REG - Down MicroCap InvTst - Circular & Notice of Requisitioned General Meeting

Downing Strategic Micro-Cap Investment TrustAnnouncement

08/07/2024 07:00

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20240708:nRSH4055Va&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 4055V  Downing Strategic Micro-Cap IT PLC  08 July 2024

Downing Strategic Micro-Cap Investment Trust plc (the "Company")

LEI Number: 213800QMYPUW4POFFX69

Publication of Circular and Notice of Requisitioned General Meeting

As announced on 18 June 2024, the Board of the Company received a request to
requisition a general meeting of the Company (the "Requisition") from Vidacos
Nominees Limited, acting as nominee of Milkwood Capital Limited ("Milkwood").

The Board considers that Milkwood's decision to lodge the Requisition is
wholly self-interested and disruptive when the Board and the Investment
Manager are focused on returning cash to Shareholders pursuant to the Managed
Wind-Down of the Company, and the Board unanimously recommends that you VOTE
AGAINST each of the Requisitioned Resolutions.

The Company has today published a Shareholder circular relating to the
Requisition (the "Circular") which contains a notice (the "Notice") of the
requisitioned general meeting of the Company that will be held at the offices
of Dickson Minto LLP, Dashwood House, 69 Old Broad Street, London EC2M 1QS on
5 August 2024 at 10.00 a.m. (the "Requisitioned General Meeting").

At the Requisitioned General Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider
the following Requisitioned Resolutions:

§ ordinary resolutions to:

a)   appoint Rhys Drennan Summerton, André Charles Tonkin and Paul
Shackleton as new directors of the Company (the "Proposed Directors");

b)   remove two of the Company's current and experienced directors, being
Hugh Aldous and Robert Legget; and

c)   remove any person appointed as a director of the Company between 17
June 2024 (being the date on which the Requisition was received) and
immediately prior to the Requisitioned General Meeting; and

§ a special resolution (the "Special Requisitioned Resolution") that directs
that:

a)   the current Board do not declare any dividend, return of capital or
other distribution on or prior to the Requisitioned General Meeting; and

b)   the second special interim dividend of 12 pence per Share declared on
28 May 2024 and any other dividend, return of capital or other distribution
declared or announced but not paid or made between the date of the Requisition
and immediately prior to the Requisitioned General Meeting be cancelled and of
no effect.

Notwithstanding the terms of the Special Requisitioned Resolution,
Shareholders should note that it will have no impact upon the Special
Dividends declared by the Company on 3 April 2024, 28 May 2024 and 17 June
2024.

Shareholders are urged to vote on all the Requisitioned Resolutions and the
Board unanimously recommends that you VOTE AGAINST all the Requisitioned
Resolutions.

The Notice and the Circular, which contains the full reasons as to why the
Board unanimously recommends Shareholders should VOTE AGAINST all the
Requisitioned Resolutions, are being posted to Shareholders today and will
shortly be available on the Company's website at
http://www.downingstrategic.co.uk/ (http://www.downingstrategic.co.uk/) . The
Notice and the Circular will also shortly be submitted to the National Storage
Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority and will be available for
inspection at https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism
(https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism) .

A detailed exposition of the reasons as to why the Board unanimously
recommends Shareholders should VOTE AGAINST all the Requisitioned Resolutions
is set out below. However, by way of a summary:

§ The current Board has worked with the Investment Manager in order to return
realisation proceeds to Shareholders in accordance with the Managed Wind-Down
(which Shareholders overwhelmingly voted for at the First General Meeting on
28 February 2024) and, to this end, following the payment of the Third Special
Dividend will have returned to Shareholders a cash amount, of, in aggregate,
approximately £27.4 million, which equates to approximately 90.2 per cent. of
the Company's NAV as at 28 February 2024. The Board expects to make further
returns to Shareholders, and if the Requisitioned Resolutions are passed, such
returns may be jeopardised.

§ Milkwood's calling of the Requisitioned General Meeting in order to attempt
to gain control of the Board is an attempt by Milkwood to acquire the
Company's assets on the cheap by avoiding making an offer for the entire
Company at a price which appropriately values the Company's remaining assets.

