REG - Indivior PLC - 1st Quarter Results <Origin Href="QuoteRef">INDV.L</Origin> - Part 1

IndiviorAnnouncement

03/05/2017 12:06

RNS Number : 0548E
Indivior PLC
03 May 2017
'To view a printable PDF version of this announcement, please click here.
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/0548E_-2017-5-3.pdf

May 3, 2017
Q1 Financial Results in line with plan. Full Year Guidance Confirmed.
Quarter to March 31
2017
$m.
2016
$m.
% change at actual FX
% change at constant FX
Net Revenue
265
258
+3%
+4%
Operating Profit
128
101
+27%
+27%
Net Income
80
50
+60%
+61%
EPS (cents per share)
11
7
+57%
+57%
Q1 Financial Highlights
 Net revenue growth of 3% to $265m (Q1 2016: $258m) primarily reflects strong market growth in the US.
 Operating Profit of $128m (Q1 2016: $101m) primarily reflects lower litigation and R&D expenditures, which due to planned phasing of activity, are expected to increase over the remainder of 2017. In addition, planned incremental investments in 2017 of $40m to $60m related to key pipeline assets are expected to accelerate from Q2 onwards. Operating margin was 48% (Q1 2016: 39%).
 Net income of $80m (Q1 2016: $50m) after tax rate of 32% (Q1 2016: 36% plus exceptional tax of $5m). On an adjusted basis, net income increased 46% to $80m (Q1 2016: $55m adjusted).
 Cash balance at quarter end increased to $729m (Year End 2016: $692m). Net cash at quarter end was $182m (Year End 2016: $131m). 
Q1 Operating Highlights
 US market growth of low double-digit percentage levels is in-line with expectations, and was modestly boosted by the impact of the regulatory change to allow qualified physicians to treat up to 275 patients from 100 patients. 
 SUBOXONE Film market share on average for the quarter was 60% (Q1 2016: 60%). Market share at the end of the quarter, however, was 59% primarily due to the loss of a Managed Medicaid account to generic competition. Total volume sold in the US was up despite significant destocking at wholesalers. SUBOXONEFilm list price increased modestly in January 2017, but was offset by tactical rebates as generic and branded discounting continues. 
 The NDA for RBP-6000, the monthly depot of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder, is on-track and expected to be filed in Q2 2017. The NDA for RBP-7000, the monthly depot of risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia, is also on-track and expected to be filed in Q4 2017.
 Indivior continues to await the outcome of the trial against Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (Dr. Reddy's) on US Patent Nos. 8,017,150, 8,603,514, and 8,900,497; and against Actavis and Par on US Patent No. 8,900,497, which is expected sometime in Q2. 
 The Group continues in discussions with the Department of Justice about a possible resolution to its investigation. The Group cannot predict with any certainty whether it will reach ultimate resolution with the Department of Justice or any or all of the other parties, or the ultimate cost of resolving all of the matters. Please see pages five to seven for a complete Litigation Update.
Guidance
 Full year preliminary guidance for 2017 is confirmed: net revenue of $1,050m-$1,080m and net income of $200m-$220m (excluding exceptional items and at constant exchange rates) and assuming no material change to current US market conditions for SUBOXONE Film. The guidance also reflects planned incremental investments of $40m-$60m related to key pipeline assets that are expected to accelerate from Q2 onwards, as well as litigation and R&D expenditures that are expected to increase over the remainder of 2017. 
Commenting on the results, Shaun Thaxter, CEO of Indivior, said:
"We are off to a good start to the year. Our Q1 results were in-line with our plan, which assumed no material deterioration in the market environment, and we made progress against key strategic priorities. In the US, SUBOXONE Film share remains resilient at just under 60% despite ongoing intense competition, particularly in Managed Medicaid. This is a testament to our market leading presence combined with the growing awareness of opioid use disorder as a disease state that is increasingly being helped by legislation and funding at governmental levels. Meanwhile, wecontinue toturn our energy and resources to Indivior's future - RBP-6000 (monthly depot of buprenorphine) and RBP-7000 (monthly depot of risperidone). We are on-track to file NDAs for both products with FDA this year and we will invest appropriately to help ensure their successful launch upon approval. Our finances continue to improve with net cash having increased to $182m at the end of Q1, and we are continuing to enhance our compliance capability to keep pace with the expected market growth. We are pleased today to confirm our financial guidance for the current year. Overall,we have made good progress in the quarter and remain focused on our commitment to empowering patients and striving to improve their quality of life by pioneering innovative, quality, accessible and cost effective treatments."
Operating Review
US Market Update
The market for buprenorphine products continued to grow strongly in Q1 2017, showing volume growth of low double-digit percentage levels, in-line with expectations. The recent regulatory change to raise the patient cap for qualified physicians to 275 from 100, have increased the provision of treatment, while the number of nurse practitioners and physician assistants applying for training as prescribers, as permitted under the CARA legislation, suggests that this provision will also expand treatment access in due course.
SUBOXONE Film had an average market share of 60% in Q1 2017, which was unchanged compared to Q1 2016, but ended the quarter at 59%. This was below the exit share at the end of Q1 2016 primarily due to the loss of a Managed Medicaid account to generic competition, although commercial formulary access remains solid. The list price of SUBOXONE Film in the US increased modestly in January 2017. 
Financial Performance in Q1 2017
Total net revenue grew 3% at actual exchange rates to $265m (Q1 2016: $258m), and was up 4% on a constant exchange rate basis.
US net revenue grew by 2% to $215m (Q1 2016: $211m). Volume was ahead of last year, reflecting market growth that was somewhat offset by wholesaler destocking resulting from a build-up of supply in late 2016 and modest share decline due to the loss of a Managed Medicaid account. List pricing was up reflecting a modest increase in January, but was offset by continued tactical rebates in connection with formulary access in both commercial managed care and in particular Medicaid in response to continued discounting by both branded and generic competitors.
Rest of World net revenue increased 6% to $50m (Q1 2016: $47m) as reported in USD. At constant exchange rates, the increase was 13%. The increase was primarily driven by the timing of export revenues in the quarter, mainly related to certain Middle East customers. In Europe, market share was again resilient, but was modestly affected by further generic substitution. Australasia saw steady growth due to growing numbers of patients seeking treatment resulting from ongoing marketing initiatives.
Gross margin was up slightly to 93% (Q1 2016: 92%) primarily due to increased production in the quarter.
SD&A expenses decreased by 11% to $93m (Q1 2016: $105m) principally reflecting lower litigation expenditures, which due to planned phasing of activity, are expected to increase from Q2 onwards in 2017, plus lower amortization as the acquisition costs for the Rest of World rights to SUBOXONE that fully amortized at the end of 2016. There were no exceptional costs included in SD&A in either Q1 2016 or Q1 2017. Planned incremental investments related to key pipeline assets - RBP-6000 buprenorphine monthly depot and RBP-7000 risperidone monthly depot - are expected to accelerate beginning in the current quarter.
R&D expenses decreased by 19% to $25m (Q1 2016: $31m), reflecting planned phasing differences versus 2016 that are expected to reverse from Q2 onwards in 2017, as well as the completion of active Phase III trials on RBP-6000 and RBP-7000. The costs of preparing the two NDAs will be incurred through the balance of the year and are included in current FY 2017 guidance. 
Operating profit was $128m, 27% ahead of prior year, primarily reflecting the lower litigation and R&D expenses, which due to planned phasing of activity, are expected to increase from Q2 onwards in 2017. Operating margin was 48% (Q1 2016: 39%). 
EBITDA was $130m (Q1 2016: $107m). EBITDA margin was 49% (Q1 2016: 42%). 
Finance expense in the quarter was $11m (2016 Q1: $15m). The decrease was due to the impact of the buyback and paying down some of the term loan facility during 2016.
The tax charge in Q1 was $37m, at a rate of 32% (Q1 2016: 36% plus exceptional tax of $5m), reflecting the mix of profits between countries in the period. Currently, we expect our full year effective tax rate to be 25%, consistent with the guidance given in February.
Net income for the quarter was $80m (Q1 2016: $50m, and on an adjusted basis excluding the exceptional tax of $5m: $55m), an increase of 60% compared to Q1 2016 as reported. At constant exchange rates, the increase was 61%. On an adjusted basis, the increase was 46%.
EPS were 11 cents (Q1 2016: 7 cents, or 8 cents on an adjusted basis) on both a basic and diluted basis. 
Balance Sheet & Cash Flow
Net working capital (inventory plus trade and other receivables, less trade and other payables) was minus $327m at end Q1 2017 (minus $390m at end December 2016). The difference primarily relates to the combination of lower accruals at quarter end due to wholesaler destocking and the timing of payments.
Cash and cash equivalents at the period end were $729m, reflecting a net cash increase of $37m in the quarter. Borrowings, net of issuance costs, were $524m (Dec 2016: $535m) at the quarter end after debt payback in the quarter of $11m. 
