Picture of SGS SA logo

SGSN SGS SA News Story

0.000.00%
ch flag iconLast trade - 00:00
IndustrialsConservativeLarge CapHigh Flyer

RCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Announces PEA With NPV of US$287M

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20231101:nRSA0781Sa&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 0781S  Silver Tiger Metals Inc  01 November 2023

Silver Tiger Announces PEA With NPV of US$287M for the Open Pit Portion of El
Tigre Silver-Gold Project

HALIFAX, NS / ACCESSWIRE / November 1, 2023 / Silver Tiger Metals Inc.
(TSXV:SLVR)(OTCQX:SLVTF) ("Silver Tiger" or the "Corporation") is pleased to
announce a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for its 100% owned,
silver-gold El Tigre Project (the "Project" or "El Tigre") located in Sonora,
Mexico. The PEA is centered on the conventional open pit mining economics of
the Stockwork Mineralization Zone defined in the updated MRE released
September 12, 2023 (Figure 1).

Highlights of the PEA, with a base case silver price of $23.75/oz and gold
price of $1,850/oz are as follows (all figures in US dollars unless otherwise
stated):

·      After-Tax net present value ("NPV") (using a discount rate of 5%)
of US$287 Million with an After-Tax IRR of 55.8% and Payback Period of 1.7
years (Base Case);

·      13-year mine life recovering a total of 60 Million payable silver
equivalent ounces ("AgEq") or 776,000 gold equivalent ounces ("AuEq"),
consisting of 16 Million silver ounces and 571,000 gold ounces;

·      Total project undiscounted after tax cash flow of US$445 Million;

·      Initial capital costs of $59 Million, including $7.7 Million in
contingency costs, over an expected 12-month build, expansion capital of $33
Million and sustaining capital costs of $31 Million over the life of mine
("LOM");

·      Average LOM operating cash costs of $803/oz AuEq, and all in
sustaining costs ("AISC") of $843/oz AuEq or Average LOM operating cash costs
of $10/oz AgEq, and all in sustaining costs ("AISC") of $11/oz AgEq; and

·      Average annual production of approximately 4.6 Million AgEq oz or
59,000 AuEq oz.

Glenn Jessome, President & CEO stated "We are very pleased with the work
completed by our consultants and our technical team on the PEA for the open
pit at El Tigre. The open pit delivers robust economics with an NPV of US$287
million and substantial after tax cash flows of US$445 million." Mr. Jessome
continued "This is a pivotal point for our Company as we now have a clear path
forward to quickly completing a PFS and making a construction decision for the
open pit. The open pit has good grade, low strip, wide benches and exceptional
metallurgy. With such positive parameters and with our new VP of Operations
Francisco Albelais, a career expert in the construction of large heap leach
mines in Mexico, we are confident we will be able to advance the open pit
portion of the project very quickly." Mr. Jessome concluded "The open pit is
only one component of El Tigre as we have also recently delivered over
90-million silver equivalent ounces in the underground in the Mineral Resource
Estimate and disclosed an Exploration Target establishing 7 to 9 million
tonnes at 225 to 265 g/t AgEq for 50 to 75 million silver equivalent ounces.
The Company will also continue to work on this substantial underground Mineral
Resource and advance that towards a PEA."

Figure 1: El Tigre Mineral Resource Block Model 3D Visualization, showing pit
constrained Resources.

Preliminary Economic Assessment Summary

The PEA was prepared by independent consultants Micon International Limited
("Micon"), with metallurgical test work completed by SGS Canada Inc.'s
Lakefield office ("SGS") and process plant design and costing by D.E.N.M.
Engineering Ltd., and environmental and permitting led by CIMA Mexico.
Following are tables and figures showing key assumptions, results, and
sensitivities.

