(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions
expressed are her own.)
By Una Galani
HONG KONG, June 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) - New World
Development's 0917.HK woes reveal a danger lurking in its
Cayman Islands safe haven. Shareholders with less than 1 percent
of the votes used the offshore centre's archaic rules to block a
$2.4 billion attempt by the Hong Kong property group to buy the
rest of its China unit. It's a reminder that a Cayman domicile
brings risks as well as rewards for the region's power-hungry
tycoons.
The obstacle to the New World buyout was Cayman's "headcount
rule", which requires certain types of takeovers to be approved
by 75 percent of the votes cast and also by a majority of
shareholders who vote. Hong Kong abolished the rule earlier this
year, but it remains in place in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda,
which are home to 75 percent of Hong Kong-listed companies,
according to Webb-site.com.
In New World's case, shareholders with 99.8 percent of the
independently-held shares supported the deal. But they accounted
for only 34 percent of the voting shareholders. Cheng Yu-tung's
property company isn't the first to trip up on the headcount
rule. Chinese billionaire Zhang Zhirong suffered a similar
stumble last year when he tried and failed to take Glorious
Property Holdings 0845.HK private for $589 million.
The headcount rule was designed to protect minority
investors from being bullied by large shareholders but it is
open to abuse. In 2009, a Hong Kong court blocked tycoon Richard
Li's attempt to take telecom operator PCCW 0008.HK private
after the Securities and Futures Commission said the ownership
of shares had been split to meet a headcount requirement. The
rule also makes it easier for hedge funds or individuals
disgruntled with a particular company to stir up trouble.
Asian tycoons favour offshore domiciles for tax reasons but
also because they tend to be friendlier to controlling
shareholders than local rules. For example, such jurisdictions
permit cross-shareholdings, and also place fewer restrictions on
loans between the company, its controlling shareholder, and
related entities. New World's stumble won't stop companies going
offshore. But it's a reminder that the preferred haven of
tycoons isn't always so safe.
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SIGN UP FOR BREAKINGVIEWS EMAIL ALERTS:
www.breakingviews.com/TOPNewsSubscription
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
CONTEXT NEWS
- Independent shareholders on June 16 blocked a proposal by
New World Development to take its China subsidiary private in a
deal worth HK$18.6 billion ($2.4 billion).
- Investors representing 99.8 percent of the
independently-held shares voted in favour, comfortably passing
the requirement that 75 percent of the shares by value accept
the deal.
- However, the offer failed to clear a "headcount" rule
which also requires the approval of a simple majority of
individual independent shareholders. Only 34 percent of
shareholders cast their votes in favour of the deal.
- The rule is still in force in the Cayman Islands, where
New World Development China is domiciled.
- Hong Kong abolished the headcount rule earlier this year
in favour of a rule that allows investors to block a deal if
shareholders representing more than 10 percent of the company
vote against it.
- New World Development and its related parties own more
than 72 percent of New World China.
- New World Development has completed a $1.8 billion rights
issue which was supposed to part-finance the deal, but was not
conditional on the offer going ahead.
- Shares in New World China fell almost 17 percent to
HK$5.30 following the announcement of the result. The buyout had
valued the company at HK$6.8 per share.
- New World announcement: http://bit.ly/1oDb0Co
RELATED COLUMNS
House-cleaning ID:nL3N0MB12H
- For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can
click on GALANI/
(Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Katrina Hamlin)
((una.galani@thomsonreuters.com))
((Reuters messaging:
una.galani.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net))
Keywords: BREAKINGVIEWS NEW WORLD CHINA/BUYOUT