Net cash was $182m (Dec 2016: $131m), the increase of $51m reflecting cash inflow and debt repayment.
Cash generated from operating activities was $71m (Q1 2016: $115m), a decrease of $44m due to higher levels of operating profit of $128m (Q1 2016: $101m), offset by a change in net working capital which was a use of cash of $63m in Q1 2017 (versus a source of cash of $8m in Q1 2016).
Net cash inflow from operations decreased to $60m in the quarter (Q1 2016: $97m) reflecting the lower cash from operating activities offset by lower tax payments in the quarter of $1m (Q1 2016: $7m), and after interest and transaction costs relating to the term loan facility of $10m (Q1 2016: $11m). After investments of $8m (Q1 2016: $4m) and repayment of borrowings of $16m (Q1 2016: $17m), the net increase in cash and cash equivalents was $36m (Q1 2016: $76m), the lower level of net cash generation being the result of short-term absorption of cash in working capital.
R&D / Pipeline Update
Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
 RBP-6000, Monthly Depot Buprenorphine: Phase III Efficacy Study (RB-US-13-0001); top line results published on August 17th, 2016 showing RBP-6000 achieved both primary and secondary endpoints. Final CSR signed off March 3rd, 2017. PK/PD/Receptor Occupancy analysis and topline HEOR data released March 22nd, 2017.
Phase III Safety Extension Study (RB-US-13-0003) completed with database lock achieved October 31st, 2016. Interim analysis signed off March 23rd, 2017.
US Fast Track Designation granted May 23rd, 2016.
Pre-NDA meeting held December 2016. Target NDA submission to FDA Q2-2017.
Meetings with Regulatory Agencies ex-USA held in Q4-2016: TGA (Australia); HC (Canada); ANSM (France); MHRA (United Kingdom); MPA (Sweden); BfArM (Germany).
Treatment of Schizophrenia
 RBP-7000, Monthly Depot Risperidone: Topline data from pivotal Phase III Efficacy Study were published on May 5th, 2015.
Phase III Long-term Safety Study (RB-US-13-0005) was completed in September 2016 with database lock achieved October 2016. Final CSR signed off March 31st, 2017. 
Pre-NDA meeting held August 2016. Target NDA submission to FDA Q4-2017.
Overdose Rescue Products
 Intranasal Naloxone: NALSCUE launched in France under Temporary Authorisation for Use (ATU) in July 2016. MAA submitted November 2016. ANSM recommended approval on March 16th, 2017.
 RBP-8000 Cocaine Esterase: Second type B meeting with FDA held March 2016. Per agreement with FDA, work has continued with the development of a lyophilized product and first test batch was manufactured in October 2016.
Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder
 Arbaclofen Placarbil:New Phase I Bioavailability Clinical Study Protocol (INDV-AP-102) of a new formulation of Arbaclofen Placarbil was completed. Results are under evaluation.
Key Pipeline Dates 2017
Q2 RBP-6000 NDA filing expected
June CPDD Conference - RBP-6000 Phase III clinical & safety data
Oct ACoP Conference - RBP-6000 Phase III Exposure/Response data
Nov AMERSA Conference - RBP-6000 Phase III health economics & outcomes research data
Q4 RBP-7000 NDA filing expected
Q4 PDUFA date for RBP-6000 assuming Priority Review is granted
Litigation Update
The Group carries a provision of $218m for the investigative and antitrust litigation matters noted below. The Group continues in discussions with the Department of Justice about a possible resolution to its investigation. The Group cannot predict with any certainty whether it will reach ultimate resolution with the Department of Justice or any or all of the other parties, or the ultimate cost of resolving all of the matters. The final cost may be materially higher than this reserve.
Department of Justice Investigation
 A U.S. federal criminal grand jury investigation of Indivior initiated in December 2013 is continuing, and includes marketing and promotion practices, pediatric safety claims, and overprescribing of medication by certain physicians. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Virginia has served a number of subpoenas relating to SUBOXONE Film, SUBOXONE Tablet, SUBUTEX Tablet, buprenorphine and our competitors, among other issues. The Group continues in discussions with the Department of Justice about a possible resolution to its investigation. It is not possible at this time to predict with any certainty the potential impact of this investigation on us or to quantify the ultimate cost of a resolution. We are cooperating fully with the relevant agencies and prosecutors and will continue to do so.
State Subpoenas
 On October 12th, 2016, Indivior was served with a subpoena for records from the State of Connecticut Office of the Attorney General under its Connecticut civil false claims act authority. The subpoena requests documents related to the Group's marketing and promotion of SUBOXONE products and its interactions with a non-profit third party organization. On November 16th, 2016, Indivior was served with a subpoena for records from the State of California Department of Insurance under its California insurance code authority. The subpoena requests documents related to SUBOXONE Film, SUBOXONE Tablet, and SUBUTEX Tablet. The Group is fully cooperating in these investigations.
FTC investigation and Antitrust Litigation
 The U.S. Federal Trade Commission's investigation remains pending. Litigation regarding privilege claims has now been resolved. Indivior has produced certain documents that it had previously withheld as privileged; other such documents have not been produced.
 Fact discovery is continuing in the antitrust class action litigation. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Indivior violated U.S. federal and state antitrust laws in attempting to delay generic entry of alternatives to SUBOXONE tablets, and plaintiffs further allege that Indivior unlawfully acted to lower the market share of these products.
 Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Amneal), a manufacturer of generic buprenorphine / naloxone tablets, has alleged antitrust violations similar in nature to those alleged in the class action complaints, and Amneal has also alleged violations of the U.S. Lanham Act. This case has been coordinated with the antitrust class action litigation.
 A group of states, now numbering 41, and the District of Columbia filed suit against Indivior in the same district where the antitrust class action litigation and Amneal cases are pending. The States' complaint is similar to the other pending antitrust complaints, and alleges violations of U.S. state and federal antitrust and consumer protection laws. This lawsuit relates to the investigation conducted by various states, as discussed in previous filings. Discovery has been coordinated with the antitrust class action litigation and Amneal cases, subject to certain stays.
ANDA Litigation and Inter Partes Review
 The ruling after trial against Actavis and Par in the lawsuit involving the Orange Book-listed patents for SUBOXONE Film issued on June 3rd, 2016. The ruling found the asserted claims of the '514 patent valid and infringed; the asserted claims of the '150 patent valid but not infringed; and the asserted claims of the '832 patent invalid, but found that certain claims would be infringed if they were valid.
 Based on the ruling as to the '514 patent, Actavis and Par are currently enjoined from launching a generic product. Par has appealed and Actavis is expected to appeal this ruling. The generics have also moved to reopen the judgment based on the claim construction in the Dr. Reddy's case. In light of the motions to reopen, Par's appeal has been deactivated until the District Court rules on the motions, and the deadline for Actavis to file a notice of appeal has been postponed.
 Trial against Dr. Reddy's, Actavis and Par in the lawsuits involving the process patent (U.S. Patent No. 8,900,497) took place on November 16th and 21st-23rd, 2016.
 Trial against Dr. Reddy's in the lawsuit involving two of the Orange Book-listed patents for SUBOXONE Film (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,017,150 and 8,603,514) took place on November 7th, 16th,and 21st-23rd, 2016. Dr. Reddy's 30-month stay of FDA approval expired on April 17th, 2017. So far as Indivior is aware, FDA to date has not granted tentative or final marketing authorization to Dr. Reddy's (or any other generic SUBOXONE Film alternative). If FDA were to grant final approval to Dr. Reddy's this would enable them to market a generic film alternative to SUBOXONE Film in the U.S. However, any market launch by Dr. Reddy's before the District Court renders its decision, or before the court of appeals renders its decision even if Dr. Reddy's was to prevail before the District Court, would be on an "at risk" basis because Indivior would have a claim for damages against Dr. Reddy's if it ultimately prevails after any appeal.
 A stipulation and proposed order was filed with the District Court on April 28th, 2017, seeking to consolidate the trial against Alvogen in the lawsuit involving the '150 and '514 Orange Book-listed patents and the '497 process patent for SUBOXONE Film with the trial against Mylan (discussed below). The District Court approved the stipulation on May 1st, 2017. Accordingly, the trial against Alvogen will be scheduled for September 25th-27th, 2017, and will be tried concurrently with the trial against Mylan. The 30-month stay of FDA approval of Alvogen's Abbreviated New Drug Application is presently set to expire October 29th, 2017.
 By a Court order dated August 22nd, 2016, Indivior's SUBOXONE Film patent litigation against Sandoz has been dismissed without prejudice because Sandoz is no longer pursuing Paragraph IV certifications for its proposed generic formulations of SUBOXONE Film.