Table 1: El Tigre PEA Key Economic Assumptions and Results

 Assumption / Result        Unit    Value       Assumption / Result          Unit          Value
 Total OP Plant Feed Mined  kt      57,038      Net Revenue                  US$M          1,422
 Operating Strip Ratio      Ratio   2.0         Initial Capital Costs        US$M          59
 Silver Grade (1)           g/t     14.27       Expansion Capital Costs      US$M          33
 Gold Grade (1)             g/t     0.39        Sustaining Capital Costs     US$M          31
 AuEq Grade (1)             g/t     0.57        Mining Costs - Plant         $/t Feed      5.81
 Silver Recovery (2)        %       61          Mining Costs - Material      $/t Material  1.91
 Gold Recovery (2)          %       80          Processing Costs             $/t Feed      4.46
 Silver Price               US$/oz  23.75       G&A Costs                    $/t Feed      0.61
 Gold Price                 US$/oz  1,850       Operating Cash Cost          US$/oz AuEq   803
 Payable Silver Metal       Moz     15.9        All in Sustaining Cost       US$/oz AuEq   843
 Payable Gold Metal         koz     571         After-Tax NPV (5% discount)  US$M          287
 Payable AuEq               koz     776         Pre-Tax NPV (5% discount)    US$M          420
 Mine Life                  Yrs     13          After-Tax IRR                %             55.8
 Average mining rate        t/day   36,000      Pre-Tax IRR                  %             79.4
                                                After-Tax Payback Period     Yrs           1.7

1.   Grades shown are LOM average process plant feed grades include only OP
sources. Mining losses of 2.5% and external dilution of 2.5% with low grade
waste for OP material was incorporated in the mining schedule.

2.   Column testing indicated both higher and gold and silver recovery (83%
and 64%) at a 3/8-in crush size. In the process design and financial model,
these have been discounted by 3% for leaching in the field versus optimum
conditions in the laboratory.

Figure 2: El Tigre Cash Flow Profile by Year

Figure 2 above highlights the post-tax cash flows of US$445 Million associated
with the El Tigre Project. The economics of the project have been evaluated
based on the base case scenario $23.75/oz silver price and gold price of
$1,850/oz. As illustrated in the following sensitivity tables, the project
remains robust even at lower commodity prices or with higher costs.

Table 2 - El Tigre PEA Gold and Silver Price Sensitivities

 Sensitivity                                     Base Case
 Silver Price (US$/oz)      17     19     21     23.75      26     30     33
 Gold Price (US$/oz)        1,324  1,480  1,636  1,850      2,025  2,337  2,571
 After-Tax NPV (5%) (US$M)  108    161    214    287        347    453    532
 After-Tax IRR (%)          28.3   37.2   45.3   55.8       64.1   78.5   88.9
 After-Tax Payback (years)  4.1    2.6    2.0    1.7        1.5    1.3    1.1

Table 3 - El Tigre PEA Operating Cost and Capital Cost Sensitivities

 Sensitivity                   -20%  -10%  Base Case  10%   20%
 Operating Costs - NPV (US$M)  345   316   287        258   229
 Operating Costs - IRR (%)     64.4  60.1  55.8       51.5  47.2
 Capital Costs - NPV (US$M)    301   293   287        280   273
 Capital Costs - IRR (%)       68.0  61.3  55.8       51.2  47.3

Capital and Operating Costs

The El Tigre Project has been envisioned as an open pit mining operation
starting at a processing rate of 7,500 tonnes per day for years 1-3 and then
ramping up to 15,000 tonnes per day by year 5 after 1 year construction for
ramp up.

The process plant is comprised of conventional three (3) stage crushing to an
optimum -3/8-in crush size. The crushed material will be conveyed and loaded
on the lined pad areas. A series of pumping and piping will allow irrigation
of the stacked heap material and subsequent production of pregnant solution to
flow to the respective impoundment pond. The pregnant solution will be pumped
to the recovery facility consisting of the Merrill - Crowe process (zinc
precipitation) and refinery to produce the gold and silver dore for marketing.
The process barren solution will be recycled (with NaCN addition) and pumped
back to the heap for further leaching.

Water supply to the process plant is provided by nearby surface wells and a
new high voltage grid power will be installed by the local utility to supply
process and infrastructure power requirements. Expansion capital includes the
cost to increase the process plant capacity from 7,500 tonnes per day to
15,000 tonnes per day as noted.

