Newscasts - When will NASA return humans to the Moon, and why?

Firefly Aerospace

30/09/2025 17:41

Click the following link to watch video: https://share.newscasts.refinitiv.com/link?entryId=1_slmmatns&referenceId=tag:reuters.com,2025:newsml_RW687822092025RP1_K15&pageId=Newscasts
Source: 'Reuters - General news videos'

Description: NASA's Artemis program plans to return humans to the moon in 2027. Key figures involved in the initiative and future uses of the Moon explain how it's going to happen and what a lunar future might look like. David Doyle has more.

Short Link: https://lseg.group/4nF3HJG

Video Transcript:

NASA will send four astronauts on a 10-day voyage around the moon in 2026, the latest step in a mission to land humans on the lunar surface for the first time in more than five decades.

We rise together back to the moon and beyond.

But the current Artemis program has different goals and methods to the Apollo landings of the 1960s and 1970s, involving moon bases and missions to Mars. Artemis, named after the twin sister to Apollo, was spawned by US President Donald Trump's first presidency. There are also other plans to land humans on the moon. Most notably China, which has in recent years invested heavily in its space program - wants to achieve the feat by 2030. But at present, Artemis is likely to be first. It's a series of missions including Artemis III, which currently expects to return humans to the moon in 2027, though space analysts expect that date to slip. The plan is to land astronauts at the Lunar South Pole - a place where humans have never previously set foot. That choice of location is significant, says Dr Lori Glaze, the acting administrator of NASA's Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate, which oversees Artemis.

So that's a place that, as we explore, we may be able to find resources like frozen water that could be used in place. We could turn that frozen ice into liquid water for drinking and then convert it and split it into oxygen and hydrogen for breathing and for fuel.

And that would be significant, she said, for establishing a longer-term NASA presence on the Moon. In addition to scientific discovery and exploration, that longer term presence is part of another goal as humans take further steps into our solar system.

And that's going to prepare us to send astronauts to Mars.

One of the companies working with NASA on Artemis is Firefly Aerospace. In February, it became the second US company to land on the moon, using its Blue Ghost lander propelled by a SpaceX rocket. Firefly CEO Jason Kim.

The gravity on the moon is much lighter than on earth. And because of that, you know, taking things and taking off of the moon's surface and taking resources to Mars is actually more straightforward than doing it from earth.

The involvement of commercial partners such as Firefly is one way, Glaze said, in which Artemis differs from Apollo. But she also sees a commercial future for the moon's surface through what she described as a lunar economy.

So, we very well could see commercial activities going on at the moon with other companies visiting on a routine basis.

One business hoping to profit from the moon is Interlune. It wants to extract Helium-3 from the lunar regolith the loose layer of rocks and debris on the moon's surface. Helium-3 has a variety of uses on Earth, including in national security, healthcare and quantum computing. It is rare on earth but abundant on the moon, says co-founder and CEO Rob Meyerson.

Helium-3 sells for $20 million a kilogram. So, it is the only resource in the universe that is priced high enough to warrant going to space and bringing it back to earth today.

Meyerson said Interlune's method is mindful of protecting the lunar surface and that the regolith is replaced so that what is left looks like a tilled field. Asked about a private company profiting from what is seen as a global asset, he said Interlune would never claim any part of the moon as its own, and that it was serving customers in important areas. According to a report from the NASA Office of Inspector General, the Artemis program was expected to cost $93 billion from 2012 through to 2025. However, cuts proposed to the NASA budget by the Trump administration would axe key parts of the program. Glaze said NASA has suppliers across the US and that the funding for the Artemis program is invested in every state.

So, we are generating jobs and for every dollar that we spend on this hardware, three dollars come back into the US Treasury.

Glaze says the moon could look like a very different place in the next 50 years to 100 years, citing the commercial activities there and the sustained NASA presence. Meyerson said the reusability of rockets such as SpaceX's Falcon 9 has been a key step in lowering the cost of access to space. What's next, he predicts, is building things in space using resources sourced in space, removing the need to launch materials from earth.

Then you can start to think about really long-term practical things, building out giant space stations where people live that have that rotate to simulate gravity, building once you have fusion reactors on Earth, you can start to think about building direct fusion drive propulsion. That gets us between the Earth and Mars in 30 days instead of 30 days to 60 days instead of six to seven months.

However, such plans raise ethical questions, says Dr David Jeevendrampillai, a lecturer in Social Anthropology at the University of Manchester who specializes in outer space.

So, if you're building infrastructure on the moon, if you're taking the moon's resources, is that enabling a transition of resources to the wealthy? Is it enabling a transition of moon territory and sovereignty and the moon as a cultural object to the few?

Almost every culture, Jeevendrampilai said, has some form of moon myth or relationship with the moon. Therefore, he argued, such space programs should feature more international dialogue around their cultural implications. "What if one person's future building," he asked, "is another person's denigration of a sacred space?"