 Trial against Mylan in the lawsuit involving the '150 and '514 Orange Book-listed patents and the '497 process patent for SUBOXONE Film is scheduled for September 25th-27th, 2017, and will be tried concurrently with the trial against Alvogen pursuant to a stipulation filed with and approved by the District Court. The 30-month stay of FDA approval of Mylan's Abbreviated New Drug Application is presently set to expire March 24th, 2018. On January 12th, 2017, the District Court issued a claim construction decision in the Mylan action that clarified its earlier construction in the Dr. Reddy's case of certain terms in the '514 patent.
 Indivior received a Paragraph IV notification from Teva, dated February 8th, 2016, indicating that Teva had filed a 505(b)(2) New Drug Application (NDA) for a 16mg/4mg strength of buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual film. The parties have agreed that infringement by Teva's 16 mg/4 mg dosage strength will be governed by the infringement ruling on the accused 8 mg/2 mg dosage strength in the ANDA now owned by Dr. Reddy's that was the subject of the trial in November 2016.
 On May 31st, 2016, Dr. Reddy's filed petitions seeking inter parties review (IPR) of the three Orange Book-listed patents covering SUBOXONE Film. Indivior and Monsol Rx filed Patent Owner Preliminary Responses opposing institution of the IPRs on September 6th, 2016, arguing that institution of the IPRs should be denied. On December 2nd, 2016, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied institution of the IPR as to the '832 Patent, and on December 5th, 2016, the PTAB denied institution of the IPRs as to the '514 and '150 Patents. On January 3rd, 2017, Dr. Reddy's filed Requests for Rehearing of the three non-institution decisions. On March 22nd, 2017, the PTAB denied Dr. Reddy's request for rehearing of its decisions not to institute its petitions for IPRs of the '150 and '514 patents. This denial by the PTAB resolves Dr. Reddy's attempts to seek to invalidate the '150 and '514 patents through IPR proceedings. A separate panel of the PTAB is handling the proceeding on the '832 patent and has not yet issued its decision on Dr. Reddy's Rehearing Request in that case.
 Mylan has filed a petition seeking an IPR of the '514 patent. A decision by the US Patent & Trademark Office on whether to institute IPR proceedings is expected in May 2017.
 In the event that one or more of the generic companies are successful in their patent challenges, and should there be FDA approval of one or more of the ANDAs and subsequent commercial launch of generic SUBOXONE Film, and the Group's pipeline products fail to obtain regulatory approval, there is the likelihood that revenues and operating profits of the Group will significantly decline. In these circumstances the Directors believe they would be able to take the required steps to reduce the cost base, however, this would result in a significant change to the structure of the business.
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals
 On March 21st, 2017 Rhodes Pharmaceuticals filed a complaint against Indivior in the District of Delaware, alleging that Indivior's sale of SUBOXONE Film in the U.S. infringes one or more claims of a patent. The asserted patent, which was issued in June 2016 traces back to an application filed in August 2007. Indivior believes this claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this action. 
Estate of John Bradley Allen
 On December 27th, 2016, the Estate of John Bradley Allen filed a civil complaint against Indivior, among other parties, in the Northern District of New York seeking relief under Connecticut's products liability and unfair trade practices statutes for damages allegedly caused by SUBOXONE. Indivior believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this action.
Risk Factors
The Directors have reviewed the principal risks and uncertainties for the financial year 2017. 
The assumptions in arriving at the Group's financial guidance for the full year 2017 are described on page 2 of this announcement. To the extent that actual market conditions differ from these assumptions, alternative financial outcomes are possible. However, the Group has issued this guidance based on industry analogues and its own estimates at this time. 
Therefore, other than in respect of guidance for the full year 2017, the Directors consider that the principal risks and uncertainties which could have a material impact on the Group's performance in 2017 include: 
Business operations and business continuity
 The Group's revenues are primarily derived from sales of SUBOXONE Film and any decrease in sales due to competition or supply or quality issues could significantly affect the results of operations and prospects. 
 The Group has a single source of supply for buprenorphine, an active ingredient in the Group's products, including SUBOXONE Film, and any disruption to this source of supply could significantly affect the results of operations and prospects. 
 Competition for qualified personnel in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries is intense and high-performing talent in key positions is a business-critical requirement. 
 Failures or disruptions to the Group's systems or the systems of third parties on whom the Group relies, due to any number of causes, particularly if prolonged, could result in a loss of key data and/or affect operations. 
 The Group's computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code or cyber threats that could have a security impact. All of these could be costly to remedy and we may be subject to litigation.
Product liability, regulation and litigation
 As an innovative pharmaceutical company, the Group seeks to obtain appropriate intellectual property protection for its products. Its ability to obtain and enforce patents and other proprietary rights particularly for its products, drug formulation and delivery technologies and associated manufacturing processes is critical to business strategy and success. Specifically, see disclosures under Litigation Update on pages {5-7} referring to the current status of the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission investigations, state subpoenas, antitrust litigation, ANDA litigation and Inter Partes Reviews, as well as the contingent liabilities disclosures on pages {18-20, note 7}.
 The manufacture of the Group's products is highly exacting and complex due in part to strict regulatory and manufacturing requirements. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) in many of the Group's products and product candidates are controlled substances that are subject to extensive regulation in all the countries in which the Group markets its products.
 The testing, manufacturing, marketing, and sales of pharmaceutical products entail a risk of product liability claims, product recalls, litigation, and associated adverse publicity, each of which could have a material adverse impact on the business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Product development
 The regulatory approval process for new pharmaceutical products and expansion of existing pharmaceutical productsis expensive, time-consuming and uncertain. Even if product candidates are approved, there is no guarantee that they will be able to achieve expected market acceptance.
Commercial and Governmental payor account, pricing and reimbursement pressure
 The Group's revenues are partly dependent on the availability and level of coverage provided to the Group by private insurance companies and governmental reimbursement schemes for pharmaceutical products, such as Medicare and Medicaid in the US. 
 Changes to governmental policy or practices could adversely affect the Group's revenues, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the reimbursement of treatment established by healthcare providers, private health insurers and other organizations may be reduced.
Compliance with law and ethical behaviour
 Business practices in the pharmaceutical industry are subject to increasing scrutiny by government authorities. Failure to comply with applicable laws and rules and regulations in any jurisdiction may result in fines, civil and/or criminal legal proceedings. Specifically, see disclosures under Litigation Update on page {5-7} referring to the current status of the investigative and litigation matters involving the Group, as well as the contingent liabilities disclosures on pages {18-20, note 7}. The Group has taken steps to enhance its compliance capability to handle the expected growth in the business, and will continue to monitor changing compliance requirements due to growth, changes in the business, and changing regulatory requirements.
Acquisitions and business development
 The Group may seek to acquire businesses or products as part of its strategy to enhance its current portfolio.
Product Safety
 The Group's pharmacovigilance processes has been established to monitor the safety of the Group's products in a comprehensive and thorough manner. This includes capturing safety-related data from multiple sources (e.g. MIU, Market Research, Literature Search and Clinical trials) and entering all adverse events received into a safety database. The Group reports to health authorities across the globe within the required and mandatory time lines and identifies safety signals with an assessment of changes to benefit/risk profile, determines actions needed to optimize the safe and effective use of our product, including communicating any relevant changes to key stakeholders. 
 The Group's annual report for the 2016 financial year contains additional detail on these principal business risks together with a report on risk appetite. 
Exchange Rates
The average and period end exchange rates used for the translation of currencies into US dollars that have most significant impact on the Group's results were: 

