(Repeats May 22 item. The opinions expressed here are those of
the author, a columnist for Reuter)
By Andy Home
SINGAPORE, May 22 (Reuters) - The London Metal Exchange
(LME) Asia festivities have just wrapped up in Hong Kong.
It is the third such annual event since the LME was bought
by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing (HKEx) 0388.HK in 2012 and
each year, it seems, the Asian gathering of the metals industry
gets larger.
The grand old London lady of metals trading is all part of
Charles Li's vision of positioning Hong Kong as the renminbi
gateway between mainland China and international markets. The
HKEx chief is confident the LME will help open up a commodities
channel to complement the newly-opened Stock-Connect highway.
It's very much still an aspiration but LME Week Asia is
where the foundation stones are being laid. ID:nL3N0YD2AE
However, while HKEx looks east, U.S. exchange CME CME.O
has just thrown down a challenge in the west with an
announcement it is planning to launch a zinc contract for North
American users. ID:nL1N0Y90RI
The LME itself is looking to launch new contracts, including
a re-entry into the ferrous trading space, in effect
counter-challenging CME's existing steel offering.
The stage is being set for a battle for metals market share
in the world outside China.
CME CHALLENGE
The CME, via its COMEX division, has a long history in the
copper market, offering futures, options, "mini" contracts and
swaps.
Historically, however, it had failed to mount any real
challenge to the LME's broader dominance of other base metals
markets outside of China.
Until, that is, North American aluminium users rebelled
against the LME's well-documented warehouse load-out issues and
the resulting disconnect between LME basis price and physical
premiums.
CME launched first a physical aluminium premium contract
0#AUP: and then an "all-in" aluminium futures contract
0#ALI: .
Now comes zinc, another opportunistic move to capitalise on
dissatisfaction with the LME's storage system.
Announcing the launch, Derek Sammann, head of commodities at
CME, said the new physically-delivered contract enables
industrial users "to take advantage of the integrity and
efficiency of our warehousing practices."
BEYOND THE QUEUES
The question for CME, though, is whether it can leverage
that discontent with the LME's warehouse system to build a North
American benchmark that would offer a sustainable price
discovery alternative to that of the LME.
Right now the jury is very much out.
The graphic below shows volumes and open interest on the two
CME aluminium contracts.
******************************************************
Graphic on CME aluminium contracts' performance:
http://link.reuters.com/nyv74w
******************************************************
It is clear that the premium contract, indexed against
Platts' Midwest U.S. aluminum assessment, is faring much better.
That's not entirely surprising given the massive turbulence
in the premium market. ID:nL3N0Y65ES ID:nL5N0XW458
Premiums across the globe, including that in the U.S., are
collapsing and one of the reasons they are doing so is because
of the LME's new rules forcing faster load-out. Moreover, the
exchange is mulling even harsher measures to force even faster
load-out.
One possible consequence is that the premium disconnect
vanishes, negating the very reason for using a premium contract
in the first place.
It's noticeable that the CME's all-in aluminium price
contract, which would in theory represent a true alternative
pricing model to that of the LME, has struggled to pick up
momentum since its launch in May 2014.
If this is only about LME queues, in other words, CME's
challenge may last exactly as long as the queues take to unwind.
And that goes as much for zinc as it does for aluminium.
LME COUNTER-CHALLENGE
The LME, meanwhile, has not been idle either.
A full suite of global aluminium premium contracts is coming
later this year, including a North American premium contract.
Evidently, they too might struggle to gain traction in an
environment where premiums are rapidly moving back to historical
norms.
LME Chief Executive Garry Jones, speaking at Wednesday's
seminar in Hong Kong, pointed out that just because you've
recently had a flood, doesn't mean you don't need an insurance
policy against future floods.
Well, it all depends on whether you regard the last flood as
likely to recur or as a one-off historical anomaly.
Perhaps more strategically interesting is the LME's plan to
re-enter the world of steel trading with two new contracts, one
for steel scrap and one for rebar.
Unlike the existing dormant steel billet contract, these
will be cash settled and indexed against The Steel Index (scrap)
and Platts (rebar).
Both will be geographically centred on the Turkish market,
moving in where CME's Turkish billet contract has failed to get
off the ground. It traded just 95 lots last year and failed to
trade at all in the first four months of this year.
CME's better established steel contracts, all part of its
"virtual steel mill" offering, are rooted in the U.S. market.
Their performance has been mixed, ranging from the relative
liquidity of the hot rolled coil (HRC) contract to the barely
traded scrap contract to the completely inactive HRC options
contract.
The exchange-traded steel space outside of China is still
very much up for grabs and the LME's second attempt at it raises
the stakes for CME.
Time will tell as to how successful it will be. The same
holds true of CME's attempt to carve out a North American base
metals business from the LME's existing franchise.
One thing is for sure, though. The competition for exchange
share in the world of metals trading is set to heat up.
(Editing by Susan Thomas)
((andy.home@thomsonreuters.com)(Tel: 44-207-542-4412))
Keywords: LME CME/AHOME