Table 4 - LOM Capital Cost Estimate

 Type                     Initial  Expansion    Sustaining  Total

(US$k)
(US$k) (1)
(US$k)
(US$k)
 Plant direct costs       31,921   25,800                   57,721
 Mining direct costs      5,340    3,250        30,924      39,514
 Pre-stripping            2,347                             2,347
 Infrastructure           9,470                             9,470
 Project indirect costs   2,200                             2,200
 Total                    51,278   29,050       30,924      111,252
 Contingency (15%)        7,692    4,358                    12,049
 Total - Initial Capital  58,969   33,408       30,924      123,301

1.   Expansion capital is not included in AISC calculations

Mining

Open pit mining will be contracted and carried out by drill and blast followed
by conventional loading and truck haulage to the waste rock storage facilities
and the process plant.

Metallurgy

A preliminary metallurgical test program was carried out by SGS Lakefield of
Ontario, Canada on open pit samples. Details of the testing were outlined in
the previous Sliver Tiger News Release dated August 24, 2023. The program
included crushing, coarse bottle rolls, and composite column testing at both
3/8-in and 1/2 -in crush size. The leach samples comprised of drill core
sample representing the Stockwork Mineralization Zone of the Mineral Resource.
This preliminary test program estimated average gold and silver respective
metallurgical recoveries of 83.1 % Au and 64.3 % Ag at the 3-/8-in crush.
Percolation testing also indicated no requirement for agglomeration of the
crushed material is required prior to loading.

Underground Mineral Resource

As previously released, the Company will also continue to work on this
substantial underground Mineral Resource and advance that towards PEA.
Out-of-Pit Mineral Resources at El Tigre of 21 Moz AgEq grading 279 g/t AgEq
contained in 2.3 Mt and 70 Moz AgEq grading 235 g/t AgEq contained in 9.2 Mt
(Table 5). For higher grade sensitivity cases refer to updated MRE release
dated September 12, 2023.

Table 5 - Mineral Resource Estimate released September 2023

1.   Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves, do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.

2.   The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of
confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be
converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of
the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral
Resource with continued exploration.

3.   The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated in accordance
with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM
Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (2014)
prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by
the CIM Council and CIM Best Practices (2019).

4.   Historically mined areas were depleted from the Mineral Resource model.

5.   Approximately 74.7% of the Indicated and 22.3% of the Inferred
contained AgEq ounces are pit constrained, with the remainder out-of-pit. See
tables 2 and 3 for details of the split between pit constrained and out-of-pit
deposits.

6.   The pit constrained AuEq cut-off grade of 0.14 g/t was derived from
US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, 80% process recovery for Ag and Au,
US$5.30/tonne process cost and US$1.00/tonne G&A cost. The constraining
pit optimization parameters were $1.86/t mineralized mining cost, $1.86/t
waste mining cost and 50-degree pit slopes.

7.   The out-of-pit AuEq cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t AuEq was derived from
US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, $4.00$/lb Cu, $0.95 $/lb Pb, $1.40
$/lb Zn, 85% process recovery for all metals, $50/t mining cost, US$20/tonne
process and US$4 G&A cost. The out-of-pit Mineral Resource grade blocks
were quantified above the 1.5 g/t AuEq cut-off, below the constraining pit
shell within the constraining mineralized wireframes and exhibited sufficient
continuity to be considered for cut and fill and long hole mining

8.   The tailings AuEq cut-off grade of 0.30 g/t was derived from
US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, 85% process recovery for Ag and Au,
US$14/t process cost and US$1.00/t G&A cost.

9.   No Mineral Resources are classified as Measured.

10. AgEq and AuEq calculated at an Ag/Au ratio of 75:1.

11. Totals may not agree due to rounding

Exploration Potential

Exploration potential at the El Tigre Project is substantial with prospective
areas for exploration both down dip and along strike with the disclosed target
establishing 7 to 9 Million tonnes at 225 to 265 g/t AgEq for 50 to 75 Moz
AgEq.

Figure 3-Exploration Potential released September 2023

Surface Rights Agreement

The Company owns royalty-free, 100% of the 6,238 hectares land-package
encompassing the footprint of proposed mining operation with no Ejido
presence. In addition, the company controls 28,414 hectares of Concessions to
conduct exploration along a 25 km strike length of the Sierra Madres.