3 Months to March 31,
2017
3 Months to March 31,
2016
GB  period end
1.2434
1.4153
GB  average rate
1.2390
1.4323



 Euro period end
1.0766
1.1176
 Euro average
1.0653
1.1019
Webcast Details
There will be a conference call at 1pm UK time (8am Eastern in the USA) hosted by Shaun Thaxter, CEO, and Mark Crossley, CFO. This call will also be webcast live. The details are below and are available on the Company's website at www.indivior.com
Webcast link:  http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/cm2hr9w3
Confirmation Code:
7569891
Participants, Local - London, United Kingdom: 
+44(0)20 3427 1914
Participants, Local - New York, United States of America: 
+1 646 254 3364
For Further Information
Investor Enquiries
Jason Thompson
VP Investor Relations, Indivior PLC
+1 804 423 8916 investorrelations@indivior.com
Media Enquiries
Stephen Malthouse
Jonathan Sibun
Tulchan Communications US Media Enquiries
+44 207 353 4200
+1 804 594 0836 Indiviormediacontacts@indivior.com
Corporate Website www.indivior.com
This announcement does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to subscribe for or otherwise acquire or dispose of shares in the Company to any person in any jurisdiction to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Forward-Looking Statements
This announcement contains certain statements that are forward-looking and which should be considered, amongst other statutory provisions, in light of the safe harbour provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty as they relate to events or circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements because they relate to future events. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding the Indivior Group's financial guidance for 2017 and its medium- and long-term growth outlook, its operational goals, its product development pipeline and statements regarding ongoing litigation.
Various factors may cause differences between Indivior's expectations and actual results, including: factors affecting sales of Indivior Group's products; the outcome of research and development activities; decisions by regulatory authorities regarding the Indivior Group's drug applications; the speed with which regulatory authorizations, pricing approvals and product launches may be achieved; the outcome of post-approval clinical trials; competitive developments; difficulties or delays in manufacturing; the impact of existing and future legislation and regulatory provisions on product exclusivity; trends toward managed care and healthcare cost containment; legislation or regulatory action affecting pharmaceutical product pricing, reimbursement or access; claims and concerns that may arise regarding the safety or efficacy of the Indivior Group's products and product candidates; risks related to legal proceedings; the Indivior Group's ability to protect its patents and other intellectual property; the outcome of patent infringement litigation relating to Indivior Group's products, including the ongoing ANDA lawsuits; changes in governmental laws and regulations; issues related to the outsourcing of certain operational and staff functions to third parties; uncertainties related to general economic, political, business, industry, regulatory and market conditions; and the impact of acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, internal reorganizations, product recalls and withdrawals and other unusual items.
Indication
SUBOXONE (buprenorphine and naloxone) Sublingual Film (CIII) is a prescription medicine indicated for treatment of opioid dependence and should be used as part of a complete treatment plan to include counseling and psychosocial support. 
Treatment should be initiated under the direction of healthcare providers qualified under the Drug Addiction Treatment Act.
Important Safety Information
Do not take SUBOXONE Film if you are allergic to buprenorphine or naloxone as serious negative effects, including anaphylactic shock, have been reported.
SUBOXONE Film can be abused in a manner similar to other opioids, legal or illicit.
SUBOXONE Film contains buprenorphine, an opioid that can cause physical dependence with chronic use. Physical dependence is not the same as addiction. Your healthcare provider can tell you more about the difference between physical dependence and drug addiction. Do not stop taking SUBOXONE Film suddenly without talking to your healthcare provider. You could become sick with uncomfortable withdrawal symptoms because your body has become used to this medicine. 
SUBOXONE Film can cause serious life-threatening breathing problems, overdose and death, particularly when taken by the intravenous (IV) route in combination with benzodiazepines or other medications that act on the nervous system (ie, sedatives, tranquilizers, or alcohol). It is extremely dangerous to take nonprescribed benzodiazepines or other medications that act on the nervous system while taking SUBOXONE Film. 
You should not drink alcohol while taking SUBOXONE Film, as this can lead to loss of consciousness or even death.
Death has been reported in those who are not opioid dependent.
Your healthcare provider may monitor liver function before and during treatment.
SUBOXONE Film is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment and may not be appropriate for patients with moderate hepatic impairment. However, SUBOXONE Film may be used with caution for maintenance treatment in patients with moderate hepatic impairment who have initiated treatment on a buprenorphine product without naloxone.
Keep SUBOXONE Film out of the sight and reach of children. Accidental or deliberate ingestion of SUBOXONE Film by a child can cause severe breathing problems and death. 
Do not take SUBOXONE Film before the effects of other opioids (eg, heroin, hydrocodone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone) have subsided as you may experience withdrawal symptoms.
Injecting the SUBOXONE Film product may cause serious withdrawal symptoms such as pain, cramps, vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, sleep problems, and cravings.
Before taking SUBOXONE Film, tell your healthcare provider if you are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. If you are pregnant, tell your healthcare provider as withdrawal signs and symptoms should be monitored closely and the dose adjusted as necessary. If you are pregnant or become pregnant while taking SUBOXONE Film, alert your healthcare provider immediately and you should report it using the contact information provided below. *
Opioiddependent women on buprenorphine maintenance therapy may require additional analgesia during labor.
Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is an expected and treatable outcome of prolonged use of opioids during pregnancy, whether that use is medically-authorized or illicit. Unlike opioid withdrawal syndrome in adults, NOWS may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated in the neonate. Healthcare professionals should observe newborns for signs of NOWS and manage accordingly.
Before taking SUBOXONE Film, talk to your healthcare provider if you are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed your baby. The active ingredients of SUBOXONE Film can pass into your breast milk. You and your healthcare provider should consider the development and health benefits of breastfeeding along with your clinical need for SUBOXONE Film and should also consider any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from the drug or from the underlying maternal condition. 
Do not drive, operate heavy machinery, or perform any other dangerous activities until you know how SUBOXONE Film affects you. Buprenorphine in SUBOXONE Film can cause drowsiness and slow reaction times during dose-adjustment periods.
Common side effects of SUBOXONE Film include nausea, vomiting, drug withdrawal syndrome, headache, sweating, numb mouth, constipation, painful tongue, redness of the mouth, intoxication (feeling lightheaded or drunk), disturbance in attention, irregular heartbeat, decrease in sleep, blurred vision, back pain, fainting, dizziness, and sleepiness.
This is not a complete list of potential adverse events associated with SUBOXONE Film. Please see full Prescribing Information for a complete list.
*To report pregnancy or side effects associated with taking SUBOXONE Film, please call 1-877-782-6966. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
For more information about SUBOXONE Film, SUBOXONE (buprenorphine and naloxone) Sublingual Tablets (CIII), or SUBUTEX (buprenorphine) Sublingual Tablets (CIII), please see the respective full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide at www.suboxoneREMS.com.


