CALGARY, Alberta, Oct 13 (Reuters) - A Canadian court
wrapped up a final hearing on Kinder Morgan Canada Ltd's
KML.TO Trans Mountain crude oil pipeline expansion on Friday,
a two-week proceeding that marks a major hurdle for the
embattled project.
The proposed expansion of the existing Trans Mountain
pipeline from Canada's oil-rich Alberta province to the west
coast has faced mounting opposition from environmental and
aboriginal groups, who have filed for judicial review of
project's federal approval. urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL2N1MA1S4
A final decision could take months but if the verdict goes
against the C$7.4 billion ($5.9 billion) expansion, it would
send it back for assessment, which could cause lengthy delays
and even derail the project.
Over two weeks in Canada's Federal Court in Vancouver,
lawyers for the judicial review's proponents argued that Canada
failed in its duty to consult First Nations and other groups on
the expansion and neglected to adequately review certain
environmental issues.
On the other side of the suit are Kinder Morgan, the federal
government and energy regulator, the National Energy Board.
"All of the applicants, indigenous and otherwise, have
raised strong arguments and the court has asked a lot of
questions showing they are engaged with all of these issues,"
Ecojustice lawyer Dina Tuytel, who is involved in the hearings
on behalf on Trans Mountain's opponents, told Reuters.
Kinder Morgan spokeswoman Ali Hounsell said the project
approvals followed many years of engagement and consultation
with communities, aboriginal groups and individuals.
The government has called the export of natural resources a
"fundamental" responsibility, and it and Kinder Morgan have said
the they held extensive consultations with aboriginal groups.
The Trans Mountain expansion would nearly triple the
capacity of an existing pipeline to 890,000 barrels per day and
significantly increase crude tanker traffic off the west coast.
urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL2N1GF1RM urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL1N1KW1I9
Energy projects in North America have come under increasing
opposition from activists concerned about their carbon footprint
and possibility of oil spills.
While it is rare for Canada's judiciary to review pipeline
approvals, the last such case, heard in 2015, helped kill
Enbridge Inc's ENB.TO Northern Gateway pipeline. urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL2N1BW1M9
There is no firm deadline for rendering judgments for such
cases, although the court announced its decision against
Northern Gateway in June 2016, about eight months after hearings
ended.
Regardless of the outcome for Trans Mountain, any decision
is likely be appealed in Canada's Supreme Court.
($1 = 1.2514 Canadian dollars)
(Reporting by Ethan Lou and Nia Williams; Editing by Marguerita
Choy)
((Ethan.Lou@thomsonreuters.com; +1-403-531-1634; Reuters
Messaging: ethan.lou.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net))
Keywords: CANADA KINDER MORGAN CN/LAWSUIT