§ Were Shareholders to vote in favour of the Requisitioned Resolutions (or
not vote against in sufficient numbers), it may result in Shareholders being
locked into a continuing vehicle that would be managed by individuals on whom
Shareholders will have little-to-no information from a performance
perspective, and the relative illiquidity in the Company's Shares may
constrain  Shareholders' ability to sell down their position in the Company
should they not wish to continue to invest in it under Milkwood's control.

§ If the Requisitioned Resolutions were passed, the majority of the Board
would be made up of Directors nominated by Milkwood, and the current Board
believes this outcome would lead to the resulting Board being unable to
effectively exercise independent judgement on behalf of all Shareholders.

Hugh Aldous, chairman of Downing Strategic Micro-Cap Investment Trust, said:

 

"The shareholders in our company have overwhelmingly voted to wind down the
trust, and return capital as efficiently as practicable, which is precisely
what we have done. To date we have returned 42 pence per share and will return
a further 17.5p distribution in July 2024. That works out at a return of
actual cash, which investors can dispose of as they wish, of £27.4 million.
So far, all Milkwood has done is to try and thwart the process that
shareholders have voted for. Calling for a general meeting in order to attempt
to gain control of the board, so soon after losing their previous attempt to
frustrate shareholders wishes, has only proven to be a further distraction for
the Board and has imposed additional unnecessary costs and hassle on
shareholders.

 

"As we have said to Milkwood repeatedly, if they want to take control of the
Company and run it in their own specific interests, then they should table a
realistic offer that is fair to all shareholders and it will receive due
consideration. In the meantime, we urge shareholders to ensure they protect
their own interests by rejecting this unwarranted further attempt by Milkwood
to acquire control of your Company and its assets on the cheap."

The expected timetable of principal events in relation to the Requisitioned
General Meeting is as follows:

 Event                                                                         2024
 Latest time and date for lodging Forms of Proxy, or submitting proxy          10.00 a.m. on 1 August
 instructions online at www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy or through CREST, in
 respect of the Requisitioned General Meeting
 Record time and date for entitlement to vote at the Requisitioned General     6.00 p.m. on 1 August
 Meeting
 Requisitioned General Meeting                                                 10.00 a.m. on 5 August

Defined terms used in this announcement shall bear the meaning ascribed to
them in the Circular, unless the context otherwise requires.

 

For further information, please contact:

 Chairman
 Hugh Aldous                         Tel: 020 7416 7780
 Dickson Minto Advisers LLP
 Douglas Armstrong                   Tel: 020 7649 6823
 Media Contacts - Garfield Advisory
 Andrew Garfield                     Tel: 07974 982337
 Jason Nisse                         Tel: 07769 688618

 

Rationale for Voting Against Each of the Requisitioned Resolutions

The Board considers that Milkwood's decision to lodge the Requisition is
wholly self-interested and disruptive when the Board and the Investment
Manager are focused on returning cash to Shareholders pursuant to the Managed
Wind-Down of the Company, and the Board unanimously recommends that you VOTE
AGAINST each of the Requisitioned Resolutions.

In support of this recommendation, the Board draw Shareholders' attention to
the following matters.

The current Board is independent of the Investment Manager and is acting in
the interests of all Shareholders

The current Board comprises three independent non-executive Directors who are
committed to doing the right thing for all Shareholders (who overwhelmingly
voted to have the Company enter into Managed Wind-Down at the First General
Meeting) and to thereby return realisation proceeds to Shareholders in the
most prudent manner possible by balancing the need to return cash to
Shareholders efficiently whilst also maximising returns.

To this end, the Board has worked with the Investment Manager in order to
achieve this outcome whilst also surpassing expectations. As at 5 July 2024,
the Company had returned 42 pence per Share pursuant to the First and Second
Special Dividends, and will return another 17.5 pence per Share on 18 July
2024 pursuant to the Third Special Dividend. This results in a return of cash,
which investors can dispose of as they wish, of, in aggregate, approximately
£27.4 million, being approximately 90.2 per cent. of the Company's NAV as at
28 February 2024 (being the date on which the Company entered into its Managed
Wind-Down). This return far exceeds the Company's Original Realisation
Expectations, and the Board expects to make further returns to Shareholders
which may be jeopardised if the Requisitioned Resolutions are passed.