Condensed consolidated interim income statement


Unaudited
Unaudited


2017
2016
For the three months ended March 31
Notes
$m
$m
Net Revenues
2
265
258
Cost of Sales

(19)
(21)
Gross Profit

246
237
Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 
3
(93)
(105)
Research and development expenses
3
(25)
(31)
Operating Profit

128
101
Finance expense

(11)
(15)
Profit before taxation

117
86
Taxation
4
(37)
(31)
Exceptionals items within taxation
4
-
(5)
Net income

80
50




Earnings per ordinary share (cents)



Basic earnings per share
5
11
7
Diluted earnings per share
5
11
7
Condensed consolidated interim statement of comprehensive income


Unaudited
Unaudited


2017
2016
For the three months ended March 31

$m
$m
Net income

80
50
Other comprehensive income



Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years



Net exchange adjustments on foreign currency translation

2
(3)



Other comprehensive income

2
(3)
Total comprehensive income

82
47
The notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
Condensed consolidated interim balance sheet 


Unaudited
Audited


Mar 31, 2017
Dec 31, 2016

Notes
$m
$m
ASSETS



Non-current assets



Intangible assets

82
83
Property, plant and equipment

34
27
Deferred tax assets

74
109
Prepayments 

1
-


191
219
Current assets



Inventories

47
41
Trade and other receivables

228
227
Current tax receivable

30
30
Cash and cash equivalents
6
729
692


1,034
990
Total assets

1,225
1,209




LIABILITIES



Current liabilities



Borrowings
6
(101)
(101)
Provision for liabilities and charge

(218)
(219)
Trade and other payables
8
(602)
(658)
Current tax liabilities

(52)
(52)


(973)
(1,030)
Non-current liabilities



Borrowings
6
(423)
(434)
Provisions for liabilities and charges

(40)
(40)


(463)
(474)
Total liabilities

(1,436)
(1,504)
Net liabilities

(211)
(295)




EQUITY



Capital and reserves



Share capital
9
72
72
Other Reserves

(1,295)
(1,295)
Foreign currency translation reserve

(20)
(22)
Retained Earnings

1,032
950
Total equity 

(211)
(295)
The notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.


Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity

Notes
Share
capital
Share
Premium
Other
reserve
Foreign Currency Translation reserve
Retained earnings
Total equity
Unaudited

$m
$m
$m
$m
$m
$m
Balance at January 1, 2016

72
-
(1,295)
(23)
967
(279)
Comprehensive income







Net income 

- 
-
-
-
50
50
Other comprehensive income

-
-
-
(3)
-
(3)
Total comprehensive income

-
-
-
(3)
50
47
Transactions recognised directly in equity







Share-based plans

-
-
-
-
3
3
Deferred taxation on share-based plans

-
-
-
-
(1)
(1)
Balance at March 31, 2016

72
-
(1,295)
(26)
1,019
(230)
















Balance at January 1, 2017 

72
-
(1,295)
(22)
950
(295)
Comprehensive income







Net income 

-
-
-
-
80 
80
Other comprehensive income 

-
-
-
2
-
2
Total comprehensive income

-
-
-
2
80
82
Transactions recognised directly in equity







Share-based plans

-
-
-
-
2
2
Balance at March 31, 2017

72
-
(1,295)
(20)
1,032
(211)
The notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
Condensed consolidated interim cash flow statement


Unaudited
Unaudited


2017
2016
For the three months ended March 31

$m
$m
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES



Operating Profit

128
101
Depreciation and amortization

2
6
Share-based payments

2
2
Impact from foreign exchange movements

2
(2)
Increase in trade and other receivables

(1)
(35)
Increase in inventories

(5)
-
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

(56)
43
Decrease in provisions

(1)
-
Cash generated from operations

71
115
Net financing costs 

(10)
(11)
Taxes paid

(1)
(7)
Net cash inflow from operating activities

60
97




CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES



Purchase of property, plant and equipment

(8)
(4)
Net cash (outflow) from investing activities

(8)
(4)




CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES



Cash movements in borrowings 

(16)
(17)
Net cash (outflow) from financing activities

(16)
(17)




Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

36
76
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

692
467
Exchange differences

1
-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

729
543
The notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
Notes to the condensed consolidated interim financial statements
1. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Indivior PLC (the 'Company') is a public limited company that was incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom on September 26, 2014. In these condensed consolidated interim financial statements ('Interim Financial Statements'), reference to the 'Group' means the Company and all its subsidiaries.
These Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. The financial information herein has been prepared in the basis of the accounting policies set out in the annual accounts of the Group for the year ended December 31, 2016 and should be read in conjunction with those annual accounts. The Group prepares its annual accounts in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) interpretations as adopted by the European Union and the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. In preparing these condensed interim financial statements, the significant judgments made by management in applying the Group's accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, with the exception of changes in estimates that are required in determining the provision for income taxes. 
The Interim Financial Statements do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the Group's annual financial statements as at December 31, 2016. These Interim Financial Statements have been reviewed and not audited. These Interim Financial Statements have been approved for issue as at May 2, 2017.
As disclosed in Note 7, the Group carries a provision of $218mrelating to the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission investigations and antitrust litigation. The finalamount may be materially higher than this reserve. This could impact the Group's ability to operate, which would be further adversely impacted should revenues decline and pipeline products fail to obtain regulatory approval, all of which could mean the Group could not continue in business without taking necessary measures to reduce its cost base and improve its cash flow. As such, this indicates a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. However, the Directors believe they have the ability to carry out the measures that would be necessary and that the Group can continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis for accounting in preparing these financial statements, which do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The financial information contained in this document does not constitute statutory accounts as defined in section 434 and 435 of the Act. The auditors issued an unqualified opinion and did not contain a statement under section 498 of the Act on the Group's statutory financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Group's statutory financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approved by the Board of Directors on March 7, 2017 and will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies subject to the approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to be held on May 17, 2017.
2. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker ('CODM'). The CODM, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). 
The Indivior Group is engaged in a single business activity, which is the development, manufacture and sale of buprenorphine-based prescription drugs for treatment of opioid dependence. The CEO reviews financial information on a geographic basis for evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. The Group has a single reportable segment.
Revenues
Revenues are attributed to countries based on the country where the sale originates. The following table represents revenue from continuing operations attributed to countries based on the country where the sale originates and non-current assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, by country. Non-current assets for this purpose consist of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Revenues and non-currents assets for the three months to March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Revenues from sale of goods:
For the three months ended March 31
2017
$m
2016
$m
United States
215
211
ROW
50
47
Total
265
258
Non-current assets:

Mar 31 2017
$m
Dec 31 2016
$m
United States
65
64
ROW
51
46
Total
116
110
3. OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
The table below sets out selected operating costs and expenses information:
For the three months ended March 31

2017
$m
2016
$m
Research and development expenses

(25)
(31)




Marketing, selling and distribution expenses

(33)
(32)
Administrative expenses

(56)
(66)
Depreciation and amortization

(2)
(6)
Operating lease rentals

(2)
(1)
Total

(93)
(105)
4. TAXATION
The Group calculates tax expense for interim periods using the expected full year rates, considering the pre-tax income and statutory rates for each jurisdiction. The resulting expense is allocated between current and deferred taxes based upon the forecasted full year ratio.
In the three months ended March 31, 2017, tax on total profits amounted to $37m and represented a quarterly effective tax rate of 32% (Q1 2016: 36%, excluding exceptionals). The Group's balance sheet at March 31, 2017 included a tax payable liability of $52m, tax receivables of $30m, and deferred tax asset of $74m. The reduction in deferred tax assets of $35m relates primarily to temporary differences on unrealized profit on the sale of inventory between Group entities. This reduction is expected to be sustained.
The decrease in the effective tax rate to 32% was primarily driven by the relative contribution to pre-tax income by taxing jurisdiction in the quarter.
The United Kingdom ('UK') decision to withdraw from the European Union ('EU') could have a material effect on our taxes. The impact of the withdrawal will not be known until both the EU and the UK develop the exit plan and the related changes in tax laws are enacted. We will adjust our current and deferred income taxes when tax law changes related to the UK withdrawal are substantively enacted and/or when EU law ceases to apply in the UK.
5. EARNINGS PER SHARE
For the three months ended March 31

2017
cents
2016
cents




Basic earnings per share

11
7
Diluted earnings per share

11
7




Adjusted basic earnings per share

11
8
Adjusted diluted earnings per share

11
8
 
Basic
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated by dividing profit for the period attributable to owners of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period. 

Diluted
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. The Company has dilutive potential ordinary shares in the form of stock options. The weighted average number of shares is adjusted for the number of shares granted assuming the exercise of stock options.


2017
Average number of shares
2016
Average number of shares
On a basic basis

720,064,760
718,577,618
Dilution for Long Term Incentive Plan

27,263,710
12,692,955
Employee Sharesave Scheme

1,050,182
-
On a diluted basis

748,378,653
731,270,573
Adjusted Earnings
The Directors believe that diluted earnings per share, adjusted for the impact of exceptional items after the appropriate tax amount, provides additional useful information on underlying trends to shareholders in respect of earnings per ordinary share.
A reconciliation of net income to adjusted net income is as follows:
For the three months ended March 31

2017
$m
2016
$m
Net income

80
50
Exceptional items within taxation

-
5
Adjusted net income

80
55
6. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES - BORROWINGS
Current

Mar 31
2017
$m
Dec 31
2016
$m




Bank loans 

(101)
(101)


(101)
(101)
Non-current

Mar 31
2017
$m
Dec 31
2016
$m




Bank loans

(423)
(434)


(423)
(434)
Analysis of net debt

Mar 31
2017
$m
Dec 31 
2016
$m
Cash and cash equivalents

729
692
Borrowings*

(547)
(561)


182
131
*Borrowings reflects the principal amount drawn, before debt issuance costs
Reconciliation of net debt

Mar 31
2017
$m
Dec 31
2016
$m
The movements in the period were as follows:



Net debt at beginning of period

131
(174)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents

37
225
Net repayment of borrowings and overdraft

16
78
Exchange adjustments

(2)
2
Net debt at end of period

182
131
The carrying value less provision of current borrowings and cash at bank, as well as trade receivables and trade payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The terms of the loan in effect at March 31, 2017 are as follows:

Currency
Nominal interest 
margin
Maturity
Required annual repayments
Maximum leverage ratio 
Minimum liquidity
$m
Term loan facility
USD
Libor (1%) + 6%
2019
10%
2.75
150
Term loan facility
EUR
Libor (1%) + 6%
2019
10%
2.75
150
 The maximum leverage ratio is a financial covenant to maintain net secured leverage below a specified maximum (Adjusted net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio) which will step down to 2.50x on June 30, 2017.
 The minimum liquidity covenant requires the Group to maintain cash on hand plus the undrawn amount available under the Group's $50 million revolving credit facility of at least $150 million.
7. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Group is currently subject to other legal proceedings and investigations, including through subpoenas and other information requests, by various governmental authorities. It is not possible at this time to predict with any certainty the potential impact of these matters on the Group, or to quantify the ultimate cost of a resolution of these matters. The Group carries a provision of $218m for the investigative and antitrust litigation matters noted below. The Group continues in discussions with the Department of Justice about a possible resolution to its investigation. The Group cannot predict with any certainty whether we will be able to reach ultimate resolution with the Department of Justice or any or all of the other parties, or the ultimate cost of resolving all of the matters. The final cost may be materially higher than this reserve.
Department of Justice Investigation
 A U.S. federal criminal grand jury investigation of Indivior initiated in December 2013 is continuing, and includes marketing and promotion practices, pediatric safety claims, and overprescribing of medication by certain physicians. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Virginia has served a number of subpoenas relating to SUBOXONE Film, SUBOXONE Tablet, SUBUTEX Tablet, buprenorphine and our competitors, among other issues. The Group continues in discussions with the Department of Justice about a possible resolution to its investigation. It is not possible at this time to predict with any certainty the potential impact of this investigation on us or to quantify the ultimate cost of a resolution. We are cooperating fully with the relevant agencies and prosecutors and will continue to do so. 
State Subpoenas
 On October 12th, 2016, Indivior was served with a subpoena for records from the State of Connecticut Office of the Attorney General under its Connecticut civil false claims act authority. The subpoena requests documents related to the Group's marketing and promotion of SUBOXONE products and its interactions with a non-profit third party organization. On November 16th, 2016, Indivior was served with a subpoena for records from the State of California Department of Insurance under its California insurance code authority. The subpoena requests documents related to SUBOXONE Film, SUBOXONE Tablet, and SUBUTEX Tablet. The Group is fully cooperating in these investigations. 
FTC investigation and Antitrust Litigation
 The U.S. Federal Trade Commission's investigation remains pending. Litigation regarding privilege claims has now been resolved. Indivior has produced certain documents that it had previously withheld as privileged; other such documents have not been produced. 
 Fact discovery is continuing in the antitrust class action litigation. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Indivior violated U.S. federal and state antitrust laws in attempting to delay generic entry of alternatives to SUBOXONE tablets, and plaintiffs further allege that Indivior unlawfully acted to lower the market share of these products. 
 Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Amneal), a manufacturer of generic buprenorphine / naloxone tablets, has alleged antitrust violations similar in nature to those alleged in the class action complaints, and Amneal has also alleged violations of the U.S. Lanham Act. This case has been coordinated with the antitrust class action litigation. 
 A group of states, now numbering 41, and the District of Columbia filed suit against Indivior in the same district where the antitrust class action litigation and Amneal cases are pending. The States' complaint is similar to the other pending antitrust complaints, and alleges violations of U.S. state and federal antitrust and consumer protection laws. This lawsuit relates to the investigation conducted by various states, as discussed in previous filings. Discovery has been coordinated with the antitrust class action litigation and Amneal cases, subject to certain stays.
ANDA Litigation and Inter Partes Review
 The ruling after trial against Actavis and Par in the lawsuit involving the Orange Book-listed patents for SUBOXONE Film issued on June 3rd, 2016. The ruling found the asserted claims of the '514 patent valid and infringed; the asserted claims of the '150 patent valid but not infringed; and the asserted claims of the '832 patent invalid, but found that certain claims would be infringed if they were valid. 
 Based on the ruling as to the '514 patent, Actavis and Par are currently enjoined from launching a generic product. Par has appealed and Actavis is expected to appeal this ruling. The generics have also moved to reopen the judgment based on the claim construction in the Dr. Reddy's case. In light of the motions to reopen, Par's appeal has been deactivated until the District Court rules on the motions, and the deadline for Actavis to file a notice of appeal has been postponed.
 Trial against Dr. Reddy's, Actavis and Par in the lawsuits involving the process patent (U.S. Patent No. 8,900,497) took place on November 16th and 21st-23rd, 2016.
 Trial against Dr. Reddy's in the lawsuit involving two of the Orange Book-listed patents for SUBOXONE Film (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,017,150 and 8,603,514) took place on November 7th, 16th,and 21st-23rd, 2016. Dr. Reddy's 30-month stay of FDA approval expired on April 17th, 2017. So far as Indivior is aware, FDA to date has not granted tentative or final marketing authorization to Dr. Reddy's (or any other generic SUBOXONE Film alternative). If FDA were to grant final approval to Dr. Reddy's this would enable them to market a generic film alternative to SUBOXONE Film in the U.S. However, any market launch by Dr. Reddy's before the District Court renders its decision, or before the court of appeals renders its decision even if Dr. Reddy's was to prevail before the District Court, would be on an "at risk" basis because Indivior would have a claim for damages against Dr. Reddy's if it ultimately prevails after any appeal.
 A stipulation and proposed order was filed with the District Court on April 28th, 2017, seeking to consolidate the trial against Alvogen in the lawsuit involving the '150 and '514 Orange Book-listed patents and the '497 process patent for SUBOXONE Film with the trial against Mylan (discussed below). The District Court approved the stipulation on May 1st, 2017. Accordingly, the trial against Alvogen will be scheduled for September 25th-27th, 2017, and will be tried concurrently with the trial against Mylan. The 30-month stay of FDA approval of Alvogen's Abbreviated New Drug Application is presently set to expire October 29th, 2017.
 By a Court order dated August 22nd, 2016, Indivior's SUBOXONE Film patent litigation against Sandoz has been dismissed without prejudice because Sandoz is no longer pursuing Paragraph IV certifications for its proposed generic formulations of SUBOXONE Film.
 Trial against Mylan in the lawsuit involving the '150 and '514 Orange Book-listed patents and the '497 process patent for SUBOXONE Film is scheduled for September 25th-27th, 2017, and will be tried concurrently with the trial against Alvogen pursuant to a stipulation filed with and approved by the District Court. The 30-month stay of FDA approval of Mylan's Abbreviated New Drug Application is presently set to expire March 24th, 2018. On January 12th, 2017, the District Court issued a claim construction decision in the Mylan action that clarified its earlier construction in the Dr. Reddy's case of certain terms in the '514 patent. 
 Indivior received a Paragraph IV notification from Teva, dated February 8th, 2016, indicating that Teva had filed a 505(b)(2) New Drug Application (NDA) for a 16mg/4mg strength of buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual film. The parties have agreed that infringement by Teva's 16 mg/4 mg dosage strength will be governed by the infringement ruling on the accused 8 mg/2 mg dosage strength in the ANDA now owned by Dr. Reddy's that was the subject of the trial in November 2016.
 On May 31st, 2016, Dr. Reddy's filed petitions seeking inter parties review (IPR) of the three Orange Book-listed patents covering SUBOXONE Film. Indivior and Monsol Rx filed Patent Owner Preliminary Responses opposing institution of the IPRs on September 6th, 2016, arguing that institution of the IPRs should be denied. On December 2nd, 2016, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied institution of the IPR as to the '832 Patent, and on December 5th, 2016, the PTAB denied institution of the IPRs as to the '514 and '150 Patents. On January 3rd, 2017, Dr. Reddy's filed Requests for Rehearing of the three non-institution decisions. On March 22nd, 2017, the PTAB denied Dr. Reddy's request for rehearing of its decisions not to institute its petitions for IPRs of the '150 and '514 patents. This denial by the PTAB resolves Dr. Reddy's attempts to seek to invalidate the '150 and '514 patents through IPR proceedings. A separate panel of the PTAB is handling the proceeding on the '832 patent and has not yet issued its decision on Dr. Reddy's Rehearing Request in that case.
 Mylan has filed a petition seeking an IPR of the '514 patent. A decision by the US Patent & Trademark Office on whether to institute IPR proceedings is expected in May 2017.
 In the event that one or more of the generic companies are successful in their patent challenges, and should there be FDA approval of one or more of the ANDAs and subsequent commercial launch of generic SUBOXONE Film, and the Group's pipeline products fail to obtain regulatory approval, there is the likelihood that revenues and operating profits of the Group will significantly decline. In these circumstances the Directors believe they would be able to take the required steps to reduce the cost base, however, this would result in a significant change to the structure of the business.
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals
 On March 21st, 2017 Rhodes Pharmaceuticals filed a complaint against Indivior in the District of Delaware, alleging that Indivior's sale of SUBOXONE Film in the U.S. infringes one or more claims of a patent. The asserted patent, which was issued in June 2016 traces back to an application filed in August 2007. Indivior believes this claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this action. 
Estate of John Bradley Allen
 On December 27th, 2016, the Estate of John Bradley Allen filed a civil complaint against Indivior, among other parties, in the Northern District of New York seeking relief under Connecticut's products liability and unfair trade practices statutes for damages allegedly caused by SUBOXONE. Indivior believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this action.
IRS Notice on Manufacturing Deductions
 In August 2015, the IRS issued notices of a proposed adjustment for the disallowance of certain manufacturing deductions claimed by the Group following its audit of 2011 and 2012 income tax years. During the 4th quarter of 2015, the Group was notified by the IRS of their intention to disallow these claims as part of the 2013 and 2014 audit cycle. The Group has appealed the proposed disallowance. The Group has evaluated its positions with respect to these claims and has provided $22m tax reserve for amounts claimed on all open periods as its best estimate of its expected settlement position for this issue.
8. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES


Mar 31
2017
$m
Dec 31
2016
$m
Sales returns and rebates

(401)
(402)
Trade payables

(23)
(33)
Accruals

(168)
(212)
Other tax and social security payables

(10)
(11)
Total

(602)
(658)
Customer return and rebate accruals, primarily in the US, are provided for by the Group at the point of sale in respect of the estimated rebates, discounts or allowances payable to direct and indirect customers. Accruals are made at the time of sale but the actual amounts to be paid are based on claims made some time after the initial recognition of the sale. The estimated amounts may not fully reflect the final outcome and are subject to change dependent upon, amongst other things, the payor channel (e.g. Medicaid, Medicare, Managed Care, etc) and product mix. Accrual balances are reviewed and adjusted quarterly in the light of historical experience of actual rebates, discounts or allowances given and returns made and any changes in arrangements. Future events could cause the assumptions on which the accruals are based to change, which could affect the future results of the Group.
9. SHARE CAPITAL


Equity Ordinary Shares
Issue price
Nominal value
$m
Issued and fully paid




At January 1, 2017

720,597,566
$0.10
72
Allotments

180,198
$0.10
-
At March 31, 2017

720,777,764
$0.10
72


Equity Ordinary Shares
Issue price
Nominal value
$m
Issued and fully paid




At January 1, 2016

718,577,618
$0.10
72
Nominal value reduction

-


At March 31, 2016

718,577,618
$0.10
72
10. RELATED PARTIES
Indivior's former parent, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, was a related party through 2016 as a result of certain transition management agreements. During Q1 2016, Indivior purchased certain services such as office space rental and other operational services on commercial terms and on an arm's length basis. The amount included within administrative expenses in respect of these services was $2m.
11. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
There have been no material post balance sheet events.


DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
The Directors declare that, to the best of their knowledge:
 This condensed set of Interim Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim Financial Reporting" as adopted by the European Union, gives a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position, and profit or loss of Indivior; and
 The interim management report gives a fair review of the information required pursuant to regulations 4.2.7 and 4.2.8 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Group's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Indivior PLC's Directors are listed in the Annual Report and Accounts for 2016. 
Details of all current Directors are available on our website at www.indivior.com
By order of the Board
Shaun Thaxter Mark Crossley
Chef Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
May 2, 2017


Independent review report to Indivior PLC
Report on the condensed consolidated interim financial statements
Our conclusion
We have reviewed Indivior PLC's condensed consolidated interim financial statements (the "interim financial statements") in the Q1 Financial Results Releaseof Indivior PLC for the 3 month period ended 31 March 2017. Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the interim financial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting', as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority. 
Emphasis of matter - Going concern
In forming our conclusion on the interim financial statements, which is not modified, we have considered the adequacy of the disclosure made in note 1 to the interim financial statements concerning the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. As more fully stated in note 7 the Group is involved in investigations by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission as well as antitrust litigation. An amount of $218 million has been established as a provision for potential settlement for all of these matters. The amount accepted in the final agreed settlement might be materially higher from this provision. This could impact the Group's ability to operate, which would be further adversely impacted should revenues decline and pipeline products fail to obtain regulatory approval, all of which could mean the Group cannot continue in business without taking necessary measures to reduce its cost base and improve its cash flow. The directors believe that they are able to carry out the necessary measures and that the Group can continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the directors continue to adopt the going concern basis for accounting in preparing these interim financial statements. These conditions, along with the other matters explained in note 1 to the interim financial statements, indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. The interim financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to continue as a going concern.
Emphasis of matter - Outcome of litigation
In forming our conclusion on the interim financial statements, which is not modified, we draw your attention to note 1 that describes the uncertain outcome of the ongoing ANDA patent litigation over Suboxone Film. In the event of a negative ruling against the Group, and should there be a regulatory approval and subsequent commercial launch of generic Suboxone Film, and pipeline products fail to obtain regulatory approval there is the likelihood that revenues and operating profits may decline. In these circumstances the directors believe they would be able to take the required steps to reduce the cost base, however this would result in a significant change to the structure of the business. As a result of this decline and extent of its impact, the directors would consider a change in the structure of the business and methods to reduce its cost base, as also described in note 7.
What we have reviewed
The interim financial statements comprise:
 the Condensed consolidated interim balance sheet as at 31 March 2017;
 the Condensed consolidated interim income statement and Condensed consolidated interim statement of comprehensive income for the period then ended;
 the Condensed consolidated interim cash flow statement for the period then ended;
 the Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity for the period then ended; and
 the explanatory notes to the interim financial statements.
The interim financial statements included in the Q1 Financial Results Releasehave been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting', as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
As disclosed in note 1 to the interim financial statements, the financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the full annual financial statements of the Group is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
Responsibilities for the interim financial statements and the review
Our responsibilities and those of the directors
The Q1 Financial Results Release, including the interim financial statements, is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible for preparing the Q1 Financial Results Releasein accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the interim financial statements in the Q1 Financial Results Releasebased on our review. This report, including the conclusion, has been prepared for and only for the company for the purpose of complying with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving this conclusion, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
What a review of interim financial statements involves
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, 'Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity' issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures.
A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and, consequently, does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
We have read the other information contained in the Q1 Financial Results Releaseand considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the interim financial statements.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
London
03 May 2017

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
  END
QRFUOSRRBRAVRAR