Qualified Persons

This PEA was based on information and data supplied by Silver Tiger, and was
undertaken by William J. Lewis, B.Sc., P.Geo., Kerrine Azougarh, B.Sc., P.Eng.
and Christopher Jacobs, CEng, MIMMM, MBA of Micon International Limited. Of
Toronto, Ontario, and David J. Salari, P. Eng. of D.E.N.M. Engineering Ltd are
the Qualified Persons as defined under National Instrument 43-101. All
Qualified Persons have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical
information in this press release.

A Technical Report is being prepared on the Preliminary Economic Assessment in
accordance with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI-43-101"), and will be
available on the Company's website and SEDAR within 45 days of the date of
this news release. The effective date of this Preliminary Economic Assessment
is November 1, 2023.

VRIFY Slide Deck and 3D Presentation - Silver Tiger's El Tigre Project

VRIFY is a platform being used by companies to communicate with investors
using 360° virtual tours of remote mining assets, 3D models and interactive
presentations. VRIFY can be accessed by website and with the VRIFY iOS and
Android apps.

Access the Silver Tiger Metals Inc. Company Profile on VRIFY at:
https://vrify.com (https://pr.report/f0xu8Nk7)

The VRIFY Slide Deck and 3D Presentation for Silver Tiger Metals Inc. can be
viewed at: https://vrify.com/explore/decks/492 (https://pr.report/mv-xRs29)
and on the Corporation's website at: www.silvertigermetals.com
(https://pr.report/ef7E1YHL) .

About Silver Tiger and the El Tigre Historic Mine District

Silver Tiger Metals Inc. is a Canadian company whose management has more than
25 years' experience discovering, financing and building large epithermal
silver projects in Mexico. Silver Tiger's 100% owned 28,414 hectare Historic
El Tigre Mining District is located in Sonora, Mexico. Principled
environmental, social and governance practices are core priorities at Silver
Tiger.

The El Tigre historic mine district is located in Sonora, Mexico and lies at
the northern end of the Sierra Madre silver and gold belt which hosts many
epithermal silver and gold deposits, including Dolores, Santa Elena and Las
Chispas at the northern end. In 1896, gold was first discovered on the
property in the Gold Hill area and mining started with the Brown Shaft in
1903. The focus soon changed to mining high-grade silver veins in the area
with production coming from 3 parallel veins the El Tigre Vein, the Seitz
Kelley Vein and the Sooy Vein. Underground mining on the middle El Tigre Vein
extended 1,450 metres along strike and was mined on 14 levels to a depth of
approximately 450 metres. The Seitz Kelley Vein was mined along strike for 1
kilometre to a depth of approximately 200 meters. The Sooy Vein was only mined
along strike for 250 metres to a depth of approximately 150 metres. Mining
abruptly stopped on all 3 of these veins when the price of silver collapsed to
less than 20¢ per ounce with the onset of the Great Depression. By the time
the mine closed in 1930, it is reported to have produced a total of 353,000
ounces of gold and 67.4 Million ounces of silver from 1.87 Million tons
(Craig, 2012). The average grade mined during this period was over 2 kilograms
silver equivalent per ton.

For further information, please contact:

Glenn Jessome

President and CEO

902 492 0298
jessome@silvertigermetals.com (mailto:jessome@silvertigermetals.com)

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT:

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that
term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

This News Release includes certain "forward-looking statements". All
statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release,
including, without limitation, statements regarding potential mineralization,
Mineral Resources and Reserves, the ability to convert Inferred Mineral
Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources, the ability to complete future
drilling programs and infill sampling, the ability to extend Mineral Resource
blocks, the similarity of mineralization at El Tigre to Delores, Santa Elena
and Chispas, exploration results, and future plans and objectives of Silver
Tiger, are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by
words such as "may", "is expected to", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends",
"plans", "projection", "could", "vision", "goals", "objective" and "outlook"
and other similar words. Although Silver Tiger believes the expectations
expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable
assumptions, there can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be
accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from
those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from Silver Tiger's expectations include
risks and uncertainties related to exploration, development, operations,
commodity prices and global financial volatility, risk and uncertainties of
operating in a foreign jurisdiction as well as additional risks described from
time to time in the filings made by Silver Tiger with securities regulators.

SOURCE: Silver Tiger Metals Inc.

 

This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  NRALFLFBXFLEFBX

Recent news on SGS SA

See all news