By contrast, in lodging the Requisition, Milkwood is acting in a wholly
self-interested manner in attempting to thwart the process of the Company
returning realisation proceeds that Shareholders have overwhelmingly voted
for, and upon which the Investment Manager is delivering substantially beyond
expectations. Milkwood's calling of the Requisitioned General Meeting in order
to attempt to gain control of the Board so soon after losing its previous
attempt to frustrate Shareholders' wishes is an attempt by Milkwood to acquire
the Company's assets on the cheap by avoiding making an offer for the entire
Company at a price which appropriately values the Company's remaining
assets.

Milkwood's actions have also proven to be a distraction for the Board and the
Investment Manager that has only served to impose additional unnecessary
costs, hassle and uncertainty on Shareholders. The costs incurred by the
Company as a result of this disruption have been significant, and Milkwood's
actions in frustrating the B Share Scheme denied Shareholders, and
particularly retail Shareholders, a tax efficient return of capital. The
impact of the costs incurred as a result of Milkwood's actions is further
exacerbated by the shrinking size of the Company: following the payment of the
Third Special Dividend, the Company will, assuming valuations do not
materially change, have net assets of less than £5 million.

Milkwood has not provided granular detail on its past performance

Despite requests from the Board, to date Milkwood has provided no substantive
information on the performance of Milkwood's funds under management or details
of Milkwood's current portfolio of assets, including granular details of the
performance of such assets. Therefore, were Shareholders to vote in favour of
the Requisitioned Resolutions (or not vote against in sufficient numbers), it
may result in Shareholders being locked into a continuing vehicle that would
be managed by individuals on whom Shareholders will have little-to-no
information from a performance perspective. The relative illiquidity in the
Company's Shares may constrain Shareholders' ability to sell down their
position in the Company should they not wish to continue to invest in it under
Milkwood's control, and there can be no guarantee liquidity in the Company's
Shares would improve should the Requisitioned Resolutions be passed. There can
also be no guarantee that Shareholders would receive any return on their
investment in the Company under Milkwood's control (either of a capital or
income nature) in the short-to-medium term.

By contrast, the Board believes the current Investment Manager remains well
positioned to build on its earlier success and realise the Company's remaining
assets in such a way as to maximise returns for Shareholders. The Investment
Manager has an intimate knowledge of the remaining investments that comprise
the Company's portfolio, and is thus in a strong position to appraise the
perceived valuation of such investments. The Investment Manager is also
familiar with the marketability of those investments and is well placed to
judge the best exit route for them, whether it be through brokers, market
makers or in-house buyers.

The Proposed Directors' independence and investment trust experience

If the Requisitioned Resolutions were passed, the majority of the Board would
be made up of Directors nominated by Milkwood. The current Board believes this
outcome would lead to the resulting Board being unable to effectively exercise
independent judgement on behalf of all Shareholders. In particular, the Board
understands that two of the three Proposed Directors, Mr Summerton and Mr
Tonkin, currently hold positions at Milkwood, with Mr Summerton being the
founder, owner and Chief Investment Officer of Milkwood and Mr Tonkin an
investment analyst at Milkwood. The Board is, therefore, concerned that the
Proposed Directors would not bring independent judgement to their proposed
role as Directors of the Company and would instead serve the interests of
Milkwood as the Company's largest Shareholder. Were this to occur,
Shareholders, and particularly retail Shareholders, may find their interests
neglected or ignored entirely.

The Board also note that the limited information on the Proposed Directors
that has been disclosed to the Board does not suggest that any of the Proposed
Directors has been a director of an investment trust. The Board do not,
therefore, believe that the Proposed Directors have the requisite experience
to form an effective Board that would ensure successful stewardship of the
Company for all Shareholders.

The Board has on several occasions made it clear to Milkwood that, should
Milkwood wish to take control of the Company, it should make an offer for the
entire issued Share capital of the Company at a price which reflects the value
of the Company's remaining assets in order to provide all Shareholders with
the opportunity to exit the Company equitably. To date, no such offer has been
forthcoming from Milkwood.

The Board, therefore, unanimously recommends that Shareholders protect their
own interests and VOTE AGAINST each of the Requisitioned Resolutions.
 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  NOGRRMBTMTBMTFI