shareholders.
Schulman is leading a turnaround at Burberry, and has slashed jobs and returned the company to profit. 
In a struggling global luxury sector, Burberry has rewarded shareholders better, in terms of total returns over the two years since he joined, than bigger rivals like LVMH, Hermes, Kering, and Richemont. 
Investors also confirmed William Jackson as Burberry's new chair, taking over from Gerry Murphy, who has held the role since 2018.

 (Reporting by Helen Reid and Yamini Kalia. Editing by Jan Harvey and Mark Potter)
 ((helen.reid@thomsonreuters.com))